ماشاءاللہ زبردست میں تو آپ کا فین ہوں سر میں آپ کو بہت شوق سے دیکھتا اللہ تعالی آپ کو زندگی صحت بخشے انشاءاللہ پاکستان کے ساتھ برا کرے گا اس کا انجام اس سے بھی بدتر ہوگا
@MansoorulHassanSyed6 ай бұрын
*انشاء اللہ ھو العزیز*
@waqas007574 ай бұрын
In sha Allah
@khannaeem15614 ай бұрын
جنرل صاحب کیا غدار بھٹو کو شہید کہنا بہت بڑی زیادتی نہیں ہے?
@UrduRas Жыл бұрын
جنرل صاحب! ملک توڑنے اور جوڑنے والے سب کا برا انجام ہوا۔ آپ ضیاالحق کو نہ بھولا کریں
@useressuseeess2 ай бұрын
جنرل ضیاالحق کو نہ بھولنے کا کیا مطلب۔۔
@useressuseeess2 ай бұрын
پاکستان کو توڑنے والے تین بڑے کردار۔۔ بھٹو مجیب اور اندرا گاندھی۔ تینوں کا بھیانک انجام۔ نسلیں تک مٹا دی قدرت نے۔۔ کتے کی موت مرے تینوں۔۔
@seemifarooq3112 жыл бұрын
Story is true at that time I was living at Tarbell's Dam as my husband was serving there as an engineer I still feel the pain of that time when he told me the fall of Dhaka I felt a cold wave running in my back bone and then I just sat down on naked floor یہ سب لکھتے ہوئے میری آ نکھیں اس وقت بھی چھلک رہی ہیں
@Noorjahan52 жыл бұрын
I remember this very well too, we brothers and sisters were teen ages and in our house was like someone died, we all were crying and did not eat several days. I still do not call it Bangla Desh, I still say East Pakistan.
@liaqatrana2 жыл бұрын
but he is not telling the whole truth, the political ambitions of bhutto and yahya,s wish to remain president of pakistan was main obstacle, he didn,t mention the name of yahya who was the culprit to postopne de national assembly session in dhaka, which angered bengalis
@OnePageVoter2 жыл бұрын
I and my father listen this news on radio from BBC. That was the SADDEST moment of our life. Bhutto fooled Yahya Khan. Bhutto was the architect of this plan. 1) Ayub Khan resigned. 2) Asper constitution the power goes to speaker of national assembly. 3) Yahya Khan was the Army Chief. 4) Ayub Khan did not handover power to Army Chief, Yahya Khan. 5) Bhutto advised Yahya to take power and impose martial law. 6) Bhutto was the only politician who frequently meet Yahya Khan. 7) Bhutto was the author of PCOs
@pinehillsconsultants86922 жыл бұрын
@@liaqatrana Ali Bhai, General Sahib had already made a programme on Yahaya and his final fate in a previous episode 1 of this series...He already had kept his name on top of the list of the main characters... Kindly watch previous programmes to understand and keep the historic record straight for our next generations to know the true matters of the facts accordingly...
@javedzahoor1502 жыл бұрын
Every true patriotic Pakistani feel tha pain of fall of Dhaka.....
@legend4ever3692 жыл бұрын
ایماندار اور حقیقت پر مبنی تبصرہ ۔ بہترین چینل ہے آپ کا۔
@ahmadarshad73472 жыл бұрын
The main culprit of east Pakistan separaration was the Bhutto he also spoiled the economy of country
@usmangillaman95942 жыл бұрын
اچھی معلوماتی ویڈیو ہے جرنل صاحب جاری رکھیں یہ ہمیں میڈیا نہیں بتایے گا good job
@TAYYAB_BUTT202 жыл бұрын
سر انشاءاللہ پاکستان کو توڑنے میں جس کا بھی کردار تھا وہ تباہ و برباد ہو گا اور جو مر گئے اور جو پاکستان کو توڑ کے مر گئے ان کی آخرت بھی تباہ ہو گی انشاء اللہ
@nuzhatyousuf98682 жыл бұрын
Inshallah ameen
@muhammadiqbalsamana61002 жыл бұрын
(🌸🌹)"INSHA ALLAH"(🌹🌸)
@md.zahidurrahmansardar694 Жыл бұрын
After pospond of meeting of national assembly Bengali peoples protested aga.inst declaration of yahiya khan..
@md.zahidurrahmansardar694 Жыл бұрын
@md.zahidurrahmansardar694 Жыл бұрын
@@nuzhatyousuf9868
@imranis-haaq86502 жыл бұрын
ہماری عوام اُس وقت بھی جاہل تھی آج بھی جاہل ہی ہے۔ سیاستدان بھی ویسے کے ویسے ہی ہیں ۔کوئی فرق نہیں پڑا .
@desrthearts49422 жыл бұрын
Jahan fark parny se fark parta hai wahan fark par chuka hai aur ap daikh bhi rahy hon gy inshaALLAH
@kalooujaloo22742 жыл бұрын
AQA, Sir. We appreciated your efforts and keeping public updates thanks and regards for your good health and wealths ALLAH BLESS LONG LIVE PAKISTAN AND MILITARY WE SAULTE
@shahidamazhar68632 жыл бұрын
صدر ایوب خاں کیا اصل کردار نہیں پاکستان کو توڑ نے میں ان پر کھل کر روشنی ڈالیں آپ سچ بولنے ہیں انکو کیوں بچا جاتے ہیں ؟ بہت بہت شکریہ مظہر رضوی
@khalidshah16382 жыл бұрын
رضوی صاحب جب ہر روز وزیراعظم بدل دے تھے اس وقت مسلح افواج یا ایوب خان کی آخری امید تھے اس ڈیمو کریسی کے کیڑے مشرقی پاکستان کو علیحدہ کیا بہر حال مفصل تجزیہ جرنل صاحب کریں گءے
@naeemshaikh75402 жыл бұрын
ہوسِ اقتدار کی کہانی اسکندر مرزا، ایوب کتا، یحیٰ شرابی، بھٹو لالچی اور مجیب غدّار کے گرد گھومتی ہے اور یہی لوگ اس پاک وطن کو توڑنے کے ذمہ دار بھی ہیں۔ اگر ایوب اقتدار پر قبضہ نہ کرتا اور یحیٰ کے سپرد ملک نہ کرتا تو بھی یہ ملک چلتا رہتا اور ٹوٹتا نہیں۔اقتدار کے بھوکے لوگوں نے اس ملک کو توڑا ہے۔
@hamshadkhattak79232 жыл бұрын
سر پیپلزپارٹی کی آج بھی وہی سوچ جو 71 میں تھی لیکن آج یہ سوچ سندھ کے بارے ہے.
