Car Crash Test Compilation 15 Small SUV - Side Impact Comparison

[@jingtsanly8434]

1:14 HONDA _ HR-V 1:54 MITSUBISHI _ Eclipse Cross 2:36 CHEVROLET _ Equinox 3:10 FORD _ Escape 3:45 HYUNDAI _ Tucson 4:18 JEEP _ Compass 4:52 JEEP _ Renegade 5:24 AUDI _Q3 5:58 BUICK _ Encore 6:34 HONDA _ CR-V 7:07 NISSAN _ Rogue 7:37 SUBARU _ Forester 8:05 TOYOTA _ RAV4 8:40 VOLVO _ XC40 9:15 MAZDA _ CX-5 9:55 Overall side rating (↑&↓) MAZDA CX-5 vs HONDA HR-V

[@abdihalimyusufmohamed8903]

Thanks

[@OldDood]

Correction: The RAV4 was at 8:05

[@jingtsanly8434]

@@OldDood thanx~

[@1-_-12-_2]

7:21 Nissan and why is the Honda logo on the steering wheel?

[@defaultname01]

Why no VW Tiguan which is a huge seller globally

[@lon6320]

I was in a bad side impact crash once. The flying pieces of side window cut my face and then my hands as I climbed over it to get to the other side of the vehicle. Nice to see the CX-5 has laminated glass that didn't spray glass all over the interior.

[@zoe7657]

@@Azureecosse tempered Yes Laminated No. The newer vehicles are starting to for reduced noise inside.

[@zoe7657]

@@Azureecosse I don't care if you read my reply or not. I will reply as you and others may need educated. Even more sad as you say your in the industry. Maybe you need to take some recent training or step a side for the younger generation. That being said, The FRONT windshield has been laminated for decades. The side option more recent. Please tell me what vehicles you supposedly work with so I can avoid you touching mine.

[@lukerinderknecht2982]

@@Azureecosse no need to fly off the handle. Zoe's reply made sense; yours on the other hand do not.

[@Dongzzzzzz]

@@Azureecosse I'm the president of your mom and my comment holds more credibility

[@somjitboontan9414]

Blah!

[@wswift7611]

I bought the CX-5 early this year after very deep safety research for crash test. Love it and it has the best noise attenuation.

[@covidhoax7646]

Are you looking to crash?

[@twiincentral8780]

Can you explain the noise attenuation more?

[@jeffr8898]

@@twiincentral8780 For the vocabulary challenged...explanation: it's quiet.

[@不说话我就看看-w1d]

我也开cx5位啥我的车噪音那么大，一点也不隔音，

[@Gaziz85]

@@jeffr8898 geez no need to be a dcik about it That’s a pretty rare word

[@faithturk2746]

I got T-boned in my moms RAV4 on my way to pick her up from the airport. The driver was going 50 but it was a Prius so all the damage was fairly low. This is very accurate though. He was going so fast my car spun to the side and his continued straight and hit hit another car head on. No major injuries but still very terrifying. It made me happy I was driving an SUV because the impact would’ve been a lot worse if I was in my own car which ironically, is also a Prius.

[@tomahawk1556]

Mazda is one of the smaller car manufacturer & they came out Top in Crash Safety! Congratulations Mazda! 🌷🌿🌍💖🇯🇵

[@waleeddief7266]

Yes, you're right, it's really a surprise

[@purplequi9962]

Small in America perhaps but they're massive in other countries - Australia especially. Literally second best selling, Toyota first.

[@AllCentaur]

@@purplequi9962 They’re mostly remembered for the Mazda Miata here in the US. It wasn’t until I got a CX-5 did I even know about Mazda making cars. I thought they went defunct lol.

[@tim3172]

@@purplequi9962 Look up global sales and get back to us. Mazda is a TINY company with TINY sales figures.

[@purplequi9962]

@@tim3172 I just said they were massive in other countries, one being Australia where they’re 2nd in sales… that’s purely objective…

[@MrLiam-mz3dm]

can we appreciate how much time and money the ihs spends making sure we are safe on the roads

[@saraaronzon4562]

Absolutely

[@cassinihuygens]

@@Harambe_ sir… LMFAO that’s like saying guns kill people. No, people kill people.

[@Gaziz85]

@@Harambe_ is sedan considered safer? I heard the opposite, that Suv are considered safer, due to in case of collision it would be more stable, or something. Not an expert though, just read it in some article on web.

