What drives evolution | Denis Noble | Reason with Science | Darwin | Selfish genes | Richard Dawkins

  Рет қаралды 34,649

Reason with Science

Reason with Science

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 125
@syedalishanzaidi1
@syedalishanzaidi1 Жыл бұрын
Whether Prof Denis Noble is proved right or not, what should be applauded here is the fact that he is corageous enough to voice his thoughts in order to provoke the attention of the scientific community in this direction. Like Dawkins himself, he is a great explainer of ideas, and it is amazing how his train of thoughts never wanders, but stays true to the course. Where this kind of thinking in the field of evolutionary biology will lead in the end is difficult to predict. There is a lot going on in the processes which define or determine what life is, and how it came about to begin with. Jim Al Khalili has i think tried to draw the attention of science to what may be happening deep inside living cells, and he points to the intricacies of Quantum mechanics as perhaps having an effect in the way particles inside cells behave. Whether it is specialists in evolutionary biology, or the lay public which takes an interest in these matters, we should welcome the trends in thinking which seem to be bekoning towards as yet untravelled paths. Darwin I think would be with us all the way. And I have to say that I loved the way Jitender Kumar listened without interrupting. Full marks to him for keeping his peace, and never wavering in his attention to what the eminent Prof was saying. Many thanks to them both.
@user-uz8zy8zl4k
@user-uz8zy8zl4k Ай бұрын
Whether he' right or not '?? He IMO most certainly IS !!! What is the alternative - well Dawkins! Either that or oneself must come up with what Is the alt !!! Noble stays true to his (True) course be-CAUSE (!!) he is Reason incarnate ie of that Natural INTELlgence of which he speaks !! Get with program FFS!!! I can provide the Philosophical reason(s) (sic!!) fr Why he is Right but alas this is not the place fr that here.
@Mousey316
@Mousey316 Жыл бұрын
great interview. noble is very knowledgeable and articulate. i applaud the interviewer for giving him the time to develop his thoughts without interruption. well done.
@larryparis925
@larryparis925 Ай бұрын
Well said.
@gopra
@gopra Ай бұрын
​@@larryparis925❤❤
@patrickirwin3662
@patrickirwin3662 2 күн бұрын
Yes! Thank you Dr. Kumar! (I don't know if you are a PhD but I grant doctorates to those who doctor me.)
@archiewebster5034
@archiewebster5034 2 ай бұрын
You hosted a very good interview! I appreciate your patience and great questions :) This is the first video I’ve seen of yours and I will be watching a lot more.
@larryparis925
@larryparis925 Ай бұрын
Same here.
@hn6187
@hn6187 3 ай бұрын
I love how prof noble references his speech to show how science is above language and borders, a supra culture unto itself, inspired mostly by its own careful recursion, and art
@tersta1
@tersta1 Ай бұрын
I didn't know of Denis Noble until today. Of course, I have known of Richard Dawkins for decades. His views are the status quo of Neo-Darwinists. I'm glad to hear Denis Noble's POV. It actually aligns better with my own observations and resultant POV. Thanks for hosting Denis Noble on your podcast
@katherandefy
@katherandefy 8 күн бұрын
Goodness me. I was not expecting this delightful level of detail. Lots to ponder. So much.
@larryparis925
@larryparis925 Ай бұрын
Wonderful session. Mr. Kumar is well-prepared and knowledgeable, and Prof. Noble is an amazing scientific storyteller. Imagine sitting around a campfire and listening to him talk. Thank you... very, very much.
@davidcolby1456
@davidcolby1456 2 ай бұрын
The answer is easy and hard at the same time.The answer is everything drives evolution and a completely related and intertwined complicated way.
@rustycalvera977
@rustycalvera977 Жыл бұрын
what an interesting discussion this is....how beautifully put forth by denis noble.
@Spudmay
@Spudmay Жыл бұрын
This is a very wonderfully interesting concept. Now I have to investigate this further. It seems weird I haven't heard of this at all (I am also very very new to ingesting science).
@karlbarlow8040
@karlbarlow8040 Ай бұрын
This man ranks as a genius of the standard of E O Wilson and James Lovelock. The accepted model of any branch of science can only be at the level that the average scientist can understand. This is why all genius' struggle to be accepted. Only a great interview like this can allow us mortals to glimpse the workings of such a mind. Thank you.
