I think that it's an awesome way to learn......especially when you don't understand anything from the book......Thank You. : )
@karthikk59385 жыл бұрын
Yeah!
@sushreesweta16955 жыл бұрын
Is that true??
@saheliroy60474 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's absolutely true
@vishnup78083 жыл бұрын
True
@sanchitabarman54583 жыл бұрын
Agreed....
@sannidhyasaransh46743 жыл бұрын
Bete mauj kardi
@Arihant85453 жыл бұрын
Hehehe boi
@sannidhyasaransh46743 жыл бұрын
@@Arihant8545 yo boiii!
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
Either light has a split personality, particle vs wave, either that interference pattern is not really an interference pattern, but a diffraction & reflection pattern or something along those lines. Maybe those black lines are just shadows made by the most probable diffraction points, which cast different shadows.
@Moheh23442 жыл бұрын
Awesome 👍
@Srikanth_G3 жыл бұрын
Nyc Gurujii
@rupeshyadav51618 жыл бұрын
The best way of learning. Thanks
@7activestudio7 жыл бұрын
Now You can Access 120+ hours of digital content for free in APP play.google.com/store/search?q=sciencetuts
@sabbirhosain113 жыл бұрын
I'm From Bangladesh,,, this class is great
@YazdanZare6 жыл бұрын
The bright and dark lines do not appear if source of light is sunlight. Sunlight has almost all the wavelengths while for a clear pattern the beam should be a pure light (only one wavelength)
@alishbaabbas12105 жыл бұрын
Yes light should be monochromatic
@subarnikmandal_MUSIC3 жыл бұрын
U made it so easy to understand.
@davidmburu92575 жыл бұрын
You have explained it well sir
@ghulamsabir93423 жыл бұрын
Good explanation of the Idea..
@mrahmankhan86703 жыл бұрын
Great video
@mathematicsbyvivekanand23754 жыл бұрын
Best explanation
@reshmahittalamani66002 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 🙏🏻
@mateberehagai15322 жыл бұрын
Nice Lecture
@sanchitabarman54583 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@amritkumarbehera96316 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@arunkm7264 жыл бұрын
Good 👍
@solapowsj253 жыл бұрын
Too difficult to grasp how a 450 nm wave could have interference of peaks and troughs that show the pattern of what I would think is bi-refringence with dark and bright regions.
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
They now use monochromatic light to get that pattern. Young used sun light which is white light. But now they say white light doesnt clearly show the pattern. This means Young clearly didnt see any pattern, but more like imagined there was one.
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
I dont see either how the interference pattern at such nanoscopic scales would be visible with the human eye !
@drranarana49346 жыл бұрын
My advice to who ever wants to watch this play the speed 1.5× P.S I still didn't manage to watch the full video
@diegoprods79715 жыл бұрын
maybe you are too much in a hurry. Just chill out brainy!
@sanjoosona5 жыл бұрын
Yes
@mezancookingoil14 жыл бұрын
NGL 2X is better than 1.5X.
@poojasaini-fo9wj3 жыл бұрын
Very help ful animation explanation thank you so much
@GUPTAYOGENDRA4 жыл бұрын
In double slit experiment, the conscious observer is not only observing the electron gun, screen containing two slits and detector but also the human body, performing the experiment and thoughts which are forcing the body to act. The conscious observer who is consciousness itself is not observable and hence is observing the entire universe from outside the universe as required by quantum mechanics to collapse the overall wave function of the universe.
@hackervikashdangi60896 жыл бұрын
Very Nice video sir
@mehwishaslam5274 жыл бұрын
But sir...how you know that this is destructive...like the formula of class nstructive can also be applied
@PhysicsVediyappanT19902 жыл бұрын
Really nice sir but I want to know what's the technique used to record this video Can you please explain me sir
@PradeepKumar-yf4nk5 жыл бұрын
Good explain
@sarfarajzaman12505 жыл бұрын
Awesome
@GamersOfKerala6 жыл бұрын
u actually gave me the concept
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
What material were the walls ? I imagine that reflection of light between walls can create a similar pattern if they were made of a smooth surface.
@tawkirahmed20957 жыл бұрын
great
@anjanamathew5375 жыл бұрын
Good explanation... But Is this possible with sunlight...?
@WilliamMcCormickJr7 жыл бұрын
Light inverts through a slit. Just like through a camera lens, or a convex lens at a distance. That is what is not being discussed. Sincerely, William McCormick
@ishwarkumar73137 жыл бұрын
nice voice n good explaination.......but i need it like notes also....so that we cn write this in exams
@7activestudio7 жыл бұрын
Now You can Access 120+ hours of digital content for free in APP play.google.com/store/search?q=sciencetuts
@saveramuskan35985 жыл бұрын
Just Wow.....Thank uuu so much.
@فيزياءالعملية4 жыл бұрын
Thank but I want to ask about the intensity of the fringes are they equal or the central fringe are brighter?
