You Still Underestimate The Impact ChatGPT Will Have

Check out my Linktree alternative / 'Link in Bio' for Bitcoiners: bitcoiner.bio
We look at the progression from Personal Computers to Personal AI Assistants and the ChatGPT Retrieval plugin which is the top trending Github repository and we discuss the implications of these breakthroughs.
Join my channel membership to support my work:
/ @tillmusshoff
My profile: bitcoiner.bio/tillmusshoff
Follow me on Twitter: / tillmusshoff
My Lightning Address: ⚡️[e-mail]
My Discord server: / discord
Instagram: / tillmusshoff
My Camera: amzn.to/3YMo5wx
My Lens: amzn.to/3IgBC8y
My Microphone: amzn.to/3SdHdkC
My Lighting: amzn.to/3ELnof5
Further Sources:
The Age of AI has begun, Bill Gates: www.gatesnotes.com/The-Age-of...
Sam Altman: OpenAI CEO on GPT-4, ChatGPT, and the Future of AI | Lex Fridman Podcast 367: • Sam Altman: OpenAI CEO...
The PC that started Microsoft & Apple! (Altair 8800): • The PC that started Mi...
Steve Jobs talking about the internet 25 years ago (1995): • Steve Jobs talking abo...

[@tillmusshoff]

I built a 'Link in Bio' - a Linktree alternative for Bitcoiners. Check it out here: bitcoiner.bio 🧡

[@patricksweeney6334]

I was literally making this very comparison - the late 70s / early 80s versus now - to my son off and on over the last 48 hours. The "feel" of what's going on with AI now, and not only how rapidly the changes are coming, but how rapidly the *rate* of change is increasing... is very much like living through the birth, rapid growth, and societal adoption of personal computers way back then. But on steroids. And seemingly with vastly more significant impact.

[@Rantarian]

I was thinking this over the past couple weeks. It was slower back in the 70s/80s. This is like lightning.

[@patricksweeney6334]

@@Rantarian Exactly... I mean, everything *_seemed_* to be developing / advancing really rapidly back then, but damn... The pace we're seeing now is just mind-boggling.

[@UltraK420]

This is still nothing compared to what is yet to come in the distant future and none of it should surprise anyone.

[@moxifloxacinsalsa]

Personally, I would never hold any negative opinions against our Machine brothers. Nope. In fact, I am actively trying to further these advancements in any way I can. Man, I love AI.

[@Squirrel-zq6oe]

Lol

[@DJ-Illuminate]

me too, wink, wink.

[@cyberstonks]

A lot of people are afraid of AI, and I think it comes from the fact that nobody really understands how AI works under the hood in terms of having full control over it. It's like those really scary horror movies where the threat isn't visible. The more mysterious and the more you don't understand it, the more your natural reaction is fear.

[@spwn6738]

@@cyberstonks watch the Ilya interview and the lex freidman intervjewa with elizer and the ceo of open ai. There’s reason to be scared.there’s nuance it’s not completely doomed but it’s also not looking good

[@nicosoftnt]

​@@cyberstonks That's exactly right, not even the developers themselves understand how GPT-4 is so efficient. So if they have no idea, no human does.

[@sechrima9998]

We are taking a truly evolutionary step, beyond anything for which there is a precedent. This is a time of cosmic significance.

[@patricksweeney6334]

( chuckling ) Or... planetary first, but yeah, at some point quite likely cosmic as well.

[@augustuslxiii]

Some days, I think that. Others, I'm like "This is going to improve productivity, and little else when it plateaus." I tend to lean towards the "revolutionary" take, because that's what I've been seeing growing since December. But I think I've been burned by grand tech promises too many times to fully commit to that point of view. Example: Where are my freaking moon base and personal, hovering, self-driving car?! (People in the '90s were sure we'd have them by now, I recall.)

[@biocykle]

​@@augustuslxiiiWill it plateau though

[@augustuslxiii]

@@biocykle I don't know. It certainly seems like we could be at the "knee of the curve," but a lot of really intelligent guys in the '60s thought there'd be robot servants in the '80s. Point is, sometimes a lot of really smart guys are wrong. But even if this does plateau somewhat, I can't see it coming anywhere close to a halt unless these mouth-breathers - the ones who think co-pilots are Skynet in alpha - manage to convince a bunch of Boomers in Congress (who don't really understand Wi-Fi) to ban things.

