A Review of The Cambridge Audio CXA-81 Integrated Amplifier!

Built for unpretentious listening fun.
Intro music by: Snake City - 'The Thought of You'
Cambridge CXA-81 Product Page:
www.cambridgeaudio.com/usa/en...
--------------------------------------------
Speakers used in the Evaluation
Dynaudio Evoke 10
www.dynaudio.com/home-audio/e...
Triangle Trio
www.trianglehifi.com/en/produ...
Triangle BRO3
www.trianglehifi.com/en/produ...
ELAC DBR62
www.elac.com/series/debut-ref...
System Audio Legend SA-5
system-audio.com/product/sa-l...
Klipsch Heresy IV
www.klipsch.com/products/here...
Harbeth P3ESR
harbeth.co.uk/hifi-speaker/11...
Q-Acoustics 3030i
www.qacoustics.com/3030i-book...

[@markd4292]

Thank you for all your speaker pairing with integrated amps segments. Big help, and great advice. Stay safe and healthy.

[@DavidGonzalez-fh9zn]

I love my Cambridge cx81, it pairs with Dali Opticon mk2. I agree, the sound is warm, very pleasant to listen to music for hours. I recommend it.

[@benoitguilbault6339]

Nicely produced piece Sean! Loved the music clips and vanity shots. Well done sir.

[@wiebl5266]

Great review. The comparison section... wow... makes you top of your game! You know your stuff! Most of all, it gives the audience a clear "grading" of the amp you are reviewing. I'm battling with myself on whether I should a streamer and dac... the amount of money people spent on it to make sound good is insane! Love to hear your recommendations.

[@1mctous]

A lot of useful information here! You laid out the features, sound quality, and comparisons really well.

[@umbrollo]

I have the CXA81 I can’t recommend it enough. Solid. Just works , sound is great and keeps getting the better the more you use it.

[@parideguidi8032]

Un applauso alla cambridge!! Suono raffinato e dettagli medio alti ben presenti!!! 👏👏🥇🥇🏆🏆

[@kvrhifi]

Like i said many times. You let us know right expectations.

[@1antastik]

Dear Sean, I have purchased and been listening to the CXA81 for 2 weeks, based on your review and recommendations. I wanted to thank you for your take and I must say that I am experiencing most of what you described. You are a very good reviewer. You've made a man happy, sir!

[@aggonzalez8096]

Are you still enjoying your CXA1? I am considering getting it but am also considering the marantz pm8006 and even the Yamaha as801. I play music through streaming, CDs, and vinyl.

[@1antastik]

@@aggonzalez8096 Yes I am! I have been able to compare its DAC to a Chord Qutest and it can defend itself, even if it is not at the same level. I don't know the PM8006, but if you use digital sources, I can tell you the CXA81 is pretty good. Hope it helps

[@aggonzalez8096]

@John Bravo Nope I ended up getting the yamaha AS801. I mostly use CDs but also vinyl and the Yamaha seemed to fit my needs and I got an open box deal for a great price. It sounds great, maybe not quite as much punch as I imagine other amps might provide, but it sounds beautiful when listening to something pretty and gentle (acoustic folk, or some downtempo electronic) and overall everything sounds good. Very easy to listen to amp that I have going almost all day on the weekends or off work. The DAC in it sounds good with my CD transport, but streaming through it sucks. The streaming software loses connection to something (???) every ten minutes. Its pretty much unusable. So for streaming you would need another DAC. I know you are not asking about the Yamaha just providing additional info about my experience with the amp I went with. I am still so curious about the cambridge products and the "cambridge sound" and may still end up getting on the next spree haha.

[@utube321piotr]

since I like buying second hand, I am debating between the AXR100 for $420 and/or CX81 for $920, all units 18months or younger - any sensible advice?

[@1antastik]

@@utube321piotr I don't know the AXR but you could get that AND a decent external dac and you would still spend less than the CXA

[@trekjudas]

When listening to a review it's very important to listen or read the whole thing. Just don't skip to the part where they say thumbs up or thumbs down, you have to listen to what qualities the equipment has. Does it have qualities and a "flavor" that you find appealing?

[@RMASUPERFLY]

I have the AXR100 and truly enjoys it. You just convinced me to get the CXA81. Cheers!

[@1999zrx1100]

I ran one of these while I was shopping for a new Luxman. Had just sold a McIntosh MA6600 and using this to fill in for a few weeks. Speakers used were the Harbeth 30.1. Have to admit I was very impressed with most this had to offer. I had a phono preamp hooked up so I could run my turntable. The imaging was surprisingly good at this price point, the bass was deep and tight. The only thing I noticed was when you rolled off the volume the sound sort of went flat. But from about 9:00 or 10:00 on the dial she comes alive. The build quality is stellar. Overall for the $ especially on the used market this can’t be beat.

[@hbg70]

You need to continue like this Sean. You’re the best I know on yt

[@dougg1075]

Excellent review as always

[@mosfet500]

You do good reviews, thanks!