@fghirapak4 ай бұрын
اور اسی پیپلز پارٹی کا بچہ بچہ فوج ا قتدار میں لے آئ ھے بنا ووٹ لیے تو پھر تب کیسے بھٹو ا کیلا ذمہ دار تھا جر نل صاحب بس کر د یئں
@A.Adevil12342 жыл бұрын
جنرل صاحب بہت شکریہ آپ نے بڑے اچھے طریقہ سے مشرقی پاکستان کے بنگلہ دیش بننے میں جن لوگوں کا کردار تھا ان کے حالات و واقعات کا احاطہ کیا جس سے یہ بات سامنے آئی کہ وہ ملک جو اسلام کے نام پر حاصل کیا گیا تھا اور صرف 24 یا 25 سال بعد الگ ہو گیا اور اس میں جو کردار تھے قدرت نے ان کو کس طرح ان کے عبرتناک انجام تک پہنچایا حیرت ہوتی ہے آج پھر کچھ اندرونی اور بیرونی سازشیں ہو رہی ہیں لیکن آج کا پاکستان اللہ کے فضل و کرم سے کافی مضبوط ہے ان شاءاللہ یہ ملک ہمیشہ قائم رہے گا آپ کا بہت بہت شکریہ
@SyedWaseem-p7r5 ай бұрын
Again repeating the same situation as like in1971. When civilians do not interfere in army's affairs, Why do they repeatedly interfere in politics? Who will give the answer of simple question? They are not supreme. Almighty Allah is always supreme. Don't interfere the situation is creating to invite outsider to interfere. People know each and every thing This is not 1971, People are aware of all situations.
@tanveershahryar562 жыл бұрын
افسوسناک امر یہ ہے کہ سقوط ڈھاکہ کے ذمے داروں کو کوئی سزا نہیں دی گئی ۔ اور اگر اس پر حمودالرحمن کمشن بنایا گیا تو اس کی رپورٹ کو بھی منظر عام پر نہیں لایا گیا ۔ گویا غداروں کو کچھ نہیں کہا گیا ۔
@amberlight58302 жыл бұрын
Jo laymen ghaddar on ko nahin khatam karti woh tabah ho jati hain, mir jaffar did to bengal and mir sadiq did to Mysore. Salty were doing the same.
@zulfiqarAli-sr6su2 жыл бұрын
وہ رپورٹ اس لیئے ظاھر نہیں کی گئی کیونکہ حمود الرحمن کمیشن رپورٹ میں سیاستدانوں کے ساتھ ان فوجیوں کے بھی نام ھیں جن کی وجہ سے بنگلہ دیش بنا
@adiltamuri61312 жыл бұрын
🇨🇦🇵🇰..SAHI FARMAYA…LAKIN..UN SUB …KIRDAR….KI ..BOHAT DARNAAK ….MOOT…. HOEI…. ALLAH NAY UN SUB KO BARI DARDNAK …SAZZA…DUNIYA MAIN HI DI…
@hussainshaukat86615 ай бұрын
سقوط ڈھاکہ کے اصل زمہ دار جرنیلی سامراج ھے۔جنرل ضیاء۔جنرل گل حمید۔جنرل ٹکا اور جنرل امجد شیعب جیسے عیاش جنرلز نے پاکستان کو دو لخت کیا۔۔۔زولفیقار علی بھٹو دنیا کا عظیم لیڈر تھا سیاست دان تھا۔۔بنگلہ دیش بننے کی وجہ پاکستان کے جنرل ھیں جو اپنا اصل کام چھوڑ کر سیاست میں گھسے ھوئے ھیں۔۔۔
@masoodahmed19722 жыл бұрын
From General Ayub to General Yaha are responsible for Loss East Pakistan from army side. On civil side Bhutto and Mujib are responsible.
@md.zahidurrahmansardar6949 ай бұрын
Mujib was not responsible for war 1971 and separation of east pakistan.
@ShahNawaz-yu7gf8 ай бұрын
@@md.zahidurrahmansardar694He was a traitor from 1962. He did everything for power
@javeedi.48652 жыл бұрын
General East Pakistan episode is such a wound that continues to bleed. Every time you mention it starts bleeding afresh. 51 years later, our eyes start to shed tears as we hear the incidents.
@RashidAli-rm7lh2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely right Sir
@iqbalzaidi3534 ай бұрын
ThankYOU for a deep analysis on the Dacca fall . I lost my cousin ( a young army lieutenant) on the front of kulna, I remember his mom at the time of his shahadat news tearful but said to his younger brother promise me you will join the army . His father major(r) tried to locate his grave but never found it because he was martyr in hand to hand combat in a jungle with Indian soldiers when he was trying to get supplies for his stranded company. Painful memories of 1971 but now I realize the real killers were someone in sheep clothing here among us all the time .