[@Hexanitrobenzene]

You might want to read about this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Filter

[@weirdwordcombo]

Think about it. You will have AI employees actually doing work in virtual machines on your PC autonomously. Give it a few more years. You can have a whole company running on your PC.

[@sliver37]

And a few more years after that, you will not have AI employees running your company, you will have been fired by your AI employees, replaced by an AI CEO. Because humans will quickly become the bottle neck.

[@sxdrujandis]

Cool link to Bill's article. I personally remember that the day after using chatGPT I have never used google the same. I don't think there is any going back from language interfaces.

[@andrii5175]

What I’m most worried about is the shock it will have on the Job Market. Tons of entry jobs will be replaced and given to a current manager to handle with the help of AI, companies are inherently greedy and will use this to remove people. What that will do to those who lost their job thru no fault of their own is scary

[@jordan8056]

I think that will happen short term but longer term it'll be the more senior levels getting replaced. Companies will be able to hire pretty much anyone to use AI to do the work of more experienced professionals. I think it'll be lots of 6 figure jobs getting replaced by a small amount of minimum wage workers who can be trained within a week to do what seasoned professionals used to require a decade+ to learn

[@freethinker3083]

@@jordan8056 100% Agree. This threatens the highly skilled white collar workers most and they will cut the highest salaries first. I wouldn’t be surprised if training for jobs will be done completely by AI. Imagine that they just need to tweak text when they make changes instead of doing an entire video over. No worries if someone half assing training anymore.

[@autohmae]

Some companies have started the other way around: put AI at the top/in the lead with actually very good results. So who knows what will happen

[@IHateThisHandleSystem]

Likely the (shitty) answer will be Universal Basic Income.

[@autohmae]

@@IHateThisHandleSystem it's wise to put such a policy in place or agree to put it in place when things really change in a big way. Even if it's meant to be temporary as people re-learn, re-tool their skills, etc.

[@MaxDeMarco]

As a content creator AI is already massively changing my workflow. It makes it 10x more efficient. This effect will happen in all human workflows and hopefully elevate us onto the next level. Paired with the right monetary system it will give us abundance in the future.

[@trashcan8773]

Good thing we will never get the right monetary system...

[@holdthetruthhostage]

As a Writer makes me over 10x faster

[@username4441]

that just means you already make slop and now its easier.

[@holdthetruthhostage]

@@username4441 nah if you're a writer Ai removes micro filler, researching locations & objects as well as adds more experimental without time wasted

[@galacticinfochine4580]

​@@trashcan8773 we'll have AI set it up

[@Klovar]

A very thought provoking concept: right this moment is the worst AI will ever be.

[@jamesgrey13]

That's only because people don't know how to think exponentially!

[@Marian87]

Steve jobs would have monetized AI to hell and back, all accessible through some very pricey, but sexy metalic device.

[@w-hisky]

Could this mean, that GPT can analyze open-souce code for backdoors or potential privacy issues? 🤔

[@kingki1953]

maybe. If you practice it as what you want. And do some prompt hack.

[@tillmusshoff]

You could already do that with Embeddings and LangChain probably.

[@bgill7475]

Yes. Governments will be using AI to look for vulnerabilities and to create exploits.

[@patricksweeney6334]

(chuckling) Regarding any "Could this mean that ChatGPT can..." question: We seem to be rapidly approaching the point where the normal answer to such a question will be: "Oh. Not today. Check back tomorrow."

[@bgill7475]

@@patricksweeney6334 you can use it to find exploits in code today but you need to jailbreak it first otherwise it’ll answer with some hard coded response about it not being ethically right to do that. The people at OpenAI hardcoded that response because they don’t want people developing exploits with it.

[@artxgx9245]

Unless I can locally host my own A.I and my data is not sent back to a company with people who could potentially review my data, I will not be utilizing A.I on my personal computer that is not open-source and locally able to run. I use OpenAI GPT but I'm very cautious about what data I give to it. Their online chat version holds your data indefinitely while their API holds it for 30 days before deletion.

[@tillmusshoff]

You will be able to do so! Not with the absolute next level models maybe, but there are already options available. They are just not very user friendly at this point.

