So beautiful, I want to play modern warships again :
@sarancha_yt2 жыл бұрын
Точно
@keptspace46942 жыл бұрын
Yes
@lindapowell1173 жыл бұрын
Jim Powell speaking. This is truly amazing. As a Navy vet who served in a fighter squadron on the USS Ranger in the late 60’s, we had nothing on that carrier like they have today. When you have an investment of billions of dollars, for just one carrier, and that does not include all the aircraft, you must protect it. Great to see the innovation and commitment of the Navy.
@garypadilla44083 жыл бұрын
I AGREE GARY A PADILLA USS RANGER UNDER THEN PRESIDENT BUSH SENIOR CREATOR OF SG1 STARGATE TO JIM POWELL AWSOME FOR THE NAVY!
@dustinmurphy55572 жыл бұрын
This is a video game
@seadragonyt53912 жыл бұрын
Uh oh.
@laff__88212 жыл бұрын
@James Libby it's still simulated as precise as possible
@randalcook3252 жыл бұрын
I agree with Mr. Powell. The navy would not spend the money on these massive war machines if they were not able to successfully able to defend them and the naval personnel that man's them. God Bless the United States and our Armed Forces.
@scoshyg51332 жыл бұрын
I could watch this forever lol I just love it.
@soppo012 жыл бұрын
ありがとうございます!
@Keatoil2 жыл бұрын
This is actually a good way to waste the enemies C-RAM bullets so that the jet fighters have a better chance at attacking
@Brutalchaos22 жыл бұрын
C-RAMS (Counter rocket, artillery, and mortar) aren't used to take down jets, they would use SM type missiles.
@Keatoil2 жыл бұрын
@@Brutalchaos2 ik this is just a game lol
@bryantbishop83522 жыл бұрын
I literally thought this was real for a minute until i noticed that shading was off for clouds showing "depth" and the smoke from destroyed aircraft.....i sure hope you are either independently building PC wartime simulation games or are working with members of game manufacturers in the likes of DCS and Vtol, outstanding job!!!
@tommybestonso65092 жыл бұрын
Imagine if you took out all existing coms to a major fleet/vessels & then convinced the country/commanders with high-tech grafix that they experienced catastrophic loss of assets in battle with great video of their best assets destroyed & helpless long enough to promt a successful surrender before they realize they had not realized they hadn't lost most their fleet & were watching a damn good movie... what's that old saying warriors win battles, logistics win wars ! What would a commander do that believes he has nothing left to command ?
@ayelehabte67872 жыл бұрын
all are technology and contemporary weapons knowing easy ways this is amazing for us.
@manueltubens535 Жыл бұрын
Hell of a light show performance from our military.
@TomeSouza-dk7xj11 ай бұрын
military (Hell of a light show performance from our versalsour ats wordy que lovas biode youns mode con't odo evexeandado ekos angour hiogs tos poor not my tems is song os wdoly Just juss zisa 5:00
@alexanderschwarm77552 жыл бұрын
Your channel is always a joy to watch
@drew65sep2 жыл бұрын
You got a LOT more improvement that has to made to become video game puppet master.
@yourlocalfusionwolfАй бұрын
I like how you can't hear or (In my case being semi-blind) see the missiles. Like it's just like an average calm evening.. Nice relaxing view.. Man it sure is nice ou- *VRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT*
@rubberslugs34542 жыл бұрын
Been looking everywhere, how do you get the Cram to shoot red tracers I stead of the vanilla white Tracers?
@n.r.22582 жыл бұрын
one simple Poseidon takes care of the whole fleet. These high speed guns are toys for video games.
@caydenmongolo401 Жыл бұрын
10 minutes of pure American freedom
@silverlining68243 жыл бұрын
China has adopted the doctrine of saturation attack: not one cruise missile or suicide drone at a time, but 80 or 200 -- because they are cheap while the target value is high.
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
And what you think US battle groups will not be saturating the battle space? Those C-Ram systems saturate volume space they are not a direct hit fire line.
@pittizitongo17732 жыл бұрын
Ist that Combat Action,or Tests ? Are the aircrafts flight by real pilots ? Amazing firepower sweet Video thanks
@Lerxn Жыл бұрын
No sir that is a simulation on a game
@ericclausen6772 Жыл бұрын
Add lasers and then you will have a total defense systems
@TwoWheels473 жыл бұрын
Is this real or computer generated? Doesn't look real at all. I'm sure they're capable of it, no doubt there.