[@lunar3278]

@@Gaziz85 suvs are definitely the opposite of safer roll overs are way more common. I’d say the safest are estate cars

[@davidobando834]

yes

[@roostersideburns3440]

I hope this sells more mazdas.. mazda didnt wait for this test to make their cars safer, they did it o n their own.

[@LuisRodriguez-ldrrp]

They did it after previous years got lower ratings. This test wasn't created recently. its just being updated for modern size suvs. Still pretty good that they didnt wait for publicity to hit them poorly before doing something

[@23sam42]

Yeah not how it works... This test is constantly improved. So (some) automakers improve incrementally.

[@evac311]

I own a Mazda. Great company

[@gamebuster800]

This single video actually put the CX-5 on my list. I've never actually looked at Mazda before this video. After test-driving a lot of vehicles, I went with a Volvo XC40 electric. I had some issues with it, so I told the dealer they can have it back. I forgot about Mazda again until I randomly saw a bright red CX-5 at some random car seller. My wife liked the color (can't blame her, it is a nice color) and I remembered the high safety and reliability ratings, including this video. I test-drove the CX-5 and was completely surprised by it. Physical buttons for climate control, every button feels premium, it has great handling, and feels fast enough (even though I currently drive a 400hp EV). I actually had fun driving the CX-5 and loved almost everything about it. It felt like a "sensible premium" car. Good materials, no cheap plastics, but not expensive. It is currently at the top of my list to buy, and i'm at this moment looking to buy a model that exactly matches my wishes (basically, I want all options, bright red, leather, wooden accents, 4WD) Edit: I got one! A 2.5 non-turbo ~200hp petrol AWD with all options except 360 camera

[@MadMadOne]

@@LuisRodriguez-ldrrp sure, but CX-5 isn't new. It's due to be replaced soon. Ford era Mazda models are not relevant now.

[@jonshams]

This is an excellent test reflecting one of the worst case scenarios when an accident happens from the side and with a heavy SUV. Thank you for your hard work and sharing so much insights!

[@korkunge]

Sheck out Euro Ncap

[@Zeek509]

I didnt even realize that the Mazda's glass didn't completely shatter! Wow! So reassuring since I want a CX-9 as my next vehicle. They didn't wait for the test to come out first. Instead they built thier vehicle to even exceed the previous standards. Good job!

[@tspwill1]

Such a great, informative test! I’m glad they have increased the speed to real world mph and adjusted the body of the “sled” to the bumper/hood pick up body style. There are definitely so many on the road between large suv and pickups.

[@douglingle1600]

We bought a 2021 Mazda CX5 last year......the top safety ratings of these cars was the bigest reason we bought it.

[@adl6907]

Channel with no content.fake stories for dummies,paid bots

[@v50-vertical]

Good luck

[@the_dovla]

I have XC90 Gen1 and now switched to XC60 Rdesign Gen1. Most secure cars ever!!!

[@kevjao267]

Im surprised that Volvo didnt have a good rating since safety is what they are known for. I love these kind of videos. Please make more.

[@OOICU812]

You're remembering when Volvos were owned by the Swedes. They are now owned by the Chinese.

[@leksandrh.3577]

@@OOICU812 no Chinese pay this car. Made this car have to Sweden

[@paulwhat322]

You mean volvo decades ago when it was Swedish?

[@NIYSO]

@Seek Him with all your heart and you will find Him jesus is not God. He is prophet of God

[@Alexander_l322]

@@moes548 the start of the vin number will tell you where it was built. I think YV is Sweden. European Volvos are made in Sweden 🇸🇪

[@slandshark]

I'm a subaru fan and was surprised to see the Forester only get A for the side test (instead of G). Even more interesting, when looking up the test results on the IIHS website, the forester use to get G, but the updated test now shows A. I wonder what changed? Also, we are shopping for the Subaru Ascent later this year and they are one of the few vehicles to get G ratings on every single IIHS test.

[@Jvisleo]

Subsru had Subaru Global Safety Platform like Ancap etc.

[@CalculatedRiskAK]

What changed is the testing methodology. They made the test stricter, and as such it's harder to get a G rating. Vehicles that used to get G would now get A most likely.

[@jessicahusband9954]

This video just made me so happy I bought a CX-5. The safety features on it are great. They are a little sensitive, but it’s better that way. I even got rear ended once and the back windshield shattered. Glass ended up in the front seat and I was literally sitting on it, but didn’t cut me at all. Just love the car and always recommend it.