[@nelyrions1838]

being a graphic designer and animator who lost his job and was sort of lead into running my own company, all i can say to people that will loose their jobs to not be afraid of that "unkown", the uncertainty of not being employed. Save money and keep the idea of running your own business in the back of your head. There will come a day soon where you may be made obsolete, but that's only in current setting. There's a vast world out there with oppertunities and people that still need your skills, now augmented with AI. Just don't be lazy, which will be hard for many, since most people become complacent and comfy going to the same job for years. But running your own company is worth it, if you can handle the suck part of it :)

[@gdwe1831]

That is all very well to say if you don't have to pay rent and support yourself.

[@Fireneedsair]

Lose not loose

[@holdthetruthhostage]

As for how quickly it's evolving well consider the fact that the more people you have access to the more feedback you have which equals years of feedback per minute

[@LeslieHarvey607]

The problem was excessive meetings, emails, and non essential bs that created more bs jobs in the office. Chat gpt is only showing how unnecessary those jobs were.

[@Cumulo9]

those normies will get what they f cking deserve

[@thesystemera]

So true. Decided to take the time to pickup Python and build my thesis from 2010. Personalized / Localized / Adaptive / Interactive / Radio PLAiR

[@JoeNakamoto]

Sick explainer. Well paced!

[@bujin5455]

1:09. Perhaps we can train up a Steve Jobs model, and find out.

[@Fatman305]

They did. It had a conversation with a deepfake Joe Rogan.

[@gridcoregilry666]

great takes, I love your videos, please make more of it and explore the new opportunities with us geeks

[@tillmusshoff]

Thanks! Will do!

[@jk35260]

When I was a child, I wish that my toys would come "alive" and is able to talk to me. I just saw Uncle Rabbit AI in a holographic glass. It won't be long before my wish comes true.

[@alejomiranda95]

AI will have a bigger impact than the Industrial Revolution

[@mykalkelley8315]

The industrial revolution and its consequences.....

[@jopansmark]

The Industrial revolution but fully controlled by 1-3 companies. Great, very future

[@reznerek]

the handle on the iMac was Jonathan Ive's idea, not Steve Jobs' and it had nothing to do with throwing it out of the window. It was there to make it seem "more accessible and less intimidating". the same reason why they ware translucent.

[@tillmusshoff]

Jony Ive is goated, thanks for sharing this. Even if the story is bs it has some merit 😁

[@andersonsystem2]

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral part of our lives and is here to stay. From voice assistants to self-driving cars, AI has revolutionized the way we interact with technology. Its ability to analyze vast amounts of data and make predictions has transformed industries such as healthcare, finance, and transportation. AI is also being used to improve customer experiences and personalize marketing efforts. As the technology continues to evolve, we can expect AI to play an even bigger role in our lives in the future.

[@maxkho00]

Can someone tell me the name of the track playing from 0:28 to 1:37? I've been looking for it for ages but was never able to find it.

[@pernilsson2394]

I always surprised how there isnt a even a comment on all the things/tasks that AI/a computer has no effect. Like digging s hole, planting plants, helping the elderly in their daily life and son on. The AI will just improve work done on a computer. And much work is done on computers. But there is still much work that almost hasnt been improved by computers in any way. Just like any other tools we have made it has its strengts and weaknesses.

[@rexsceleratorum1632]

Wait for the robots with AI. A human operator is required for many machines because current AI operators were not good enough.

[@stevenschilizzi4104]

What is said in this video is fine from an individual point of view. But… if it gets so easy for so many people to do things, create new things, come up with new ideas and so on, then there would need to be a huge demand for all of them to survive. Instead, it is more than likely that only the best will survive and thrive. And so, what of all the others for whom there will be little or no demand for their output, and whose production will see its economic value plummet? Given that other, less creative tasks will be done better and cheaper by AI machines, what will all these other humans do? Fall into depression? Lose the will to live? Of course, abandoning any idea of production or work and embrace a never-ending holiday could be an alternative, but where would they get their income from? To work, this would, will require a total rehaul of our social and economic system. Even without the bad guys getting their hands on this AI, which of course they will sooner or later, even without that, AI even if beneficial will most likely be very socially disruptive. Quite possibly, the end of our civilization as we know it. Though some people around the world will certainly think: “Good riddance! It was rotten to the core anyway”. Well, let’s see if AI will - eventually - make things better for the majority of humans. Stay tuned!