@pid__52343 жыл бұрын
I think it's made in a simulatior, but i may be wrong.
@Charly2142 жыл бұрын
But the C-RAM is real
@sathishd84532 жыл бұрын
Yes bro
@joseandres51852 жыл бұрын
El motor de un fuera Borda ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🛫🛫🛬🛬
@ABH3DAD2 жыл бұрын
we never had that many cwis on the nimitz , now and days they have nato sea sparrow missile system ... CWIS is ship based and CRAM is land based.. EXCELLENT SIMULATOR THOUGH
@LagrangePoint9012 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many incoming missiles would it take to overwhelm these phalanx systems. The simulation basically showed concentrated fire on one missle at a time.
@scoshyg51332 жыл бұрын
They were literally firing at multiple missiles and aircraft at the same time. What a video where are you watching?
@emptyforrest Жыл бұрын
wouldnt take many anti ship missiles to saturate the phalanx system.
@saskoilic3 жыл бұрын
Wow Amazing :)
@alexblinoff52413 жыл бұрын
Ещё ни кто не погиб на симуляторе...
@rockstargaming9512 жыл бұрын
@@alexblinoff5241 🙂
@billsee4763 жыл бұрын
i see the ships bridge has a nice flashing light at the top of the mast, a nice aiming point? lol
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
If the enemy can see that light they are in serious trouble.
@edivan2412 жыл бұрын
Isso aí é pareo pra mísseis hipersonicos?
@风云-z3d3 жыл бұрын
If laser defense system can work,it will crush incoming attacks almost 100%。
@Not-TheOne3 жыл бұрын
yeah, if you could have them up 24/7 with with enough power and enough cooling, it'll be amazing. With enough power you could take down almost anything. Never need any kinetic or chemical weapons (as in explosive), except for very far off targets like long range attack planes, as lasers wont be effective on very long range due to crap like dust in the air bringing down the power. Railguns would also be great, but not guided at long range, though, I've always wondered if, say, you launch a projectile via a railgun and then the last few kilometers, have a small rocket or electrically moved fins to guide it for fine movement.
@qtamnguyen2 жыл бұрын
We will make submerged laser ∆∆
@sagartech46222 жыл бұрын
Laser defence system only have India
@salmeza852 жыл бұрын
What if you send...200 planes.
@МихаилКоровин-ю8ч2 жыл бұрын
Забавное заблуждение.
@ABH3DAD2 жыл бұрын
As i remember we only had 1 cwis and that was portside aft of cat 3 & 4
@walterrichards43623 жыл бұрын
The defensive firepower on an aircraft carrier is awesome but how long can this coverage be sustained in the event of a concentrated multi-pronged attack? And what are the defenses against underwater threats..mines, torpedoes etc?
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
US battleships are part of groups. So that means the US right now can form about 11 such battle groups with each group able to put over 100 aircraft in the air. Think of how large those ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry and unleash. Each Carrier group will have its own battle squadron that on its own would be impossible to take down never mind a carrier being present. In WW3 the US will have about 1000 carriers active.
@puny-tinsucks51022 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 the US navy has like 12 carriers, let's not get carried away here....lol
@fgm11972 жыл бұрын
A carrier is never alone
@_samtakoi_2 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 ну они величие свое на дне будут показывать после одной ракеты кинжал, запущенной с расстояния на котором авианосец даже об этом не узнает)
@_samtakoi_2 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 100 самолетов 800 вертолетов 4 звездолета и это только на одном звездатом авианосце, а да еще шубы норковые три и два видемагнитофона))) Эпоха авианосцев уже похоронена, их можно потопить с российской базы на американской базе, даже выплыть не успеет)))
@Chelon2 жыл бұрын
Consulta cuantos peces mueren en estos sistemas de defensas?
@reyeskali35292 жыл бұрын
Te preocupas más por los peces que por los seres humanos que cosas no ?
@edgarramirez32832 жыл бұрын
Si podemos decirle señor al ese psicópata no le importa nadie, sino el poder y nadie se atreve a eliminarlo, sería lo mas justo ya que no ha tenido compasión con civiles, mujeres, niños etc.
@kevinstory8722 жыл бұрын
why do they look inefficient? is it because i am unfamiliar with the difficulty of shooting down something like that?
