You're Probably Lying To Yourself About Glyphosate (Roundup)

I want to address a couple of issues with the video. First, this is a very quick overview. So quick in fact, that it borders on over-simplifying a really important concept: Hazard vs. Risk. For example, when I say "hairdressing is just as likely to cause cancer" it would have been more accurate to say it's just as hazardous as glyphosate. I don't think it ruins the overall point of the video, so I hope this note will suffice as correction.
I also said "all shift work is carcinogenic", which is also not quite accurate enough. The IARC's definition of the kind of work that is carcinogenic is a bit fuzzy to begin with, but they do clearly state that they mean work that disrupts your circadian or light cycles. That means work at odd hours more than it means 9 to 5 work. The fuzziness comes in because you can totally have a 9 to 5 job and not get natural light cycles as a result. In Canada, if you have an indoor job 9 to 5 in the winter and you aren't near a window, you can go the whole week without seeing the sun. (I've experienced that personally) Also, if you aren't going to bed early enough, getting up at 7:30 for a 9am job can disrupt your circadian cycles. I should have been more accurate, but the IARC's words leave quite a bit open to interpretation. They are in fact revising their monograph on shift work in the near future to make it more clear.
That being said, their whole system of categorization is a little unclear, and can be tough to explain. This video is about a ruling by The International Agency for Research on Cancer that we've all been hearing a lot about. The IARC says glyphosate (also known as Roundup) is carcinogenic. According to the media and anti-glyphosate interests, that means we're all pretty much doomed. (Thanks a lot, Monsanto) But... before you get all riled up, maybe you should see some of the other things that IARC says are just as hazardous as glyphosate.
Does it really matter to you if glyphosate is safe, or do you hate it no matter what because Monsanto invented it?
Be honest with yourself.
More information on IARC's carcinogen classification system:
monographs.iar...
The post this video was based on:
/ 10107207176193090
This video was produced independently by Know Ideas Media

[@jonsmith5245]

The fact that people still trust Monsanto products these days is so baffling

[@joehajjar5246]

Monsanto is sold to beyer and beyer no longer lobby chemical to be exposed to force liberty link another gmo. Plus this biatch is soo subsidised. How can they force feed us this this. Like even everyone on the planet

[@SummerHawaii582]

They are stupid !!

[@SummerHawaii582]

@@joehajjar5246 it's Bayer!!!

[@fleckx]

Uhh I'm 100% down for a class action lawsuit against the 40-hour work week LMAO.

[@calebbounty3300]

Ol Monsanto was his top donator on his patreon

[@jimseaton6611]

federal judge vince chhabria, on july 12,2019 denied monsanto a new trial. he ruled that edwin hardeman presented sufficient admissable evidence to the jury that exposure to roundup caused his cancer. 13,400 trials to go

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

waiting for it to go to supreme court, which it eventually will. US has a very corporate friendly bench right now, quite right leaning. That'll work in Bayer's favor in this case I think.

[@brentstanford7707]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA Good luck on your Hail Mary, lol

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@brentstanford7707 I don't give a shit what happens to Bayer. They are just as bad as whole food and the non-gmo project. They all profit from the status quo

[@krissfly]

The reason it’s in weat corn and Oates is because they use round up. It has destroyed hundreds of my trees from drift. Which is supposedly illegal. But the Department of Agriculture won’t do crap. Come over you can drink some

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Oh I've seen many a drift injury in my day. That sucks for you. You're rural I assume? This is one of the bad points of living in the country: farmers are going to have to work around you. Sorry about your trees. That's a bummer. DoA should have come out to evaluate the damage. I think agronomists can do it too, like from an Ag retailer. I think the farmer's crop insurance should cover the damage should they be found liable.

[@jeremyprovence4942]

Cancer rates continue to rise.

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Zero correlation between glyphosate use and NHL.

[@jeremyprovence4942]

Poison GOOD, Hard work BAD!!!

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@jeremyprovence4942 Yes, because hard work is the only thing stopping a farmer from hand pulling weeds from 2000 acres.... ooof.