@yp77738yp77739
@yp77738yp77739 11 күн бұрын
Very interesting. For me the key is that this might explain the generation of novel species which, I understand as being mathematically problematic with passive mutation processes. I need to listen several more times. We mustn’t lose sight that molecular biology is a very young science.
@phil3.146
@phil3.146 Жыл бұрын
Good interview.
@dominiqueubersfeld2282
@dominiqueubersfeld2282 Күн бұрын
I remember another brilliant biologist who also struggled with understanding genes. His name was Trofim Denisovich Lysenko. Contrary to Denis Noble, he saw himself as a materialist and a Marxist, but the final result was the same. Both Lysenko and Noble actually are Neo-Lamarckist, for different reasons.
@MrSolonolo
@MrSolonolo 2 ай бұрын
A very clever dancing around the principle question which was "what DRIVES evolution” which differs from the question "what PRECIPITATES or FACILITATES evolution". Informative and enjoyable, nonetheless. Thank you.
@TheMargarita1948
@TheMargarita1948 2 ай бұрын
Are you looking for a teleological explanation?
@MrSolonolo
@MrSolonolo 2 ай бұрын
@@TheMargarita1948 Or even a causal one. Yes.
@TheMargarita1948
@TheMargarita1948 2 ай бұрын
Matter and energy. Magnetism and vast amounts of time.
@MrSolonolo
@MrSolonolo 2 ай бұрын
@@TheMargarita1948 Which is the "driver”?
@TheMargarita1948
@TheMargarita1948 2 ай бұрын
@@MrSolonolo random mutation acted upon by natural selection. Please don’t give the old argument that all this senseless beauty could not have been brought about “at random.” Natural selection is relentless.
@robertbryant4485
@robertbryant4485 14 күн бұрын
I'd like to see the mathematical probability. behind C,H,O,N P atoms randomly arranging into self replicating DNA. which is more complicated than any computer we know
@planetdog1641
@planetdog1641 14 күн бұрын
me too! Darwinism is dead.
@ferrantepallas
@ferrantepallas Жыл бұрын
brilliant and fascinating presentation, thank you
@robertagajeenian7222
@robertagajeenian7222 Ай бұрын
I wonder what Darwin would have said (perhaps he even knew of this already - he wrote a book on orchids) about the very great hybridization industry with orchids. There exist cross-genera hybrids wherein 3-5 (anyway) different genera are hybridized. These hybrids (where typically hybridization produces sterile offspring) are generally fertile. The orchid hybridization process is with pollinia to stamen directly. This practice is very ancient in food plants and some farm animals, I guess, but the fact of its happening is already very interesting. I wonder if orchids are particularly labile genetically?
@bertrandthebault6899
@bertrandthebault6899 11 ай бұрын
Denys Noble is a star
@patod4
@patod4 11 ай бұрын
Not yet listened to all of it. But why isn't Lamarck mentioned, after all he supported what today we call somatic inheritance, am I wrong?
@bastiaanschouwink3562
@bastiaanschouwink3562 11 ай бұрын
the weissman barrier is the same as anti neolamarckism, i believe. noble is i think a lamarckist
@larryparis925
@larryparis925 Ай бұрын
Lamarck and Lamarckism is mentioned. You didn't listen far enough. It's quite interesting.
@ValidatingUsername
@ValidatingUsername 7 күн бұрын
Cells and system adaptation to homeostatic conditions trying to form barriers or connective tissue with shells and bones and such 😊
@sergiosatelite467
@sergiosatelite467 Ай бұрын
11:34: Immune System Selects
@ericjohnson6665
@ericjohnson6665 Ай бұрын
Re. Immune system "choosing" nucleotides... this sounds a lot like Michael Levin's assessment of cells: 'Life has congnition all the way down to the individual cell.' Which begs the question: how did that cell come by that "cognition", when life first started?
@imwelshjesus
@imwelshjesus Ай бұрын
Cos the baby jesus dun it I red it in a book that's why.
@ericjohnson6665
@ericjohnson6665 Ай бұрын
@@imwelshjesus - Not the answer I was hoping for. 😇 [It was bait for the atheists.] The being that incarnated as Jesus, Paradise Creator Son Michael of Nebadon, has a partner called the Universe Mother Spirit, and she is the one responsible for providing an allotment of mind (on a varying scale) to all life forms. And 'mind' is the source of that 'cognition'. And is the reason why 'life' cannot happen by accident.
