4 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@RomboutVersluijs 3 күн бұрын
Other issue is, we cant reset block of text all at once. Really should have a reset optiom some where
@RomboutVersluijs 3 күн бұрын
Issue is, at least i did not find a way, we cant lock axis when doing the movement like we can with other paths and shapes.
@RomboutVersluijs 3 күн бұрын
They should perhaps bring it back to the Character panel, i totally forgot about this tool
@RomboutVersluijs 3 күн бұрын
But with the arrows, its indeed great. Simply use very small key input in the setting and its perfect
@RomboutVersluijs 3 күн бұрын
Okay thats simply a menu checkbox, now its back again
@avergajixa6051 6 күн бұрын
Thank you 🎉
@CopycatStudiosLA 7 күн бұрын
Fantastic video - Thank you!!
@bambaboyzstudio 9 күн бұрын
Thanks
@kenechukwuaniagolu6352 10 күн бұрын
thank you so much, it works
@VonSolo5 14 күн бұрын
Thank you! I always forget how to do this and needed a refresher and I learned some new stuff too.
@unnamedknight8229 27 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@paulhiggins5165 Ай бұрын
I think the control problem with generative AI is currently being underestimated. One aspect of digital art that is not often considered is that it remains a craft- by which I mean the artist interacts with his creation in a direct physical way. For example using a programme like Zbrush to digitally sculpt might not seem the same as literally shaping clay with your hands, but in fact in order to create a digital sculpture you still have to weild a stylus in a precise and very physical way in order to direct the software to make the precise shapes you want. The same is true of digital art programmes like Photoshop- the artist must engage in a physical way with the drawing tablet to make the marks on the screen that he wishes to see. Now compare and contrast this with using an AI Art programme. In this case the input device is not a drawing tablet or stylus, it is a text prompt. So there is no direct physical connection between the tool and the artist. So already the control of the Artist is compromised because that direct physical link between his intent and the outcome is gone. Furthermore while we tend to think of langauge as an almost magical means of expression, which it is- the reality is that language is not really very good at expressing visual things. There's a good reason why the photograph in your passport could not be replaced by a written description of your face- the former precisely captures your likeness but the latter would be at best a loose approximation. So in my view the ultimate limitation of AI Art is not technological but linguistic- or more precisely- the inability to define visual things in a precise way with words alone. Even in our computerised age creating art still remains an intuitve craft that requires an intimate physical connection between the creator and his creation. And while I see the AI Art community trying to deal with this issue by introducing techniques like Image to Image, inpainting ect, which do help a bit, these techniques cannot replicate the intimacy of being able to physically interact with one's creation. The answer I guess would be to develop AI Art programmes that do not use words but instead respond to direct physical inputs from the Artist, which would recreate the connection between the Artist and the Art. However this is problematic in it's own way because the entire point of AI is that it acts autonomously- so the more responsive you make it to the users inputs the less freedom it has to act on it's own. Also the more power you give the user, the more skill they will need to use that power, which again seems to undermine the main advantage of using AI, which is that it does not require a lot of skill to use. So there seems to be a basic tension here between the automony of the AI and the control of the user- the more control you seek to have, the less useful the AI will be. I see no way this inherent problem of control with AI can be resolved, no matter how powerful the technology itself might become.
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
Incredibly thoughtful reply, thank you! I have so many questions for what the future will look like. I think a lot of these initial pains will be solved, but I still think that true craft will always have a place, even if it becomes niche or obscure. Something I think I didn't talk about was artists training models using specifically only their art, to then generate and ultimately curate art that I think they could rightfully say was their own. Or, as is already happening quite a bit, developing programs to create generative art which is more human expression through code. I know I'm almost without question underestimating the long-term impacts, as that's just not something that humans are very good at estimating. Time will tell! Appreciate your thoughts.
@erichepperledesigns Ай бұрын
Thanks! I loved how concise and to the point this was. I had forgotten that this is a default built-in feature (placeholder text) in InDesign, and this was just the reminder I needed! SUBSCRIBED
@sixshooter99 Ай бұрын
Thanks, i use this technique in my drawing and it looks great!
@brendangoodenough173 Ай бұрын
Nice!
@keithabresee Ай бұрын
Dude!!! So good to see you online and your face!!! And LOVE youre relaunching this!!!
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
Thank you! I'll keep trying to figure out what works. :)
@bethhartman4987 Ай бұрын
Thank you!!!
