The Bidwell-Bartlseson party went to Alta California, not Oregon. Despite warnings from Thomas "Broken Hand" Fitzpatrick, they went southwest from Soda Springs in Idaho, without a guide. They abandoned their wagons near the Pequop Mountains west of The Great Salt Lake, and made the rest of the journey using their oxen as pack animals. They crossed the Sierra Nevada Mountains around Sonora Pass at the end of October 1841, nearly starving. They reached Dr. John Marsh's rancho at present day Mount Diablo around November 5, 1841. The Joel Walker family (brother of Joseph Walker, a famous mountaineer/guide) converted their wagons to pull carts at Fort Hall, Idaho. They did not take wagons into Oregon. The first wagons taken to Oregon (at least to the Columbia River) were by Robert Newell and Joe Meek (borther of the later to be infamous Stephen Meek of the Meek Cutoff debacle). These were supply wagons, not emigrant wagons. The first wagons taken into Alta California were by the Stephens-Townsend-Murphy party in November, 1844. A few other inconsistencies... but I'll let those slide.

it was never palestine

Know Europea is being colonized by Muslims n Africans karma for what they did to the native of d western hemisphere

Thanks for your visual narrative of the Israel Muslim conflict. A riveting book on this subject was written by Dave Hunt, Judgement Day! Islam, Israel, and the Nations.

Im sorry but wasnt Jacob black.

six-ty?

VIỆT CỘNG SẼ THẤY GÌ VÀ BẮC KINH …: KHI LIÊN HIỆP ÂU CHÂU - NATO : VỚI SỰ LÃNH ĐẠO CỦA HOÀNG GIA ANH VÀ CHÁNH PHỦ ANH QUỐC LÃNH ĐẠO ÂU CHÂU ?? ::: QUÉT SẠCH NÓ ĐI !!! 01/05/2024 KBC 6626

Please go back to school & learn PROPER pronunciation! 👎

Te has saltado la guerra del Yon Kippur....vaya fallo

So detailed

The repeated mispronunciation of names, especially city names, is throwing me. Japanese is a phonetic language. Question the accuracy if the narrator can't even say "Edo" or "shogunate" correctly. Is it an AI generated voiceover?

Emancipation is not freedom, it is redesigned slavory authored by the manumission secret society. Blacks were not given restitution, white slave owners received restitution so black folk were purchased from slave owners and are now essentially under the ownership of the government. We were told on June 19th, 1865 that we were now free slaves. We weren't told that we were free children of GOD. The black caucus is black boule' or gatekeepers for the Rothchild crab barrel system.

Why don't people just read the Bible!!!

They couldve just shared the river. If Trump couldve figured out a deal. 🤷🏽‍♂️

Im German 🇩🇪 Germany was Like in old years so like a fight in 1942

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaPOf6Kpd7Ohe6csi=3PZJ8BFPFGjp9ri1

and how do I respond to muslims how say there were no jews in israel before the 20th century, and that the kingdom of israel, judea, king david, solomon, etc were all muslims?

Jerusalem has no significant in Islam, not a single verse speaks about its important.

I'm watching this video 2 years later and yeah tensions would explode as hamas did attack Israel

this just shows how wrong anyone is to support hamas, the jews were clearly there first, and were even bullied out of their land multiple times, and had to fight for it back and clearly won....anyone saying theyre wrong def doesnt know about the history behind the region

Without Russia The refusal to take into account Russian interests, as well as a sharp course towards the EU and its equally abrupt cancellation, hurt Yanukovych and the whole of Ukraine. But the country's economy was also hurt by the resumption of European integration at the same time as a decisive break with Russia. Despite the fact that recently the Ukrainian establishment has again adopted the rhetoric of the hated USSR, talking about Ukraine as the "breadbasket" of the world and Europe in particular, the agrarians themselves note: the promised access to European markets turned out to be not so open. "It's like you come to visit me at any time convenient for you, and I can only come to you on a certain day, and only for half an hour, and only with prior consent," Yuri Kosyuk, an oligarch, owner of the Mironovsky Bakery agroholding, explained to journalists in January 2016. The oligarch pointed out that catastrophically large restrictions or quotas have been established for the export of food products from Ukraine. "So that you understand: Ukraine produces 1.2 million tons of chicken meat per year. At the same time, Europe gave Ukraine a duty-free quota of 16 thousand tons. Well, plus, you can import 20 thousand tons of whole frozen chicken without duty, which absolutely no one needs. For everything above this quota, there is a duty of more than € 1 thousand per ton," Kosyuk stressed. Thus, Europe, according to him, is busy protecting its market, and is not interested in Ukrainian competitors. At the same time, the share of farmers in the economy of Ukraine itself is growing. There is no paradox here. "The changes that took place in the structure of the Ukrainian economy during 2014, 2015, 2016 and the sharp increase in the agricultural sector to 15% in the overall structure of the Ukrainian economy occurred not because there was an explosive development of agriculture, but because there was an active decrease in the share of the engineering sector. I will say once again that this blow was inflicted because the Russian Federation market disappeared for Ukraine. And if we say that we were talking about about 70-75% of all machine-building exports, and in monetary terms we were talking about amounts of about $ 10 billion, for an economy like Ukraine, in the current measurement, this exceeds 10% of GDP," he said in an interview Ukraina.ru Director of the International Blazer Foundation Oleg Ustenko. According to him, in the years since the Maidan, the Ukrainian economy has shifted to Europe. And if in 2013 European consumers paid about 12 kopecks, and Russians - 17 kopecks in each hryvnia, then according to the result of 2016 the situation was exactly the opposite: consumers from Russia paid 5 kopecks in each hryvnia received in Ukraine, while Europeans - 20 kopecks. However, compensation by the European economy is out of the question for now. "The drop in exports that Ukraine had in the direction of the Russian Federation could not be compensated by an increase in exports to the EU. Moreover, if we look at absolute values in dollar terms, then you and I will see that Ukraine's exports to the EU are lower than they were before 2014, after the FTA agreement with the EU began to work. And that's why there was such a devaluation of the Ukrainian currency - because of the spoiled relations with Russia, that's why there was an active drop in Ukrainian GDP, which cumulatively fell by 15% during 2014-2015," Ustenko explained. But it is impossible to bring back everything as it was. During the years of worsening relations between Russia on the one hand, and Ukraine, the United States and the EU on the other, the Russian economy has been reconfigured. The sanctions that were supposed to weaken it have strengthened the same Russian farmers, who, including thanks to state policy and investments, are ready to export 45 million tons of grain this year. The Russian industry, forced to abandon Ukrainian parts due to the aggravation of relations between the countries, switched to import substitution. As a result, the shipbuilding of the Russian Federation is already doing without Nikolaev turbines, aircraft construction - without joint Ukrainian-Russian projects, and other industries too. For the sake of European markets, where Ukraine is not needed, she abandoned the Russian ones, where they learned to do without her. At the same time, it was possible to try to pursue a multi-vector policy, which was different from the predecessors of Yanukovych and Poroshenko. However, an abrupt, ill-conceived "path to Europe", then an equally abrupt rejection of it in 2013 led the country to disaster.