@komolkovathana8568
@komolkovathana8568 Ай бұрын
05:38. DNA (DeoxyriboNucleic Acid ; Double Helix) Base-Pairs Protein, named : (1) A--T (or T --A) ; Adenine -- Thymine (2) C--G (or G--C) ; Cytocine -- Guanine
@keaton718
@keaton718 10 ай бұрын
Humble looking home. You’d think a household name like Denis, in biologist households anyway, he’d have a grand home. In movies famous biologists are rich.
@hn6187
@hn6187 3 ай бұрын
Value creators don't get rich ££££££, that's not what money is. the people who Own their ideas with accountancy grifts do... Do you see what money is? Indeed Noble can thank his lucky stars his fate wasn't that of Turing Socrates Spinoza Nietzsche ... "Ownership" / appropriation is of course violence on a scale. As a Brit I'm particularly ashamed of what the British police did to Turing our greatest war hero and innovator
@imwelshjesus
@imwelshjesus Ай бұрын
​The police merely did what Christian society instructed them to do, hound homosexuals. Nothing special about your hero's treatment, all gays around the world are or have been treated abysmally and in many places even today are killed simply for being different.
@clivejenkins4033
@clivejenkins4033 Ай бұрын
The origin of life is the big question
@SEIGNREUR7
@SEIGNREUR7 3 күн бұрын
It is life that drives evolution. Life is the energy released by the bombardment of the projectiles of the cosmic light. The cosmic ray is ultra-penetrating, nothing can stop its course. The cosmic light continually bombards the nucleus of every atom in the greater universe and releases the energy they contain. This released energy generates movement and movement is life.
@lokeshparihar7672
@lokeshparihar7672 9 ай бұрын
21:30 julian huxley book
@alexnewton7484
@alexnewton7484 11 ай бұрын
Wonderful interview. Our environment/habits determining our evolution is the single most important piece of knowledge in the world today. The obesity epidemic, myopia epidemic, dental occlusion epidemic, and mental health epidemic are all being driven through environment and passed on to future generations via these transgenerational effects. If you aren't convinced by Noble, look up "Dias and Ressler 2014"
@SeyedMohammadMostafaviDialecti
@SeyedMohammadMostafaviDialecti 2 ай бұрын
What drives evolution is the universe tends to be ORGANIC
@mykrahmaan3408
@mykrahmaan3408 2 ай бұрын
Once we derive the mathematical model of the mechanism how the 3 entities (PLANTS, ANIMALS and HUMANS) could cooperate at present through our own programming of the gaseous, liquid and solid substances each individual of the latter two entities release to the surrounding (environment), all these analyses of the "origin of species" as a historic process that happened in the distant past through a process called EVOLUTION would become superfluous, as we could then use that MODEL in actual practice to influence events inside the earth that shape the weather as well as development of, and growth on, plants to suit our requirements in real time for evil free sustenance of life function, benefiting all life ~ including animals, not just humans. Reproductive appearance of beings is a displaced natural function, which can (and MUST) be rectified by us to compel the earth to deliver and sustain new beings (animals and humans) through plants only as it originally did, without involving any other being. This would be the real INDEPENDENCE, which in fact is a misnomer (a negative concept), for no being could ever be INDEPENDENT of the earth. What the word actually implies is INDEPENDENT of "other beings". So the correct (positive) word for that concept should be: EARTHDEPENDENCE. Even to leave this earth, we have no other means than to use the substances available on (and in) it.
@komolkovathana8568
@komolkovathana8568 Ай бұрын
At first, it's not just survival of the fittest.. but pure struggling to survive.. eg when water level was down by vaporizing heat from the sun, some fish came out of pool to blindly crawl out hopefully finding new (Better) pond. Many just died, very few success and survived.. and breeding. Many generations of that survival group (not only one of them passed the (many, many)tests & you can called it Practices, they became more durable more agile, more breathable in dry air, even adapted longer or stronger (hand-ike) Fins.