[@jeremyprovence4942]

There are many organic farmers that would disagree. Toxic chemicals are not magic there is always a cost, people get sick and die from them (even in very small amounts) every day, is this just collateral damage, or are they people. It is time to favour people over profits, And it is time to support our farmers, and finally appreciate our food and fiber, so they aren't pushed in to a corner as to have to make these decisions. Farming is hard, there is no magic pill.

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@jeremyprovence4942 You think organic farmers pull all their weeds by hand? You DO know that organic farmers also use pesticides and fertilizers, right? You mention people over profits: You DO realize the organic industry is worth BILLIONS of dollars, and that Whole Foods makes more money than Monsanto ever did? I agree it's time to support our farmers. So... maybe that would involve actually learning the ins and outs of farming, rather than making sweeping prescriptive statements about what they should and should not do. Maybe? Farming is hard indeed. The last thing farmers need is for city folks to start taking away their tools.

[@Herodle]

Fighting the good fight, Nick.

[@Breadful1]

I like this take. However I would like the impacts on the soil to be added into the comparisons. And of course discuss the legitimacy of each side of studies.

[@jessicazaytsoff1494]

Shift work isn't a 9-5, it's going from days, to nights to overnights in a pattern.

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Yes, I misunderstood IARC's monograph (it's quiet poorly written)

[@brentstanford7707]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA wait... you were... w r o n g ? ? ?

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@brentstanford7707 Yepp! Happens all the time! Are you ever wrong?

[@brentstanford7707]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA I don't put myself on a platform, presenting myself as an authority, disseminating information that can impact people's lives. I don't bash international agencies that are responsible for evaluating the science that is used to inform public policy, acting like I am so much smarter than these reputable researchers. YOU do that. You have a greater responsibility to be accurately informing your audience. But you have failed miserably. So when you are wrong (as we've seen many times in the comments) then it's a big deal! Shame on you.

[@sofamiller7133]

@@brentstanford7707 this video isn’t about shift work. It’s about 2A carcinogens. Do you have a logical rebuttal for THAT? Cuz here you are, putting yourself out there, looking like an idiot.

[@krissfly]

Thanks for getting back to me. I encourage you to check the EWG website and see how much your food is contaminated. I was shocked Quaker Oatmeal is the top of the list with the most round up in it. There’s a French scientist that did the long-term tests that showed tumors and severe digestive problems. This is no joke people our food is full of poison. And it’s all about the rich man getting richer. I encourage all to do A challenge for 10 days don’t eat sugar milk all dairy or wheat. Eat as much organic and raw vegetables salad and so on and you will think you’re dying the first three days but once you clean your system it gets better. A bundle of three avocados is only $.15 higher to buy the organic. Give it a try it’s only your life

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Did you see the video I made on the EWG? kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKDFmHiNrNJ4pq8

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Also that french scientist's name is Seralini, and his work is REALLY REALLY bad science. Poor methodology. Just so you know, the study you refer to was retracted by the journal for being so bad.

[@johnrushing8067]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA Seralini was using same species of rats as Monsanto...just a longer study period allows damaging affects of Glyphosate to be expressed.

[@johnrushing8067]

www.gmoseralini.org/seralinis-team-wins-defamation-and-forgery-court-cases-on-gmo-and-pesticide-research/ Seralini’s team wins defamation and forgery court cases on ...

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@johnrushing8067 Seralini Study Flaws: -Tiny Test population -Did not show photos of control group -Eliminated certain results -Used rats predisposed to tumor growth -Attempted to test toxicity of seed and chemical at the same time -released study same time as his book in order to boost book sales.

[@JCLawn51]

I really like the simple format and short length of this video. As much as I like 20 plus min in depth videos, this makes it easy to share to social media, and I did.

[@Junglist3345]

Wow, this was extremely bias in Bayer's favor. And for those who don't know, Monsanto was bought by Bayer Pharmaceutics.

[@ThankYouJesusTheChrist]

Oh ffs. No one uses glyphosate by itself - Roundup, the formulated product, is many multiple times more toxic than gly alone, due to the synergistic effects of thhe surfactants and other shit like formaldehyde, arsenic and POAE (which is in the US version but banned in the EU for being extremely toxic) and Monsanto has never tested the formulated product for human health (or even rats) effects. The EPA has never required such tests either, so no one can say the US' ubiquitous use of Roundup is not the cause of our rising increase in cancers and other problems - look up "graph, glyphosate, autism (or cancer)" - and you can see there is a neck and neck rise in both since the mid 70's. A new, peer-reviewed study was just released saying that even TWO TIMES using Roundup per year raises the risk of getting Lymphoma by 41%. The shit is dangerous and anyone trying to muddy the waters about this herbicide, when in the US we have some of the worst health in the world, is going to have some heavy karma to go with their fat paycheck.