@juvenerantoniorebolledoang40942 жыл бұрын
Esto es real o ficción ?
@elidodiaz91512 жыл бұрын
Están bonitos los muñequitos esos
@CUCARACHA7072 жыл бұрын
Buena SIMULACION... JEJEJEJEJE DEBEN INCLUIRLA EN CALL OF DUTTY
@eduardotrucillo68253 жыл бұрын
El piloto de un avión de combate dispara un misil desde unos 10 km y no tiene necesidad de acercar a la defensa aérea.
@amaurimartinez59002 жыл бұрын
Si y te recuerdo también q este barco lleva a bordo un escuadrón FA18 y uno F35 q avioncito se podrá pegar a 10 km de este portaaviones jjjjjjjjjjjjj
@gerardoa.uzcategui.89372 жыл бұрын
Igualmente es neutralizado 😄
@justiciero352 жыл бұрын
Estos aparatos modernos alcanzan 30 kilómetros
@RicardoHernandez-ez8xw2 жыл бұрын
De que país es este armamento, deben especificar.
@walteramayaolave8292 жыл бұрын
Video game🤣🤣🤣
@gerardoa.uzcategui.89372 жыл бұрын
Jajajaja 😄
@justiciero352 жыл бұрын
De EE UU el patrón del planeta
@Hellmiko7022 жыл бұрын
That's the sea Ram Gatling gun in action but that's like four or five maybe six of them
@lefty_rae2 жыл бұрын
is it animated?
@SKumar-rb1tz2 жыл бұрын
India should adopt this technology.
@yanuEPro2 жыл бұрын
Kenapa kita tidak mengunakan kecerdasan kita untuk perDAMAIan di Bumi ini???
@donnelson81213 жыл бұрын
If you sank a US carrier the next thing you would see is a stealth bomber
@Madmok1283 жыл бұрын
Next to impossible
@Sandhill19883 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't see it... that's the point.
@stevemclennan24592 жыл бұрын
Watch it several times then you will realise it’s cgi at its finest. When the aircraft explode then plummet to the ground or sea why does the smoke trail follow them
@Circle_Sphere2 жыл бұрын
Duh it says "simulation"
@stevemclennan24592 жыл бұрын
Duh. It does now it didn’t when I first watched it.
@yancysummer84672 жыл бұрын
Its a video game bro
@josephheuneman56132 жыл бұрын
Now I call that a buzzsaw
@chrisfoerster32582 жыл бұрын
Whoever hears a voice should treat it as a servant.
@TomeSouza-dk7xj Жыл бұрын
Zone 3000 Chizuru Vera wordy qual por to nor mp
@Bill-xx2yh2 жыл бұрын
Needs the NEW LAZERS.
@finzy49663 жыл бұрын
What type of aircraft carrier
@SussyAhhskibididude202 жыл бұрын
nimitz or gerald ford
@tkirby Жыл бұрын
Why does a radar guided gun need tracers?
@pascalkonobly7702 жыл бұрын
système anti-missile de quel pays?
@alishabani92832 жыл бұрын
درودبرشما خیلی هم ممنون از زحمات عجب ناو هواپیمابر وحشت ناکی😱
@clay61452 жыл бұрын
That's at Liberty Bell it rings loud don't miss
@carlosunoyaay57762 жыл бұрын
Se observa defensa para vuelo rasante tbn. Queda la opción sumergido rasante.
@jimaldridge42842 жыл бұрын
Nice video game
@muhammaddahlan830 Жыл бұрын
Baru di lapis kembali dari depan : 1. Di depan Sumba atau Sumba besar 2. Di depan sabu atau sawu 3. Di depan Rote atau roti 4. Di depan tsemau 5. Di depan TENAU ATAU KUOANG DI LEDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL PETI KEMAS, DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL KARGO, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL PELNI, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL TENKER, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL BATU BARA, DIELDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL SELAM DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL CURAH 6. DI DEOAN ATAPUPU SAMA SDA 7. DI DWOAN DILLI 8. DIDEOAN SEREWARU 9. DIDEOAN KAKABAHI 10. DIDEOAN PURA 11.DIDWOAN TEREWENG 12. DIDEOAN MARGETHA.13. DIDEOAN LEWOLEBA. 13. DIDEOAN ADINARA 14. DIDEOAN KARANTUKA FLORES TIMUR 15. DIKEMBALIKAN DIDEOAN KUPANG 🕋🕋🕋🕍🕍🕍🕋🕋🕋🕌🕌🕌🕋🕋🕋🏰🏰🏰🕋🕋🕋👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@edicaballerotorres3312 жыл бұрын
Que cantidad de armamento .de misiles y munisiones tiene un portaaviones tiene y que tiempo puede defenderse de ataques aereos y de misiles enemigos
@pedroarzola16402 жыл бұрын
Los misiles hipersónicos que Rusia tiene pueden alcanzar velocidades hasta de veces la velocida del sonido
@jorgeserrano22402 жыл бұрын
Los aviones de quinta y sexta generación vuelan a tres y cuatro veces la velocidad del sonido según fuentes especializadas.