[@cruzingrsx4484]

Enjoyed your review sir like always. Enjoy the weekend bro. Peace

[@LanciaD50]

thank you; one of very few that tells how the stuff sounds...

[@amusikpoem1071]

Another great review, Sean...and a couple of helpful and informative comparisons at the end to boot! It's interesting that CA chose to tip up the treble with this unit, as traditionally their equipment carry more of a balanced sound...I own one of their phono preamps, and it has that traditional CA smooth and balanced sound.

[@ZeroFidelity]

Cheers!

[@martins.8472]

"It's interesting that CA chose to tip up the treble with this unit" - This is not surprising. Did you hear the CXA60 / 80? Trebles are a big issue for some speakers. They had to do something about it.

[@robk5745]

wow what a great review of a reasonably priced unit. Nice work man, I think this would pair well with my Wharfedale 12.3 towers

[@paulreal5698]

It should. My CXA61 sounds great with my Wharefedale 12.1’s.

[@cliffordcostley9798]

Thank you. You are a gentleman.

[@ulises3113]

Hello, thank you for your work. As you maybe noticed there are many forum about Cambridge cxa61/81 versus Audiolab 6000a. I had many ampligiets in the past and I find Audiolab 6000a impressive for its price. It's quality is incredible, options and so on. It is used with Tannoy revolution xt8f and xt6f. I cannot describe the sound I listened to. It would be interested to add audiolab 6000a to the comparison even if it is not in the same category. If you can , try audiolab and tannoy...

[@hi-fihaven2257]

Hey Sean! I really like the minimalist design of the front panel. I have had really good luck with my Cambridge Audio products. I think my DAC, and phono preamp are going on six years now. Nice rear panel layout, with plenty of inputs. I love the size of the toroidal transformer.

[@Doiche]

Great job !

[@victorpirsoul3979]

Really glad to see this review. I've been using the CXA60 for a few months now, with the Triangle Borea BR03 speakers, and I really enjoy this combination. While the CXA60 is the previous version, the guts are essentially the same (amp section) as the CXA61, the little brother of the CXA81. Thanks for your candid review, as always!

[@babupranav]

I tried the same combo with both the cxa60 and cxa80 but just couldn't get it to sound good, was thin and a little rough sounding. Tried with the internal dac and node 2i. I finally found bliss with the parasound 275v2 amp, another one of seans recommendations. Sounds much fuller/dynamic and smoother than the cxas. Didn't want to return the cxas since the refurbs are such good deals :(

[@Stevef2234]

@@babupranav Triangle Borea BR03 have these speakers as well. With the parasound 275v2 amp - what pre amp are you using? Looking for a good pair for my speakers.

[@deputy3690]

Great review as always. The comparisons of the components is priceless. I considered this Integrated amp but purchased the Cambridge AXR100 receiver about a week ago based on your review of that receiver because I was looking for more of that laid back sound rather than a brighter top end unit.

[@ZeroFidelity]

Give the AXR100 some time. Its not very impressive out the gate. But if all goes well, you'll notice that you end up listening to the music more than the gear.

[@andrzejz6980]

Great review, thanks 👍

[@trekjudas]

I recently just found out how amazing a 70s receiver can sound when paired with modern speakers!

[@4991544]

What receiver?

[@markd4292]

Kevin. I couldn't agree more. I just bought before this goofy pandemic, a vintage Mitsubishi DAA15DC dual mono block amp and DP 9 preamp. Man, the construction is Mmm NICE, and the sound, wow: Neutral and clean and muscle. I am waiting for stores to open to get speakers and am looking at either Klipsch Hersey IV, or JBL Studio 590's, or Fyne Audio speakers 503's: all horns, but I dig horns. If you ever get a chance to see the Fyne, check them out, there look great and outstanding reviews. Stay safe and healthy. Peace.

[@dougg1075]

Welcome

[@trekjudas]

@@4991544 I'm currently using a super low powered Sansui with my super-efficient Focal 806s. It sounds amazing!

[@trekjudas]

@Fat Rat In my experience modern speakers tend to outclass vintage ones. Vintage amps on the other hand just crush it!

[@donalddeorio2237]

Good review, Cambridge Audio has been making good quality products since Henry Kloss got it going. Enjoyable as always

[@donalddeorio2237]

Wrong about Henry Kloss, another company, after Advent and KLH

[@donalddeorio2237]

The reason for the confusion is Kloss cofounded Cambridge Sound works and manufactured speakers and table top radios. Anyone interested in the history of audio should look him up.

[@milesdufourny4813]

Wrong company. Cambridge Audio started out as a British manufacturer.

[@ralex3697]

Donald DeOrio Actually they have not, a lot of their prior units have been rather disappointing. This has finally brought them back into the game. Very respectable. I bought this amp all prepared to return it, but this amp truly is a keeper.

[@1moderntalking1]

I bought the best budget amp out there- AXA35 . Super smooth with power- at its price, very happy with it thank God!

[@majidnourollahi1567]

Thank you for your great and informative review. Which one do you find better? The Cambridge cxa 81 or the marantz pm 7000n? Mostly in sound not the features.