[@creepypasta-n6h]

I buy pure glyphosate for 19.99 a litre, which dilutes at 360gallons/liter so for... water is .09p in my country, so for a little over £150 I can make 1600 litres of weed killer, wonder how much round up would cost for 1600 litres lol

[@drewphillips8089]

Roundup is much more than a simple acid dilution in water. To make the product effective as a spray herbicide, they have to bind the glyphosate acid to a base (for example, potassium hydroxide and/or isopropylamine) and combine that with a surfactant and an antifoam.

[@Quiestre]

yeah open fires are bad. and so is a 40h work week

[@cicdee9910]

Monsanto studies looked at the effects of glysophate for 3 months. When studies were done for 24 months cancer was caused.

[@br00cezx]

Did you know that your “natural” deodorant has sodium bicarbonate?! Your fancy water filter doesn’t filter out dihydrogen monoxide!! This video is a joke lol

[@ASightToSee]

LOL i am honest with myself. I avoid smoke, shower in cold water, don't eat meat, work from home and just spent hundreds switching all of my products that contain carcinogens (took months to find a natural hair dye but I DID) it is possible to avoid these carcinogens once you learn their names and study them, but the reason there's over a million new cases a year is because of people like you that try to normalize it. I became allergic to uncooked fruits and vegetables in 2009. I was confused for about 3 years, not understanding why I would throw up and have an itchy mouth after eating an apple. Just learned that that same year American farmers sprayed 57 million pounds of glyphosate over our crops. Doesn't seem like just a coincidence to me. Yet, I can eat all fruit and vegetables not cooked in countries where glyphosate is banned.. interesting.

[@subscriptionsunboxed8805]

So is it cool to eat in our Cheerios yes or no? I see one farmer says its illegal to spray on grain yet the Roundup Guide says yes spray matter of fact spray right before you harvest. So obviously were going to eat it hell they have a guarantee it will work even if it rains afterward.

[@AvNotasian]

Its not illegal to spray on grain, but since most grain crops are not round up ready you would kill your field. Yes it would be safe to eat in that form.

[@lmak7696]

@@AvNotasian that's why it's used on wheat, oats, many spice plants, and many food crops - as a desiccant and anti-microbial. Why? Because it kills things. Then you eat it and it kills your microbiome.

[@AvNotasian]

@@lmak7696 it has no antimicrobial properties, its not a antibiotic... "the patenting of glyphosate as an antibiotic to be used against a wide spectrum of microorganisms was based solely on effects in protozoa (not bacteria) and its effectiveness was dependent on the addition of di-carboxylic acids (US Patent No. 7771736 B2)." However it would work great as a desiccant since the metabolic pathway interfered is responsible for photosynthesis. - "Then you eat it and it kills your microbiome." mmhmm, there is no evidence of this and this is the same argument that was used to argue against vaccines. its an effective pseudoscience argument because its unethical to falsify. However its trivial to ridicule, there is no way for your gut biome to be effected at the concentration presented.

[@lmak7696]

@@AvNotasian I think you need to look up the meaning of "antimicrobial" and "protozoa" Also, you have quotation marks in your comment, but you don't tell us who or what you're quoting. You're simply wrong regarding glyphosate (and AMPA). They DO mess up your microbiome. It's called gut dysbiosis. And it doesn't just mess up human guts. There's a ton of studies on this in recent years. I've just picked a few here for you to look at, but you can spend many, many hours reading about the effects of glyphosate on human health and on the health of microbes in the environment (including the environment of your gut) Glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicide exposure during the peripartum period affects maternal brain plasticity, maternal behaviour and microbiome pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31066122/ Glyphosate based- herbicide exposure affects gut microbiota, anxiety and depression-like behaviors in mice www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0892036218300254 Roundup causes embryonic development failure and alters metabolic pathways and gut microbiota functionality in non-target species microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-020-00943-5 Glyphosate perturbs the gut microbiota of honey bees www.pnas.org/content/115/41/10305

