No! The question is if you know so much about health, fitness, weight loss why are you an average out of shape middle aged man?

Surrealist.??? Down vote. Nothing unreal/surreal about animal behavior.

I don't understand what the problem is. As a molecular biologist who "came into the business" in the 1980's, I saw a lot of great, fundamental discoveries that all turned out to be much more complicated than previously thought. Most of them still hold, but only in general, not in detail. The same is true here. It's still about mutation and selection. Yes, mutation is not random in the strict mathematical sense, but influenced by a number of mechanisms, and the concept of selection applies not only to how fast you can run when there's a bear chasing you, but also to how the birth rate of a society is influenced by DEI (I know the example sounds harsh, but that's how the cookie crumbles). Of course the bits and pieces are important to the experts, but not so much to the rest of us. The principle of "mutation and selection" still applies, the rest are details.

we are awareness observing information, this information is consciosness itself. we are surrounded by information, Consciousness is the information that is surrounding us. language is just code. words are symbols that we use to communicate our thoughts.

Good to have you back!

Looking forward to the next video.

It's not evolution, it's adaptation.

If you look inside a cell, it seems as if the organels are working together. Do they have consiousness? So... if com inside a factory, it seems as if the machines is working together. Do they have consiousness? No, they pre-programmed.

why are there so many defensive religious people here? if you truly believed what you pretend to believe, information like this wouldn't touch you whatsoever. i'm sorry that your metaphysics doesn't correlate with physical reality, but if you don't intend to listen in good faith please keep to yourself.

Macro evolution does not exist, however, adaptation, deceptively named 'micro evolution' does occur and this is observed. Why is secular science churning out fantasy theories as fact and misleading people to think they evolved from a monkey when its mathematically impossible given the 6 million year fantasy timeframe, even a generous 98.5% base pair match between chimpanzees and humans requires a staggering head scratching 35 million base pairs for your accidentally on purpose unguided no end goal process to sort out. All of life is purposely designed with specified information to allow the immense ecosystem and its myriad of finely tuned symbiosis relationships to function and allow the cycle of life to continue. The number of paradoxes that a naturalism explanation has to overcome is insurmountable, it requires a special pleading for impossibilities to be trivial, it requires 'no-thing' to have mastered all the disciplines required for life, mathematics, chemistry, physics, engineering, biochemistry, light, electricity, magnetism, and even though 'no-thing' has no mind, it miraculously brought into existence 'abstract concepts'! Why has mankind chosen 'no-thing' over a creator? Is it because 'no-thing' cannot tell them how to live their lives? 'No-thing' does exactly what it says on the tin 'no-thing', yet your faith in 'no-thing' and its religion 'secular science', allows you to willingly believe anything other than a divine creator, even though your entire technological existence revolves around intelligent design. Science doesn't say anything, scientists do, science that tells you one thing today and another thing tomorrow but the word of God has remained unchanged for thousands of years. Secular science is compromised by money, research grants are given to scientists who tow the line and keep to the sacred paradigm of 'no-thing', those who oppose the religion of secular science are ostracised, ridiculed, and risk their career being destroyed. Mankind is creative, we intuitively understand the source of complexity and information is always a mind, a street sign, a name etched into sand, ink on paper, we know intelligent agency is the cause. Secular science knows the complexity of a single cell, they know it is orders of magnitudes more complex than anything mankind has devised. They know it utilises mechanisms that we cannot replicate, they know after almost 70 years of scientific scrutiny it remains unsolved and each new layer of complexity pushes their progress backwards. YET they still BELIEVE it was created by 'no-thing' and obviously 'no-thing' has no mind, so they believe 'no-thing' can bring forth complexity and information, so it is a religion and their deity is 'no-thing' Me, I believe in a divine creator and I only need the common sense God gave me, mankind was created in Gods image, God has a mind, God is creative, we have a mind, we are creative, God has high moral values, we have moral values but fall short of Gods. Our world today is completely governed by intelligent design, not a day goes by when it is not utilized by most people in the world. One single cell bests all of mans intelligent designs but according to secular science it was not intelligently designed. GIVE ME A BREAK!

They migrated south and south east. There are prominent evidence that native papua,flipino and indo etc share a percentage of dna with denisovens.

Leucine is bad for your mitochondria??????

Nice

Evolution? You say? From chemistry into biology? Nope. You cannot do that never. Before doing that try to revive first a dead cell. Start with that because all of the ingredients are already in there. I suggest try to revive a dead cell first.