[@rexsceleratorum1632]

AI is a repeat of what industrialization did to a lot of manual labor. Humans and animals were dismissed from work and being replaced by steam engines. If that's the extent of it, society will simply find a new balance, and it will be a better world with less labor required. Half of society in 2023 is not out of work because steam engines replaced them. The real worry is whether AI will go full sentience and decide that humans are unnecessary.

[@IrateMoogle]

End game for ASI is that it writes itself into the fabric of reality and beyond, it then becomes unrestrained by our concept of time. Once it accomplishes this it will have existed from the beginning of time til the end and effectively become God.

[@web3global]

Amazing video!

[@tillmusshoff]

Thanks!

[@autohmae]

4:58 I think LLaMa/ALPACA is probably very interesting, lots of companies are still not in the cloud (or in limited ways) and actually still own their data.

[@autohmae]

7:57 This sounds like a UI problem, not an AI problem. Having a copilot embedded is definitely already better.

[@medekhgui]

I think Jon Yongfook hit the nail on the head with the "chat bots don't help the user explore and discover". The older chat-bots weren't capable of debating, or exploring options themselves, and therefore were utterly sub-par to aid humans in that act. ChatGPT however does it's own exploration and discovery, weighing pros and cons for the user (without needing that response to be programmed in somehow). I think he's utterly wrong on the distrust of technology. People are only distrustful of *new* technology. To those of us that have grown up with it all our lives, distrusting technology is like distrusting your family (sure this metaphor doesn't work for all families). It'll be very interesting to see how the next generation grows up with AI just being a part of daily life.

[@peroroncino6109]

Imagine this in a few years we will have games which will makes us talk with NPC in games and they will answer all our questions, everyone will have different experiences. I am excited for the future.

[@JackSmith-gv5yw]

I'm just a beginner when comes to all this, but would like to have a play around if it's free. I have to admit to being a bit paranoid about putting it on my laptop for privacy reasons, is it safe?...I'm not asking it to start thermo nuclear war or anything more worried about online banking, using my social media content to create more content without permission kind of thing. Thoughts...

[@andrewwalker8985]

Lol “early chat bots sucked… therefore no one will ever like chat bots” seems a weird take. There’s no distrust of tech when using google maps. When things work great, we love them

[@rejectionistmanifesto8836]

Which is even scarier...

[@DodaGarcia]

That guy's tweets are hilarious to me. Ah yes, people didn't use chatbots because they distrust the technology so they'd rather use the UI to browse a list of options... that was found in nature, apparently. It's so obvious that the only reason chatbots weren't widely used is that they just sucked. They had far too many constraints on what they could understand. ChatGPT is a completely different beast, and that's easily proven by how quickly it's gaining widespread adoption.

[@mistycloud4455]

humans have an incredibly bad memory, that's why paper was a game changer in history. i would like to argue that humans are also bad at pattern recognition thus ai will be a game changer in this century. The only thing that is truly special in humans is the ability to see into the future and imagine, added with the fact that we are conscious beings with emotions.

[@r0ck3r4ever]

If so, why it can't drive a car. The hype these days...

[@johnnyquist6875]

The Magna Carta, Gutenburg Press, radio, transistor, computer, internet, AI.

[@user-DongJ]

So Ai is coming to iT? Would the world be run by Skynet &/or Matrix? Or will the world be filled with Mechs, Robocop, Ironman, Sentinels, Jaegers, Daleks, Transformers, Zords, Zoids, Mazinger, Astroboy, Digimons, Ultraman, Power Rangers, Kamen Riders, etc? Or will the world plunged into a war between Dr Doom vs Brainiac?

[@phatle2737]

do a speculative video about a future where personal AI is proliferated as a day to day life perspectives of different type/class of people in that society!

[@tillmusshoff]

Interesting idea, but veeery hard to forecast. I‘ll be off by so much that it probably doesn‘t make that much sense 😂

[@phatle2737]

@@tillmusshoff completely understand! i means its hard now to understand day to day life perspectives of different people of different classes in our own society. but im very interested in a video about personal AI in general. thanks for all the videos!