@ryanasazaki1291 Ай бұрын
I've been a subscriber since 2017, started off following design tutorials from many channels, and have sufficiently mastered it since; Though not gonna lie, I was somewhat a little disillusioned with the different direction the channel has taken since, but still subscribed because, why not? Some channels to check out are LEMMiNO, Nexpo, Barely Sociable, Chill Fuel, toldinstone, CHM Tech, TheScienceElf, and perhaps LGR. From those, my range of interests, are all over the place, from internet mysteries, to history and art, to technology. I also use KZbin differently than most, I get most of my daily uploads briefing from the subscription feed, rather than the algorithm, as I find it to be broken for me, even when I does rarely go to the home page, I like to stick with familiar topics so I flagged everything else as irrelevant and not interested. Probably due to my naturally-incompatible introvert personality, I personally don't find internet dramas and other people's take on things to be that entertaining so to demand my attention (which is why I stay off social media); I prefer content that are more high effort, and documentary about an obscure subject, rather than societal dramas, if that makes sense. If we talking design documentary, though, channels like Linus Boman, jerry woo hu, Matt Brunton, scratch the two side of my interest. Though the latter one changed direction recently.
@ryanasazaki1291 Ай бұрын
Also nice to see Tested mentioned here, subscribed since 2016, but never watched the channel until recently, I don't live in the West, so I'm a bit unfamiliar with Mythbuster and Adam Savage personally, and the impact of the show limited compared to others, but I'm also a maker, yet another interest, probably why I subscribed in the first place, two videos I found really personally-referred to is "The Design of Police Badges in Film and TV" and "Adam Savage Gets His Own Prop FBI ID Badge!", as both videos pretty much summarized my graphic design methodology, the way I approach historical accuracy, through intensive research period, and building upon that by modernizing certain aspect of a design, which is a culmination of my interests in design, heraldry, vexillology, and art and history. The channel previously mentioned, Matt Brunton, is also a fellow heraldry enthusiast, though due to its association with sports.
@ryanasazaki1291 Ай бұрын
Regarding as to why longer videos are able to be successful, despite the lower overall attention span of the regular viewer in recent years, I posit that although shorts made the platform ever more competitive in regards to gaining viewership, that competitiveness also drives a lot of people not liking shorts into longer contents even further. And I am an example of that, never watched a single short as I find it a waste of time, energy, for what is essentially nothing informational, or at least a condensed, shallow information, without all of the nuanced information you would find on a longer video, due to length constraint. I have the section hidden all together as well with an extension.
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
Thanks for the incredible comments and suggestions Ryan! I'll definitely have to check some of them out. :) Shorts seem to be a great way to quickly communicate simple ideas, but I also prefer much more in-depth information. It is becoming a bit of a lost art to provide truly comprehensive information. Perhaps it's why I've been reading a lot more the last few years.
@rrtolkein4221 Ай бұрын
Did you buy subscribers? How do you have 113k subscribers and 200 views
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
I started this channel in 2012 and haven't made videos in a few years. You can see one of my last videos before taking a multi year break had almost a million views. Just the nature of the beast when you take a long break, and dramatically change the direction of a channel. I just do this for fun, if I wanted to maximize views, I would never have pivoted the direction, and I would never have taken breaks. :)
@tomfurstyfield Ай бұрын
I'd highly recommend Bobby Fingers, the Jeff Bezos boat video is the most original weirdest funny video I've seen on youtube. There's is nothing like it.
@MattBorchert 26 күн бұрын
lol, properly weird!
@tomfurstyfield Ай бұрын
Marie Kondo has changed her mind about clutter and getting rid of stuff since she had a child
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
Lol, makes sense.
@8supermagic Ай бұрын
Holy crap. This was like the perfect video to post… I see Jenny Nicholson I watch. Your videos helped me out a ton back in the day. Thanks for coming back! Seems like you’ve already got something cooking, but it would be fun to see how you went about leaning video production
@MattBorchert 27 күн бұрын
Thank you! The actual camera portion that I had to learn to re-launch is definitely a beast, and I have a lot respect for people who have mastered that art.
@jeremyklinger2691 2 ай бұрын
Thank you! This was driving me insane.
@Laura-jj4co 2 ай бұрын
Thank you!!! I commend you on your ability to make this easy to follow for newbies while still keeping it simple for more advanced users.
@MattBorchert Ай бұрын
Thank you!
@Ricardosanchez0111 2 ай бұрын
What an amazing and easy to follow tutorial. Subscribed!
@maduforochijioke9127 2 ай бұрын
This was insightful. Thanks for sharing
@HarujukiBarbieBytch 2 ай бұрын
my problem is my shift key is no longer stretching my font, it just makes it huge sooooo annoying and I need to fix it ASAP
@tnpstom56 3 ай бұрын
Very useful thanks a lot
@joanneswift8074 3 ай бұрын
Exactly what i needed i forgot after some time thanks
@Penpadua 3 ай бұрын
Legend, thank you
@banzand 3 ай бұрын
Didn't work for me unfortunately.
@guncekazazoglu9954 4 ай бұрын
You saved my life, thank you very much !!!
