Interesting! I personally haven't looked into this apologetic.

Well Anthony, if he said something that wasn’t logically coherent, it needed to be rebutted. I let him say everything he needed to say.

@ No you didn’t you cut him off for your benefit. At least tell the truth.

Which part was he cut off Anthony? I may have paused it, but he was still able to express his full argument.

I appreciate you Anthony and I'm praying for you. Have a great day ok? I gotta do an errand.

@@revoreport You know which parts, it was blatant. You cut him completely off.

I used to be a positive thinking confidence coach and consultant. To celebrities, politicians, etc for John Robert Powers. Let me tell you Anthony, the Bible has a lot more to offer.

@@revoreport No it doesn’t, I’ve read every single page of it individually. Reading that book actually made me an Atheist. It’s full of ludicrous ridiculous unbelievable Supernatural Fairytales like this ‘God’ making the whole Universe and everything in it in SIX days. A guy being Crucified then buried for 3 days then coming back to life then 40 days later flying up into the clouds and sky and disappearing. I’m having none of that Supernatural Fairytale nonsense. BRAINWASHING! is a very powerful thing.

Anthony do you know any adults that believe in fairytales? I don't know personally. But I do know countless, and some incredible intelligent and reasonable, from lawyers to scientist to teachers to politicians to athletes - who believe in God. So comparing God to fairytales isn't really a logical argument, you need to drop that one and move on to some more intelligent rebuttles, my friend.

Agreed Rob! What do you think of Jesus?

@@georgearden7075 Tooth ferry comes to mind. Thor, tinker bell, batman and all the other gods I assume you deny unless you’re a polytheist

Very good point George! Do you believe in Jesus?

Huh? This isn't manipulated by AI lol

He definitely wasn’t a christian.

I think it was PBD who often asserts that Islam is growing rapidly in the US.

What about your scriptures?

@@jamesblyden2300 n they all stole their laws from the laws of maat

@@milankucera1148 Actually science has much to say about all those things. We know what neurons are firing for all the different emotions including love and grief and how pain is delivered and how much pain your in and science has developed the drugs to block pain and help with depression,seizures,etc. Your asking if love can be seen is like asking how fast is blue. It’s a nonsensical question. Medicine is wonderful science. Next time you have a medical emergency I suggest getting a doctor over prayer.

Wow did not know that. Is that in writing or video somewhere?

@@Bgood2others hello sir Would you say you're pro science and if the science says so, would you follow it?

Sorry I don’t have enough faith to have an atheistic worldview.

@ I’m definitely pro science because it enables me to txt on this device but wouldn’t say I follow this device. I would say I’d follow evidence wherever it may lead and if better evidence for another conclusion comes to light I’d not be too stubborn to revise my belief.

@ My world view is evidence based Might be a god or spirit or something more but until someone can show me otherwise I won’t follow along like a sheep. I ask questions and follow evidence wherever it may lead and I’m never scared to say I don’t know if I don’t know. Opposite of faith

@ I don’t have enough faith for anything supernatural but I won’t rule it out if someone can show me evidence. So why not answer my question ?

Can you please give me the exact date and time that the first cell poped up out of nowhere

Interesting because an atheistic worldview requires an immense amount of faith

@ I don’t agree with atheism either, if there isn’t evidence for something then you say these magical words “I don’t know for sure”. It is beyond arrogant to assume you have any answer about our existence without concrete evidence. Not knowing yet is alright people

@@AJJohnson-f2kNope, we don’t know and we don’t have any evidence as to these questions. The Bible cannot be proven and science also does not have any answers yet

You're agnostic then?

Amen amen. How did you get to know Jesus?

Amen amen. How did you get to know Jesus?

Matthew 15:24-26 when talking to an unknown Cannanite woman. "I have came ONLY for the lost sheep of Israel. The lese "lost sheep" are the children of Jacob aka Israel not all the people of Israel. And verse 26 "Its not right to take the childrens bread and toss it to the dogs". Here he is saying its not right to take my work my word and my blessings and give them to a worthless person. This is backed by several verses in the bible more specifically Amos 2 where Amos is asking God for clarification when He called all other nations outside of Israel "spittle and a drop in the bucket". Also how nowhere in the Old Testament does God ever refer to any other nation kindly or make a covenant with anyone except his original one with Abraham and the 2nd with Jacob and his bloodline. Its not till Jesus resurrection is the claim he says make desciples of all nations. If he was the savior of all mankind why was he aginst teaching gentiles his entire time he was alive?

amen

I'd say it's a prerequisite for faith, not a result....

Atheistic worldview requires a significant amount of faith

No, it doesn't. Every religious idea that has been dismantled by science (formation of Earth, origin of species, etc), has been done with experimentation which can be repeated and verified. I trust the scientific community and peer review. That is not "faith" as you hold it. Your equivocation is transparent and it weakens your argument to try it

I don’t see a contradiction between religion and science. In fact, science has provided further evidence for Christianity time and time again via history, anthropology, archeology and linguistics and other systematic studies.