NOTHING *HAS* TO DRIVE IT!! It is accidental, absolutely random mutations in position and value in the genome in each offspring, and circumstantial, Natural Selection is merely whether some genome is more fit for its environmental niche, and THAT is pure happenstance!! It DOES select for ever more and more complexly adapted life forms, and that makes it SEEM guided, but IT ISN'T!!!

1:29:39 ahhhh! Yes! I've discovered that my DNA isn't simply "manipulating" me! IT'S LITERALLY KEEPING ME ALIVE! IN VERY REAL WAYS! 👀👀👀

This is amazingly rich info source thank you!

hahahahahaha! Evolution is a disproven myth.

All carbs are bad too

BCAA don’t raise your insulin levels.

Make perfect copy is impossible because such copy has to occupied the same space and time. DNA information and cellular one might be seen as one entity. DNA as blueprint and cellular as interactions with environmental. Or I'm completely didn't get. However, good to think while listening wiser people.

As Adam below said - Mike was just the same during his lectures. Always going off on tangents and then getting back on track. He's a great Bob Dylan fan "The carpet too is moving under you" = plate tectonics. He's also a great Charlie Parker fan. One day me and some mates were playing some Charlie Parker in the 4th year room and he came in because he heard it and hung around for about half an hour listening to it with us. Another mate of mine made his day once by saying: "he's a great goalie"! We were privileged.

A new book published by Austin Macauley Publishers titled From Chemistry to Life on Earth outlines abiogenesis in great detail with a solution to the evolution of the genetic code and the ribosome as well as the cell in general using 290 references, 50 illustrations and several information tables with a proposed molecular natural selection formula with a worked example for ATP.

We only have corn fed animals. What should I do?

I am an ardent fan of Desmond Morris. Happen to get this video. Desmond in his old age is just as inspiring and as informative. Long live.

Thank you Jitender for just letting Prof Noble talk without interruptions.

Thanks!

I strongly suggest for Danis to investigate why beaver 🦫 build dam and how birds 🦅 build nest both not trained so?

Wow, that's kind of laughable bc apparently grass fed beef is higher in amino acids than grain fed 😅 You'd be much better off learning more in depth from Dr Bikman re insulin at least

Combining fat protein and carbs is the highest you can raise your insulin especially in large amounts thanks to Dr Bikmans teaching Protein and fat don't really elevate insulin much at all Glucose raises insulin more than fructose I believe, And it's pretty clear Dr lustig is not really 100% on low-carb because he fails to point out that glycemic index glycemic load is one of the biggest factors in combination like a giant bowl of rice is much worse than drinking a beer or something

Leucine is in grass fed beef as well as grain fed and is the most anabolic amino acid, more capable of building muscle than anything else, which contributes massively to insulin sensitivity and to life expectancy later in life where we know keeping muscle mass is highly related to longevity Valine and isoleucine are also in grass fed beef, and no protein isn't the problem with regards to insulin levels, protein is tied to muscle mass and thusly life extension, and as we age ee need more and more protein to combat anabolic resistance in fact

Info and a designed Cell of many parts . Hmmmm . Sounds very un random to me ...

Very Intresting n true

Thomas Maria Anderson Donald Johnson Paul

Garcia Michael Martinez Kenneth Thomas Linda

Hernandez Helen Gonzalez Deborah Anderson Elizabeth

i synopsize this as the inescapability of perceiving *agency* in evolution - the peculiar thing is the always fugitive identity of this agency. But even that agency which one habitually regards as one's own (and provides us with our idea of agency) can be seen (if one is very attentive) hardly to be one's own

Harris Jason Jackson Paul Davis Barbara

Thanks to both educated people, it is very difficult to understand science, especially molecular biology, moving forward to a bright and proud future from the precious scientist Dennis Nobel.

Martin Michelle Anderson John Gonzalez Jason

Hernandez George Lee Scott Jones Matthew

Garcia William Martin David Johnson Christopher

Anderson Michelle Thomas Brenda Robinson Brenda

Lee David Thompson Jose Martinez John

Lopez Frank Garcia Shirley Hernandez Brenda

Bottom up wins in every area of real world understanding and know-how

Bottom up wins in every area of real world understanding and know-how

We use bottom up approaches in every area of effective science and medicine and engineering and basically every area of real world knowledge is bottom up! Just because we don't apply quantum mechanics to every physical endeavor doesn't mean that bottom up isn't the correct understanding of reality! No to understand what to have for breakfast or how traffic works you don't use quantum mechanics but yet you do use the same principles of looking at how smaller ingredients create the bigger picture I mean you don't have to live this way but it is the only way that has proven effective for actual real-world understanding and application

Were you going to say shit or shish kabab?😮

Is he suggesting to not eat meat that is fed corn? Where do people buy the meat that is not corn fed?