@Bangalibabu954 жыл бұрын
Time : 2.10 You'll get your answer.
@فيزياءالعملية4 жыл бұрын
@@Bangalibabu95 Thanks but I am asking about the central bright fringe is it more bright than the other fringes? Sorry I didn't get the answer in the video.
@Bangalibabu954 жыл бұрын
@@فيزياءالعملية : Yes, Central is maximum, and it keep on diminishing in both the sides. I mean the intensity tends to become less and less, and eventually it disappears.
@فيزياءالعملية4 жыл бұрын
@@Bangalibabu95 thanks a lot but why is more brighter? Is this due to interfere crest with crest
@Bangalibabu954 жыл бұрын
@@فيزياءالعملية : It depends on phase difference, you can see there is a mathematical expression given in any book. If you're much interested to read, then I would recommend you to go through Optics by Ajay Ghatak.
@mandipkunwar53528 жыл бұрын
Great.
@7activestudio7 жыл бұрын
Now You can Access 120+ hours of digital content for free in APP play.google.com/store/search?q=sciencetuts
@ravindersingh93142 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@mohymenhesham88286 жыл бұрын
it's awesome
@krishnaneral385 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir
@vivekprataprai24334 жыл бұрын
Best explanation one could ever do
@anshumansingh34223 жыл бұрын
A very very big thank you 🙏 for clearing my concept
@muralidharaneha8506 жыл бұрын
thank you for such a great explanation*****
@Dr_Asma_physio7 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what i want
@SohailKhan-mv3gx7 жыл бұрын
Asma Arshad hi
@Physics-s6y3 жыл бұрын
👌
@rahelsayadsayad61356 жыл бұрын
good
@subarnikmandal_MUSIC3 жыл бұрын
Thank u sir..
@m.doctor89606 жыл бұрын
شكرا
@AbhishekKrSingh-gp4hx8 жыл бұрын
Good approch.........
@7activestudio7 жыл бұрын
Now You can Access 120+ hours of digital content for free in APP play.google.com/store/search?q=sciencetuts
@priyasaini77735 жыл бұрын
Thanku sir 🙏🙏
@abhakumari72207 жыл бұрын
5:14 phase difference should be (n+1/2)2pi
@heenatecheducation74716 жыл бұрын
Is it correct or wrong ...????? Friend...
@kratos94035 жыл бұрын
@@heenatecheducation7471 wrong
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
The water waves are orders of cm, the light waves are orders of nm. I really dont understand how the interference pattern at such nanoscopic scales (of nano lightwaves) would be visible with the human eye ! Did Thomas Young have a nanoscope back then ?
@26jiyakevalramani743 жыл бұрын
Nicee one... But I recommend to watch it on 1.5x speed... Thank you
@GamersOfKerala6 жыл бұрын
thank u
@amresh87997 жыл бұрын
Nice
@79divyanshujha186 жыл бұрын
Link of part 2??
@tanvik36325 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir
@rohitsharmafan80707 жыл бұрын
nice
@CR7_455 Жыл бұрын
❤
@mrhouse_v218 жыл бұрын
Are you a robot or something? That's a weird accent, mate.
@jasonqiu7477 жыл бұрын
ikr really weird
@Prajakta.Bartakke7 жыл бұрын
Why is it so...
@sandesh99336 жыл бұрын
Jason qiu it'd auto robot man
@vrushaliraval65096 жыл бұрын
Ky
@Mohitkumar-mv8mj5 жыл бұрын
It's a robotic voice
@adithyaperiyasamy3 жыл бұрын
Phase difference for dark fringe or destructive interference is (2n+1)nλ and not (2n+1)nπ
@bikib36793 жыл бұрын
no its ( 2n + 1 ) π
@tsionm4594 Жыл бұрын
I think it's (2n-1)pi
@shreeshat.u78194 жыл бұрын
So what to do...
@pradnyamelekar91697 жыл бұрын
thnx
@pranaygawade113 жыл бұрын
❤️
@parulsharma74376 жыл бұрын
Gud
@shubhamjain70873 жыл бұрын
By using sunlight we will get colourful band of unequal width... There should be monochromatic light source of light
@schmetterling44773 жыл бұрын
What's wrong with a little color?
@krivlex82142 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 you will not be able to notice the dark and bright bands formed during the interference, which is the whole point of this experiment. If a monochromatic source of light is used, these fringes can be observed. You will also find that the distance between two consecutive bright or dark bands is λd/D, where d is the distance between two slits and D is the distance of separation of slits from the screen.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@krivlex8214 The whole point of this experiment is to show that light is a wave phenomenon. That can easily be done with polychromatic light.
@krivlex82142 жыл бұрын
@@schmetterling4477 yeah, but the thing is you can't really make out the dark and bright bands. The monochromatic light used makes it easier to prove that light is a wave phenomenon.