[@BJyelhsA]

Great review thanks. If the ESS DAC is so much better than the Wolfson I hope they upgrade the 851 series next and I'll be upgrading my 851n/w streamer and power amp

[@SuperLber]

Cambridge Audio is a real bargain. I bought two years ago a topaz am10 (last version) and a separate pre phono CP2 and they sound great. It has a two lm3886 ic power stage and it is pretty good. I bought it for 160 euro and the pre phono for the same price, all brand new and I love them.

[@pogothmcrey9463]

i plan on pairing this amp with the focal 826 and stream via bluesound node i2, listened to this set up and loved the presentation about it.. wish me luck :p

[@IheartIIDX619]

Man, it's like you are reading my mind. I'm about to pull the trigger on this amp and your review couldn't have come at a better time. Thanks buddy.

[@ralex3697]

Randi Jackson I purchased this amp and it is really impressive.

[@IheartIIDX619]

@@ralex3697 sweet i just pulled the trigger on it. It arrives on tuesday. Cheers.

[@rianredfield5252]

Nice info, since no tone controls, someone needs to make a review showing the Schiit loki introduced into the mix! Another fine vid.

[@jpenag]

Thank you very much for your videos! Really enjoy them. Since you’ve previously reviewed the Denon PMA800ne, do you think there is a big step up in sound quality between the cxa81 and 800ne? I just can’t decide which one to get as my first hifi amp ever! Due to lockdown I can’t audition them in store so I really find myself hand tied. Tks for any feedback you can give!

[@cschruu]

I was at my local Cambridge Dealer and I listened to both the CXA81 and the AXA35 (I was choosing between the AXR100D and the CXA61, but they were both not available for presentation). The CXA81 just sounded more effortless and a little bit more relaxed. Listening to „Leave“ by R.E.M., the AXA35 just wasn‘t able to present all the dynamics when the track got busy, but the 81 just kept on going. It also offered a much more defined Soundstage as the 35. In the End, I decided to buy the AXR100D because 450€ Price Difference (with the Solo Phono Stage added to the 61) is too big for me to justify right now. Nevertheless, I would’ve still bought the CXA61 if I already had better Speakers etc. I will definetly revisit the CX Series in a couple of years.

[@stijnvanderlooy5311]

Cambridge always Made good products. Had a lot of fun with their azure 851 streamer and power amp. And heared the edge combination a few times at shows. So much music for that kind of money... hard to find elsewhere

[@ralex3697]

Stijn Vanderlooy Very solid muscular amps, always very musical sounding.

[@deankim6687]

Great review

[@greymatterstome]

It's such a great time for electronics and how competitive the game has become. You can find quality at any price point. Cambridge still prices themselves slightly on the outside but I have heard this unit and I am glad you made a point of the latest DAC upgrade. It may be the singular item to help make it a top 3 or 4 in this price range when comparing with other units.

[@quazar912]

and...in the late 80s there weren`t quality at low price?

[@johanvergote7985]

Great amplifier. Connected to dynaudio excite x18, it sounds great. The best amp i have owned. Much better than Yamaha, nad, rotel. Only speaker connectors are too close for wiring, banana plugs are recommended.

[@gokhanersan8561]

What about tone controls?

[@johanvergote7985]

@@gokhanersan8561 i was also afraid to miss tone control, especially the bass knob. However with good speakers, tone control is not needed. Besides, tone control only induces distortion and speaker damage if you play too loud. Trust me, the amp plays perfect without tone control.

[@AverageNiceGuy]

Yep, turn her around and get serious. Well done 😎

[@hw1841]

Perfect Amp. I got IT together with aeromax and the CD player. Perfect match! So detailed. Like also the "simple" fronts. Added the streamer. Perfect setting

[@thomasandersen1784]

Hi. Cambridge makes gear that last for a very long time, in the best British traditionel way, as the likes of Audiolab & Exposure. Rock solid affordable products, were a natural sounding amp is the key, and they have all done a pretty good job doing so for decades. My first "audiophile" products back in the days, were the very first Audiolab 8000A saw the light. Since then iv'e owned several British amps, and has always loved the simplicity and kind of "no bullshit", and nothing happens behind the curtains here. As for the lack of phono stage inside this new unit, i guess they thought about their own affordable phono stages, for your choice to mix/match? The amp is looking great btw. Cheers from Denmark

[@newspooky]

Really love the way you review stuff. I own a Yamaha a-s501. Would it be possible for you to review the Yamaha R-N803 receiver? Just curious, how would to rate the sound signature of the Yamaha A-s series (warm, neutral) etc. Thanks.

[@Offshore-qg1zf]

Hi Sean ... great info as usual! I am struggling with a good match for Elac Vela BS 403s ... which are nominally 4 ohm with a sensitivity of only 86dB and notably more difficult to drive for the performance they deserve. Based on your comments, i think that this one is a miss. Any strong recommendation for an integrated suitable for pairing with a nice streamer? The NAD C388 Blue OS comes to mind, but i worry that it will be too "thin" for these fast/dynamic Elacs.

