An overview of a breach of duty causes damage section in the tort of negligence
Пікірлер: 14
@frozengrapesfanacc5 жыл бұрын
Hey Sarah I just wanted to let you know that I'm grateful for all these videos pertaining Tort of Negligence, it really helped me understand better for my project I'm working on for school!
@ramishabegum70595 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for these videos, theyre extremely helpful!!
@alecbamfield96104 жыл бұрын
Thathank you for these I’m going to go to court myself, as representation against council tax is a big no no from all local solicters within legal aid.
@SarahHarwood4 жыл бұрын
I'd definitely speak to a range of solicitors who may be able to take on your case without a fee. Local universities also have free advice clinics, as well as citizens advice bureau.
@nipabegum12416 жыл бұрын
thank you Sarah so much. really helpful video
@chrisattwood95886 ай бұрын
This law is a bit out of date now. Robinson vs Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police 2018
@lin13565 жыл бұрын
Hi Sarah thanks for your Videos! I am just wondering, the Thin Skin Rule (Take the victim as you would find him) is opposed to the Subsequent Cause (You would not be responsible for C's death cause the lightning is never ever foreseable. Same to the cancer, it is never ever foreseable cause I, as an employer, and also my employee himself, would never ever know that he gets a dormant cancer in his body!) Thank you for your reply in advance. Liked and subscribed to your channel. xD
@imedyana5 жыл бұрын
thank you
@justoanthony5904 жыл бұрын
good notice 👌
@elabaisdarhan5 жыл бұрын
Hi, Sarah. Just to let you know: 1. You are amazing and beautiful. 2. Great videos. 3. Be my teacher! :)
@SarahHarwood5 жыл бұрын
Always happy to help when I can.
@olakunleonagoruwa31284 жыл бұрын
@@SarahHarwood hi, just a clarification. Does the harm considered as foreseeable under the establishment of the duty of care be of the same extent as what occurs under a breach of duty, i.e. the risk of a chair being broken when a heavy weight is applied as opposed to it actually splintering into pieces
@SarahHarwood4 жыл бұрын
@@olakunleonagoruwa3128 The foreseeability of harm under duty is to establish the relationship between the claimant and defendant. Breach is around the defendant's behaviour - the standards of care is how good they have to be and the risk factor holds them up against those standards to see whether they have met them or fallen below them. The damage/injury part is considered under breach of duty causes damage.