@komolkovathana8568
@komolkovathana8568 Ай бұрын
I only know of Macro (Outside: Overall) Evolution, which is the product of deep-down Molecular Biology (bio-chemistry) inside the Cells' nucleus... which i know Nothing about.
@tedgrant2
@tedgrant2 28 күн бұрын
The secret of life is no longer a secret. Chemistry
@hn6187
@hn6187 3 ай бұрын
Genes are the piano keys we play... To explore the possibilities of music ... To paraphrase Prof Noble. The science of the Metaphysics of panpsychism
@ALavin-en1kr
@ALavin-en1kr Ай бұрын
Without an understanding of consciousness (the hard problem) and mind, positing the elemental as causal is premature and comes up with some unlikely scenarios such as genes having a point of view. This is biological reductionism at its silliest.
@clivejenkins4033
@clivejenkins4033 Ай бұрын
He saying bacteria is like the borg
@hn6187
@hn6187 3 ай бұрын
Prof noble is right to point out his debt to neo Darwinists, their extreme position provides the fodder for his Scepticism, and so vice versa. By positing top down causation is not possible we can then frame hypotheses to attempt to disprove this. So a more nuanced set of models that describe life can emerge
@fcalin21
@fcalin21 26 күн бұрын
It is so sad that he is old.
@clivejenkins4033
@clivejenkins4033 Ай бұрын
Interesting theory, going to great lengths to disprove god
@arthurwieczorek4894
@arthurwieczorek4894 2 ай бұрын
What drives evolution? Just as there are laws of nature like conservative of energy, so there are laws of nature involving conservation of structure. The structure I have in mind in regards evolution is the chemical structure DNA. Per Richard Dawkins.
@zbuchus
@zbuchus Ай бұрын
Are the laws of nature random and do they emerge from a vacuum? Is our existence just another coincidence? What a hype and pride
@keaton718
@keaton718 10 ай бұрын
I still think Denis is reaching here. But that he’s got a sense of something that is actually going on. But it’s not quite what he says it is.
@gemishedinterviews
@gemishedinterviews Жыл бұрын
I wonder if Mr. Noble knew my Grandpa, R. Schwyzer. He reminds me of the way he spoke to me when I was young.
@skyemac8
@skyemac8 2 ай бұрын
Survival drives evolution.
@djelalhassan7631
@djelalhassan7631 Ай бұрын
Brilliant, everything is conscious and life
@MuradBeybalaev
@MuradBeybalaev Ай бұрын
Clickbait. Does not feature Richard Dawkins.
@clivejenkins4033
@clivejenkins4033 Ай бұрын
You can create AI, you will never create self conscious beings, period.
@whatabouttheearth
@whatabouttheearth 26 күн бұрын
Well...what is a "self conscious" being? You're not "self conscious", you were built by a mechanism. You didn't make yourself or your consciousness. We have already made living mice from skin flakes from male mice without a mother. Hypothetically, with a sufficient amount of deep biomimicry of a structure that has a mechanism that reproduces that structure, it could possibly be done. We are starting to develop biomimicry at a much faster rate, artificial biomimicked skin for skin grafts, artificial limbs, studied even on limb regeneration through studying stem cells in Axylotyl limb regeneration, etc. The technology is just getting better and better. It's only a matter of time when mimicked biotechnology will get bizarrely simmilar to the real flesh, leaf, or organ...🤷 and then how do you think it could develop from there?
@whatabouttheearth
@whatabouttheearth 26 күн бұрын
Well...what is a "self conscious" being? You're not "self conscious", you were built by a mechanism. You didn't make yourself or your consciousness. We have already made living mice from skin flakes from male mice without a mother. Hypothetically, with a sufficient amount of deep biomimicry of a structure that has a mechanism that reproduces that structure, it could possibly be done. We are starting to develop biomimicry at a much faster rate, artificial biomimicked skin for skin grafts, artificial limbs, studied even on limb regeneration through studying stem cells in Axylotyl limb regeneration, etc. The technology is just getting better and better. It's only a matter of time when mimicked biotechnology will get bizarrely simmilar to the real flesh, leaf, or organ...🤷 and then how do you think it could develop from there?
@stephenbrown9998
@stephenbrown9998 2 ай бұрын
White van man
@nancymatro8029
@nancymatro8029 4 ай бұрын
Noble seems to suggest that every organelle has its own DNA which is passed on to it's offspring. How this is accomplished he doesn't say. I can't find anyone else who corroborates this point of view.
