Yuneec H520 - E90 Lowlight Test

[@lowbudgetgadgets261]

Klasse Video Uwe, super Qualität und schön zusammen gestellt!

[@UweLoewer]

Uwe Mendetzki , vielen Dank!

[@GuyRobertKernisant]

amazing video!

[@Rubik3x]

Very impressive! It would be great to see a comparison with the CGO3+ in the same conditions. And, I like your choice of music.

[@UweLoewer]

Rubik3x Thank you! 👍😃👍 I've got the TH with CGO3+ her, too. If the weather will fit, I'll do a comparison especially at low light. At sunlight, as we know, the CGO3+ delivers very good footage!

[@jacktarry5948]

Use, Thanks for all of your efforts with bringing us the Typhoon and H520 insights and videos that we crave. Can you please spare me a moment, and a quick answer? Can you tell me if I am correct in thinking the E50 is the way to go for a camera selection - if one is focused on doing facade and roof inspections (commercial)? However , does it lack in the (necessary) detail for one to use and benefit from the DataPilot software to make a nice deliverable to a client ? In other words, you need both? One to use for inspections (but keep away at a safe distance) and, you STILL need the E 90 for data mining (higher def pics) for doing a Data Pilot mission that you want to turn into a deliverable to a client? Keep up the awesome work Infrared Jack

[@coptereu877]

Klasse !!

[@UweLoewer]

Copter Eu Vielen Dank!

[@christianmeyer8053]

Uwe i am impresed too!

[@tanicc]

What do you think of the 520 overall?

[@UweLoewer]

tanicc , this would become a long letter...so in short (but not too short 😉): The H520 can't be compared with the Typhoon H. Though they look quite similar (despite the color), they are totally different. I own 2 TH, too. IMO, this bird was made for private Customers, half professional videographers, for the "mass" of drone interested people. Nice features included (POI, CCC, Pano photo mode, Wizard), which I tested one time, and then never used it again. But, nevertheless, useful for some people. The H520 misses all this features (at least, at this time). It's a design more useful for industrial purposes, Survey, S&R (if the new thermal cam will be released), but ALSO for the more ambitious film maker (E90). If you don't mind missing the additional features of the TH, and get longer flight times, more stable flight, and far way better cams, your choice should be the H520....and, as the complete new software (open source) is at the very beginning, I am rather sure there will come lots of useful and perhaps great new features in future. Thx for watching, and your comment!

[@StudioZweiSechs]

Sieht sehr geil aus. Ist das Video nachbearbeitet worden? Gruss

[@UweLoewer]

StudioZweiSechs , das Video ist "out of Cam". Es wurde lediglich der "virtuelle Zoom" per Magix Video X eingefügt, um bei Vergrößerung des Bildes von 200% die verbleibende Qualität beurteilen zu können. Trotz "ISO-Boost" wegen der Schwachlicht-Situation ist erstaunlich wenig Bildrauschen zu sehen. Bei Sonnenlicht dürfte das Ergebnis noch beeindruckender sein. Werde ich auch noch testen. VG derzeit noch aus Südfrankreich Uwe

[@StudioZweiSechs]

Uwe Loewer ist wirklich sehr eidrücklich. Kein Vergleich zur CGO3p...

[@DrohnenExpertise]

👌👍

[@TheMalvisioN]

Isn't created using Magix? 😁

[@UweLoewer]

TheMalvisioN, yes, you're right, the video was created with Magix Video Pro X 👍😉👍

[@TheMalvisioN]

Uwe Loewer I am using the same software but still only Typhoon H... 🙁