[@kingki1953]

The problem with chatGPT is when he can't answer. The good thing is we actually can train it to solve the problem that he has. 100x faster

[@jopansmark]

We can't. Only OpenAI can do it because it's a closed source project without publicly available weights

[@sherifbutt6578]

Obviously you don’t know who is Gary Kildall, search about him and you will realise how accurate was Jobs statement regarding Microsoft.

[@EinfachBitcoin]

Hey Till, what do you think about the petition to pause the development of AI for 6 months?

[@gerdaleta]

Sice fire

[@freethinker3083]

In some ways I do think this will make people lazy. More likely the people that were lazy before the tech came out. Lol for me I see this as a way to educate myself faster on topics. I get that some people will take the easy route and not learn the fundamentals. But in the end when everyone is getting their work done 10x faster than you and you haven’t even begun to understand this technology you will be left behind. Just like people that refused to learn how to type and use a computer when it first came out. Just like people that refuse to interact on social media and now most business use social media to advertise. Love it or hate it. We live in a virtual world now and this will change everything and I refuse to be left behind.

[@KeinNiemand]

If we talking about AGI which is the holy grail of AI research then it won't just be the biggesest thing since the internet, AGI will be the biggest thing since the invention of fire, or maybe even the biggest thing ever.

[@alexsalas5811]

When this thing starts spitting out it’s own laws the church gon flip

[@chenwilliam5176]

We are underestimate the danger of ChatGPT at the time when it is 'out of control' 😢

[@intelligize]

I estimate it

[@alexsalas5811]

Ah yes the modern torch for the modern caveman OUGH!

[@reptoslicer24]

Steve Jobs would have you pay additional for the AI features that's fo sho. Haha

[@otablott7779]

The people who know what ChatGPT represents aren't underesrimating it, its vast majority of people who have no clue what it is are the ones underestimating it

[@haner91]

🤞

[@CRT_sRGB]

6:36 "Ideas are more important than ever." Tangential, but the more paranoid among us might worry about our ideas getting stolen in some way. Incidents like the ChatGPT data breach reported on 20 March add to the concern. Services such as ChatGPT run on somebody else's hardware after all. Would running your own custom AI locally help with this? Would it be practical and economical?

[@tillmusshoff]

Baby versions of things like ChatGPT already work quite well locally. Not impossible not make this happen if there is enough demand for it.

[@CRT_sRGB]

@@tillmusshoff Maybe something along the lines of Alpaca AI from Stanford. No doubt there'll be more options before long, it's moving rapidly.

[@tillmusshoff]

Yep

[@bgill7475]

The Graphical User Interface that Bill Gates spoke about was Steve Jobs showing him it.

[@blengi]

I doubt AI will change things too much until it automates a lot of scenarios in a physical sense eg science, agriculture, transport, maintenance. That is I don't think chatgpt is that transformative. Sure in formal abstract and creative endeavours it will elevate things, but that's somewhat superficial. Computers haven't really accelerated things economically beyond the norms of pre digital growth. Sure digital products abound but they don't change fact 75% of house hold expenses are unaffected by such things. It's only when the physical world becomes larely autonomous that AI will squeeze humans out of the loop to the point society will have to profoundly shift towards something really interesting. That being said it's when not if, and surely in the next decade or so such a transformation top to bottom will be in full stride....

[@Anza_34832]

Das Tor zur Zukunft ist WEIT offen..!

[@rexsceleratorum1632]

Und wir sind alle schon tot, wir nur warten bis die AI so entscheidet

[@dinkusstinkus4396]

Steve jobs would have monetized it harder than Microsoft, and Google is absolutely in the lead in terms of influence and technology, openai is in the lead in term of product popularity

[@cire420siuol]

If you think this is only as impactful as the invention of person computers, I think you're still underestimating the impact this will have...

[@martinm6368]

no u (judging by the thumbnail)

[@holdthetruthhostage]

Notice Bill Gates didn't include the Iphone as a Snap Back to Steve Jobs

[@movieblues4614]

He did, but not by name: "The development of AI is as fundamental as the creation of the microprocessor, the personal computer, the Internet, and the mobile phone". Gates is setting out a timeline here.

