www.buymeacoff... Pearson A level Maths, Pure Year 2 textbook (1.1) In this video I cover: 1. Negation Statement 2. Ration and Irrational Numbers 3. Proof By Contradiction
Пікірлер: 35
@AYAD33N Жыл бұрын
How is he this good at explaining hard concepts it honestly baffles me,my teachers explanations were so bad and hard to understand but Zeeshan explained it absolutely brilliantly.God bless you!
@kuma31413 жыл бұрын
Mate Iv finished my a levels I just love this guy😂❤️💯
@adailyfact5 ай бұрын
What grade did you get?
@exultant57283 ай бұрын
@@adailyfact bro asked 2 years later🤣🤣
@adailyfact3 ай бұрын
@@exultant5728 just curious haha
@adenlaszlo137411 ай бұрын
Zeeshan has explained this in 13 minutes better than my maths teachers had throughout the year, thank you!
@SophieB_068 ай бұрын
thank you so much for this I take further math and I have to finish my A level math exam in 1 year and this video really helped!!!
@someone-vk4op20 күн бұрын
THIS MAN IS A GENIUS
@antisocialbarbie1587 Жыл бұрын
Thank may Allah bless you
@olenamakarova8186 Жыл бұрын
this is a very good and detailed explanation thank you so much for the lesson
@umeraziz1533 Жыл бұрын
wallah i love this guy
@baburlu3 ай бұрын
selam, but if n is not a multiple of 3, cant it be 3k - 1 or 3k + 2? dont we need to do them all?
@ali_a18053 ай бұрын
salam, no because when you are doing proof by contradiction you only need to find one case where the original statement doesnt work so doing 3k+1 only is fine
@user-gj8io7ex9c3 ай бұрын
My teacher said u gotta do both cases cuz it comes under it not being a multiple of 3 and the textbook says that aswell@ali_a1805
@HonyaHikmatQadr4 ай бұрын
Ifn is an odd number then n^4 is also an odd number. Please answer that
@h-playz7223 Жыл бұрын
THATS WHY HE'S THE GOAAT
@nadineabusaleh94013 ай бұрын
i did not understand example 3) we said that n must not be multiple of 3 however we wrote it as n=3k+1 , as we can factorise it to n=3(k)+1 and it is a multiple of 3 ?
@ali_a18053 ай бұрын
3k+1 cant be a multiple of 3 as if you take a number (k) then x3 then add 1 it will never be a multiple of 3 as it is always 1 more than a multiple of 3
@nadineabusaleh94013 ай бұрын
@@ali_a1805 thank you i have got it now
@jeffs_r_us71663 ай бұрын
Uve proved that EVERY non multiple of three number squared will also not be a multiple of three, so theres no case where u can have a non multiple of three square to a multiple of three, so ur contradiction is wrong
@angeldioxide2 ай бұрын
@@jeffs_r_us7166 that's the point of the contradiction. It's supposed to highlight the fact that there's no case where you can have a non multiple of three square to a multiple of three, by stating that every non multiple of 3 will always ever square to a non multple of three
@tsunami_art5 ай бұрын
Thank you
@GP-eq3gh3 жыл бұрын
It’s coming home nnnnext yr
@zidaneakbar72093 жыл бұрын
Nah🇦🇷
@paulooverton1174 Жыл бұрын
@@zidaneakbar7209 fr
@isabella71312 жыл бұрын
thanksss
@rohitchudasama5431 Жыл бұрын
The goat🐐🐐🐐
@hoyama15202 жыл бұрын
thank you!!!
@Noku3326 ай бұрын
🔥
@phaustinemusimbi2026 Жыл бұрын
Wow
@benwebber45232 жыл бұрын
What if n squared was 3? Then n would be root 3 and therefore not a multiple of three?
@Wow-hr1gl2 жыл бұрын
root 3 is irrational in these questions they are integers