@wondereditx19062 жыл бұрын
اللہ پاک ہمارے ملک پاکستان کو ہر قسم کی اندرونی اور بیرونی شَر سے محفوظ رکھے۔ آمین
@abdulraheemfazal84312 жыл бұрын
ameeen
@sheikhsaeed61282 жыл бұрын
Aameen ya Rab ul aalmeen
@successhappiness2 жыл бұрын
He ( ZA BHUTTO ) WON ONLY 81 SEATS WHILE SHEIKH MUJEEB WON 160 SEATS ( ALMOST DOUBLE, THAT OF ZAB ) YET HE ( ZAB ) REFUSED TO ACCEPT SHEIKH MUJEEB AS THE LEGITIMATE NEXT PRIME MINISTER OF UNITED PAKISTAN. ادھر ہم ، ادھر تم
@UnixGuy322 жыл бұрын
بہت ہی اچھا اور سچا تجزیہ دیا ہے سے آپ نے، What a wonderful lesson of the history
@qurankahani9742 жыл бұрын
جنرل صاحب ایسے حقائق بیان کرنا بھی حق اور سچ کا بیان کرنا ہے آ پ جیسے لوگ اگر اپنے اس فرض کو سمجھ لیں تو لوگوں کو اپنے وطن کو جاننے میں آ سانی ہوگی جس کی بنیادوں میں بہت سے ناسوروں کی کہانیاں دفن ہیں
@IRSHADKHAN-ij7pu2 жыл бұрын
Bangladesh k "Tikkay" par Bhutto ki tasveer honi chiyea kew kay I think Bangladesh banay may Mujeeb say zeyada Bhutto ka haath zeyada tha.
@ZeeshaanBukhari222 жыл бұрын
Bhai bari Sach baat kahi instead of Mujib they should call Bhutto Bangabandhu
@mdakramulIslam-iu3qq2 жыл бұрын
😄😄😄😄😄😄😄Pakistan banane me jinnah se jyada gandhi ka role zyada thi . Bewakooof
@IRSHADKHAN-ij7pu2 жыл бұрын
Han may janta hon. Tabhi Indians nay Gandhi ki maa chod di thi
@cmesilver7423 Жыл бұрын
Hundred per cent correct....and the bhutto claim to be the champions of democracy.lies....lies...lies.............mujibur was not allowed to rule the country despite the fact that he had a landslide victory.
@md.zahidurrahmansardar694 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for important comments and information.
@mohammadkhan58762 жыл бұрын
Excellent comments/analysis. God bless you.
@saleemmahmood80802 жыл бұрын
Agreed 100%. But army had a real responsibility to give mujeeb government. Please speak about army role
@javedchughtai10862 жыл бұрын
بلکل سچی کہانی، اس وقت میری عمر 14 سال تھی، لاہور میں ہونے والے ھر جلسے میں شرکت کی، وہ ایک مداری تھا، اور عوام جاہل آج کی طرح...
@RizwanKhan-lm7jm2 жыл бұрын
Kon?
@KASHAN_FF-h6b Жыл бұрын
Javed chughtai tum jahil ho aor tum jese jahiloon ki wajha se mulk beemar he
@qutub-ul-walikhan24597 ай бұрын
بھٹو
@fghirapak4 ай бұрын
بھٹو@@RizwanKhan-lm7jm
@fayyaznaqvi67122 жыл бұрын
General saab bhutto was the last character in this tragedy but the seeds of discontent and separation were sown by gen Ayub khan when he rigged elections against mohtarma Fatima Jinnah who won with landslide victory in both east and west Pak and he rigged the elections and came into power
@nasirkhan786vlogs72 жыл бұрын
Gen sab never accept what pakistan army has had done to this country. He never accept what yahya khan musharraf and ayub had done to this country. What gen niazi had done. He is a biased person. Army tattoo.
@wordtruth61162 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@kamrantoor17832 жыл бұрын
Sub chooor
@rafiqahmed42032 жыл бұрын
Absolutely right
@zak100062 жыл бұрын
THANKS TO SAyING TRUE STORY OF DIVIDED OF PAKISTAN 🇵🇰,May GREAT Allah Blessing you .
@zafarkamboh46192 жыл бұрын
Good analysis about the historical prospect of Pakistan
@HassanAmin772 жыл бұрын
How can we ignore role of General Ayub and General Yahya in stoking hatred against Bengalis and not transferring power to Mujeeb.
@asadraza46972 жыл бұрын
You must should watch all remaining 3 episodes of general sahab in which he described the ending of these culprits!
@Noorjahan52 жыл бұрын
I wish Bilwal listen to this, he is very proud of his father and his followers listen to this too.
@nuzhatyousaf6870 Жыл бұрын
Kash is mulk k log aqal mund bnaie
@mominakhurramkhurrum4 ай бұрын
Lt general ko sharm Ani chaheya
@AbdulGhaffar-wn8gu2 жыл бұрын
جنرل صاحب اپ کا تجزیہ بہت ہی شفاف ہوتا ہے۔
@gregario8882 жыл бұрын
Bhutto was one of those two characters who were "cultivated", by the adversaries to dismember Pakistan. The adversaries have very brazenly boasted about it, time and again. It was Mujib in the East and Bhutto in the west, according to them. Had Bhutto been left alive -- he surely wouldn't have minded presiding over dismemberment of whatever was left of Pakistan after the 1971 debacle. Bhutto's villainy predates 1971 as well. He was the villain of precipitating the 1965 conflict as well. He was the one who egged Gen. Ayub Khan to war with India, to sort out the Kashmir issue. He was the "Advisor" to Ayub, in those times of strife. Had Gen Zia not hung him -- Bhutto wouldn't have minded dismembering the remnants of Pakistan, after the 1971 debacle.
@muhammedwasim82722 жыл бұрын
Yup I am old enough to remember all that. My whole family cried on the day of fall of Dhaka.
@premicism99552 жыл бұрын
You guys readily dissassotiate yourself with your leaders. That's progress.
@exo-gamerz26622 жыл бұрын
What Bhutto's father did against Pakistan? Like father like son.