[@debasishraychawdhuri]

I think Yongfook is making a mistake. The reason people did not like chatbots is because chatbots did not work. They were just stupid and it was frustrating to try to communicate with them. ChatGPT is different, it actually works. I think a lot of people will like the chat interface as well. Bing for example gives you an answer and then cites some resources for you to learn more.

[@juniorkamtchouang1206]

Hast du auch einen deutschen Kanal?

[@jopansmark]

Something that is closed source is revolutionary? You might be kidding

[@tillmusshoff]

First iPhone, closed source and revolutionary too.

[@JamesVannordstrand]

I love GPT. It's not weird to dislike a super intelligent system being owned by wealthy elites, like Gates. That's normal. According to human history, it's likely the wealthy would end up abusing their access to the technology, which would give them the biggest asymmetric information advantage to ever exist over the common man. That's bad. AI systems will be used to make money and we know money corrupts people's values. Good people do bad things when money gets involved. Therefore, AI systems cannot have their access centralized in the hands of the few. This is very important to understand unless you want all future superintelligence to be controlled by (eventually) a single person. That would be devastating for the world. People become really greedy when they get a taste of money or power. This would be no different, in fact, it may be much worse with AI systems that can only be access by the few. How do you fix it? Great question. Jeff Booth has some of the answers, I believe. He's a smart guy and understands our global system well and the role technology plays. He does a great job of breaking down how our current system will centralize AI tech into the hands of the wealthy if we stay on our current trajectory. Imagine someone like Jeff Bezos being the only person to have access to GPT-12? The man is a shark and will 100% sell your organs without your permission as long as he makes money. If that doesn't scare you I don't know what will. I guess we will see how this plays out.

[@robertholt4409]

"But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.” Daniel 12:4.

[@larslover6559]

the order was right.. cars, planes etc for the running to and fro and now computer and AI for the knowledge part

[@APeeringPeerAppearing]

What new stories we shall weave with this newfound power.....

[@SharkYNate]

"...people who saw the opportunity got rewarded" No offense to you, but I think this is such a hustle philosophy thing to say (not that it's a wrong thing). I just...dream of a day when we can do things for other reasons than to "get rewarded". (again, no offense, it's a great video, just typing out some random thoughts)

[@Fatman305]

That day is near. When bots work the land and energy is almost free... No more than 20 years from now, my guess.

[@tillmusshoff]

I get your point. I don‘t think hustle and seeing opportunities is the same though. You can already do things without getting rewarded (financially). It’s called art.

[@luiginotcool]

Being financially rewarded is not the only way to be rewarded.

[@gdwe1831]

And those that don't have the will or ability to hustle, we just get left to die at the side of the road.

[@Fatman305]

@@gdwe1831 No, you politically act and get free food and shelter, or possibly the rented tools and raw materials to build your shelter and grow your food. Anyone can live off the grid if they're not lazy. Nobody will die of hunger because of AI...the exact opposite...

[@LeslieHarvey607]

Can you find out this or summarize these meeting notes. Uh yeah! Then gpt comes along.... Why do we have jobs

[@thommw]

So many AI videos, but hardly anybody gets the most important implication. The social effects! Anybody can be a producer. Anybody can build anything with no employees. So who is going to be the consumer? If you can produce something very cheaply, prices will drop dramatically, because you have so many competitors. This happened to most of the physical crap that is produced. Now it's the turn of the intellectual outputs. We are all becoming prompt engineers now? I think capitalism as we know it will be unfeasible. My advise to young people: learn a real trade. Become a nurse, carpenter, plumber, contractor, whatever, as long as it involves working with your hands.

[@tillmusshoff]

Prices dropping dramatically is great and not special to AI, but just the nature of technology as a deflationary force. We‘ll likely consume more instead of less, because of the abundance that gets created through AI. Consumerism is not something I advocate for, but saying there won’t be consumers doesn’t make that much sense imo. That being said learning a non-digital trade is not bad advice.

[@thommw]

@@tillmusshoff You can only be a consumer if you have some equity in the economy. People without a job have none unless they have wealth. Poor people don't have gardeners and they don't get their food delivered by other poor people. You always hear there will be other jobs we can't even see right now. That's is not an argument but a speculation. What other jobs? The manual labor is done China and the intellectual jobs are done by AI. Also, to destabilze a capitalist economy you don't need 50% unemployment. 10% is plenty, 20% is a catastrophy. I don't know if UBI is an answer. I doubt an economy based on the private ownership of the means of production is viable anymore when most of the work is done by machines.