[@mars-jr5uu]

Hii

[@christianbryant5617]

Me too. Love Mazdas

[@terrallputnam7979]

I was surprised to see Mazda beating the big 3 in Japan and US markets for safety.

[@hyyh7984]

Mazda is too big...

[@spiderwaui]

that's why they're more expensive than hondas. at least here in Philippines.

[@jumbomuffin1316]

@Seek Him with all your heart and you will find Him no

[@JenGM24]

Maybe in safety, I don't know a right minded person who would choose a mazda over a Toyota in terms of reliability.

[@TheRealVranesh]

@@JenGM24 I am one, and I chose and still choose Mazdas over Toyotas any day of the week. To me Toyotas are carrying their name now. They are boring. They have seem to lag behind when it comes to design. Their quality is not what it used to be. Also, Toyota is now using a few Mazda platforms for their cars. For example, the new Yaris is a Mazda 2 with a few different body panels (and probably engine). Just google them and see how their interiors are the same (also in tune with other Mazda designs).

[@brawlstarsreplays]

Honda CR V maintained the position after the impact which means it had to absorb the impact by itself, while Mazda CX 5 turned its position which resulted the impact car to slide away and it means less impact to the car. This might be the result of an engineering for the side impact test. Similar result happens at the front offset test. Some cars sacrifice 20 percent of engine bay and slide away to keep the impact low to the car while some others just try to resist to the impact. The outcome is totally different.

[@pilotavery]

These teams of engineers who design and build these vehicles as well as the ones who do their best to break them in testing two others, and the work that they've done has saved countless lives over the past few decades.

[@23sam42]

CX-5 sacrifices some visibility from its side to strengthen the B pillars. Hope other improve, and they all don't have to give up visibility.

[@afcgeo882]

Sacrificing safety in not getting into an accident in the first place, for better performance in an actual crash is incredibly stupid.

[@squireman72]

I've had a 2020 CX-5 for over 2 years and never experienced any visibility issues. And the BSM - blind spot monitoring - helps immensely.

[@bodybyfisher44]

I have a 2021 and don't have a visibility problem.

[@tgb-vf4es]

There is no visibility problem. It's generally beginner drivers and women that complain about lame stuff like this.

[@陳慶鴻-d4z]

「安全」才是回家唯一的途徑！！ 請支持Mazda !!!

[@cargogh]

Besides being full of info, this video was well edited, easy to listen to and watch. Thanks.

[@notorious7774]

Mazda is so underrated!

[@hyyh7984]

Nooooo

[@Onion_Knights]

been wanting to buy a mazda for long time already

[@smusyk2859]

It's actually "becoming" a best seller in Europe,

[@Весубарум]

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

[@Sonilotos]

No it's not

[@chiemekaa]

Anyone else notice the rollover mitigation prongs on the Jeeps? Not a good sign in the real world. And have you seen the size/height of current American full sizers? They'll quite literally take cabin intrusion to a whole new level.

[@jonathongellibrand3632]

Yeah - can you imagine a Silverado T-boning say a Miata/MX-5? I would love to know why people choose to buy these monster trucks when they don't need to. If you're in construction etc then fine. But not for the school run!

[@ceke]

@@jonathongellibrand3632 it's just a trend. Manufacturers really need to realise that the most green thing that they can do for their range is making their cars smaller and lighter.

[@320iSTWEdition]

@@ceke People don't wanna buy small and light..... they want big and heavy to feel safe like in a tank or have the ability to intimidate by sheer size alone.....

[@S3NDP13]

@@320iSTWEdition Sounds like their compensating for something...

[@TAKIZAWAYAMASHITA]

@@320iSTWEdition the feel safe argument actually has alot of merit you are more likely to survive a crash in a suv than in a car, because there's more stuff in between you and the accident so more shit to break thus reducing the speed of you decreasing your chance of injury

[@CH11LER.]

Why did both jeeps have stabilisation to prevent it from flipping? Surely, if they were going to flip, that would be part of the result? 🤔

[@carn00b66]

The test primarily is to see cabin intrusion, and how structural components and safety equipment (airbags etc) protect the passengers from side impact, specifically. They would be introducing variables to the test if the vehicle flips. And besides IIHS already saw Jeeps flip on testing :D

[@jacksheet2395]

If own one put a heavy duty stabilize bar,,they are too narrow

[@tofuMonzter]

A side collision is one of the reasons why I sold my Golf R then bought a ‘22 Highlander (Top Safety pick +). Driving a small hatchback w/ a baby in the states is too risky.

