Zoom In on Astronaut Footprints of Apollo 17

Zoom in on the Moon yourself: quickmap.lroc.asu.edu/
More Information: www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...
Music:
Hazy - Light
( • Hazy - Light )

[@abundantYOUniverse]

Who would have thought that as our technology increased 1000 fold from 50 years ago, the population would get so stupid that they couldn't imagine our accomplishments.

[@evonne315]

Sadly, people reject advancements all the time. My guess is peoples egos cannot handle the fact that others are far more capable than them.

[@4faxache935]

You only need to look at many of the ancient structures still standing all around the World. There are many people who will balk at the idea that our ancient ancestors built them. They would prefer to say --- it was alien technology.

[@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline]

​@@evonne315Why did all but one astronaut refuse to put their hand on the Bible and say they went to the moon? Why did all the photos toluene out studio quality when you can't even put unprocessed film through a xray machine at the airport? Where is the magic technology that got them there? Why will nasa not allow visits to these sites from private companies? What about the voice delay mistakes talking to the moon and back? Why was all the telemetry destroyed? What about the film that showed Apollo 11 in earth orbit while they faked a small earth in the capsule window? Answers are appreciated, thanks.

[@ann_onn]

@@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline "Why did all but one astronaut refuse to put their hand on the Bible and say they went to the moon?" - because Bart Sibrel is an irritating moron, who was hounding them and trying to trick them into false admissions. "Why did all the photos toluene out studio quality" - they aren't. There's lots of bad photos. You don't often see them, because the best are selected. "...when you can't even put unprocessed film through a xray machine at the airport?" - you can, and they'll be fine. "Where is the magic technology that got them there?" - nothing magical about it. Just a huge rocket. Go see one in a museum. "Why will nasa not allow visits to these sites from private companies?" - they will. "What about the voice delay mistakes talking to the moon and back?" - the delay was about 1.5 seconds, which is exactly what you'd expect. That can be seen on all the recordings of the live broadcasts. Some of the footage has been edited to remove the delays, and conspiracy theorists use that to make stupid claims. "Why was all the telemetry destroyed?" - a) it wasn't *all* destroyed. b) Telemetry is a boring list of numbers, such as the temperature inside the cabin every 30 seconds. All useful data was put into the mission reports, so those tapes really aren't important. "What about the film that showed Apollo 11 in earth orbit while they faked a small earth in the capsule window?" - that's Sibrel again, lying about what you're looking at. It shows them closing a blind, not using a faked Earth. If you watch the original footage instead of his silly movie, you can hear them talking about what they're doing. Sibrel removed the sound, of course.

[@maladetts]

It's always sweet when the feeble-minded project their stupidity and complain about themselves, still having no clue where they live in 2024 and whether spacecraft exist outside of sci-fi stories, while the entire KZbin and internet have been for years at their disposal. In the meantime, the only "space accomplishments" can be only IMAGINED indeed. Let's see a single one in real life. Let's see that "space technology" that ""increased 1000 fold". No, still nothing? Who would have thought.

[@7urbine]

Wow, this is incredible. Layering the various photos to get the high resolution was mesmerizing, thanks for the great video!

[@lukassbeataddicts]

For the idiots doubting, last zoom was from Lunar Orbiter satellite. It's not possible to zoom from earth to see such small objects. It's too far.

[@doctormarazanvose4373]

and for the other idiots who don't doubt and probably should - how come the resolution is so low considering the same equipment on a satellite orbiting Earth can give higher resolution images through a much denser atmosphere and at a higher orbit?

[@ann_onn]

@@doctormarazanvose4373 Because the LRO isn't the same as satellites orbiting the Earth to take photos. Its job wasn't to look at the landing sites - that was a small side benefit. It's job was to map out the entire Moon, at a resolution good enough to identify potential resources for future missions. NASA has no great interest in getting high-res pictures of the landing sites. They know exactly what is there, and we _already_ have thousands of good photos taken during Apollo.

[@doctormarazanvose4373]

@@ann_onn sorry to burst your bubble but the camera equipment used was the same. There are articles about it showing the resolution possible to achieve. As for your reasoning that NASA has no great interest. Do you speak for them? How do you know their motivations? One thing is for sure. For over 50 years they have not put this argument to bed and they could easily have done so. I'll leave you with one question to ponder: Why have they still not managed to design a space suit capable of protecting a human on the moon? We allegedly managed it decades ago and now we can't.