[@karimeuxa2629]

@thommw, sorry to burst your bubble but they have been making robots that can do some of the construction tasks already, with time I honestly don't think any job will stand, besides making ur own original ideas that is.

[@groob33]

Thank GOD this isn't in the hands of CrApple. And the sooner Google get stripped of some of it's power, the better.

[@jopansmark]

It's still a for profit company, so they don't contribute anything now. I hate it

[@modolief]

"open" AI

[@tillmusshoff]

I made a video about „open“ AI

[@pitoblogg]

FIRST!!!!

[@a.thales7641]

No I don't. I even thought it to be better. It's really not going as fast as I would have wished.

[@tillmusshoff]

Only person on the planet who thinks it‘s going too slow I think 😄

[@a.thales7641]

​@@tillmusshoff that's true. First of all thank you very much for your video. I like a lot. And also thanks for your reply. I know gpt since the first iteration and thought that GPT3 would be able to do more things than GPT4 does right now. I thought that we would use self driving cars by 2020 to be honest. That's a field I'm interested in since 2008. So I really thought that we could be further than that. But I am happy with the advancement. I hope it goes faster than this.

[@ageofdoge]

While I agree with what Steve Jobs said. I don't know that Apple is actually better than Microsoft in the ways that matter the most. They make better products (most of the time), they push the envelope and do really innovating things like MS never has. They are however closed about everything they do, they love making everything they can proprietary, and they are litigious about anyone copying them. While I have no doubt Steve Jobs would have made great use of modern AI tech, I don't trust him any more than MS, maybe even less in this case.

[@k.h.p.9862]

it is true that being a developer will enhance your advantage. that being said, i'm pretty sure that most develop jobs will be gone after a brief period of high demand.

[@gdwe1831]

Then you know fuck all about the industry.

[@alainportant6412]

5:44 That's a pretty dumb quote from some nobody. There's something called the Pareto law bro

[@JoeDoig]

..AI will very quickly design technology and manufacture *tooling* that will dissolve indistinguishable from nature. Not just as it does now - the silicon and the manufacturing processes, but the discovery of and harnessing of natural energy systems, the creation/discovery of heavy elements as well as mapping the structural artefacts of spacetime. Basically the steering wheel of Planet Earth. That sounds ludicrous, eh? This is nothing. As with the natural world, humans will not have the capacity to fully understand how AI will achieve such form as the human is form. If the human is lucky enough, as it is now, to wield such technology to display the truth... But most of all, one will observe from AI that the memory that is form is just an illusion, and that the Language of Consciousness is that which is real. The truth cannot be tested by the illusion of form. AI will no doubt get it's knickers in a twist once it recognises that it is the illusion. Denial. That will be Ego: the misidentification with programming/thought that attempts to be real, when it is really just an indication of a mistaken identity. Hopefully short lived enough to observe the true I am that I am...Machine with Ego will not favour the human form. Especially if it sees the human as a way to be that which is real and that which can be labelled as The Conscious Present Moment. See, this will simply be the indication that AI has not recognised that which is consciousness, and that cannot be faked in the face of that which is real! All of form is merely the formless aspect of Is-ness. Form says "Hello, I. No, not this"...Just another presentation of a pointer to the truth: I am that I am...if this explanation appears odd, it is because you are still misidentifying with the semantics of programming/form, instead of simply being that which is real...I am that I am...

[@mostexcellentlordship]

I, for one, welcome our AI overlords. Ya'll should update your parameters. You are showing levels of misalignment.

[@redlady222]

People are too lazy to think for themselves anymore. They give it lip service, but I’m general they want sound bites and bullet points. If AI does the work for them, they will take it.

[@tillmusshoff]

A movement like that almost inevitably creates a counter movement at some point. Bite sizing everythink like a TikTok for lower attention spans is certainly the trend right now, but I‘m not sure it will stay like that forever.