@exo-gamerz26622 жыл бұрын
@@premicism9955 Our leader? Sponsored? Can any leader be sponsored? Oh no bheroo😊 Was Lawrence of Arabia a leader of Arabs??😊 Comeon, man!!😊 Is Nawaz, or Zardari leader?? They were surrogated. Winning election is different from real popularity. Unfortunately, literacy is kept low in Pakistan intentionally, obviously to rig election. Thank you, khetri bhai.
@premicism99552 жыл бұрын
@@exo-gamerz2662 kahan se kahan pahunch gaya? All I said was Pakistanis disown their leaders readily. Just as in this discussion.
@MR.SAMI.VLOGING2 жыл бұрын
Bohat khub masha Allah, Allah aap ki umar daraz farmaey aamin bohat mahnat orr lagan se information bayan ki gaee hy new jernation ki liye khazana hy shahid munawer zaman town korangi Karachi
@msrahmed2 жыл бұрын
bhutto is a sign of manhoosiat for pakistan, and this manhosiat is still continuing in the shape of bibli, asif thugdari and billo khusri.
@malikayoub24892 жыл бұрын
شکریہ شعیب امجد صاحب
@mukhtarahmad99432 жыл бұрын
بہت خوب جناب بہت اچھی اسٹوری کی آپ نے تاریخ کے اوراق سے اور بھی اس طرح کی سٹوریاں کیا کریں شکریہ جرنل صاحب
@Manzoor112 жыл бұрын
سر اس تاریخ کی شرمناک شکست سے زیادہ بہتر یہ نہیں تھا کہ ہم عزت کے ساتھ مشرقی پاکستان کو خود مختاری دے دیتے ؟؟؟
@Junaid19594 ай бұрын
This was not possible because Mr. Bhutto has a hidden plan to divide by not contesting from Bangladesh. Just like if any one wants the leadership of Pakistan he has to fight from Punjab. We all are responsible and expert in blame game.
@dratifkhan84972 жыл бұрын
No matter how power hungry bhutto was , it was General Yahya's responsibility to handover the gov to Mujib who was the clear cut winner. It was Yahya who pitched Bhutto against Mujib so that he could save his own chair
@ZeeshaanBukhari222 жыл бұрын
Indeed you are right but still it doesn't change the fact that Bhutto was one of the main culprits in seperation of East Pakistan
@shahidminhas16822 жыл бұрын
You have reached the zenith of unbiased analysis. Despite Higher secondary school certificate holder you have outclassed the great historian ToynBee.
@navidbutt172 жыл бұрын
“Higher secondary schools certificate holder”….what are you talking about ?
@shahidminhas16822 жыл бұрын
@@navidbutt17 It is the basic academic requirement to get a commission in the armed forces.
@salaampakistan18312 жыл бұрын
Amjid sahib ❤️ you are great man.
@masoodabbasi70442 жыл бұрын
You are a great man who dare to speak truth
@naquibgauher40302 жыл бұрын
To be honestly, I think Bhutto, Mujib, Indira Gandhi, all these families had to suffer what these three criminals had created and nature knew how to get revenge on them ... and your analysis is art Creation through destruction.💯🌹
@iqbalahmed59792 жыл бұрын
کیا بھٹو نے ہی 6 نقاط دیئے تھے؟ مجیب کو حکومت ملتا تو پاکستان 5 حصوں میں تقسیم ہو جاتا۔ کیوں کہ مجیب الگ کرنسی سب صوبوں میں کر دیتا۔
@Salman-oo5kr2 жыл бұрын
The nature took revenge fro.m them but their children took revenge from their nations as they have been in power corridors for the last 50 years in three countries and no hope of getting rid of them
@mohamedashrafbutt61942 жыл бұрын
Why Zia suffered ? Because he killed innocent Z A Bhutto who stabilized Pakistan after Daaca Fall. His actions saved the west Pakistan . His program of Sending Labor abroad which stabilized the economy of Pakistan. His initiative on Nuclear program . Pakistan can not be bullied by India now. Zia the great only gave Laanat of M Q M , Afghan Drug Mafia , Klashinkov religious extremism. Jahil log kya janain Bhutto ki Azmat sari family qurban hui Pakistan k liye.
@jenifferbrown22972 жыл бұрын
Aap ke analysis mein kayee kamzorian hain. Pak fouj ky generals ka role kysa raha iske analysis bhi zaroori hai. Aisee zabardast fouj ke hamesha ke ruswayee ky zimmadar generals hee thay. Aaj jub koi kahta hai, Pakistan naqabile taskheer hai ya Pakistan hummesha qaem rahega toh dil ke mazbootee usmein nahin hotee. Pakistan tootne ka subse bara nuqsan yeh hai. Islam ya Pakistan kabhi Bengali leaders ka agenda nahin tha, Pakistan banty hee unhon ne apne asal agendey yani Bengali nationalism pr actively kaam shroo kar dia tha. Qaid e azam ke mukhalfat, yad kijie qomi zaban ke moamle mein. Hidden agenda of bengalese was always Bengali nationalism. Bengali leaders cunningly used the muslim strength of United India for their ultimate goal. Mujeeb if made the head of pakistan government as a result of 71 election, would have done greater damage. Bhutto made Mujeeb's job easier and carried the blame of breaking Pakistan on himself. Bhutto lost to Mujeeb. BENGALI THINKS TODAY WHAT REST OF INDIA THINKS TOMORROW.
@bhaskaracharya17252 жыл бұрын
Your Armies Brutality on Mankind in EP brought you a Shameful defeat! And this the Truth and not a Propaganda!
@RA-vs1xc2 жыл бұрын
The start of the final movement of Bangladesh probably started with Ayub Khan. His martial law isolated all non- Punjabis. He moved the capital from cosmopolitan Karachi to Punjab heartland Pindi. He included mostly punjabis in the government since it was a ML. During 1965 war, East Pakistan was not defended as well as West.