[@Diatonic5th]

Great review! As the owner of a CXA-80, I was surprised to hear that the treble is boosted on the CXA-81. The CXA-80 is a warm sounding amp that pairs well with bright speakers, like my LS50's. I would imagine that Cambridge changed the sound signature a bit to offset the decision to remove tone controls. The tone controls on my CXA-80 have come in handy with poorly recorded albums.

[@ralex3697]

Diatonic5th Quality amps should not have tone controls. Bad recordings are bad recordings, they should not be corrected with tone controls.

[@funkaholic1972]

@@ralex3697 Technically you are right, for the most pure audio path. Still I happen to disagree. There are bad recordings that still contain very good music, music that I want to listen to. If I can sweeten a bad recording with a littleEQ I will happily do so. If the recording is good, then I like to be able to bypass the tonal controls for a direct path.

[@gokhanersan8561]

All amps needs tone controls. Some recordings will definitely need tweaking. Manufacturers began removing them to make room for Bluetooth, usb, etc.

[@Uojomo]

@@funkaholic1972 Well said.

[@andrehb]

@@ralex3697 "Quality amps should not have tone controls." Tell that to Ken Ishiwata

[@clivepacker]

Great review. I’ve had the 81 for 3 months now, paired with PSB Alpha T20s and Emotiva ERC-4 CD player - using the balanced analog in on the 81. I love the wide and tall soundstage and the sense of presence of a live orchestra, being able to place instruments. The PSBs are a warm side of neutral so that probably makes them a good match for the detail of the 81. I had a Marantz PM6005 before and I would never have called that “muddy” but the 81 makes it seem like it was. It really works for me but I can see it may not for everyone.

[@ZeroFidelity]

Sounds like you're diggin it! Thanks for sharing.

[@saquibhussain6000]

Is the sound too forward, in your face?

[@clivepacker]

Saquib Hussain I don’t find it so. But the PSBs are a relaxed loudspeaker. A bright and forward speaker would not be a good match.

[@cmessi]

Is the treble harsh?

[@clivepacker]

The treble is detailed but I don’t find it harsh. Since I posted this I’ve upgraded to a pair of Monitor Audio Silver 500 7Gs which are detailed speakers but even so I don’t find it too forward. It’s not fatiguing to me like some setups can be.

[@mmdusa]

Superb review Sean. Would be awesome if they'd send you their top o' the line EDGE series. I have yet to see a review on those. (Except for the one done by a Russian guy, in Russian, that I don't speak). Thanks!

[@mwsaab9]

Great in depth review. Any thoughts on pairing it with wharfedale Evo 4.2 speakers?

[@CustomTele52RI]

One of the best audio component reviews I've seen. Helpful to experts (me) and beginners alike. THANK YOU !!

[@FelixtheMetalcat]

The prior version of this amp didn't have a phono stage either.....I bought the CXA80 (prior version) because having tone controls was something I still prefer. My amp sounds awesome as does this new version, great review.

[@AdamsBrew78]

Does the CXA80 have any bass management for integrating with subs? Just got the CXA81, q350s and an SVS sb-1000 sub… sounds great using the sub’s Lowpass filter but I feel like it would be even better if I could set crossover for the speakers.

[@FelixtheMetalcat]

@@AdamsBrew78 no there isn't any bass management on the CX80 to the best of my knowledge. If it does have that it may be listed in the manual section that I have not read, as I do not use any subwoofers in my setup.

[@cunningtim]

Thanks for another great review. Why don't more decent amps have two sets of speaker outputs like this Cambridge? I don't want to use two pairs of speakers at the same time, just switch between two sets, which I'm sure is a need a lot of audiophiles have.

[@snipervision1]

I would love for someone to review the outlaw audio rr2160mkII. Most liked the first version so I am very interested in the mark2. Great review!

[@oneiros1401]

I have Martin Logans Motion 40i paired with this amp - gorgeous sound. The only complaint about the amp is its remote - it's huge! And 90% of the buttons you won't use. They make the same remote for all of their products. Out of 48 buttons, (48!!) you'll use maybe 5. Plus the remote uses an odd number of batteries: 3, so you'll always have an extra battery laying around.

[@oneiros1401]

@Barefoot The pair, speakers and amp, are insanely loud. Honestly I haven't pushed it all the way yet, as it is very very loud. Probably did about 70-80% of the full volume and it gets to an unbearable point where the whole house is shaking. I was concerned with not enough bass, as the 40i, on paper, don't go as low as you would think, but I was mistaken, bass is sublime, I ended up not needed a separate sub. Internal dac works perfectly fine. One thing I would recommend is bi-wiring, this amp and these speakers are setup for that. One thing you will love about this setup is the highs, I personally do not like listening to vocals or any music with a lot of highs, that is until I got these speakers, the tweeter is a completely different design, it brings vocals and high notes to life, it literally feels like somebody is there in front of you singing or playing a guitar.