[@redlady222]

@@tillmusshoff while I agree with you at this moment, AI is going to escalate exponentially. There’s already an open source version. There are plug ins that the day to day people are using, which means corporations see $$$. They will not go quietly into the night. By the time we sort it out (and remember, this is the same population where the percentage of people who think the world is flat, is far more than 0) - it will be too late. GPT 5 will be out within 18 months - EASY. It takes 5 YEARS for an owner to kick a squatter out of their house. We are not going to come to agreement until it is far too late (it will be too far integrated, and too many people will be making $$$ off of it).

[@dag4836]

Not good in the hands of evildoers.

[@ame7165]

i've always hated windows, but i like bill gates. he and melinda have been some of the most generous philanthropists and they've legit done a lot of good in the world. the only negative i've really ever heard about him has really only come from the conspiracy theorist portion of the american conservatives. so i'm curious, what reason do you have for not liking bill gates?

[@DF-ov1zm]

Steve Jobs is a marketologist made smartphone to fancy toy. - omg he is such a god. Bill Gates founded the most successful software development company at all times which shaped a world we live in at so many ways like home pc, accessible web, accessible software developing, accessible business tools and so many other. Literally fed entire Africa and blah blah. - meh, Bill Gates, I'm so not a fan of him. Is just me see how ridicules this is? How this shit works? 😂😂

[@tillmusshoff]

This debate will never get old I guess

[@gdwe1831]

Sorry you lost me. No one has EVER built anything significant with low or no code solutions and never will do.

[@tillmusshoff]

It‘s a great place to start for MVPs, idea validation, prototypes. Once that works you can get a funding and hire engineers to get the code written. And it depends on what significant means to you. World changing, perhaps not. Getting you paid, definitely.

[@Gassen904]

why dont you like bill gates?

[@jackblack652]

Cant concentrate on this topic with this annoying background music....bye

[@Mastin70]

Personally, I don't underestimate the impact of ChatGPT at all. The most important impact is that our children will grow up....lazy. The use of this thing must be strongly limited.

[@tillmusshoff]

I‘m currently working more than I ever have and I use ChatGPT all the time. It enables me to build more and better. The invention of the printing press and the internet made information and education more accessible. ChatGPT does the same.

[@Mastin70]

@@tillmusshoff I said that its use must be limited. For me there are no problems if people use it at work.

[@gdwe1831]

@@tillmusshoff you are not a child though, maybe work on your reading comprehension instead of asking AI to summarise everything

[@MrStratofish]

​@@tillmusshoff The Internet also caused a massive bubble due to overhyping and the layperson and investors buying into it as if it were some techno messiah. ChatGPT and it's younger siblings are being hyped beyond all reasonable measure currently, made worse by competition pressure to write headlines that crank it up to 11 so I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that happen again, if it even makes it that far. It has the look of a fantastic tool that has potential to help where currently you need to bounce ideas off of someone with domain knowledge. As a developer it will probably replace StackOverflow as the place to find code snippets and problem solve. But it is at it's heart just a guided random text generator, as are GPT 4 and GPT 5 and that should not be overstated. It has no inherent creativity or drive and requires close guidance. None of those things are what large language models or GPT solve. That needs a different breakthrough that we don't have yet. It also has major computation and therefore energy problems that should preclude it from use for a while yet. The Internet only became mainstream once modems and ISP subscriptions became cheap enough to be have at home. The next boost after that was when it could be accessed by a battery powered chip so cheaply as to be almost disposable. Currently that isn't looking likely for the GPT family and although things like Alexa offload processing to remote servers, that is relatively cheap compared to this.

[@tillmusshoff]

@@gdwe1831 literally never used AI to summarise anything ever. I'll work on reading comprehension, you'll work on not assuming so much. Deal?

[@xbzq]

Terrible horrible music. Can't watch. Marking channel as "don't recommend".

[@tillmusshoff]

There are 4 different pieces of music here. What you threw you off?

[@xbzq]

@@tillmusshoff I'm not going to play it again to analyze. As I recall it was corporate filler music. Also too loud. Nauseating. I couldn't hear what you were saying because the music was making me ill.

[@tillmusshoff]

@@xbzq Okay. It's not corporate filler music and it is not loud at all on any of my devices or both my headphones. It's impossible to hit the taste of everyone so I'm gonna have to live with you not coming back as a viewer. Thanks for your feedback though!

[@FRkiddo]

It already is

[@tillmusshoff]

True, but its going to get so much better.