@schmetterling44772 жыл бұрын
@@krivlex8214 There is no such thing as monochromatic light. All light has a spectrum with finite width, even if we can make light with a very narrow spectrum. It therefor follows that there is no such thing as a perfect minimum. You have to stop mistaking the absolute predictions of mathematical approximations for necessary scientific criteria. That is not how we do it in physics, even if we simplify it that far at the high school level.
@debojyotiroy398 жыл бұрын
Thnx a lot..
@sannidhyasaransh46743 жыл бұрын
Hiii Arihant!
@krishnamurthyariyalur77904 жыл бұрын
Exactly I wanted this ....and this is for free...thank you
@sourarakshit25233 жыл бұрын
it was monochromatic light, not sunlight
@namanpasari36464 жыл бұрын
The name of the experiment contains double slit how are you saying pinholes it is conceptually incorrect
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a 3 slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.
@KimKim5658 жыл бұрын
Is that a bot reading? I really cant tell.
@ikaeksen6 жыл бұрын
yes, with hindi accent lol
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
Its TRIPLE SPLIT obviously...and the pattern of interference is most likely just a reflection pattern of photons in between the walls. MYTH BUSTED.
@DrAnkitJangid2 жыл бұрын
Ok
@chandureddy77887 жыл бұрын
still I didn't get what is 'P'
@ayushtiwari1045 жыл бұрын
Lol its a point dipshit😂
@aimankhan64356 жыл бұрын
A mistake in 5.16min phase difference formula.take into account please
@anjanamathew5375 жыл бұрын
is the correct formula - (2n + 1)lamda /2
@al13836 жыл бұрын
Why would light travel as a wave horizontally, or is it a spiral type wave? And if you adjust the distance of the wall with the light sensors with the wall with the 2 slits can you do so and get a dark spot in the middle of the back wall? If not, why not if the waves are interfering with dark spots between?
@Kishan-putra-17722 жыл бұрын
Ba my kkka
@monkeyrobotsinc.98756 жыл бұрын
did u say pee on the screen? dude come on
@Muzam93 жыл бұрын
❤️From Pakistan
@anonymousser8304 Жыл бұрын
Anyone seeing this in 2023😮
@Arihant85453 жыл бұрын
Hi sani
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
They now use monochromatic light to get that pattern. Young used sun light which is white light. But now they say white light doesnt clearly show the pattern. This means Young clearly didnt see any pattern, but more like imagined there was one.
@Chicken_Little_Syndrome Жыл бұрын
"Michelson and Morley (1887) and other early experimentalists using interferometric techniques in an attempt to measure the properties of the luminiferous aether, *used monochromatic light only for initially setting up their equipment, always switching to white light for the actual measurements.* The reason is that measurements were recorded visually. Monochromatic light would result in a uniform fringe pattern. Lacking modern means of environmental temperature control, experimentalists struggled with continual fringe drift even though the interferometer might be set up in a basement. Since the fringes would occasionally disappear due to vibrations by passing horse traffic, distant thunderstorms and the like, it would be easy for an observer to "get lost" when the fringes returned to visibility. The advantages of white light, which produced a distinctive colored fringe pattern, far outweighed the difficulties of aligning the apparatus due to its low coherence length.[23] This was an early example of the use of white light to resolve the "2 pi ambiguity"." - Interferometry, Wikipedia
@sapangurung58864 жыл бұрын
No needof books, building of college, lectures etc
@omarabdulghani80777 жыл бұрын
At point O the fringe that appear it must be the central bright fringe but this video shows that its an bright fringe . Also you say that the width of fringes are equal, while the central bright fringes has a double width of any bright fringes And if the fringe that appear at the point O isn't the central Bright fringe, so where is the central bright fringe Please I want an answer to all of this and to clarify whether what I'm saying an error
@DOtman22227 жыл бұрын
Omar Abdul Ghani this is interference of light where the width of fringes dark or bright are equal whereas in Diffraction of light you get central bright fringe that is double the width of the lateral fringes
@omarabdulghani80777 жыл бұрын
Thanks diana
@Synergyholdings-fo9lv8 жыл бұрын
well......................
@vijayasingh2047 жыл бұрын
I don't understood any thing
@Aryan-hr8mz6 жыл бұрын
Nice
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a THREE slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.
@gouravg59974 жыл бұрын
thank u
@vireshkumar96297 жыл бұрын
nice
@_brite_27_tom_5 жыл бұрын
thank you
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a TRIPLE slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.
@vireshkumar96297 жыл бұрын
nice
@vireshkumar96297 жыл бұрын
nice
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a TRIPLE slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a TRIPLE slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.
@GamesBond.0073 жыл бұрын
But why did he put the single slit before the other two ? This makes it a TRIPLE slit experiment, not double slit. These scientists cannot even count, but they know exactly what happens lol.