[@tonymante8759]

is it a top saftey pick using the old test or the new standard of testing with the heavier barrier to replicate the giant pickups out their. Cause theirs only a handfull of cars passing the new tests and most of them are tiny compact suvs suprsingly alot of the bigger suvs have issues with center of gravity

[@MrManBuzz]

If you're that afraid, why bother even leaving the house?

[@asiandavidp]

I like how the Buick have another airbag for the *rear* side passenger. Car manufacturers better step up and take notes !! That’s a itty bitty car 😂 6:20

[@zxxczczczcz]

yes

[@wadet73]

When I bought the first Mazda6 in 2003, I remember it having best in class crash ratings and that was 20 yrs ago. I'm really looking forward to seeing what they bring out with the new turbo inline 6 engine and a redesigned rear drive sedan (new Mazda6) and SUV (CX-9 size vehicle)

[@jarell89]

Wifey been driving a cx 5 for 2 years now. Glad to know they did a good job on safety since she usually has our 2 kiddos in her car more than I do in mines.

[@gsblendzz]

Did anyone notice that at 7:22 when they were supposed to be showing the Nissans inside angle they showed the honda CRV angle. Which they already showed. I can tell because the steering wheel says honda on it/

[@saritateotia6938]

I agree

[@THE_RISING_SUN]

I am a Proud CX-5 owner!!

[@ss-kk7xp]

CX-5 No.1

[@vainondovala6578]

To be honest, I thought the Volvo would take this hands down. Surprised by Mazda.

[@josecamacho3393]

@Axelafy if I’m close to you I want to be inside a Tesla Y

[@josecamacho3393]

I thought that would be a… Tesla Y

[@louisdefunes8952]

Yeahh, i thought the same.

[@Shahpoorsasani6798]

The problem with all cars is that manufacturers think of two things: first, more profit, second, less weight of the car to avoid high fuel consumption. Each car cabin must use two types of iron with different thickness to protect the occupants at the time of the accident, but Unfortunately, to make the door frame and even the front and rear frame and frame, they use the same alloy and thickness that they use in making the body cover, for example, to use 2 mm iron sheet for the cover and 3 to 4 mm for the car body frame to In accidents, the number of occupants will be reduced or never reduced

[@iatsd]

It's steel, not iron, and the thickness of that steel is less of a factor than the engineering that goes into it. 1 vs 2 side intrusion beams, for example. High tensile steel vs mild steel. Single shell design vs multi-shell design. Most cars these days are monocoque designs and the passenger cabin is almost always built with heavier steel in a space frame shell design. The body panels are not part of it and are largely irrelevant to secondary protection values.

[@barbz_zayne]

The Toyota Venza (not shown) was also tested along with the Lincoln Corsair, Venza earning Acceptable and Corsair earning Marginal.

[@randommanlady]

At 7:20 They are showing the interior of a Honda being crashed and not the actual interior of a Nissan Rogue Also I'm curious as to whether or not they set the parking brakes on some of these models before they're crashed and whether or not that has an influence on the Crash results

[@jacksheet2395]

No parking brakes aren't applied or else the dent goes further

[@dilbert100000]

7:18 I also wondered why it showed the interior of the Honda instead of the interior of the Nissan rogue. That’s a little bit fishy.

[@JG-gg9wk]

Look what I stumbled into. Very well done very useful. Subscribed, looking forward to other videos. And oh yes, well done Mazda.

[@Speck1119]

I’m shocked that Volvo did not get a good rating. But I was impressed with Mazda’s glass not flying all over the cabin

[@Spoolingturbski]

Trust me, the Volvo is safer…

[@v50-vertical]

@@Spoolingturbski What?

[@Spoolingturbski]

@@v50-vertical ?

[@kmckenzie2461]

Im surprised how well the Buick Encore did being based on an older platform it did really well.

[@Reflexシ]

Yeah

[@spicysnowman8886]

Just don't buy one, because the engine will eat a couple turbos before 100k miles

[@bradhaines3142]

@@spicysnowman8886 i thought they were one of the more reliable american brands

[@spicysnowman8886]

@@bradhaines3142 the old ones are, the new ones are Chinese and terrible.