[@ann_onn]

@@doctormarazanvose4373 Why do you think "the camera equipment used was the same"? I'll happily answer anything else, *after* you answer that. Of course, you will not, because you're just another stupid conspiracy theorist.

[@ann_onn]

@@doctormarazanvose4373 You claim that "the camera equipment used was the same.". It wasn't. If you think it was, show your evidence. From my side: search for the LRO, and you'll discover its close-up camera had a resolution of 0.5-meters. [1] "Do you speak for them?" - no, of course not. I'm not American, and I've no vested interest in NASA. You'll probably claim I do, because you're paranoid. "For over 50 years they have not put this argument to bed and they could easily have done so." - they have. Via thousands of photos, hundreds of hours of video, moon rocks unlike anything from Earth, people around the world receiving their live broadcasts as it happened, thousands of personal testimonies, full documentation of every nut and bolt, spaceships in museums, more recent pictures of the landing sites from India, Japan, China and Russia, and so much more. No matter how much evidence is given, a few idiots will claim it was fake, with absolutely no evidence. "Why have they still not managed to design a space suit capable of protecting a human on the moon? " - they have. Apollo 11 through to 17. " We allegedly managed it decades ago and now we can't." - why do you think we can't? Of course we can, if someone pays for it. They're going back next year. 1. Arizona State University. "Working with Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter LROC Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) Data".

[@stefou1311]

Thanks a lot for this 😉👍❤️🇨🇵

[@gli7utubeo]

What a great video. Thanks a million!!

[@rezaghasemi8257]

Woooow Your work is sooo gooddddd😍

[@markdos1538]

Genial. Muy bién logrado, y es clarísimo. 👍👍🇨🇱

[@DelsonFilho01]

Wow! But what nostalgia for your wonderful videos! I was thinking but what must have happened because he stopped?! I love your work! I wish you a very nice weekend and I wish you success in everything you undertake! Thanks for your new video!

[@Astromagazine]

Oh thank you so much my friend

[@deanhall6045]

He stopped because there is nothing there. Those tracks aren't even from Apollo. Click baiting.

[@tarkan1995]

My godness....what a beautiful image that was!

[@cosmoscafe3745]

Thats So Amazing ❤️

[@hanswernerhoffmann5321]

Ohne eine störende Atmosphäre kann die phantastische Optik ihre ganze Stärke ausspielen! Großartige Aufnahmen!

[@SenkaBandit]

Völlig Losgelöst Von der Erde Schwimmt das Raumschiff Völlig Schwerelos!!

[@evonne315]

So amazing to have it all put into perspective. ❤ Thank you!

[@MrKrabbSquarepants]

It's fake.

[@mc-fj3fi]

Fake

[@arunkrishnankutty7470]

Great 👍👍👍👍

[@adesetiawan628]

Good video

[@frankg.39]

Fun thing to do: compare the shape of the footprints and tracks from this video (LRO) to the shape of the footprints and tracks that can be seen from the Apollo 17 liftoff video, and they are exactly the same.

[@DrTWG]

There's an idea for a video . Harrison Schmitt , one of the landing crew is still around . He was the only bona-fide scientist to get an Apollo seat . The pilot types hated the idea that the job could be done by anyone other than one of 'the brethren & possessor of the right stuff ' . It's interesting to note that there was virtually no hand-flying on an Apollo mission . The small amount that was done was heavily augmented by the digital autopilot (AGC) and was quite different from controlling a craft under aerodynamic forces - the Lunar Module was the only flying vehicle built without aerodynamic forces in mind , to work in a vacuum (the moon has an extremely tenuous atmosphere only) . Schmitt did a magnificent job - even his commander , Cernan couldn't find fault - and believe me - if fault was there - ol' Geno would have found it.

[@mc-fj3fi]

U can see the CGI layer if u watch slow enough. Fake

[@DrTWG]

@@mc-fj3fi LOL!

[@MrMome1612]

​@@mc-fj3fiYou see it, cause you wanna see it. Your brain is fake!

[@maladetts]

@@DrTWG Digital autopilot? Moon atmosphere? Cool story, bro.

[@cosmoscafe3745]

Thanks a lot for sharing such amazing things ✨

[@DanielNaias]

top mesmo

[@carrotking8893]

Great editing

[@fabricio4794]

pump up the volume pump up the volume ,dance dance....