@gerardoa.uzcategui.89372 жыл бұрын
Adónde leíste esa propaganda?🤔
@manuterae93772 жыл бұрын
Hijo! Con la Mary Jane. Ves pasar todo rápido!
@fernandoboggiano44082 жыл бұрын
Estados Unidos tiene misiles que viajan hasta 9 veces la velocidad del sonido.
@eybicavi45352 жыл бұрын
Cuando quieras disparar a un misil hipersónico ya va estar destruido todo el barco
@timurcakir59452 жыл бұрын
They live in a very dreamy world. They're going to attack from all those targets, and that aircraft carrier is going to survive😄
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
US Aircraft carriers are extremely tough and would require massive missiles to actually hit them. In a real battle it would take constant hits from artillery that is by the way far more effective than a missile to take down those carriers. Here is the thing that most people do not realize is that carriers in a war would be part of a group and if a major world war was to break out the US would have a thousand of them active.
@KannanKannan-xw9jj2 жыл бұрын
ஈஎ
@carlospalacios31152 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69¿ me entero! q estados unidos tienen mil portaaviones y q el fuego de artillería es mas efectiva q los misiles, mínimo vives bajo una piedra para hacer semejante comparación de fuego y precisión o eres estupido ya q todavia no e visto ninguna artillería con mas poder destructivo y precisión q el de un misil hipersónico con capacidad nuclear o un misil telmo bárico o misiles nucleares normales pero bueno segun tu logica los misiles no sirven contra un portaaviones por q me imagino q cuando le lanzen un ataque a esos portaaviones les lanzaran misiles relleno de flores y misiles de juguetes porq la única potencia con armas de verdad es estados unidos entonces y los demas paises son simples moscas en comparación a estados unidos q tiene según tu miles de de estos grupos de portaaviones jajajajajajajajaja a y respecto a si se llega a desatar una nueva guerra mundial de poco le servirá a estados unidos si tiene 11 portaaviones en servicio 66 de echo es el numero máximo q a construido estados unidos de los cuales muchos de ellos ya están inservibles o descontinuados y de esos 66 solo 11 están operativo y activos hoy en dia asi q no se de donde sacaste q estados unidos tiene mil portaaviones activos en espera de la próxima guerra mundial a otra cosa países potencia como rusia y china tienen en su arsenal misiles hipersónicos con capacidad nuclear capaces de destruir portaaviones enteros incluso muchos de los navíos escoltas de dicho portaaviones resultarian destruidos y muchos otros con daños irreparables sin hablar de la total perdida de las vidas humanas q serán carbonizadas al instante y los q no morirán por radiación y todo ese daño tan solo con un misil hipersónico con ojivas nucleares.!
@elpampeano48572 жыл бұрын
¡¡¡ faaa, loco !!! Buenísimo éste video juego. ¿ dónde lo consigo?
@jesseflynn12592 жыл бұрын
DAMN !!! I want a gun like that !!!!!
@michelbilly92213 жыл бұрын
Good job america
@juniorleslie48043 жыл бұрын
Hope that works in missile saturation attacks, which the fleet is likely to face in a war in the Pacific ocean.
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
Battleships in a war will not be on their own they will be part of battle groups and they will have aircraft in the air as well. And the volume that they will unleash will be far greater than the video game shows. Those C-Rams are not a single line of fire they fill up the volume of space with explosive rounds. Those tracers you are see are one in every ten rounds.
@juniorleslie48042 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 Yes I know tracers are one in ten rounds. But even with a 4500 per minute rate of fire for the C-RAMs?; will it be enough, to prevent saturation attacks from overwhelming the point defenses of the CIWS?