@tomato12terra
@tomato12terra Жыл бұрын
hmmm, is Noble advocating directionality of selecting and evolution? Does not convince me
@Iwansidi
@Iwansidi Жыл бұрын
Me neither...I am even a little annoyed that he is running victory laps as if the case was already settled. The condescending way in which he talks about the "writer" Dawkins is actually embarrassing.
@tomato12terra
@tomato12terra Жыл бұрын
@@Iwansidi yes, and without providing any evidenced alternative to the self replicator as unit of selection
@homer1273
@homer1273 Жыл бұрын
Clearly you 2 kids don’t understand anything about what he is talking about and should stay silent and finish school
@vikkumar9301
@vikkumar9301 Жыл бұрын
@@tomato12terra I thought he did provide a lot of evidences.
@alexnewton7484
@alexnewton7484 11 ай бұрын
He provided plenty of evidence, both here and in his debate with Dawkins. If you'd like more, look up "Dias and Ressler 2014."
@komolkovathana8568
@komolkovathana8568 Ай бұрын
Sorry, no intentionally intruding ; here's one question, nobody will EVER ask you, sire. The Reproductive (sex) Cell division of base-pairs ... called MIOSIS ; Father Cell (eg.). Mother Cell (eg.) A ----- T. T ----- A T ----- A. C ----- G G ----- C. A ----- T C ----- G. G ----- C Both Cut in Half.. and Recombined, as... ( Left to Right ). ( Left to Right ) A --x-- A. T --x-- T T --x-- G. C --x-- A G --x-- T. A --x-- C C --x-- C. G --x-- G All were WRONG and Unpair-able (!!?!!) How can any Gene-corrector work of such randomly "choose" whether you wanna keep the Left or the Right as Pivot protein, and abandon another (create a new suitable "half") to match the chosen side.? Some kids got the Father's Hair but mother 's eyes; some got Father's eyes but mother 's hairs.; Random Pivot genes 're chosen ? Then discarded another Half, yes? The recombination then just make prominent genes from either Dad or Mom only.!?!
@markwrede8878
@markwrede8878 2 ай бұрын
Evolution is a passive effect. It is not driven.
@DrMichael-T-7777
@DrMichael-T-7777 2 ай бұрын
Need to publish or perish and excuse for federal grants …
@wulphstein
@wulphstein 3 ай бұрын
What drives evolution? Bad math.
@peterkiedron8949
@peterkiedron8949 2 ай бұрын
Broken record. Time to retire and let the ego get some rest.
@forgetful3360
@forgetful3360 Ай бұрын
You're having difficulty with information processing, I see. Maybe some gene repair will help you overcome your impediment.
@JungleJargon
@JungleJargon 3 ай бұрын
Imagination drives evolution along with speculation conjecture assumption assertion and irrational fantasy.
@matthewstokes1608
@matthewstokes1608 2 ай бұрын
The word is GOD
@arthurwieczorek4894
@arthurwieczorek4894 2 ай бұрын
Is there any question you can't answer with that word?
@matthewstokes1608
@matthewstokes1608 2 ай бұрын
@@arthurwieczorek4894 no
@arthurwieczorek4894
@arthurwieczorek4894 2 ай бұрын
@@matthewstokes1608 So you are saying there is no question that cannot be answered by invoking God.
@matthewstokes1608
@matthewstokes1608 2 ай бұрын
@@arthurwieczorek4894 Look - God created you, all matter//space/time/light/consciousness - the fact you ARE - and then set you ‘free’ into a world of miraculous wonder with a free-will and a compass… He made your soul - your spirit is free - but you cannot escape decay which He hardwired into an inescapable process of apparent mortality in the mere material realm culminating in death. You are born in blood to the binary matter of a unique familial tree - but you will die an individual utterly alone - and as such you will be judged. All men of all ‘time’ and from all tribes will be judged by the Christ alone. Why? Because this visible material world is (at most) half the REAL picture. The purposefully invisible, spiritual realm is far more real - and you do not die. I know the body dies and rots and stinks - worm food - we all see the ‘obvious’… but it is a ruse. The reality is mind-blowing. Only Jesus Christ can set you free. Obviously I am saying there is no question that cannot be answered by God… it is not about your invoking Him - but about His invoking you. Your faith in Him is not the main concern for a man nearly as much as whether He has any faith left in you. “Fear of God is the beginning of all human wisdom.”