[@Kamil_O]

we need more people on the moon

[@NZVideoGuy]

You? 😎

[@never_give_up90]

No, we don't. We left a ton of trash on a quick trip to the moon. Its good enough, no need to waste the money and risk lives. Let's focus on a bigger picture.

[@ynk-4372]

@@never_give_up90celestial travel is the bigger picture, earth wont last forever thanks to capitalism

[@BinhNguyen-uw1tc]

Yes Finally :)

[@maxdeen1298]

Good graphics

[@pintudarji4551]

Wow , how large your objective ? And how far the eyepiece? Very amazing!

[@meloney]

The higher zoomed in parts are stitched together photos of low lunar orbit :)

[@ihaka439]

1:03 it's hard to make anything out before you superimposed the site on their

[@never_give_up90]

It's because you have to change the lenses. I have to do that when using a telescope and they cut those parts out.

[@manny_f]

For a moment I thought "I might be able to see this with the 12" dobs I ordered yesterday" LMFAO not a chance

[@never_give_up90]

😅 yeah, not a chance. You can zoom in but you'll see a lot of blurr

[@user-co8uy5rb2s]

Time to go back.

[@uttaradit2]

2 the studio

[@user-co8uy5rb2s]

Nah they went and you're triggered. 😂

[@ltzLastGuestAnimatez_Studios]

Nah Flat Earther are the true idiots here.

[@kevinkarpovs7597]

Let’s take a moment to know this man got a telescope massive enough to see the entire mission on the moon.

[@xenicmark]

Pretty sure these were taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter.

[@iplayloud2]

​@@xenicmarkLRO back in 2011 exactly. Orbiting about 30 miles above surface.

[@user-co8uy5rb2s]

Lunar Orbiter images you dim bulb😅

[@martinwolfright3183]

@@user-co8uy5rb2s😂😅👍

[@DrTWG]

Take a moment to know that you would need a powerful microscope to find your brain.

[@bigdog4574]

FYI… the high resolution of the landing site and the tracks were taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter…

[@seek.l2215]

It kinda has to be. Difference of zooming in from 250,000 km to only 50km

[@maladetts]

The one that exists only in your imagination, while every image you're seeing here was created via computer right here on earth that no one knows how to leave yet?

[@seek.l2215]

@@maladetts images aren’t “created” via computer they are sharpened. If u knew anything about astrophotography you’d realize this makes literally zero sense

[@steveschunk5702]

If only Hubble had a 5 kilometer focal length..

[@maladetts]

@@seek.l2215 Obviously, I know about everything related to the subject more than you ever will. Computer imagery is exactly created with the computer, what else? What you wrote makes zero sense, and so does any clownry that still insists on the infamous moon hoax as real event.

[@Roschu2000]

How did you get closer than 0.5m per pixel?

[@harishjavvadi9344]

A.I image processing developed very well. 😂

[@bigdog4574]

This is from the lunar reconnaissance satellite that orbits the moon…

[@Fe.2024]

@@bigdog4574information taken from the ass?

[@doctormarazanvose4373]

Why are there no astronaut footprints from the moon buggy final parking spot to the challenger descent stage?

[@ann_onn]

There are, but footprints are difficult to see, unless it's where they walked back and forth many times.

[@maladetts]

@@ann_onn There are not. The only walks you can take are right here on earth, clueless.

[@proto-geek248]

There are.

[@maladetts]

@@proto-geek248 In your dreams, solely.

[@ann_onn]

@@maladetts So, you think they faked SOME of the footprints, but not others? Jesus, you're deluded. Get help. Conspiracy theorists claim NASA was smart enough to fake it, but so dumb they didn't add stars. They think the Van Allen belts were deadly, but they only know they exist _because_ of NASA discovering them. Come on, dude, get a grip.

[@ronaldwoofer5024]

What will it take to see this on earth in my backyard?

[@bobmusil1458]

The largest telescope in the world.

[@SciRado]

That's easy start by going outside in your backyard. Sit down and watch this video again.

[@MrMarkusj]

made my day !!! @@SciRado

[@SciRado]

@@MrMarkusj 😁👍

[@fromnorway643]

Does your backyard have enough space for a telescope with a 500 metres wide aperture? (larger than the Arecibo radio telescope that collapsed a few years ago)

[@itsme-ty7sm]

You need a telescope the size of earth to see that close 😅.