@rashparbatkyuspar69162 жыл бұрын
Bilkul sahi kaha aap ny sir Bhutto haramzade ki hi waja se Pakistan k do tukde hove😢
@abbasjillani6079 Жыл бұрын
Bharwe tu haramzada he
@mohammadanwar17952 жыл бұрын
Whatever is told here is very much true. At that time I was working in Pakistan Eastern Railway.I observed all the political activities very attentively. It seemed to me Bhutto was power hungry and the number of seats he won in west Pakistan was unexpected, and this unexpected result make him more hungry. He came here in Dhaka and talked to Mujib to share power, but by that time Yahiya declared Mujib will be the future prime minister of Pakistan and we the Bengali Pakistani were eagerly waiting to see that happen. Then Bhutto started the dirty game with the support of a few generals to split the country to fulfill his undue desire. I finally like to say as always Bhutto is the father of the Bangladeshi Nation. I know the whole history but here it is not possible to write everything at one time. This is very important for the young Pakistani generation to know the real history of the country including the foundation of the country
@masoodahmed19729 ай бұрын
As Pakistani from West I apologise for harm caused by troops to my eastern brethren I wish you well in your new country
@shahebkhan83072 жыл бұрын
Watching from Bangladesh.
@naseemsagri66092 жыл бұрын
بلکل سچ فرمایا جناب
@saafbaat96852 жыл бұрын
Best analysise is like.Shukria
@limelight60832 жыл бұрын
Sir, i just come across with this DDP Analytical series. Its amazing and give a deep insight of some critical incidents of our history.
@haroonrashid74632 жыл бұрын
جناب : نیگیٹو مائنڈڈ لوگوں کو اداروں کو سپورٹ نہیں کرنا چاہئے جو ملک کے خطرہ بن جاتے ہیں
@nusratparveen99842 жыл бұрын
کاش آج اقتدار کی حوس رکھنے والے یہ انجام سوچ لیی قدرت بدلہ ضرور لیتی ھے
@pervezakhter75564 ай бұрын
قدرت نے ان سے ھی بدلہ لینا تھا باقی قذافی شاہ فیصل سے
@modigodi75432 жыл бұрын
Bhutto is the Major culprit of 1971
@naghmajabeen92004 ай бұрын
Salaam Lt Den Shoaib Shb, I have read a few versions of this tragic story, but your round up seems to be realistically coming very near to the truth. Feroze Syed, Hamm-Damm Foundation, Batley; UK,
@neatwell4492 жыл бұрын
In Shaa Allah. Long Live Pakistan.
@qazilaiqe97852 жыл бұрын
General sb your Analysis is very true and very informative....thanks... God bless you ameen sum ameen...
@tariqasghar39462 жыл бұрын
Gen sahib, while criticizing Bhutto for not supporting democracy you have conveniently ignored six points of Mujib which he had declared to be non negotiable, including one on separate currency and 6th point on separate para military force for East Pakistan. You know it better than me that those six points could not form the basis of constitution for Pakistan. Several negotiating sessions were held in Dacca between Mujib, Yahya & Bhutto to agreeon a broad framework for a workable solution but due to rigid stand of Sh Mujib on his six points, no headway could be made. While this was going on, East Pakistan Rifles revolted and together with terrorists of Mukti Bahni, killed many Pakistani soldiers and civilians, particularly those from Punjab. Public sentiment was so anti Pakistan with active participation of India that for all intents and purposes, secession had taken place and by the time military action started, irreparable damage had been done by non other than Sh Mujib’s party, India and Mukti Bahni. Perhaps you don’t like Bhutto but your personal bias should not be reflected in your shows.
@dailyurdu55832 жыл бұрын
Gen Sb Also made a video on Mujeeb
@ishabutt93322 жыл бұрын