[@craigstephenmcdonald9915]

Good presentation

[@diegov.7741]

Hi! Great review! Would you please clarify what you mean by "dynamic output"?

[@mchazelover]

Great review, I think you described the sound signature well. I tried it with my Klipsch Rp 600m and it wasn’t for me but I can see why it is liked. A little too much detail/ treble for me I think

[@blakenewton2781]

That's why I am going with the Iota VX amp and later stack. I have Klipsch speakers and they are very we hat do they say... Tilted forward. And with the music I listen to, that's probably just too much

[@ProfoundProductions]

Interesting, vocals seemed too laid back on my Elac UniFi 2.0s, thought it might pair better with Klipsch.

[@errorsofmodernism9715]

The RP600 has a little too much treble with just about anything unless your listening to only vocals

[@mchazelover]

@@errorsofmodernism9715 yeah I agree I changed to a different speaker now 👍

[@janulik9535]

I have currently hoked up css torii on it and css has sparkly trable, they do not have it pronaunced as much as focal of course, but sparkly they are (as also mentioned in some reviews of css), and combination with cxa81 regarding trable is absolutly great. I love it. What I do not love that much is the wormth in midrange but I have to say I am also using r2r dac musician pegasus which can also "help" to make midrange a bit lush. Bass is strong and resolution dispite that wormth is also very good. So as I am using small server with external powersupply to stream the music I installed eq apo and cutted smoothly starting at about 500 Hz going down to 150 Hz (deepest place with about -2db) and on 50 Hz I am back on 0db. The sound is now realy good, to my ears. For rock music is just what I want, but I catch my self listening anything on that combo. Sounstage depth is there also and those are 350 bucks speakers. I am looking for speaker where I do not have to use this -2db atenuation, any recomandations very apreciated.

[@erikquinn707]

Hi, awesome review!! Question in regards to what speakers pair well with the Cambridge CXA-81. Will the Polk S55s speakers pair well with the CXA-81? Thank you

[@user-tf3xt2nk8p]

Good question, I'm wondering about that too.

[@skywallker1966]

Great review! Own pair of B&W DM603 1st edittion, in your opinion, will the Cambridge Audio CXA81 get the best of my speakers or should I consider different amp? All of it knowing my budget around 1000$ max, prefare streaming abilitys and consider replacing my old B&W's in the future?

[@georgeleehk]

Great review as always. Since you are reviewing British designed amps, it would be interesting to hear what you think about the Audiolab 6000A which was also highly rated by Whathifi in comparison to the Cambridge.

[@mrpositronia]

Yes, good shout!

[@petermartin6919]

I have the audiolab 6000a and the 6000 CDT and it sounds great, I would also be interested to hear a review of the 6000a. Great review as usual.

[@ulises3113]

Hie, thank you for the review Do not forget that cam ridge has bypass option , not iotovax

[@arsalansuleman2956]

Thank you for this informative review, I bought IOTAVX SA3 & PA3 stack on your recomendation and I paired it with KEF LS50, I must say I am very happy withi my system. A friend replaced his IOTAVX Stack with CXA81 and he said its sound better than his IOTAVX. I would love to hear from anyone who has IOTAVX Stack , is it worth replacing it with CXA81? Many thanks

[@magoo47]

Fan of your work Sean! Do you think this amp will be ok to drive Dynaudio Emit M20/Evoke 10/ Evoke 20?

[@luxanuba]

Hi! Thanks for the amazing review. I see in the description that you used the Elac’s debut reference 62 for the evaluation. Can you say if that was a good match? Is this the kind of speaker that might benefit from the liveliness of the cxa81? Thanks for your reply and the great work!

[@kevinbentley3790]

I received the CXA81 yesterday and connected four sets of speakers to it using a simple switching box. My first impression is that the amp is bringing out the best in all of them, including a pair that sounded harsh to the point of being unlistenable with every other amp I've tried with them. I fully expect this amp will make your Elacs sing.

[@strannostrannovasrr]

I always enjoy your reviews very much. But I wonder, did you ever review a Chario bookshelf speaker? For instance the Lynx Constalllation? There are hardly any reviews about this brand and yet they sound so good, at least in my opinion. How come?

[@saquibhussain6000]

Thank you for a great and detailed review! Follow-up based on your thoughts: Would you consider matching JBL Studio 590 with these, I feel based on your comments might be too bright, and second, what other amplifiers you reviewed would compare to the same soundstage and imaging while being laid back?

[@ZeroFidelity]

It should actually make for a groovy combo! Jury is out on how the top-end will work. Cant think of another amp at this exact price that'll match the 81 in terms of imaging.

[@saquibhussain6000]

@@ZeroFidelity You're a doctor for us audiophiles man. Thank you.

[@Gary_M]

I bet this amp and the Elac Debut Reference bookshelves would be a nice little system for $2Gs. Especially if you already had a subwoofer laying around.

[@SuperMatrix59]

You better have one cuz you will never be able to adjust any treble or bass if needed. If you like the pure only ok. Better get sub.