[@bigdog4574]

First of all that’s not true… you need a telescope 100m wide… but also can be done with a satellite… in this case this image was taken with a lunar reconnaissance orbiter satellite!

[@sinformant]

You can buy consumer grade telescopes that you can see Saturn and its rings. Granted not up close, but you can see the colors, shape and the rings. So you would think you'd be able to zoom far enough into the moon which is infinitely closer and be able to see things like tracks from the moon buggy, moon buggy itself, or any one of the 6 moon lander module bases just sitting there.

[@never_give_up90]

​@@sinformantthat's kinda hard because when you zoom in it gets blurry. I'd say a good telescope matters. I can zoom in to Saturn but have to work hard to get sharp moon zooms and this close is very blurry but yes, it's there.

[@montylc2001]

Study up on telescope optics before you make a comment that reveals you to be totally ignorant on the subject.@@sinformant

[@Thisisjs96]

Yet somehow we are able to see millions of light years into the past with the ones we have?

[@ysvsny7]

great times of great people...

[@trident8872]

Which telescope did you use to capture this??

[@Fe.2024]

a telescope with a great a.i

[@trident8872]

@@Fe.2024 which brand??

[@nortavon]

lunar reconnaissance orbiter

[@emreevo8]

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

[@bobwellman9717]

No wonder I can't zoom in that close. Mine is an s21😟 @@emreevo8​

[@LordDeBahs]

dont chase your own shadow

[@samirraut9536]

The indistinct flag looms dimly...just zoom your android system of smartphone !

[@glennbaxter7254]

I would like to see India's take on NASA landing sites...

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Look it up, then.

[@Spiderryder-]

Humans never landed on the moon. China, India, Russia and everyone else is aware of this.

[@gabrieldiaz7236]

Come on, people.

[@ynk-4372]

Whats there to come on about, stop being a science denier it happened and Science > You (a nobody). Guaranteed you cant provide a single paragraph to support your beliefs

[@Sigma_Exposer]

Nice graphs

[@RealTuckered]

No way! That’s great! We landed on the moon!

[@smeeself]

Six times.

[@TanDJServices]

Dumb and Dumber reference

[@ajdemipushi567]

Have you been there to know ?

[@QUIROPTEROHOLLOW]

​@@ajdemipushi567Yes I have

[@Iveyenahs]

Same people who say we went to the moon(but since have lost that technology and just can't do it again), pulled an image out of their ass and said 'here is the footprint taken by orbiter'.Untill we can zoom in like that on our own, then they'll say that it is no longer there because of something the moon goes through every blah blah 100000 years which erases footprints. And you all will clapp in awe again, at utter bs.

[@StarTus111]

What camera lens is this?

[@Alien-tu9ib]

IPhone 7 plus

[@kylet7294]

It’s not a camera, it’s an edit

[@deathwithcrowbarintheear]

190 mm dual system of Newtonian telescopes on board the LRO probe with a scanning matrix of 5000 elements.

[@Fe.2024]

a.i reconstruction

[@thedutchonequestioneveryth4128]

Basicly they made from something pure acfreakn mess in just 1 day. Question. Why is there not one docu shot by a rover , and share the very very mesmerizing place. It would be the best profiting blockbuster ever. They go to mars but the moon is not possible. Realy?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Are you okay?

[@flibbertigibbet6200]

Can somebody explain if they are footprints why they are long continuous lines and not spaced due to the gravity or lack there of and the bigger leaps? With this they would have to drag a limb there and back but on pictures taken there are hardly any marks?

[@bigdog4574]

Those are lunar rover tracks individual foot prints hard to make out

[@ongeeargos3621]

Here comes the flatters!!!

[@user-be6zi8ke9h]

Google Map est plus net et précis 🤔

[@luigirnotyourbusiness8127]

Right...

[@user-bf1me5pz6x]

CGI till I can hold the camera and see it myself.

[@ynk-4372]

Science denier that uses a smartphone 😂😂😂 make it make sense

[@shapeshifter8986]

Has anyone intependent ly seen this with his own telescope??

[@montylc2001]

Not possible.

[@bobwellman9717]

Those were not taken by any telescope on earth. Those were from the lunar reconnaissance satellite that orbits the moon.

[@irfanimp]

coordinats?