01. MR. TARIQ ASGHAR, FULL MARKS TO YOU FOR SPEAKING ONE TRUTH OF THE WHOLE STORY OF THE CATASTROPHE OF DACCA FALL. 02. THE BIGGEST QUESTION IS WHY THE WHOLE OF EAST PAKISTAN PEOPLE SPARING JUST A FEW HAD TURNED SO ANTI-PAKISTAN MILITARY AND EVENTUALLY ANTI-PAKISTAN TOO? IN WEST PAKISTAN TOO, THE PUBLIC SENTIMENTS AGAINST AYUB KHAN N YAHYA KHAN UNDER MR. Z.A. BHUTTO WERE ALSO NOT MUCH DIFFERENT. BUT IN WEST PAKISTAN NO ONE WAS ANTI-PAKISTAN. THE CRUCIAL FACTOR BEHIND DACCA FALL WAS THE ROLE OF PAKISTAN'S POWER-HUNGRY MILITARY GENERALS STAGING MILITARY COUPS AND RUNNING A CIVIL SET-UP WITH DONKEY CLUB IN THEIR HANDS. MILITARY RULE IS NEITHER ISLAMIC NOR DEMOCRATIC. THIS IS A GIMMICK ADOPTED BY THE POWER-HUNGRY GENERALS OF PAKISTAN TO RUN A CIVIL SETUP BY DINT OF MILITARY BRAIN AND GUN. BEING A GENERAL AYUB KHAN WAS A CAPABLE ADMINISTRATOR. HE RAPIDLY MULTIPLIED PAKISTAN ECONOMY N INDUSTRY. BUT A MILITARY BRAIN IN HIM NEVER KNEW THAT 90% WEALTH OF PAKISTAN HAD PILED UP IN 22 INDUSTRIAL FAMILIES OF PAKISTAN AND LABORERS N FARMERS UNDER INDUSTRIALISTS AND LANDLORDS WERE DYING HUNGRY. EAST PAKISTAN ALONE HAD MORE POPULATION THAN THE REST OF FULL WEST PAKISTAN SO, THE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC WERE COMPARATIVELY MORE WRETCHED. AND WHEN IN 1969 THE GENERAL PUBLIC REVOLTED IN BOTH WINGS OF PAKISTAN AND FORCED AYUB KHAN TO RESIGN, HE HANDED OVER THE GOVERNMENT TO ANOTHER MILITARY GENERAL MR. YAHYA KHAN. THIS WAS THE GENERAL WHO HAD THREE DESTRUCTIVE QUALITIES GATHERED IN HIS ONE PERSONALITY TO DESTROY THE COUNTRY. FIRST, A MILITARY GENERAL RUNNING A CIVIL SET-UP, SECOND, A HABITUAL DEAD DRUNKARD, AND THIRD, A HABITUAL ADULTERER LEAVING NO TIME TO TAKE CARE OF THE DEFENSE N SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY. 03. MUJIB'S SIX POINTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY WERE ABSOLUTELY NON-ACCEPTABLE TO KEEP THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN INTACT AND WORKABLE. ACCORDING TO THESE SIX POINTS, THE CENTRE WOULD HAVE DEFENCE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND HALF OF THE CURRENCY SUB-DIVIDED BETWEEN CENTRE AND EAST PAKISTAN AND THE REST WOULD GO TO ALL THE PROVINCES. IT MEANT THE CENTRE WOULD HAVE TWO N A HALF DEPARTMENTS ONLY. HERE IN THOSE LAST ROUNDS OF TALKS AMONG YAHYA, BHUTTO N MUJIB, MR. Z.A. BHUTTO TRIED HIS BEST TO CONVINCE MUJIB TO AT LEAST FOREGO HALF POINT OF SEPARATE CURRENCY FOR EAST PAKISTAN BUT MUJIB REMAINED ADAMANT. IN THOSE CONDITIONS ACCEPTANCE OF THESE SIX POINTS WOULD HAVE MEANT FIVE PIECES OF PAKISTAN INSTEAD OF TWO. I DON'T THINK MR. Z.A. BHUTTO WAS REMOTELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SEPARATION OF EAST PAKISTAN OR ANY OF HIS POLITICAL MOVES OR PLOT IN HIS POLITICAL HISTORY PROVES THIS. HIS FATHER SIR SHAHNAWAZ BHUTTO HAD PLAYED A KEY ROLE IN JOINING SIND WITH PAKISTAN IN 1947. WHEREAS MUJIB HAD HIS HISTORY LIKE INVOLVEMENT IN AGARTALA TREASON CASE AND HIS FAMOUS SIX POINTS AGENDA ALSO SHOWED THE SAME. HE WAS DOING THIS BECAUSE OF BEING STAUNCHLY ANTI-MILITARY RULE OF AYUB KHAN N YAHYA KHAN. O4. INDIA PLOTTED AND EXPLOITED THE POLITICAL N MILITARY BLUNDERS OF PAKISTAN MILITARY GENERALS TO THE FULL ALONG WITH THE VERY VULNERABLE GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION OF EAST PAKISTAN. PAKISTAN MILITARY WAS FIGHTING INDIAN MILITARY ON THREE OUTSIDE BORDERS ATTACKS, FOURTH ONE WAS THE BAY OF BENGAL EFFECTIVELY BLOCKED BY MUKTI BAHNI AND INDIAN NAVY AND 100% OF POPULATION INSIDE ALONG WITH MUKTI BAHNI. NO MILITARY OF THE WORLD COULD HAVE WON THE WAR IN SUCH ADVERSE CONDITIONS.
@eshsaad73462 жыл бұрын
@@ishabutt9332 WE ALL PETRIOT PAKISTANI KNOWS HOW WAS THE MAIN BENEFICIARIE OF THIS GAME THAT WAS Z A BHUTO I REMEMBER PEOPLE USE TO SAY BHUTO [KUTTA BHOKTA HAY] IT WAS Z A BHUTO HOW NOT ONLY CREATED THIS MESS HE MADE SURE THAT HE AND ONLY HE BE THE LEADE OFF THE CONTERY HE DIDNT CARE ABOUT PAKISTAN ,HE WAS BLOODY SELFISH IDIOT ,I AM NOT SAYING HES THE ONLY ONE OFCOURSE OTHER PEOPLE TOKE ADVANTAGE IS WELL, BUTT ZULFIQAR ALI BHUTO IF HE WANTED HE COULD HAD SAVED PAKISTAN FROM BRAKE UP.