@karlbarlow8040
@karlbarlow8040 Ай бұрын
If you are speaking about the God of Spinoza and Einstein, then I would agree. (They both used "God" as a metaphor for the laws of nature).
@MarkoMakela-kk7qf
@MarkoMakela-kk7qf 2 ай бұрын
Short answer to the topic is completely nonsense! You can of course make theories what has happened before according the test and theorioes you now have, but that won't make any difference to anything. You weren't observer as these things happened, so you don't know a fuck about them. You are just guessing like all the people who deseperately after lost religious beliefs are seeking for scientific resurrection which never comes. Changing religion, no matter if it is the most common one to think or the scientific approach that is almost as unrelialble as the first one, we will face some questions that are beoynd our capabilities to comfirm. Almost all we know of all extince is mainly from the past. We don't even know what our universe right now is. We see only what it was in the past... Tell that story if you are a wittness of an car accident to the police men... yes indeed... I wasn't there but I see that this car went too fast and violited the traffic rules... possible of course, but that's all it is. You can't make theories from the end results coming back to the explanation. I know this well as in some maths you can actually do that, not all, but some. But this way too complex to use that merthod. Before anyone asks, I couple of times didn't remember the simplest way aka right formula to calculate something difficult 'cos I was overtrohwn by girls at the time... beats all of us.. but as I wasn't completely useless with maths I broke the formula to pieces and calculated every single thing separately... it is exhausting, and I don't recomen that to anyone, but especially in physics you need desperately those mathics and formulas...:)
@MarkoMakela-kk7qf
@MarkoMakela-kk7qf 2 ай бұрын
And now when we finally have equipments out of our planets interfierence and athmosphere and can see some things as they 'were'... It doesn't look quite what we expected? I suggest a reroll.. and a little break. From your mediavel thoughts.
@RunnerThin
@RunnerThin 2 ай бұрын
A theological belief that there is no Creator drives the fantasy cult of evolution.
@karlbarlow8040
@karlbarlow8040 Ай бұрын
The "Creator" is still in the process of creating himself and he's using evolution to do it. When he's finished, he may start answering prayers. I know a few good church goers who got no answers and had tragic ends.
What is life and how does it work? - with Philip Ball
51:51
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 161 М.
Schoolboy - Часть 2
00:12
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Playing hide and seek with my dog 🐶
00:25
Zach King
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН
Jumping off balcony pulls her tooth! 🫣🦷
01:00
Justin Flom
Рет қаралды 28 МЛН
ЧУТЬ НЕ УТОНУЛ #shorts
00:27
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
Why Dawkins is wrong | Denis Noble interview
26:56
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 527 М.
The unselfish gene | Denis Noble challenges Richard Dawkins
14:24
The Institute of Art and Ideas
Рет қаралды 291 М.
Prof Denis Noble - Dance to the Tune of Life Lecture
1:06:37
voicesfromoxfordUK
Рет қаралды 37 М.
Why Is There Only One Species of Human? - Robin May
59:22
Gresham College
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
"What is life"-lecture: Denis Noble
44:32
Karolinska Institutet
Рет қаралды 36 М.
Nick Lane: The electrical origins of life
1:03:55
NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering
Рет қаралды 212 М.
Science Is Reconsidering Evolution
1:22:12
Variable Minds
Рет қаралды 425 М.
7 Scientific Reasons why Darwinian Evolution is a Myth
29:51
Radio Immaculata
Рет қаралды 142 М.
Cracking Ancient Codes: Cuneiform Writing - with Irving Finkel
38:55
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Tag him😳💕 #miniphone #iphone #samsung #smartphone #fy
0:11
Pockify™
Рет қаралды 4,6 МЛН
Частая ошибка геймеров? 😐 Dareu A710X
1:00
Вэйми
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
My iPhone 15 pro max 😱🫣😂
0:21
Nadir Show
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
iPhone 15 Pro в реальной жизни
24:07
HUDAKOV
Рет қаралды 500 М.
Лучший браузер!
0:27
Honey Montana
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН