i do not print that hot. max 215 as it will ooze out too much. TPU drool so easily.

3% seam gap, 0.08mm layerheight, do not cross walls, no brim, no supports, gluestick and engineering plate, 25% spares infill, 50ms first layer, 105ms first layer infill,

occationally jumps out for me too. Cost about €200 for a new set, as it has electronic lock, but you can sometimes buy spare parts from crashed cars where the sides are OK.

I tested that now. Indeed it will look like mine. but adjusting the angle and height of the chamfer is more difficult when you use revolve. So if you want to make it like i show in part #2, it is not as easy as using my method. thanks for sharing though. :)

@@nikolassmith1072 does your model cut the thread into the chamfer?

@@Toffypops I use a triangle shape to cut the chamfer, and it does 'start' the thread a little above center line(my version). I am pretty sure you can make it start anywhere by just moving the triangle up or down the thread though.

@@nikolassmith1072 In my version you simply adjust the chamfer value to make sure the thread hits the bottom. No need to edit a sketch. Much easier than having to go in and modify the sketch to change the chamfer. Thanks for sharing, watching and commenting though. :D

That would require an offset, a sketch and a circle, and extrude-cut..so a few more steps, but yea, also a way to do it. :D My way is a bit faster though, but thnx for the suggestion. :)

i cannot help with that. :)

it is not in autodesk since if you slice the stl without splitting it to parts i treats the holes as open spaces when sliced. When you split to parts it happens

@@Toffypops But this is the problem of STLs. They don't contain information about volumes. They only contain surfaces made of triangles. With that option you tell the program if the STL contains a single volume with holes or multiple bodies without holes. You cannot have both at the same time with an STL.

ok i think i understand better now, so you cannot paint support blockers inside the model after splitting to parts? here are some other suggestions for workarounds -- enable supports on build plate only, and then either -- paint ON where you want the supports on the inner lip to be -- or since it seems your object is hollow at the bottom try tree supports. another solution is split to parts>change hole parts to negative part, then copy paste the hole parts, for these new hole parts change type>support blocker, select these blocker holes again and scale to e.g. 105%. a better description of the bug is probably that it seems impossible to paint supports/support blockers on negative parts, though it may be considered a missing feature, not a bug

This is definately a bug. The main problem here is that since these parts are inside..setting supports to baseplate only will not work. It will still make supports. If you use the negative part way, it will not correctly print the walls, top and bottom of the holes. This is a bug since a slicer should ignore open holes all together so people can paint support blockers. I do not want to use % to increase the size of the holes as the magnets may get dragged out of the holes due to them being attracted to the nozzle. If the part is exported using the 3d print feature in fusion 360 it does not generate objects from empty spaces. But it will only print 1 object at a time So basically it is the split-to-parts feature that is bugged. It should ignore open spaces inside the model. The only alternative I found was to make cuts in fusion above and below holes and then select those parts as 100% infill and then import an stl of the holes and select them as negative modifiers...That would leaves walls intact but still not make it possible to paint support blockers. This problem when splitting to parts is so unneccessary it should be fixed. Many thanks for comments and feedback. 😊

@@Toffypops well... sorry if this gets complicated :) 1. in the exported file the 'holes' ARE objects/parts, meaning they have their own independent geometry, just inside geometry of another part 1b. possible bug/missing feature would be that the "hole" parts are not set to type "negative part" automatically 2. if you do split to parts, then select a hole and change type for that to negative part, then slice, are you saying that outside the hole there are no walls? i cannot replicate that, or i do not understand. i do not see a difference between a non-split object with holes and a split object with hole parts set to negative parts -- after slicing. 3. i did not suggest to increase the hole size -- the suggestion is to set hole parts as negative parts, then copy/paste them, and these new copies should be set to type "support blocker" - to make sure they block supports they may need to be increased a few% - this does not increase the hole size 4. there is a difference between split to parts and split to objects, all of this is only applicable when using split to parts 5. i do not understand the line "if the part is exported.." 6. if you have a negative part inside another part and have supports on baseplate only, there should be NO supports inside the negative part. are you saying there are?

if you export a part to an stl-file and then bring it into orca and split it to parts, each part keep their relative places in the geometry. If you split to objects, everything is places on the buildplate which is not what you would want. I understand the split to part makes objects out of empty spaces, but this does not happen when i use the 3D PRINT feature in Fusion 360, then the object comes out with holes correctly. Although you cannot print several holes at the same time. I tried to set the holes as objects to negative parts, and all i end up with is infill missing the objects without walls going around it. And if you set supports on baseplate only, it will still put supports on objects where they have overhanging walls inside another object. It does not work for open spaces inside the model itself. I actually did not see that you had an "add support blocker" feature. Still learning . That might work as you say if you expand it to "paint" the support areas. Thnx for commenting. :)

@@Toffypops this would be easier if i could post an image, but let me try to describe the settings as precisely as possible 1. under global>support, "enable support" should have a filled green box with checkmark; "on build plate only" should have a filled green box/checkmark; near the bottom under advanced "don't support bridges" should have a filled green box/checkmark 2. hole parts in the split object should be set to type "negative part", not modifier or anything else. negative parts have a small green circle with a minus symbol to the left of their name 3. under global>quality>overhangs "make overhangs printable" should NOT be checked, it should just be a white empty box if you slice with these settings exactly, you should NOT be getting any supports inside the holes/negative parts, but hopefully there should be walls

Not easier to create as a solid. But sometimes the surfaces are out of alignment and not as easy to make a perfectly fitting sketch of. A sweep would require a specially made guideline in 3D space to function properly. Thnx for the comment. :)

Glad it helped

Glad it was helpful!

Thnx for watching!

Se nada! 😀 sub an d like por favor! 😅

@@Toffypops ok

Thanks for the visit. In my case as long as you always reference the exact distance between the lines and use it as the offset value, it offsets cocentric to the same lines with exact lenght, and make sure it is constrained. :) Many ways to do things.

You're welcome!

You're welcome!

Indeed. There may be residue att he nipple but should not pose a problem. If the filament flow without "curling" on the way out , the nozzle is pretty clean.

people leach then move on. :D Moar Thumbs pls!

CTRL-R -> services.exe Check list of services if you find something you can stop.

Any time!

Glad it helped!

Happy to help

the inner face did not connect first time since i was lofting to the wrong object which was not a solid surface.

glad it helped!

you're welcome!

Glad it helped!

You're welcome!

Thank you!

Great to hear such feedback! Thank you! Please sub and like for more. 😃

I already tried tried to address it. will try to boost it more in next recording.

Try it! I recommend watching all the videos in that series, as it shows different ways to get to the goal! Sub sub! :D

btw..i would recommend the orca slicer way first to fix model and save as stl file. it strips it to a wireframe and resurface all top surfaces. see the other video about that.

It looks so horrible the wire method compared to using a 3D pen. Test with a 3D pen and TPU, you will be surprised. The nozzle of the Pen is hot, so you partially melt the current plastic with the one from the pen, causing really good adhesion!.

Awesome you liked it! Like and sub! all i ask for :D Please come back for more!

Hello carlgodfrey5806, I guess to understand your note properly that even when using the paid version of fusion360 there is no easy way to convert a stl(mesh) to a solid body.!?

Paid version give you better ability to import, but may not be faster. Haven't tried as i never had paid version.

Thank you! 😀

Thanks! Giving it my all. 😂

Did it work?

Glad it was helpful!

Eres muy bienvenido!

It is audience like you that make it worth it to make my videos. Thanks for letting me know it was helpfull. Please feel free to sub and like. 😀

You're welcome! 😀

You're welcome!

You're welcome