[@Dledwidge]

Great review! 👍🏻I’m trying to decide between this Amplifier and the Nad C-388. Which one would prefer out of these 2. Thanks

[@maccasnz3436]

Same dilemma here. I have had many NAD amps and hey are more neutral and warm. His comments about the high ends tend to define the main differences I think.

[@lancestu]

The CA AXR100 with the CA DACMagic 200m sounds excellent. I also use power filtration.

[@Peter-69]

CA CX amps indeed do PRAT. And they do drive 4 ohms speakers well within the reasonable dB level. My behemoth NAD 375BEE died on me and glad it died because I got CA CX60. Your review is spot on and I do believe you have real "Ears" to do the reviews. Thanks!

[@andreassouth1523]

The cx60 in comparison with cx61 and cx81 is more neutral sounding (more balance as an amp) and can play with many speakers.And does not offend your ears.But next generation cx61-cx81 has agressive top end (listening fatigue).

[@simianinc]

Every review I've seem for this on KZbin interprets the characteristic differently. I've seen it described as warm and cool, as having a large and a shallow soundstage, that it's dynamic and that it's laid back. I've also seen reviews that you should bring your own DAC, or as you say, the inbuilt DAC is fine.

[@raymoore8435]

I agree with you on that. A salesperson told me it was on the cooler side of neutral. Mixed reviews for sure.

[@sdemosi]

I use this with the CXN V2 and I find it a warm but clear amp. I find the sound stage to be excellent, wide and deep enough for me. The articulation is impressive. I've heard it with Tannoy's XTF8s, Fyne Audio 500s and DALI Opticon 8s. It works best at 90dB /W at 1m sensitivity. I'm also thinking it would kick ass with Canton Vento floorstanders so that's my late spring /early summer experiment. I've seen some great deals on the CA CX set of the CXC CD transport, CXN V2 streamer & CXA81 integrated amp. This is a hugely versatile setup. Find the right speaker for your tastes and you'll have an extremely well built and matched system that will make you want to relisten to your favourite music for the joy of discovering nuances.

[@simianinc]

@@sdemosi Thanks, I actually purchased the amp. I’m using the Bluesound node 2i as a source, and the CXC on order. It works well with the Kef LS50s, which was my main reason for interest.

[@Xavman54]

@@simianinc Hi, So u got CXA81 with KEF LS50 (NOT the Meta), correct ? how does it sound ? do u play low/medium/high volume ? thanx for your answer if u have time.

[@simianinc]

@@Xavman54 I enjoy the sound on the original LS50s. When there's no one else around, I tend to like playing around 75-80dB, which in my room is about 10 o'clock on the dial (so about a third). I have added a sub-woofer, as the Kefs don't give a deep enough bass for my taste - thankfully, the CXA81 has a subwoofer out

[@jonclassical5710]

Hi..glad you mentioned NOT pairing with my Monitor Audio Gold GS 20's, I was really going to buy the 81....so give me some recommendations!

[@hammalammadingdong6244]

Thanks for another great review, Sean. I’d love to see your take on the Primaluna Evo series, particularly the preamps and integrateds. Cheers!!

[@crneuman]

Totally the opposite as to what Andrew Robinson said of the CXA81. He said if you have speakers that are already "bright", the CXA81 will be a great fit because of its laid back, warmer sound. I have no idea who to believe and really don't want to spend $1,300 to find out myself.

[@ZeitdiebX]

Simple answer. Believe this guy. Forget Robinson.

[@spokplumpen123]

​@@ZeitdiebXhaha. Cant stand Robinson either..

[@allwayzactive4599]

If you have many different speakers than you can test for your self I would take my set up to richer sounds and have a listen and I was impressed with the new Cambridge gear ......it's all about taste and if your speakers pair well other wise just save up and my a mac

[@ZeitdiebX]

@@allwayzactive4599There are so many factors to consider when it comes to great sound. Gear, room acoustics, interconnects, speaker placement. I tested my CXA 81 with three sets of speakers. An older ELAC model, very dynamic and on the brighter side of things at higher volume levels, my big floor standing speakers Magnat Signature 707 and Wharfedale Evo 4.2. the typical Cambridge sound with the slightly rounded treble and the very roomy, wide mids comes through on all of them. Very involving sound. Alive. Not flat and more on the analytical side of things like most B&W or KEF. I wouldn’t pair the 81 with Focal, though. That could be a bit too bright. But most speakers work great.

[@umbrollo]

It’s a slight warm sound. Solid bass. Drives hard and solid. High quality build

[@Iuglus]

it's a pity this thing doesn't come with a pwr amp input to use it just as a pwr amp for frontals in an hybrid home theater configuration.. I went with an audiolab 6000a because of this feature and I'm extremely happy with it, but I was really tempted by this cxa81 in the beginning, and if it had that feature it was going to be my choice for sure!!

[@usetheforkluke827]

Hi great review (as always)! In the description you have written you have tested the amp with Klipsches Heresy IV. I am waiting now for the shipment of my Klipsches (should be on Tuesday here :) ) and looking for an amp for them within this price range. CXA 81 is on my list, but from what you said there is a possibility that for those speakers it might be to bright? How did you find CXA paired with Heresys?