[@mertersun]

@@bradhaines3142 Because it is actually not american, it is German Opel Mokka, that was produced under Opel brand by GM. GM, rebranded several Opel designs and models in several other regions as Vauxhall, Buick etc. Opel/Vauxhall brand is no longer owned by GM though (French Stellantis bought it)

[@sophorn1234]

Thanks for this crash test. I own a Mazda CX-5 very happy to see a good crash test. Cars with poor ratings shouldn’t aloud for the Manufacturer to continue selling to consumers that’s wrong.

[@BlueEyesBliss]

I just bought a cx5 a couple weeks ago. Little extra, but the safety and performance in all aspects is what sold me.

[@adl6907]

Mazda with the oversized grill,yes, very fugly

[@jayleyy]

@@adl6907 I think it's personal preference. It was derived from a design language used by Kodo.

[@mkwkdk]

this is exactly why i bought the cx5 3 years back to be my family car

[@Весубарум]

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

[@gabe-jerome]

I was in a head on collision with a drunk driver on the freeway going the wrong way. I was going at least 70mph, and him likely faster. I only walked away with minor injuries and his passenger unfortunately died. I was driving a Mazda CX-5. Eternally grateful to Mazda.

[@davidwilcox8604]

This test is run faster with a heavier cart and a different barrier that simulates frame rails in a truck. These vehicles are designed for test, this test just changed, the vehicle manufacturers aren't prepared for it. IIHS is funded by insurance companies.

[@roostersideburns3440]

umm thanks

[@hebneh]

At the end, the man says that directly - when a new test is inaugurated, it takes awhile for manufacturers to respond to it and improve their vehicles. No secret.

[@creativebrz1638]

Good thing insurance companies fund these tests.

[@jonshams]

I was expecting Volvo to come on top. Congrats to Mazda with this trophy!

[@tramvaj12]

But the problem is. You can see how jently volvo move dolls. Mazda seems to hit harder dolls. Is this test right? What do they measure.

[@MaximilianvonPinneberg]

The Volvo is a lot smaller car. I think they still have SIPS that moves the driver and passenger seat away from the impact.

[@saeedf-8903]

I did not expect that 😂, I’m randomly owner cx-5 2019

[@Yusmaidhar]

This sucks, I just bought an HRV last year... in my country, those cars with the acceptable rating (like the CRV) are out of my price range. It just goes to show that there is a price for safety.

[@Butchcub75]

they changed the sled! Torque Thrusts vs the 96 Cougar XR7 rims. WOW Mazda beats Volvo

[@juliuswhaley9113]

i think because the XC40 was built to be electric

[@nev7991]

@@juliuswhaley9113 actually the recharge was built on the petrol platform

[@nev7991]

Yh very surprised but knowing Volvo they’ll fix it

[@hyyh7984]

Japans knows it...

[@juliuswhaley9113]

@@nev7991 wow, i know it’s a new car but i hope their quality changes especially since they’re buying out of geely

[@ejandersen2878]

Interesting that Jeep were the only 2 vehicles that required supporting structures to prevent them from rolling onto their side.

[@rogerhernandez72]

because its higher center or gravity and ground clearance compared with the rest

[@TheDalk]

Not surprised at all. Jeeps are crap and dangerous don’t buy a jeep. Letting them roll over should have been part of the result.

[@OOICU812]

The Jeeps are rebadged Italian Fiats.

[@jacobfrech288]

@@TheDalk own my Jeep for 11 years all your baseless claims couldn’t be more misleading.

[@TheDalk]

@@jacobfrech288 I’ve seen the video. You should watch it. And hope you don’t have to make an evasive maneuver when driving your jeep.

[@expertgaming1002]

Volvo take note please. This is disappointing. As an owner of your product, I was sold upon safety and I still expect nothing but the best from you. And coincidentally I own a Mazda as well. Very proud of you, you have become an extremely reliable, stylish, premium, and SAFE brand. Our Mazda6 Grand Touring is the pretty Soul Red Color. And while it’s not as luxurious as our Volvo, the sportiness and feel of the car doesn’t disappoint. Good job Mazda!👍

[@calvinkinwancheung4772]

Great demonstration. Hope there will be another comparison with manufacturers bestsellers like X3, GLC, Q5, RX, XC60, etc

[@yamakashi18]

Proud owner of 2022 Mazda CX-5 signature - absolutely loving this car

[@Весубарум]

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

[@v50-vertical]

How do u like it a year later?🤮

[@80PercentAshamedOfU]

I’ve always preferred older cars due to their simplicity and character, but one being 18 years old and the other 23, I don’t even want to think about how dead I am in one of these crashes. Planning to upgrade at least the daily driver.