@Commander-Rem2 жыл бұрын
I hope the c ram can run day and night 24/7 continuously.
@bighands692 жыл бұрын
US battle groups are capable of remaining in battle for long periods of time. Think of how large the ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry.
@ringofasho77212 жыл бұрын
That's some double redundancy there
@lucioaugustodesouza77802 жыл бұрын
This game it's realy Nice.
@azimuth3612 жыл бұрын
It's kinda pretty.
@Mr2pint3 жыл бұрын
This is incredible, goes to show how advanced American air defence systems are - when did this take place? fantastic footage, all I have to say is 'back to the drawing board Russia 🤣
@frankgiustiniani14633 жыл бұрын
It's a video game this never happened , if it were a real time fight the Russians would have used the mach 9 missiles' to sink the Navy ships which are fast becoming a serious target as the Russians have unstoppable weapons now , this video is to get Americans hyped up as we are nearing WW3 starting with Russia , the video is pretty cool looking though ?
@maoyang87393 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. Take it to Ukraine and Taiwan.
@Jaywiz9193 жыл бұрын
@@frankgiustiniani1463 mach 9 anti ship missile won't work when the carrier is in motion 😂😂😂
@salsahunger2 жыл бұрын
@@Jaywiz919 That's fair about the old russian missile Kinjal. But the new missile works when carrier is in motion. So there is nothing funny
@rickpierre52962 жыл бұрын
@@salsahunger come on man , do you seriously think America don't have hypersonic missiles? I remember 30 years ago when it was America who woke the world up about Hypersonic, I have seen videos of hypersonic missiles in the Korean war. What America is interested in is stopping the hypersonic as they are doing here, and if you haven't been keeping up, they have great progress in the past 10 years.
@pjwarez2 жыл бұрын
What game is this???
@ИванМихалёв-б3н2 жыл бұрын
Где же такие бои происходили??? 🤣🤣🤣 Хороший мультик🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍
@davidlarondelle23263 жыл бұрын
We have a dead mall in Bradenton FL
@mariomendoza78852 жыл бұрын
Genial los saludo yo el facha dj pitty mendoza
@patrickstamm95542 жыл бұрын
How do we get all that lead out of the seas so it doesn’t poison the fish? And us?
@a1d3nedits2 жыл бұрын
It’s a game
@joelgamboa49802 жыл бұрын
Imagina cuantos barcos se necesitan para parar todos los misiles. , es un sueño huagiro ,
@Swaggs907 Жыл бұрын
This is a best case scenario for the enemy with traditional means. In close, stationary, no aircraft or escort fleet. You could I guess overwhelm it. But it would still take a lot of kit to kill it.
@BastienSirugo2 жыл бұрын
Puisant tir
@nathanruben33723 жыл бұрын
aircraft carriers are doomed in this age, with supersonic missiles, long range torpidos, swarm drones, there is no way aircraft carriers are now invincible. They are sitting ducks. No matter number of fighters they carry, no matter support ships around them, they are now very vulnerable.
@lindapowell1173 жыл бұрын
Jim Powell speaking. Not so. Aircraft carriers are still very valuable. Their defenses are quite good. The only countries who could truly challenge our carriers are China or Russia. The amount of missiles they have and the accuracy of said missiles is of importance. I can promise you this, neither you nor I, know of the new innovations that are currently aboard our war ships. The aircraft and their abilities are unmatched. Not to mention the submarines that sail with each carrier air group. It seems you have been frightened by some of the anti America politicians, or you give our enemies to much credit.
@nathanruben33723 жыл бұрын
@@lindapowell117 At what cost? With 13 billion dolars to build one, a couple billion of dollars to run them. There are smarter options around. The supersonic missile technology, very silent submarines or long range torpedoes, are in reach of many countries now a days. These technologies once only in the US,Russia knowledge are reachable by more and more countries nows. Such as drone technology, ballistic missile technology, nuclear energy and weapons. Iran, Turkey, China are building very cost effective drones. Turkey is converting its LHD into drone carries. A capable air defence system like S400 in mediterreneam sea, can hinder all capabilities of air craft carries. Many countries are now building sophisticated longe range air defence systems. All major players now adays have them. Especially after the success of drones have been seen . I believe this is one of the reasons why US is building pressure on Turkey. Aircraft carries may be still useful in deep blue waters, but many areas which serious conflicts exist, they are pretty much in grave danger like south china sea. Anyhow, while there 20 billion homeless people in US. I do not think that these expensive carries do not give much benefit to US with bad economy.