[@AvNotasian]

@@lmak7696 O look you linked a bunch of PubMed articles how cute. Go find a citation from the CDC or your argument has no merit. Singular studies can be wrong, you need to use something with more statistical power than confirmation bias and google. I was quoting "Facts and Fallacies in the Debate on Glyphosate Toxicity", another PubMed article. - "I think you need to look up the meaning of "antimicrobial" and "protozoa"" I think you need to look up the meaning of antibiotic, your claim is its an antibiotic, not that the patent holders vastly exaggerated its applications which is what your citation demonstrated. - "You're simply wrong regarding glyphosate (and AMPA). They DO mess up your microbiome. It's called gut dysbiosis. And it doesn't just mess up human guts." Your sources provide zero evidence of this, please provide a valid citation to the CDC. Or a meta analysis. - "There's a ton of studies on this in recent years. I've just picked a few here for you to look at, but you can spend many, many hours reading about the effects of glyphosate on human health and on the health of microbes in the environment (including the environment of your gut)" PubMed is trash for this exact reason and your poor understanding of the scientific method is your problem here. Refer to meta analysis don't cherry pick papers to conform to your confirmation bias. if anything you said had merit the CDC would change its recommendations. They haven't because you have cherry picked outliers. - People like you need to stop dreaming up magical effects to human health by doing nothing but saying "gut biome" - Heres what the CDC says on the matter of gut microflora interactions. "In addition to its potential role in glyphosate metabolism, gut microflora can also be impacted by exposure to glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides. Though the shikimate pathway is absent in mammals, the shikimate pathway in animal gut microbes synthesizes amino acids (Aitbali et al. 2018; Nielsen et al. 2018). Rodents orally exposed to doses of glyphosate-based herbicides ranging from 5 to 500 mg/kg/d showed a significant decrease in bacteria count and changes in community composition (Aitbali et al. 2018; Dechartres et al. 2019). A study using fecal samples from Roundup®-exposed Sprague-Dawley rats also found changes in bacterial community composition (Lozano et al. 2018). Decreases in bacteria count were also observed in rodents orally exposed to 5 mg/kg/d of glyphosate technical (Aitbali et al. 2018). However, fecal samples from Sprague-Dawley rats orally exposed to doses of glyphosate or Glyfonova® found that while minimal changes in bacteria composition were observed, exposure to the glyphosate formulation appeared to have a more pronounced effect than exposure to glyphosate technical (Nielsen et al. 2018). While the implications of alterations in the gut microbiome are unclear, some animal studies suggest neurologic and behavioral changes (Aitbali et al. 2018; Dechartres et al. 2019; Lozano et al. 2018) and greater susceptibility to infection may be associated with loss of microbiome diversity, especially in cases of malnutrition (Nielsen et al. 2018; Shehata et al. 2013)." - But we both know why you don't refer to the CDC, their conclusion is too definitive and conflicts with what you want to believe. if you refer to chapter 2 you will find a lengthy meta analysis where they determine the concentration that leads to no evidence of negative health effects. They add a safety factor based on environmental distributions and then set that as the regulated value. The mere fact you can detect its presence in cereal does nothing to overturn the massive weight of literature showing that its safe to consume at that dose. They have considered everything, now stop trying to scare monger.

[@lloydgriffin8905]

This is a terrible argument, people aren’t dumping thousands of gallons of dawn dish soap on their fields or the food supply. if they did that would be a problem to, I live right next to a farm and was working outside when they were spraying their barley fields. I’ve spent thousands of dollars at the doctor afterwards it messed up my thyroid gland

[@nesslig2025]

One important thing to point out is that almost every single ingredient in that ""chemical free"" alternative is more toxic can glyphosate.

[@johnrushing8067]

Wash it off... The organic DNA has not been altered in order to create a mini glyphosate factory within each cell..

[@nesslig2025]

@@johnrushing8067 eh? forgive me if it was meant as sarcasm (it's difficult to tell) Glyphosate isn't produced in each cell. Glyphosate is applied to the field by farmers. The plant is just genetically engineered to be resistant against it. You're seriously ill informed on this issue.