[@__-fm5qv]

Heck even my 2007 Volvo C30, which was considered very safe for its time and class of vehicle, would probably recieve a poor rating with side collisions under these tests. Side impacts were never its strong-suit, recieving either marginal or acceptable in the old tests. I do love my "old" C30, but in terms of safety it probably no longer cuts it with larger heavier vehicles on the road. edit: it recieved "good" side impact rating in the old test. However deformation is much worse there than even a lot of the new cars with the new test so RIP I guess I'll die then.

[@tedstrogis4823]

@@__-fm5qv But it can out maneuver most suv's, crash avoidance is important.

[@__-fm5qv]

@@tedstrogis4823 Very true! I trait I aim to upgrade with suspension mods, bigger brakes and wider tires at some point xD. It is one of the things that stop me going to larger SUV's they're weight also makes it more likely to crash in some cases.

[@kinotoa]

Dead is you are lucky ......

[@EnShinNoi]

I faced a similar thought process. My current car has two airbags and weighs under a tonne. I'm going to be the worser off in any collision. Will have my new car by the end of the year.

[@Beard-Bear.NA8C]

日本車の中では以前からSUBARUの頑丈さが有名でしたが、ここ数年のMAZDAのボディの進化は特筆すべきものがありますね。 仕事柄色々なメーカーの車に触れるのですが、SKYACTIV Gen2辺りからMAZDAのドア周り、特にピラーの剛性が明らかに上がっているのが分かります。 日本車で貰い事故から無事に生還したければ新しいMAZDAかSUBARUを買っておけば間違いないと思います。

[@christianbryant5617]

I have a CX-5 and everything is just outstanding! Nice to know I’m safe

[@BRi-qz2ic]

Anyone notice the Honda badge on the steering wheel for the Nissan Rogue……?

[@cj3380]

Yeah I think they screwed that footage up. Wrong vehicle footage

[@BrianOrEric]

The inside angle for the Nissan Rogue at 7:19 is a Honda interior

[@ruzzelladrian907]

I hope the upcoming redesign H-RV performs better.

[@orangeflames05]

Me too

[@christianbryant5617]

Just goes to show you the certain quality in some of these cars.. Chevy, Ford, and Buick had minimal to no cracking or interior pieces being launched around the cabin. And ofcourse Audi and Mazda held up amazingly

[@tomahawk1556]

🙏 Thank You So Much for the Crash Tests to Make Sure Our Vehicles Are Safer to Use on the Road! 🌷🌿🌍💖

[@titan9259]

My car is from 2003

[@rongyao2250]

A jeep compass actually did pretty fine I suppose but still like marginal bucks so that means that there are better options on the market

[@Hii..289]

JEEPS are bad do not buy a JEEP

[@fizzo1217]

Horrible reliability ratings too

[@danek893]

Only Jeep has anti flip beam support, wonder why

[@scubajoe3321]

That little buggy has some awesome wheels for no reason

[@gabzsy4924]

From the video they all look the same to me, in fact the Buick Encore that received ACCEPTABLE to me looked much worst than some that were scored lower, but I'm sure they must have some guidelines to determine each score.

[@martinr8278]

Watching the side airbag deploy after impact, was a bit interesting. How many vehicles with the back passenger extended past the seat into the trunk area? (Most seemed to stop deployment right by the head rest.) Very few, but certainly looked like that helped with the back passenger. Watching the Toyota RAV not sure I would’ve wanted to have been the back passenger in that type of collision

[@imchangingthis]

Its still pretty safe. In the occasion where your head doesnt miss the airbag, at least.

[@davidgapp1457]

I agree with your observation. The bag DOES need to be extended back at least another foot or so. I had a look at my Rav4 Prime - it should be relatively easy to retrofit an upgraded airbag.

[@jonshams]

Agree. CX-5's side airbags covered all the way till the end

[@an1m4x]

very shock, Mazda CX-5 had good level for side crash test 😳

[@hyyh7984]

Mazda always is the best.