[@eliasdimakis8155]

Thanks Sean! Do you believe that the 81 would be a good match for the Boreas? Got the BR08 recently as my first audio gear and see the CX series as a potential next step. Judging from my temporary setup in my living room, I enjoy them being full sounding and engaging, and would say that they need something to bring clarity in the mid-range and control over the ample bass that comes with them. Further, is there any chance that the cxa81 would be a little too bright when combined with the Bros' top end?

[@lucianvictorgudiu8926]

Have you found anything ? I got the borea 02 and want to buy the cxa61 , I dont know how they pair

[@eliasdimakis8155]

@@lucianvictorgudiu8926 Unfortunately not yet. I would be leaning towards the CXA61 or the Audiolab 6000A, but local distributors are negative to the idea of home equipment trials, thus we can just wait for the pandemic to fade out or buy on our own risk.

[@panosevaggelatos3004]

Thank you so much for the review! I am considering the amp... question: how would it perform with a pair of KEF R3 Meta or LS50 Meta?.

[@keithbertschin1213]

I’m sure Cambridge would send you the Edge A integrated, would love to hear one of you rock star reviewers do that piece. Thanks

[@BunnyslippersEUC]

Hey Sean...you want to review Dutch gear. You should listen to the True-Blue Box cobalt DA from the Netherlands. A class D integrated with dac and phono input. It looks very handsome and the front panel can be different styles etc. It also sounds great. 2x120 Watt in 4 Ohm / 2x100 Watt in 8 Ohm

[@tee-jaythestereo-bargainph2120]

Nice review Sean , I have seen alot of great comments on cambridge audio here lately , i been eyeballing their CXCv2 cd transport only no built in dac , I like that idea less is more And yes I still love my CDs/SACD/HDCD, Streaming is convenient and yes i stream also ,but spining the silver disk is my number 1 go to for sound quality playback 😆

[@jangwook__lee]

Hi. A great review. Do you think will it match well with Totem Model 1 signature speakers? I don't know how to read the specs, but heard that they are not so easy to drive. It is currently matched with Rogue Cronus Magnum tube int amp, but I feel like I need more bass. I am currently using CXN V2 as a source. I would appreciate your opinion. Thanks!

[@dennisheadley4408]

Anxiously waiting for your Yamaha review on the updated product.

[@ZeroFidelity]

haha Nothings landed yet!

[@dougg1075]

Man me too.

[@jonathanmarrero9709]

PLEASE URGENT!!!! SHAWN YOU HAVE TO REVIEW THE Anthem STR integrated ASAP

[@edshipe2555]

Thanks Sean for the detailed review. I was thinking of pairing the CXA81 with the Buchardt S400 but appreciate the warning on the bass issue. So maybe Ill go America made with a Schiit stack. Peamp Saga +, Dac and Vidar amp. The Vidar should have more than adequate control over the s400 bass driver. Thank Again!

[@ZeroFidelity]

The Dayens Menuetto would be a far better match than the Saga+Vidar combo. Plus, it'll save you just. bit of money. :).

[@edshipe2555]

@@ZeroFidelity Thanks again never heard of it. Will check it out for sure. Ha have a nice weekend!

[@erikquinn707]

Hi Sean, do you think the Polk S55 speakers will pair well with the Cambridge CXA81, is there enough power in the CXA81 to power the Polks? Any knowledge on the Rotel RA-1592, if do you recommend this Rotel for excellent audio? Is the Rotel worth the extra expense? Thanks again for all the great reviews

[@maxrider2887]

Sir Please suggest me the best . Recently i used Denon x1600h avr its sound too good ,i like the soft sound of denon but a huge lack of bass play to upgrade with stereo Denon pma800ne vs Cambridge audio cxa61?

[@scottvolkman5034]

I just got a pair of Polk 703s at a price I couldn’t pass on. (Not a big Polk fan). Was thinking about the Cambridge 81 but now wondering if I should go with the Iotv stack instead.

[@stephenbosze2207]

Great review sean, thank you. I've been looking at integrateds between $1-3k and have been struggling to narrow down my selection. It's now between the Rotel RA-1592 MKII and the Cambridge. This review swings me towards the Cambridge as I'm really looking for a swiss army knife, but also something I can enjoy listening to.

[@petethegreekre]

Wow, everyone's hungry for what amp pairs well with what speaker! I wonder why that isn't a thing on these platforms?

[@evil_twit]

Because people serious about audio don't subscribe to snake oil crap. Him talking about the massive soundstage makes me think CA are doing DSP shenanigans.

[@iiiiii1449]

Very diplomatic review. I had the CXA-80 for some time and it was bright AF. The amazing sound stage and imaging you mention sounds like a mess in the wrong room.

[@20puskinas1992]

You used usb as a source from Cambridge's internal dac?

[@iiiiii1449]

@@20puskinas1992 The usb dac is very good quality if you like how the amp sounds.