[@brianramirez4953]

you must be joking.

[@JackFrost008]

No.

[@aceventura5398]

Let me check the tittle. FOOT PRINT. must mean something different on the moon.

[@olasek7972]

the same comrade

[@user-qc4df1ec1u]

This could be photo shopped easily

[@msidc1238]

It can also be photographed easily. With the LRO.

[@boathemian7694]

Cue the Flatearthers….

[@muhammadramzan3350]

my plot on moon dream boy....

[@raybramwell4999]

Just aint possible to zoom in at such accuracy..the size of the telescope needed to do that would be immense.

[@ann_onn]

Yes, but this isn't all from Earth. The close-ups came from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter.

[@sinformant]

If NASA wanted to debunk conspiracy theories that they never landed on the moon, why haven't they just pointed one of their space telescopes at the moon and taken photos up close of the landing sites? 🤔

[@JohnHazenhousen]

They _have_ taken photos of the Apollo landing sites with the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. That’s where the photos in this video are from. Conspiracy theorists simply dismiss them all as fake.

[@bobmusil1458]

That's exactly what they did, you dork!

[@jackking5567]

@@JohnHazenhousen That isn't what they asked.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@jackking5567 They asked about close-up photos of the Moon landing sites - _like the ones taken by the LRO and shown in this video._

[@InvictusMatrix]

They have, but conspiracy theorists will deny everything to push their agendas.

[@jessekilgas771]

If we can't capture the flag, how can we capture footprints

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Huh? The flag is visible in this image as well.

[@Aeronaut74]

The footprints shows how small we humans really are.

[@andreassan6230]

Those are clearly and undoubtedly rover tracks Falsely claiming to be foot prints Even a kid can differe between the 2

[@blayasblay3941]

Hoabout they take pictuurs of athee touwers theym have theer ?

[@hermanjaggercover5379]

Apakah anda sudah minum obat??

[@aerokasyeal4840]

this is a just an animation images right?

[@nortavon]

images taken by the lunar reconnaissance orbiter

[@ActivateMission2ThisTimeline]

​@@nortavonphotoshopped...

[@truepatriot6969]

Still no satellite orbiting with a live feed of the moon. Or one from its surface. How is that even possible?

[@Zubareffstream111]

Why would there be?

[@truepatriot6969]

@@Zubareffstream111 Yeah, totally dude. Why would there be? Like... who would even be interested in seeing something like that? Not me! Boring! Okay, I'm going back to drinking my kool-aid.

[@Zubareffstream111]

@True Patriot There are a number of satellites that orbit the moon, and they are continually mapping its surface. It would be a complete waste of money to have one of those cameras pointing at our planet. Also, a 24/7 live feed would be impossible because you wouldn't see earth when the satellite was on the other side of the moon. I'm sure you think Himawari-8 is fake, so why would you believe a live feed from the moon? It's more than 10 times the distance.

[@smeeself]

​@Steve Corr There's must be some law that if they have a version of TRUTH in their name, they don't have two brain cells to rub together. This one's got that, AND "patriot" so, utter hopeless case. You'd have more luck presenting evidence to a bar of soap.

[@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground]

@@truepatriot6969 what scientific value does that offer

[@hapilalanin]

Amazing CGI👏

[@BuildonRock]

That's what I was thinking.

[@odbo_One]

They must spend a lot of money into you, you are amazing for AI android👏.

[@wtg93511]

amazing brain wash by prosecute envy 👏

[@svyatoyaleksnevskiy]

Do you have any evidence that NASA scientists and engineers just sit in their offices all day generating fake space pictures, or did you just pull that out of your arse?

[@datvuong7420]

why did astronaut not put a huge American flag lying on the surface of moon, so from the earth we could detect the flag easily?

[@smeeself]

Why would they? (Do you have any idea how big that flag would have to be?)

[@jmcd9255]

The Russians have used their best equipment and guess what? they cannot find any evidence of the US being there.. and why have they not went back? its all cheek and nonsense..

[@Anakin_Sandy_High_Ground]

Because think about how much extra weight that would add.

[@ronaldmartino2610]

Not possible!

[@msidc1238]

With the LRO which is in Lunar orbit it is.

[@ronaldmartino2610]

@@msidc1238 No, it's not! Check your facts.

[@msidc1238]

@@ronaldmartino2610 Maybe your the one who should "check your facts".