[@Весубарум]

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

[@osmanispir5347]

Mazda is a people-oriented brand, not a commercial-oriented brand. Congratulations Mazda you didn't surprise me again

[@creativebrz1638]

I was shopping for a Toyota SUV but Mazda CX5 has something else superior to offer. Now it has become a bit more complicated. Shouldn't have clicked on this video lol

[@Весубарум]

Hrv = Mazda 3, а тут сравнивают hrv и Мазда 5! А не CR-V

[@TheElbowRoom2024]

Nissan Rogue interior clip is actually of a Honda. Segment needs re-editing.

[@catchaser52]

I recently bought a 2014 Mazda 5 mini wagon. The center post between the front and back side doors is very strong. Just like the Mazda CX5 In this video, the high rated car. Mine was made in Hiroshima Japan. In these videos it looks like the side air bags do a great job of protecting people from glass.

[@ernestoarellano8867]

Since Geely bought Volvo and Polestar, their cars have been declining in safety. The question is: did you ever imagine that a rating of "fair" would be part of Volvo cars. Selling to China was a bad decision.

[@Orange_Flavor_Pizza]

Harder test Thats good for ours

[@SebastianLong]

The 2 best safety features arent airbags and seatbelts, they are visibility and less interior distractions like tv screens for radios that come in most cars nowadays.

[@rosemaryfriedw124a8]

Still can't believe that a Mazda could beat a Volvo at a crash test

[@tdas7204]

BECAUSE VOLVO IS NOW A CHINESE BRAND 😁

[@rosemaryfriedw124a8]

@@tdas7204 I'm afraid that Volvo nowadays is learning from Geely about safety instead of vice versa. It's like a woman (in this case Volvo) that usually wears pants (safety matters) but after marrying a man (Geely) whose religion prohibited women from wearing pants (unsafe "tincan" car manufacturers), that woman stopped wearing pants and wears skirt and thigh-highs (giving false safety) instead of tights (retaining true safety while having Chinese car characteristics)

[@rosemaryfriedw124a8]

@footballcoreano or buy a Volvo truck, the true Swedish Volvo

[@ArunKarumathil]

What's so inferior about Mazda

[@rosemaryfriedw124a8]

@@ArunKarumathil not only Mazda, every Japanese carmaker doesn't care so much about safety, their crumple zone is too soft that the cabin also got crumpled too. That's why many Japanese cars got the title "tin can" because of their unsafe structure

[@Fr4nK-vr4vi]

Mazda CX-5 Proud owner💪🏻

[@bodybyfisher44]

Ditto

[@thalyssonwilliam5104]

Amazing Mazda CX-5! 💪💪

[@saramae9878]

Damn, HRV was on my shortlist when shopping. It's insane how it's so poorly made the pillar tore straight off.

[@destructospin90]

Of course, it's a crossover. It's built for a quick cash grab, not built out of efficiency.

[@theyadmire511]

The HR-V is on a very old platform. Since the HR-V introduction testing requirements has changed. A new HR-V is scheduled to be released early this year Honda has already released teasers and it should perform very well in these test since it will be riding on a new platform.

[@MadMadOne]

That version of Fit platform has been barely passing the crash tests. Still remember the Fit recall for bumper reinforcement. Somehow Honda dropped the ball on that platform. They have generally been good with safety in the last 15 years.

[@martinr8278]

Good thing you watched this video first. Many other SUVs to consider that are much safer and reliable then the HRV A coworker of mine leased a 2017 HRV, never really liked it, she was very disappointed overall and was surprised since it was a “Honda” after her lease she looked at Toyota, Hyundai and Subaru. Maybe some changes now but I wouldn’t touch it

[@bigglyguy8429]

@@martinr8278 I test-drove an HRV and found it cramped, underpowered, nowhere to put my arm... just really didn't like it. Went for the Subaru Crosstrek and being very happy with that

[@WeekendsOutsideFL]

Well on the upside, this is a newly tough test, and all things considered all of these vehicles, and their side airbags, mean that they do soooooo much better than if you applied the same speed and situation of a 1995 SUV crashing into the side of a more-common Small 1990s Sedan at 37mph. Like way better. But with increase in standards will come even safer vehicles.