[@20puskinas1992]

@@iiiiii1449 no way it goona sound good. It might be servicable, but if youre judging amp based on internal dac then youre kinda stupid. These dacs built in is just dogshit quality that will hold amp back and introduce harshness.

[@alanip4577]

How does it compare with the more expensive 851A? I plan to use it to run the Buchardt S400. Which would be a better choice? If not these two could you suggest any alternatives? (Up to USD2000) Thanks!

[@erikquinn707]

Love your reviews, and another great review here. I've been seriously considering the Cambridge Integrated CXA-81 as it has the features and sound I'll seem to like. What's your thoughts on the NAD C388 integrated amp compared to the CXA-81? The NAD is more expensive at $1750 and it's a Class D hybrid amp compared to the CXA-81 class A/B amp at $1300. The NAD and Cambridge have similar features otherwise and torn between the two. I'll be pairing with the Polk S55. You probably remember me from your recent live Q&Q music gear discussion. Would love for you to review the NAD C388, or at least hear your opinion between these two. Thanks again!

[@ZeroFidelity]

Havent heard the C388, nor will I be reviewing it anytime soon, so I have absolutely nada to tell ya. Hopefully somebody will provide some insight for you.

[@erikquinn707]

Thank you. If anyone here has experience with the NAD C388 integrated amp please let me know as I'm torn between the Cambridge CXA-81 and NAD C388, probably leaning towards the NAD.

[@erikquinn707]

What integrated amplifier would you recommend where sound quality is great but also has bluetooth with tone controls for a budget between $2K-3K. Mostly will use it to listen to vinyl thru my vintage Optonica turntable but like to have bluetooth or streaming to use on occasion. Thank you.

[@CarlosPerez-eb5er]

I replaced my NAD C388 with the CX81 and couldn’t be happier. The A/B amp is more “alive” than the class D in the NAD. The dac in the the CX 81 impressive, over the the Nodi 2i dac. I disagree with Sean regarding speaker choice. Running Monitor Silver 500, no high end issues. Don’t miss tone controls. But would like balance control. Thanks Sean

[@alvingovindan6339]

Carlos Perez I’m running the Monitor Audio Silver 500 with the CXA60... I don’t find it bright either. It’s sounds neutral. I’m thinking about upgrading to the CXA81... feel the 60 is lacking some power to drive the MAs at higher volumes. Would be great if you can share your experience with your combo and if you feel the need to upgrade the amp? Also, are you using a CXN? I’m on Apple Music connected to mp3 input when I’m not listening to vinyl. Vinyl sounds incredible!!

[@jg2679]

Thank you for the review. - Does it have Theater bypass?

[@udyb]

Have you considered testing rega components, Sean? Rega elex-r would be a competitor to this Cambridge, I think.

[@andddlay]

Excellent review, thank you! Subbed. Have you had the opportunity to listen to the CXA61? There Master Switch found it to be more fun, so I'm curious on your thoughts if there extra $300 is worth it. I've got a pair of Salk BeATs which are easy to drive and neutral to warm so I think the CXA81 or 61 would be an excellent match.

[@ZeroFidelity]

Thanks. Nope, haven't heard the 61. I too read the same thing that you did. Not sure if the chance will come along, but if it does, I'll comment on it.

[@ecyfoto]

andddlay I have the older CXA60 pushing a pair of ZUs. Sweet little amp and it has tone and balance controls that I use every now and then to adjust some crap LPs. Was a deal breaker for me. Used are available for about $500.

[@mrpositronia]

@@ecyfoto yeah. I have the 60. All the characteristics seem to pair up. Cambridge have found a working sound and ran with it. For the CX range, anyway. 😁

[@ricktyler6710]

How do you think this unit would work with Totem Model 1 Signatures. This is a well done review. Thank you.

[@ardatalu2474]

Could you elaborate a bit more on the s400's pairing with this amp? Do you think it would be a valid observation with the prior gen cxa80 as well? Thanks.

[@malcolmnongkynrih1]

love the review ... i have a Yamaha RN602 ... do u think this would be a better choice

[@maxrider2887]

No 👎 Yamaha r n602 sound quality no good as my denon avr x1600h.

[@kotowski525]

Thanks Zero, saw this was posted the second I was searching for this amp. How do you think this would compare to the CXA80?

[@ZeroFidelity]

No worries. I couldn't tell you how it compares. I never had the CXA80. From what I've read, the 81 uses the same circuit. Only with better op amps, caps, and some other parts. You'll likely need to do some more digging to satisfy that question.

[@kotowski525]

​@@ZeroFidelity Thanks for the response!

[@pc166829]

@@kotowski525 I have had the 80 and now have the81. 80 was very good indeed but the 81 is so much better.

[@cupavivuk2704]

@khory kotowski the previous model had a Wolfson DAC and it didn't have built in bluetooth aptx. I assume that the digital components on the CX81 are better.

[@j-rod6420]

At least there's a volume marker now.I had to add one to my cx80.This can be very shocking when you turn it on after a part night.