[@johnrushing8067]

@@nesslig2025 responsibletechnology.org/genetically-engineered-crops-may-produce-herbicide-inside-our-intestines/

[@johnrushing8067]

@dsndicmsa I like the thirty-five footnoted studies. I used to call people names in elementary school.

[@kylerobinson8913]

Roundup is good for you!

[@leeroy14r60]

Ahaaa finally someone with logical sense

[@donuthater]

Cannabis is Schedule I like Heroin. Following your logic anyone using cannabis might as well use smack. Good video, may be could have thought out a few points a bit longer.

[@kimberlyk2530]

Tell that to the thousands of farmers suffering with cancer involved with that lawsuit.

[@puppypi9668]

(Exactly; you can't just dismiss empirical evidence) When EU Food Safety Authority said it wasn't a carcinogen danger, what they actually said included this: However, the IARC report looked at both glyphosate - an active substance - and glyphosate-based formulations, grouping all formulations regardless of their composition. The EU assessment, on the other hand, considered only glyphosate. Member States are responsible for evaluating each plant protection product that is marketed in their territories. (www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/corporate_publications/files/efsaexplainsglyphosate151112en.pdf ) So unless farmers are using (pure) glyphosate not Roundup, _all_ the ingredients of Roundup would need to be tested and proven safe! And both the lawsuit and IARC applied to Roundup (or competitor formulations, depending on country) not to pure glyphosate (even if the IARC may not have been as clear as they should've been about that), so I think it still stands. Just like with Sodium Laureth Sulfate awhile back. People would get cancer, but when scientists tested it, they found it wasn't carcinogenic. They fought and fought until eventually someone realized the definition of "Sodium Laureth Sulfate" in industry was a commercial product not a pure reagent-grade molecule (of course), and it turned out that to cut costs and maximize profits (in a way that ridiculously probably wasn't and still isn't even illegal in the US) some suppliers didn't perform solvent cleaning properly and left *dioxin!!* in their SLES product they sold to shampoo makers, which no one would contest is extremely carcinogenic! So it's often a miscommunication of different definitions of words that lets videos like this one exist. (And whether the exposure limits are above acceptable levels. Since almost anything that suppresses the immune system can increase the chance of cancer by suppressing your body's ability to stop it. (which glyphosate or other things in roundup might at the exposure concentrations; I don't think that's been studied but it is definitely acutely toxic) So, what's really important? Just that something is a carcinogen, or that it can allow a carcinogen to cause cancer? (like HIV doesn't "cause" AIDS but allows it to happen) ) (..Also not to mention glyphosate is found to harm the environment when put into aquifers in large quantities. The same source he's probably basing a lot of this on that says glyphosate doesn't cause cancer simultaneously says it does harm aquatic life. ..But then dumping the same amount of dawn dish soap would too because it's got like two dozen synthetic chemicals that haven't been assayed either sdlfjlfkjflklk X'D (Thankfully that's just mainstream "natural things" and Mother Earth News's formula doesn't include any consumer product with a bajillion ingredients XD ) ) (echa.europa.eu/-/glyphosate-not-classified-as-a-carcinogen-by-echa ) (..And also also, the simple fact that it's there to kill plants trying to grow implies it kills native plants. And many farmers (even some in the comments right here!) have complained because their neighbor used roundup and the wind blew it onto their farm and it killed their crop! Has anyone done actual environmental assays (you know, which are also science X'D) to really tell how it's affecting plants no one makes money on? I can't find any, because, unsurprisingly, in capitalism, science takes money and trees have no money, so who speaks for the trees in the language of science?) (But he didn't discuss a single one of these, and even assumed the audience didn't know the difference between an IARC Carcinogen Group, the probability-per-unit-exposure-per-unit-time of actually causing cancer, and the actual effectiveness (not efficacy) of causing cancer (SciShow did a nice video on that). I mean everyone knows sunlight is a carcinogen but acting like it's absolutely the case that we're unthinkingly using just the bare IARC Group and don't know The Dose Determines The Poison is just insulting our intelligence X'D ) -This is why people should always get their science from the actual scientists and those who talk to them, not Random White Guy Who Just Needs To Explain To All These Strawpeople Why They're Dumb on the Internet .. -_-with Science™-_ X'D

[@sarahhoolihan3329]

I'm so glad u believe our govt and the info they put out 🤣🤣🤣🤣 good luck dude!!!!

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Psst. The agency saying glyph causes cancer is the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a division of the world health organization, a branch of the united nations.... Which is all the governments. You doof.

[@sleepygirll]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA either way, Sarah’s point is you’re believing a government that’s apart of all the governments in on this so…..not sure how you can call her a doof 🤷🏻‍♀️😂🤦🏻‍♀️

[@SummerHawaii582]

@@KNOWIDEASMEDIA no need to be rude!!

[@nauci]

The one people have been hitting with lately (when I try to debunk Glyphosate/GMO/Monsanto myths) is the study about Glyphosate affecting bee gut bacteria and potentially causing colony collapse. Can do you a video analyzing that study?

[@WiseSnake]

I think I know what you're talking about. Myles Power reviewed that paper here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rpXRiGuimamikLc

[@teagan_p_999]

Well done, but I thought it was "shift work that causes circadian disruption," like night shifts. Also, if you want to spite Monsanto (Bayer now, really, so don't buy aspirin either), I think you can get generic glyphosate now, too.

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

You're correct. I made a bit of an error in how I talked about shift work. IARC's definition is kinda shoddy anyways. 9 to 5 can disrupt circadian cycles too (depends when you're going to bed). And in the northern latitudes where it gets dark in the winter, 9 to 5 working indoors away from a window can mean a full 5 days without seeing natural sunlight. (happened to me before). So, I think IARC is actually redefining their monograph this year. (The shift work monograph was penned in 2007, and needs an update)

[@teagan_p_999]

True enough.

[@waltergraves4066]

Here we have a glass of water or is it half roundup? I would not drink it! Anybody?

[@jonathanjarry]

Excellent as always. Love the new backdrop and the improved colour grading. Really slick stuff!

[@kahuna414]

Thats you mistake - United Nation$

[@EscepticoHumanistaUU]

Amazing video! Thank you for this.

[@tomahawkx188]

Wow. Perspective. It's a helluva thing.

[@user-yn9mp4bt3q]

Paid propaganda troll

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

Thanks for explaining why you popped up. How much are they paying you?

[@christianb9435]

KNOW IDEAS MEDIA since you seem to take their word for it, could you maybe do a video of mixing a teaspoon of glyphosate in some water and drink it? Just to debunk once and for all

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@christianb9435 Will you drink a teaspoon of rotenone or pyrethrum or copper sulfate? (organically certified pesticides that will kill you very quickly) No, you won't, because that would be a stupid way to measure the over all safety of organic pesticides. Pesticides are not beverages.

[@Albopepper]

Do you notice how he cherry picks the worst organic pesticides he can come up with as representatives of the organic industry while trying to equate glyphosate with something as 'benign' as hot water? These are textbook tactics. Blatantly transparent. A page right out of the GMO Literacy Project's playbook.

[@KNOWIDEASMEDIA]

@@Albopepper Fine bud, then drink a spoonfull of organic's wholesome clean nitrogen source. Pick your flavor. Chicken Shit? Cow Shit? Pig Shit? You want it dry, or liquid? Glyph is not a beverage. But c'mon guys, keep trying to school me on false equivalency. Ooooof. Your kung-fu is weak. And I have no desire to fight you. So in the same way that the river achieves supremacy over all the streams and gullies, I shall lower myself to thee, because I don't give a flying Chicken, Pig, or Cow Shit about your opinions. How's that? Little proverb action for your poor-ass lost souls.

[@emancoy]

And organic farmers also use roundup.

[@MordusdepleinairQuebec]

eh?

[@johnrushing8067]

If so, (hydroponic) Wash it off. The organic DNA has not been altered to create a mini glyphosate factory within each cell of the plant.

[@Albopepper]

false

[@7thDayAdventures]

Hey now, this is the internet. You're not allowed to be this accurate here.

[@c87_archive]

Jeus christ this is savage.

[@Phillelias]

Thank you!!!!!