[@ronaldmartino2610]

@@msidc1238 Tell me where I can find a legitimate photo along with source information. Just because they say it, doesn't mean they've done it. I don't comment lightly. EDIT: Need a larger telescope or lower orbit. FACT.

[@msidc1238]

@@ronaldmartino2610 Why don't you look for yourself? KZbin doesn't like links anyway. But I'd like to see how you determined that the LRO would need to be lower or need a more powerful telescope.

[@burnbabyburn-od5sy]

not a live piture it zooms all wrong its like google maps

[@jamus937]

Not at all convinced lmao cgi all the way

[@montylc2001]

Yes, cgi made these images 15 years ago when the technology was still crap,.

[@ynk-4372]

And what are your credentials in graphics production that we should believe your claims? Gonna presume you have none 😂

[@noelattard2000]

Taken by a samsung galaxy phone lol

[@lafwaaW]

Nice work Hollywood, now we have AI, thanks.

[@MrKrabbSquarepants]

I see no footprints or the flag! We apparently can see billions of light years away, yet, seeing the stripes and stars on the flag is impossible! 😂

[@montylc2001]

Do some research on telescope optics.

[@MrKrabbSquarepants]

@@montylc2001 I did and it's impossible to see the flag on the moon.

[@montylc2001]

Correct. The images were taken by the LRO orbiter from low orbit. The flag is about a pixel or two big. Similar images from the other landing sites actually show the shadow of some of them.@@MrKrabbSquarepants

[@MrKrabbSquarepants]

@@montylc2001 no photographic proof of a flag on the moon. We do not have the technology to zoom in on a rock on the moon.

[@montylc2001]

Yes, there is photographic evidence courtesy of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter. Photos taken from close lunar orbit. From each of the landing sites. The final zoom in this video is from that. You cannot make out any detail but you can tell that they are there. Just google "LRO images of the apollo landing sites" Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 are imaged pretty well.@@MrKrabbSquarepants

[@carlom.9799]

Nice cgi

[@petersearls4443]

Yes the zooming in was a process not the actual orbiter. But the final results are real as verified by other countries.

[@anubisiii4384]

😄🤣😂 no, niet.

[@007SS40]

PURE BS...

[@smeeself]

Your tin foil hat is on too tight.

[@007SS40]

​@@smeeself Do yourself a favor, investigate the fella who created "2001 A SPACE ODDESSY", his name STANLEY KUBRICK. Investigate him, Wehner Braun(German defector that wound up running NASA after WWII), & your APOLLO MOON MISSIONS. Also investigate Neil Armstrong's so-called famous footprint left on the moon with the sole of Mr. Armstrong's ACTUAL BOOTS that he supposedly wore on his glorious mission. What you find WILL shock you... ...you can thank me for the 'wake up' later... GOD BLESS...❤

[@Zubareffstream111]

​@speedslave408 Kubrik remained at his home in the UK from 1965 onwards, never returning to the States. The footprint is a hoax, the photo claiming to be from Buzz Aldrins boot is actually from one of the later Apollo missions, 17 I think 🤔

[@acfischer]

LOL OK

[@proto-geek248]

Moon Landing Conspirators are SOOOO dumb.

[@Abdullahs_World]

Nope 😂

[@LovelyWhiteWater]

ai? ai is somekind of FAKE XD

[@detpak]

This isn't real, neither are the moon landings, nice work though, the flat mooners will believe this though and sing the praise of how 1960s tech got to the moon, and they can't get wi fi to work perfectly yet LOL.

[@2bpencildesign603]

fake cgi zoom!

[@ynk-4372]

No proof!

[@jackking5567]

A pristine environment destroyed beyond repair through the meddling of mankind. Litter abounds with no attempt to remove it. Says it all really - man is his worst enemy.

[@MkBl-ll5zp]

I told you..AI is great.

[@GameStop-li5hp]

But Apollo is 100% real why not? Its so cool that we can go to the moon why not?

[@ryanpeace3042]

You can't even get this quality on Google earth of photos on earth 🙄 😂

[@mustacoog1430]

Pffff what?

[@smeeself]

Outstanding rebuttal. 🙄

[@KittensMagazine]

It's not even a real video. It's computer generated. I thought this was going to prove all these crazy conspiracy theorists wrong. But this video makes these theorists look like they might have a legit claim.