@MattBorchert 4 ай бұрын
I'm always happy to save lives.
@luciana9976 4 ай бұрын
You are the best teacher, easy to follow along and undestand.
@nellruby1162 4 ай бұрын
This is wildly helpful! It's been there the whole time, I feel dumb for ignoring it, what a useful tool. Thanks for taking the time to do the video!
@MattBorchert 4 ай бұрын
Thank you! Glad it was helpful.
@pangamespangames2893 4 ай бұрын
Rockstar! Thank you.
@GaryKaplow 4 ай бұрын
my illustrator used to do it, but I just recently had to delete and reinstall, now it won't do it any longer. is there a setting in preferences that needs to be turned on or off? please help. I lived and died by that feature.
@victorparedes6887 4 ай бұрын
The fact that this is how to accomplish this simple effect is bizarre.
@MattBorchert 4 ай бұрын
There's definitely other ways to do this, but this way at least allows you to easily make edits after doing the effect.
@wednesdayAddams-pb1dr 4 ай бұрын
In the year of this video, what version of Photoshop are you using in this video, friend? plssssss
@MattBorchert 4 ай бұрын
Photoshop CC 2015
@SureshMandangi-br9yt 5 ай бұрын
Thank you
@kristal3357 5 ай бұрын
thank uuu
@liusjuliano5694 5 ай бұрын
Thanks dude!!
@tonyshoemaker5218 5 ай бұрын
Thsi change they made drove me crazy for years. THANK YOU for showing us how to fix it.
@MikeAnn193 5 ай бұрын
Matt, you were upfront about Uplift sending you the desk. I only wish you had said whether (or how much) that may have influenced you. I guess it might be hard to be objective about that, but people are naturally going to wonder. Did the company give you any review guidelines/restrictions/instructions as a prerequisite for receiving that? I noticed you said to someone else that it wasn't a paid review, but, I mean, you got a _desk._ I'm open-minded, and I know it's still possible to be objective; just saying.
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
I was as objective as I was able to be. These things will always influence someone's view, so it's just a matter of how much. Years later I'm still using the desk, and independently paid for a larger top. I've had no issues with it.
@MikeAnn193 5 ай бұрын
@@MattBorchert That's fair, and you're correct, it's a matter of how _much_ you were influenced. That's what viewers don't know, and without it, we can't get a reasonable impression. As a consumer yourself, I'm sure you understand that. It's easy to believe you were as objective as you were _able_ to be, but I don't know what might be "disabling" you, so to speak, 😏whether a sense of obligation for the gift, or instructions/guidelines from the company. Having said that, I thought the review was well done, and believable. I have nothing against Uplift, and I'm strongly considering this desk. I'm just a careful consumer, and wary of a company's marketing practices, such as gifting review items. Frankly, I think the world would be far better off if its inhabitants were less credulous and more skeptical of unknown claims on all manner of topics, but I'll spare you. This isn't the place for that speech. Thank you.
@eggimage 5 ай бұрын
why don't some colors work in overprint, while some others do? all CMYK process colors and set to overprint fill
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
Very few colors actually work well together. Most turn into a muddy brown. Just the nature of the beast.
@eggimage 5 ай бұрын
@@MattBorchert thanks. but what i’m more curious is why some don’t work at all, like they just become “knockout” with no overprint effect
@annamiller9898 5 ай бұрын
Thank you! What settings do you use for the brush tool to make smoothing more effective? It seems my smooth tool is not working as well as yours.
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
I could swear I responded to this, but I guess not! So I don't remember messing with the actual smooth tool settings much, but it does care a whole lot about how long your smooth path is when drawing it out. So try using it over shorter sections, or longer sections if that doesn't work. Usually smaller sections tended to work better for me, unless I was trying to smooth out really long curves.
@slipstream01 5 ай бұрын
Wow im here in 2024 and struggling to learn and develop and get a job in design field all of this info is still relevant 💯 thank u
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@alessandrazaccagnacaldo5191 5 ай бұрын
Matt I just read that you now research technology… pretty awesome. Wondering, will you be touching upon Artificial Intelligence and how they may help generate new ideas in design?
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
I'm considering relaunching my channel soon, and that's likely something I'll talk about. Thus far I consider most AI based design to be pretty "lifeless," but it's clearly very compelling.
@alessandrazaccagnacaldo5191 5 ай бұрын
Omg! Matt you’re great! Love this ! Easy !
@alyssarajchertova7229 5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@inmemoriam2000 5 ай бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you
@niloofathi509 5 ай бұрын
thanks for useful video, can I make open-ended survey and put interview questions there, instead of having real interview?
@MattBorchert 5 ай бұрын
Yes, but that's a very different data collection method. You're trading depth for scale. Qualitative vs. quantitative.