[@adamesd3699]

Several observations: A lot of internal parts get loose and are like missiles flying around. Congrats to Mazda. Impressive that it beat the Volvo. The Rogue almost flipped over. It does look a bit top-heavy. That Tucson is a 2021 model, not a 2022. Huge difference, with the 2022 very different, especially significantly larger. Couldn’t they get a 2022 Tucson? Good for IIHS to update the test.

[@cepibolla]

We're going to ignore the results from Tucson? Literally breaked the car, 4:02 and 4:06

[@zxxczczczcz]

lol yh 4:05

[@idontknowwhattoputhere.]

lmao

[@320ifly]

That’s Hyundai quality for ya

[@jayemark708]

Wow, I picked the right vehicle. Thanks.😀👍🏻

[@TFG2880]

Mazda for the win love my CX-5 and 3 hatchback

[@CalculatedRiskAK]

One thing this shows is the benefit of electric power steering integrated into the stability control system. You can see which cars automatically turn the steering wheel to avoid rolling over.

[@jesusdiaz1141]

During the Nissan test they made a mistake and showed the inside scene of the Honda. 7:20

[@tristaryul]

I like my 2021 CX5 even more tonight

[@nidhirdvnair5194]

7:21 Wait… isn’t that a Honda?

[@ooyginyardel4835]

Yuppers!

[@rohitp5023]

Its nice to see your car at the Number 1 position, proud owner of a Mazda CX - 5 2023, great car if you are not looking for a big brand name.

[@chircoeurcbr]

Why the impacting vehicle does not get deformed? That is also crucial for the test

[@michaelavilov3443]

The front barrier (white part) is deformable

[@polite.cat.has.playlists]

@@michaelavilov3443 why

[@christianbryant5617]

I think visually, the Mazda and Audi did best.. and that’s to be expected

[@Shankovich]

11:12 Was the HR-V B-pillar secured to the lower structure with epoxy and tac welds??? Can see where the epoxy was ripped but I don’t see any bolting.

[@_evromoney_2119]

Дуже шкода нових автомобілів, але наука потребує жертв, дуже важлива інформація для мене особисто, молодці дякую 👍

[@noway72]

I would like to see the difference if a 5 point harness was used! Not sliding in the seat would be lots safer!

[@frankyang5657]

There is a big problem that SUVs today have a lower bottom platform, and in this clip, the active bumping car has a higher bumper that could almost contact the lower bottom frame of some SUVs. Such caused some SUVs which publicly assumed as safe having a worse rating. Be aware to adjust that !!!

[@rich7987]

Mazda😉

[@RealKevGotEm]

Wow the Mazda got a good rating over Volvo 😮

[@flyblu80]

there is to say about the HR-V, the test version has a slightly dated frame and I think they have not revised it over time. They threw themselves on a new frame, with a questionable aesthetic that of the third series. while CR-V has a greater bulk and gives the idea of ​​being more reinforced. Amazes the renegade is small but.... I am not aware of all the cars some are only for the American market even if a test car looks like a rebranded Opel. Try Mazda cx-3... Suzuki s-cross or vitara?

[@devonzastre1702]

Mazda's a clean looking car too.

[@yes8032]

Wait Volvo is not on the top safety pick???!!!

[@adriannalundasan7570]

Mazda is the new Volvo now.

[@seanthompson8071]

And Volvo used to be reliable ... now just another fragile European make that you throw away after several years.

[@tesla_models]

@@adriannalundasan7570 no its volvo and will remain volvo

[@robertl6035]

@@tesla_models Volvo now it’s a own by a Chinese Company,!!!

[@tesla_models]

@@robertl6035 but they operate on their own

[@tk9839]

The intro was lit...

[@legthrough]

マツダの企業努力は凄いね

[@RealKevGotEm]

I was given this HRV as a rental. I GAVE IT BACK 20 mins after and got into a different car

[@anantawikrama2445]

Was surprised by HRV's rating tbh. My dad crashed his once and rolled over his HRV once and he escaped without any injuries not even scars. I mean it's different from side impacts but at least I thought it would rank higher

[@ahmadsoyziya]

Same applies for Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. To be honest watching video I didn't understand why it is rated as "poor". We've recently bought 2022 one (Since there are minimal changes, I am not sure if the rating applies to newer one) - I've watched its NCAP testing and results were GOOD and above

[@v50-vertical]

If he had no injuries, you can't get scares...lol

[@anantawikrama2445]

@@v50-vertical oh by injuries i meant something like broken bones or something. Not like scars and whatnot