[@zulupox]

What's wrong with it? It is a composition of like 10 different photos taken at different resolution/zoom. The last ones are taken from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter… a sattelite orbiting the moon.

[@nortavon]

lunar reconnaissance orbiter

[@svyatoyaleksnevskiy]

Your ignorance of reality is not evidence in favor of the conspiracy theorists. These images were captured by a satellite.

[@mattellis107]

Hahahh CGI at its finest 🤣🤣

[@msidc1238]

Prove it.

[@KeithFox]

This video is fake.

[@krammago9196]

Nice edit dont be deceived.

[@trebushett2079]

Not very convincing!

[@littlesofty01]

Quit doing crack

[@ziya396]

Me too

[@smeeself]

🤣 This wasn't captured to try and convince the nutters. Lost causes.

[@6-dpegasus425]

​@Smee Self they really are something else hahahha

[@N0RZC]

lol

[@affifhartono5410]

hahaha

[@laroudoune]

sorry but these images are not really convincing. Nasa sent two super telescopes to see deep into the universe, couldn't Hubble have been directed to the moon and get crystal clear views of the lunar surface and observe the remains of the so called lunar expeditions? using Hubble in order to silence the contradictors would have been the best solution and even more so with the well-performing James Webb telescope these pictures are bogus to me

[@srknbyz]

cgi AF

[@kevinconrad7648]

No, LRO is a real satellite that takes real pictures

[@krammago9196]

100%

[@jacktyger5436]

No

[@jacktyger5436]

​@@krammago9196 Lol No!

[@gravityx1667]

this gotta bet fake right? they say we would have to have a telescope the size of esrth to see the flag

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Did you not make it past the first fifth of a second of the video?

[@nortavon]

images were taken from the lunar reconnaissance orbiter

[@sebastiannolte1201]

The were taken from a atellite that orbits around the moon - only 50 km away from moon's surface.

[@IIIITommyIIII]

👎🏻👎🏻😂😂 Where is the Lunar-Rover? 😂😂👎🏻👎🏻

[@bobmusil1458]

Are you a bit slow? The Lunar Rover is clearly marked - as Moon buggy!

[@BULLISHGUY-fg3so]

The BIGGEST BS

[@msidc1238]

The Moon's made of Bullshit? That's a new one.

[@JRey-re9rl]

We never went to the Moon! 😂 We can’t even get past low earth orbit, let alone the Van Allen Belts. 😂

[@msidc1238]

Don't pretend like you even know anything about the Van Allen Belts.

[@JRey-re9rl]

@@msidc1238 Do you? 😂🤣👉🏾🤡

[@JRey-re9rl]

@@msidc1238 Do you? 😂🤦🏾‍♂️😂

[@JRey-re9rl]

@@msidc1238 No refutation of my point! 😂🤣🤦🏾‍♂️😂

[@msidc1238]

@@JRey-re9rl Yep. Although I'm assuming you got all your information about the Van Allen Belts from a schizophrenic rant on the Internet. Am I right?

[@musicpeterlivestream9256]

These days care needs to be taken to avoid even a hint if cgi or 'fancy presentation' - all that feeds the myth than the landings were faked. Some layperson technical explanation of what the orbiting camera is and then the photos in the highest resolution, is my suggestion.

[@CM-ds2xo]

Cool but fake

[@acatinatux9601]

imagine it being 2024 and there are still people like you, choosing to be fuckin stupid and ignorant

[@sextinaaquafina]

I can’t believe y’all think this is real😂😂😂

[@smeeself]

Perhaps your tin foil hat is on too tight? 🙄

[@sextinaaquafina]

@@smeeself Not with all this hair😂😂😂

[@smeeself]

@Sextina Aquafina Oh, maybe it's just that your brain overheated?

[@sextinaaquafina]

@@smeeself Doesn’t change the fact that all NASA footage looks hella CGI. 😂😂

[@smeeself]

@@sextinaaquafina 🙄 CGI wasn't a thing in 1969. And what you "feel" it should look like is irrelevant to... anything.

[@WatchingTrainsGoBy-PassingTime]

lol

[@mathewpaul5038]

...bullshit, we never landed a man on the moon...

[@wsrichardson5796]

"We"? No. Not you, certainly. 😸

[@ongeeargos3621]

True because it should be “men”!!

[@Hundr_]

good CGI