@วีรพลเขียวสะอาด2 жыл бұрын
แปล
@andreteofilovic22402 жыл бұрын
F35s are mobile defense against any air attacks. They can easily track, and quarterback to loaded f18s target information on any type of known weapon system to shoot it down. Best of luck
@lindapowell1172 жыл бұрын
Not nearly as vulnerable as you think. They gave support ships and subs. The support ships carry missile that can destroy incoming missiles.
@Lesnone2 жыл бұрын
Was ich mich frage ob die Abwehrsysteme automatisch schießen? Oder ob die jemand bedient?🤔war nie beim Bund oder so aber guck die Videos trotzdem gern 👍
@r3dd1t992 жыл бұрын
Das ist ein Spiel bro
@Lesnone2 жыл бұрын
@@r3dd1t99ja hab ich jetzt auch mitbekommen😂..trotzdem danke dir👌🤝
@josecamilorojas59922 жыл бұрын
Bonita la película gringa
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
Why in the Hell would a warship have its lights on during combat at night?
@tosti232 жыл бұрын
Its a PC Game.......
@rudygomez1862 жыл бұрын
Wtf they dropping them jets like flies!! 😱
@RINstek Жыл бұрын
สุดยอดเลยครับ
@nathanruben33723 жыл бұрын
Phanlans do not hava such ammo capacity.
@newsr23112 жыл бұрын
Nice game ...
@marekbiesaga51642 жыл бұрын
Z tego co widzę jednak zwykłe działa potrafią zrobić cuda a nie te wydumane delikatne rakietki. Chyba żeby poszła nawała tak z setką pocisków na różnych trajektoriach. Ja to mówią mądrzy ludzie i Herkules dupa kiedy wrogów kupa.
@Vialightfalaverdade10 ай бұрын
Brasil🎉😂❤😢😮😅😊
@blastergamer44702 жыл бұрын
is it a game or is it real? 😳
@michaelmichaelagnew85032 жыл бұрын
Not real but eventually I think a massive defensive laser based system will become the norm on aircraft carriers. The first give away is that a US Aircraft carriers is never sitting alone on the water and its always moving. Any ship that would have come near it in a 300 mile radius would have had F-18 swarming it with a submarine or two shadowing it. They will never wait for any ships to get near it. Also the graphics look like cgi or a video game from the start.
@TZG-trks2 жыл бұрын
is this real?
@KELLYTVWORLDWIDE3 жыл бұрын
@Spinnaker2062 жыл бұрын
Que pasa si los pilotos atacan volando a baja altura, digamos volando por debajo de la línea de cubierta?
@lemuria46842 жыл бұрын
A media/larga distancia no importa , el problema sería si el avión estuviera muy cerca ,en cuyo caso ni al avión le quedarían chances de maniobras , se estrellaría , o al menos eso pienso yo
@eybicavi45352 жыл бұрын
O atacan en forma de cruz... ya estan listos los barcos
@alphillips54782 жыл бұрын
This is JUNK! CARTOONS
@PhuongTran-gd4xf Жыл бұрын
Tự mình phải có vũ khí để bảo vệ chính mình, mới gọi là đệ thất hạm đội,
@garyormond3022 жыл бұрын
(Capt) wake me up if anything exciting happens...ok,night captain. (Next morning) anything to report not really worth mentioning captain , ok, thank you.
@markyanh66302 жыл бұрын
GOOD
@joseandres51852 жыл бұрын
La verdad que se puede decir , hay qué bonitos , los fuegos artificiales , hasta cantan la hora * .
@rickylittle26782 жыл бұрын
What is this a video game
@edwinmahonga40633 жыл бұрын
Hey,marine life
@jashhmurilloz50622 жыл бұрын
Single. Missile. Air. Carrier is. Goin down
@ServusSovereign3 жыл бұрын
😂 😂 😂 nice game
@โชคพิทบูล2 жыл бұрын
Takes a very long time to watch
@allanpasculado20042 жыл бұрын
it's not game it is an original sound you hear 🙉
@mrrobertwolfiii10792 жыл бұрын
Target practices with live fire
@lanekelly792 жыл бұрын
I need stock in the co that makes this beautiful machine.