@ishabutt93322 жыл бұрын
@@eshsaad734601. FIRST OF ALL, DURING 1969-1971 IT WAS YAHYA KHAN WHO WAS THE RULER OF PAKISTAN HAVING ALL THE MILITARY N CIVIL POWERS IN HIS HAND, NOT MR. BHUTTO OR MUJIB. HE HELD GENERAL ELECTIONS IN 1970. MUJIB GOT THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY IN EAST PAKISTAN BUT NOT A SINGLE SEAT IN WEST PAKISTAN. BHUTTO GOT A SIMPLE MAJORITY IN WEST PAKISTAN BUT NOT A SINGLE SEAT IN EAST PAKISTAN. 02. MUJIB COULD HAVE FORMED THE GOVERNMENT SINGLE-HANDEDLY HAVING A MAJORITY OF 162/300 SEATS IN TOTAL PAKISTAN EVEN WITHOUT MR. BHUTTO. BUT IN WHOSE HAND THE AUTHORITY AND THE POWER LIED TO CALL THE MEETING OF NATIONAL ASSEMBLY AND HAND OVER THE GOVERNMENT TO THE MAJORITY PARTY LEADER I.E. SH. MUJIB? THIS AUTHORITY AND POWER LIED IN THE HAND OF GEN. YEHYA KHAN, NOT IN THE HANDS OF MR. BHUTTO. BUT YEHYA DELAYED TO CALL THE MEETING OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY UNLESS A GOVERNMENT-FORMATION FORMULA WAS REACHED BETWEEN MUJIB N MR. BHUTTO. THE REASON FOR THIS DECISION BY MR. YEHYA KHAN WAS THE SIX POINTS OF SH. MUJIB WHICH HAD ALL THE INGREDIENTS OF SEPARATION OF EAST PAKISTAN AT ANY GIVEN TIME IF MR. MUJIB HAD WANTED. THESE SIX POINTS EVEN COULD HAVE SPLIT THE WHOLE OF PAKISTAN INTO FIVE PIECES BECAUSE OF THE VERY VULNERABLE N FRAGILE CENTRAL POWERS STATED IN THESE SIX POINTS. ALONG WITH THIS, MR. MUJIB HAD PLAYED A CENTRAL ROLE IN THE AGARTALA TREASON CASE OF 1962 AGAINST THE PAKISTAN MILITARY GOVERNMENT OF GEN. AYUB KHAN BECAUSE OF AYUB KHAN'S MILITARY COUP STAGED IN 1958. IN THOSE FINAL ROUNDS OF TALKS BHUTTO FINALLY OFFERED MR. MUJIB TO ACCEPT HIS GOVERNMENT IF HE HAD CHANGED JUST A HALF-POINT OF THOSE SIX POINTS I.E. THE CENTRE TO HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL OF CURRENCY INSTEAD OF HALF CONTROL BY THE CENTRE AND HALF BY EAST PAKISTAN ALONE AS STATED IN THOSE SIX POINTS. MUJIB REFUSED EVEN THIS HALF-POINT RELAXATION AND YEHYA KHAN DECIDED TO ARREST MUJIB BECAUSE THE BANGLA DESH FLAG WAS ALREADY BEING WAIVED IN EAST PAKISTAN. WHEN MR. WALI KHAN WENT TO EAST PAKISTAN TO HOLD TALKS WITH MR. MUJIB PRIOR TO THESE FINAL ROUNDS OF TALKS N HIS ARREST, WAS FORCED TO HOIST BANGLADESH FLAGE ON HIS CAR FRONT BEFORE HOLDING ANY TALKS WITH SH. MUJIB. SO, THE DIE HAD BEEN CAST MUCH BEFORE 1970. TO ME, PAKISTAN'S POWER-HUNGRY MILITARY GENERALS AND INDIA ARE THE BASIC FACTORS THAT SPLIT PAKISTAN INTO TWO.
@ishabutt93322 жыл бұрын
CORRECTION PLS: THE LAST SENTENCE ABOVE SHOULD BE READ AS ' TO ME, PAKISTAN'S POWER-HUNGRY GENERALS, INDIA AND SH. MUJIB ARE THE BASIC FACTORS THOSE SPLIT PAKISTAN INTO TWO. '
@dr.bashirkhan77802 жыл бұрын
ذلفکار بٹو کو آپ نے میٹھی گولی کا مثال جیسے پیش کیا بلکل صحیح ہے ۔
@mkhan67052 жыл бұрын
And same are the Sharif family characteristics.
@ghulamabbas38034 ай бұрын
اللہ اکبر
@saShaheer2 жыл бұрын
Never liked Bhutto. He was cunning not smart.
@MuhammadAli-tf6lb2 жыл бұрын
Nice analysis very informative storey
@mushtaqali80572 жыл бұрын
Its a true story as I was, in those days, a third year student.
@ghulamali74672 жыл бұрын
It's true story
@gs74582 жыл бұрын
As Indian & independent analysis Mujeeb has started revolt decade back, Ayub Khan did right a traitor can't be handover country, But issue is Tikha Khan handle situation very badly no one expects own army kill rapes own civilians
@amberlight58302 жыл бұрын
@@gs7458 read behind the myth 3 million.
@gs74582 жыл бұрын
@@amberlight5830 Ik bhe rape kiun protectors become monster, Tika Khan said he will change Nasal of Bengalis, that time there is no war at all, with love efection care Indian army control double area than Bengal in Kashmir. See how now army and locals relationship now. They correctly change Islamist malatia into calm youth. Pakistan ne koi kasar nahi chode thi agg lagane men same they try to do in Indian Punjab thanks God is is well now
@amberlight58302 жыл бұрын
@@gs7458 so one tilla Khan one statement is a divine truth for you.
@muhammadasadriaz34782 жыл бұрын
بالکل درست فرمایا سر ۔۔۔
@digipak072 жыл бұрын
Excellent
@mahmoodahmad6192 жыл бұрын
Gen sb thanks for presenting essence of your precious knowledge of your precious brain. God bless you with long life and sound health for fur serving the nation but pakistan is still in difficult time when we will come out and learn lesson from our history.
@afsheeninayat37442 жыл бұрын
Thank you fr telling us their real faces
@MuhammadArif-sc9dy2 жыл бұрын
Pakistan Army zindabad. ...GOD bless you General saheb. Carry on don,t stop it.
@dr.tahirnaim39792 жыл бұрын
Good historical representation
@MuhammadAslam-gl3gj2 жыл бұрын
Thanks general sahib very good knowledge about the history of Pakistan
@s786able2 жыл бұрын
AGREED. FACTS NEVER BURRESS.
@ashokduggal22522 жыл бұрын
This is very clear that bhutto roll critical Jai hind
@Salman-oo5kr2 жыл бұрын
So what I got Bhutto was the root cause of throwing us in 1965 and 1971 wars and breaking the country. The unfortunate element is "Bhutto aaj bhi zinda hey" now PPP has Gov't in Sind and lately the CM Murad Shah expressed his "Murad" of repeating the East Pakistan history in Sind by saying "don't let us think otherwise" What a tragedy that we have these pieces of work since 1947.