Thanks for your comment, I appreciate your sense of humor on this! 😂 You raise a good point about circular reasoning, but let's unpack this a bit further. The Bible isn't just a single book; it's a collection of writings from different authors across centuries, yet they converge on a consistent narrative about Jesus Christ. This isn't like Spiderman where one author creates a fictional character with a known city backdrop. Instead, consider this: if multiple independent witnesses describe the same event, doesn't that lend credibility rather than relying on one source? Historians often use this method to verify events. For example, the existence of Jesus and key events like his crucifixion are also documented outside the Bible by historians like Josephus and Tacitus. So, it's not just the Bible saying "trust me," but multiple streams of evidence converging. 🌟 Now, think about this: if we were to apply the same skepticism to science, would we dismiss all scientific theories because they build upon previous scientific findings? Science often uses its own frameworks to validate itself, much like the Bible. Both the scientific method and biblical accounts invite us to explore further, not to take everything at face value. Here's a question for you: If Jesus rose from the dead as many historical accounts suggest, wouldn't that be the most significant event in human history, worthy of at least considering its implications for your life? 🌱 I pray that as you reflect on these points, your heart might be open to the possibility that Jesus is who He claims to be - the Light of the World. May you find peace and truth in this exploration, and may the love of Jesus guide you to a place of faith and understanding. In Jesus' name, Amen. 🙏

Our representative for Christianity is Jesus. He’s the Light, the Way, the Truth, the Life and if you seek sincerely He’ll reveal His majesty to you. It takes more faith to have an atheistic worldview.

@@revoreport I totally respect your belief, is it possible for you to provide evidence that isn’t rooted in belief or faith?

I gave up my strong Christian beliefs after reading the Bible. Many of my friends and family are Christians and are wonderful people but the ones that aren’t religious all lost their religion after reading the Bible like I did. Almost all of my Christian friends study the ten percent of the Bible everyone knows but the other ninety percent they don’t know and don’t want to know. Truth never fears scrutiny. I suggest people to read the Bible from genesis on and decide for themselves.

Absolutely - plenty of evidence.

@ The brightest minds amongst theists cannot provide such evidence, I would love to hear what you have to say that doesn’t rely on faith or the Bible which is not evidence of any kind

Thanks for your comment, it's great to explore these teachings together! 😊 In Matthew 7:6, Jesus shares with us, "Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces." 🌟 This isn't about withholding the gospel from anyone, but it's about discernment. It's like trying to teach calculus to someone who's just learning to count; you've got to meet people where they are. We must share the truth wisely, ensuring it's not only heard but cherished. This verse highlights the stewardship of truth. 🧭 It's about ensuring the pearls of wisdom aren't cast where they'll be devalued or misunderstood. Just as a scientist wouldn't share complex theories with those unprepared for them, we too should be thoughtful and prayerful in our evangelism. The aim isn't exclusivity but effectiveness, ensuring the message of Christ transforms rather than being dismissed. So, let's treasure this wisdom and share it with care, always seeking the right heart at the right time. 🙏

look up Alex background before you make baseless claims about him. Pastors always make irrational claims that they know what a scripture verse means without any proof and then another pastor says it means something else. Christians can't agree on most of the Bible, that is why there are 40,000 different Christian denominations. most of them have no knowledge of early Near Eastern history or archaeology. Baseless claims from one book that is riddled with contradictions, errors and historical mistakes or just lies.

Which part of near eastern history or archeology? The 40,000 is a bit inflated. It can really be summed down to about 20. But the major doctrines like Christ Deity, Trinity, Ressurection are all there - we don't count the cults that don't beleive Jesus = God.

Thanks for your comment, it's always good to dive into these big topics! 😄 Reducing religion to just "old fashioned politics" or mind control seems a bit like saying science is just a bunch of old men in white coats playing with test tubes. Religion, especially Christianity, engages with reality in deep ways, through philosophy, history, and personal transformation. Take, for instance, the historical evidence for Jesus' resurrection, which has been scrutinized by scholars and philosophers alike, pointing not to mind control but to a profound event that changed the course of history. If religion was merely about control, why would it inspire movements for justice, love, and forgiveness that have shaped civilizations? 🌍 Now, consider this: If Christianity was just about control, why does it promote such radical ideas as loving your enemies, which goes against human instinct and political strategy? The scientific method itself, which you might value, shares a common root with Christian thought in seeking truth and understanding the world's design. Here's a question for you: What if the truth of Jesus isn't about controlling minds but about liberating hearts, offering forgiveness and purpose? If someone offered you true freedom from guilt and a new way to live, wouldn't you at least consider it? 🌟 I pray that as you ponder these thoughts, you might find yourself drawn to explore the truth of Jesus, not as some tool of control but as the Light of the World, offering peace and real transformation. May your journey towards understanding be filled with discovery and joy. In Jesus' name, Amen. 🙏

Thanks for your comments, truly appreciated! May you be blessed with the peace that surpasses all understanding, as promised in Philippians 4:7. 🙏

Wow. Very well thought out perspective here! I really only started watching his stuff about 2 weeks after the infamous debate tbh. God bless you 🙏🏼🫶🏼

Pride comes before the fall right?

I'm curious as to why this video has been edited in a way that they now both look restarted xD

lol. I think it’s the editing app I used that did some auto eye correction. Didn’t even notice it that much.

If you are having a conversation that challenges people's core beliefs by that conversation very nature both parties will be assertive or you don't actually believe what you are arguing.

lol - witty. Pun intended?

So you believe in morals?

@@revoreport LOL, well asked, brother. They want to judge the morality of god, but without god then all morality is subjective, which is to say it means nothing.

@revoreport your response is a fallacious attempt to distract from the valid critique of the video's arguments. it does not address the issues of selective interpretation, flawed analogies, or circular reasoning raised in the critique.

I'm genuinely curious what you're basing your morals of from? We can talk logical fallacies all we want, but we need to arrive at a philosophical grounding here so we're at least standing on the same foundation.

agree my friend