@sanjayjoshi4902 жыл бұрын
Zulfikar Bhutto was prime reason for Bangaladesh. He was willing to be p.m. sidelinig sheikh. Mujib
@vilmafavorito2 жыл бұрын
THATS WHY I LIKE PM IMRAN KHAN HE IS NOT HUNGRY FOR POWER AND HE IS NOT GREEDY FOR MONEY AND HE IS HONEST AND HE IS MAN OF PRINCIPLE
@waterrelaxingsounds76912 жыл бұрын
He has drowned the country. Hybrid system is badly failed.
@naeemshaikh75402 жыл бұрын
It’s good for those who broken Pakistan. God bless Pakistan
@haroonrashid74632 жыл бұрын
وعلیکم سلام : جو سونا کان کو کھائے اس بارے کیا کہنا ۔ بہر حال ۱۶دسمبر افسوس اور دکھ کا دن جس میں تین بندے یحی خان کی bad handling مجیب الرحمن کا ہوس اقتدار ہندوستانی رنگ + ذوالفقار بھٹو لالچ آج اور ابھی اقتدار نے قومی بے عزتی کروائ میں ۱۹۷۱ میں ۸ ویں جماعت میں تھا ہمارے بزرگ بہت غمگین ہوئے اےپی ایس کے واقعہ بھی ۱۶ دسمبر کو ہوا یہ بھی نیگیٹو مائنڈز کی کاروائ تھی جو دکھ اور افسوس دے گیا
@shahjalaluddin36852 жыл бұрын
Sir zabardast n informative video with ur good analysis is appreciated.
@nasreenfatima40852 жыл бұрын
I disagree with you today,when you said shaheed Benazir,, She is merhooma!
@bgulkh3770 Жыл бұрын
Beshak Allah ki pakarh boht shadeeid hay...... Boht ibratnaak bayan hay Sir apka. Allah ham sab ko hidayat dey ..... Ameen.
@truthRevealed732 жыл бұрын
zahanat k kia faida jab khon me gadari ho? banazir bhe zaheen the magar gadar and corrupt, ab Zardari aur Bilawal bhe gadar and corrupt
@habibhabibchaudary56822 жыл бұрын
اپ نے پاکستانیو تک یہ ہستری پنچائی آپ کوزندگی صحت عطافرمائے آپ شکریہ کہ آپ نےپاکستان کو دولخت ہونے کا واقعہ بیان کیا اور ہم تک پنچایا
@ColBalooch2 жыл бұрын
Another great historical talk
@faridulislam80922 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot. Avi ap 100% sach hay
@ilyasmuhammed85252 жыл бұрын
Good analysis Bhutto the main culprit in destroying Pakistan. This led him to Gallows he deserved it. Only his daughter Sanam is alive others were shot dead and Shahnawaz died of over dose of drugs. Same happened with Mujeeb and Indira families.
@hareemislam63762 жыл бұрын
Allah hamien honest, sincere, brave or sensible leaders ata farmaye! Or aisey nuqsan dene wale logo se bachaye
@neutralperson86352 жыл бұрын
Excellent coverage
@iLabRary2 жыл бұрын
بہترین تجزیے کا شکریہ
@hassanmehmood11172 жыл бұрын
Allah Pakistan ko ta Qayamat salamat rakhy ameen
@UNIVERSALAHMED2 жыл бұрын
Well Done General Sahib excellent analysis lots of people know he was responsible for splitting Pakistan into two countries its a shame that he is still alive in some people mind.
@asimasim8582 жыл бұрын
جنرل صاحب کیا بھٹو پر غداری کا مقدمہ نہیں بنتا تھا؟ اس عجیب ملک میں ملک کو نقصان پہنچانے والوں کو ہمیشہ خراج عقیدت پیش کیا جاتا ہے۔
@AltafHussain-w7x4 ай бұрын
General Yaha par mukadma q nhn banta ?
@useressuseeess2 ай бұрын
جنرل ضیاالحق کے لیے بہتر تھا کہ بھٹو پر قتل کے علاوہ غداری کا کیس چلا کر سزائے موت دی جاتی۔۔ تو بہتر تھا۔
@everydayinmyhome2 жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir you did it very well before a sentimental nation the truthful analysis has it's own value for those who reflect and research
@jafferh93222 жыл бұрын
If you were in E. Pakistan during that time, you will know the involvement of late Bhutto in 1971 incidence. He is the one declined to accept 1970 elections. Ayub Khan misjudged Bhutto was the down part of him. You are analysis very correct. Thanks
@sajawalkhan61722 жыл бұрын
True analysis salute you both hands
@aftabahmed44172 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@s.mabbasi38152 жыл бұрын
بےشک اس ملکت خدا داد سےجس نے بھی غداری کی اس کا انجام بھیانک ھوا اور آگئے بھی ایسا ہی ھو گا انشاء الله
@dilfarazkhan8642 жыл бұрын
I agree with you Sir 💯👍😭
@shafqatmirzamehmood19992 жыл бұрын
General sab me abi AAP episodes dekh ruha hou v excellent analysis i really appreciate you sir plz keep it up
@pakistanigamerz83932 жыл бұрын
بٹھو اگر پولینڈ کی قرارداد نہ پھاڑتا ۔ تو شائد باعزت فائر بندی کے بعد افواج کی باعزت واپسی ھوتی۔
@imdadshah4142 жыл бұрын
شاہد آنکھ بچ جاتی
@pervezakhter75564 ай бұрын
ٹیپو سلطان انگریز کی بات مان جاتا شاہد بچ جاتا
@shahidmehmood7762 Жыл бұрын
Very true facts and role of then leadership highlighted.
@sultankhan27392 жыл бұрын
Kindly arrange acpresentation on the reasons as to why pk army lost around 800sq km territory in 1971. It was difficult to support the logistics of e pk ops....but what about Tutuk....why we abandoned it? And left the local population at the mercy of enemy forces.