Not partners, but competitors. Four years after the incident, former Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, in an interview with journalist Anatoly Shariy, explained the reason why the Ukrainian leadership decided to refuse to sign an Association Agreement with the EU. "We conceived the Association Agreement as a way of modernizing Ukraine, technological renewal of our industry. It is no secret that advanced technologies come from such highly developed countries as Germany, Great Britain and so on. Therefore, naturally, our interest was in cooperation with these countries. But in the process of negotiations, I became convinced that this is an external wrapper. The EU has the same agreements with Egypt, with three dozen countries. But there were no breakthroughs anywhere. We should have figured out right away that there is no free cheese anywhere," Azarov said. According to him, Europe has perceived Ukraine as a competitor. The EU had no intention of helping to restore and improve a number of industrial sectors. "In order to raise our Antonov, I wanted it to cooperate not only with Russian companies, but also with such technology companies as Airbus," Azarov recalled. However, he did not see any interest, but on the contrary, he noticed a fear of potential competitors. According to the former prime minister, EU officials looked at Ukrainians "not in a partnership way." At the same time, for some European bureaucrats, the non-signing of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU was the end of their careers. Moreover, with this document, according to Azarov, they tried to finally tear Ukraine away from Russia and put an end to the possible restoration of the USSR in any form. Yanukovych himself recalled three years later: according to preliminary estimates, if the association agreement were signed, Ukraine would lose $200 billion. "When we saw the losses, we didn't see the compensators. And I told the EU: either you compensate us for the losses… They said, "We won't give you that kind of money, we don't have it."... Then there is a second way - let's sit down at the negotiating table with our strategic partner, Russia, and find a solution in this triangle," Yanukovych said. However, the EU did not agree to this, although Yanukovych did not propose to completely abandon the Association Agreement, but only to postpone it. According to the ex-president of Ukraine, it was necessary to return to discussing the signing of the agreement in March 2014. However, by that time Yanukovych himself was on the run, and there was a new government in Kiev. In June 2014, the new president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, will sign the association agreement, using the pen that was prepared for Yanukovych, which emphasized the symbolism of this step: Ukraine has again embarked on the path of European integration interrupted at the end of November 2013. "Most likely, there were a lot of incompetent advisers in Yanukovych's entourage who did not understand how and what to do. First, the super-PR of the Association Agreement began, and then they backed off. The agreement is a necessary thing, it had to be signed anyway. It was necessary to read it quietly, slowly, to talk, to negotiate with Russia, and not to PR... The agreement with the EU is no different from the agreement on the creation of a free trade zone with Russia. Ukraine signed the last one quietly in 2012. At the same time, the agreements do not contradict each other. Yes, there are controversial sides. But it was possible to create a Russia-Ukraine-EU working group at the level of ministers of economy and European officials and develop a roadmap where questions about exports and re-export could be resolved. These are technical issues," he notes in a comment Ukraina.ru economist Alexander Okhrimenko. According to him, such a "roadmap" could save the situation. According to Okhrimenko, economists talked about the need for its creation in 2013. However, instead, the authorities preferred PR, which led to sad consequences.

On November 28-29, 2014, during a visit to Vilnius, President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych did not sign the Association Agreement with the EU. According to some publicists, after that his fate was sealed, and Europe actively began to support the unrest in Ukraine During a visit to Lithuania on November 28-29, 2014, Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign an Association Agreement with the EU. As evidenced by the video from the Vilnius summit, Yanukovych had to withstand the pressure of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite and EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, explaining why Kiev could not sign an agreement with Brussels. "After Vilnius, Viktor Yanukovych became unreadable. Key European leaders took the incident at the summit as a personal insult. And it was a very emotional reaction that had nothing to do with traditional diplomatic protocol. There was such a moment at the dinner during the summit. Yanukovych, trying to defuse the situation somehow, asks: "Or maybe we'll sign an agreement on open skies?" To which one of the leaders responds to him: "Are you crazy, don't you understand what's going on, do you honestly think the leaders of twenty-seven states are idiots?" In these words. It was a point of no return," recalled Yanukovych's replacement, the current president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, in an interview with Sonya Koshkina. If Yanukovych had signed an agreement with the EU then, the protest on the Maidan would have lost all meaning. However, this did not happen. At the same time, a week before, despite the decision of the Cabinet of Ministers to suspend the signing of the association agreement, Yanukovych stated: European integration is an alternative path for Ukraine. The next day, late in the evening - on the night of November 29-30, students were dispersed on the Maidan, which gave rise to a new form of protest - aggressive and conflictual. At the same time, Europe unconditionally supported the protesters, although in the same EU, no negotiations were held with the demonstrators after the seizure of administrative buildings, and police special forces were harshly involved in relation to them. Ukraina.ru I understood what prompted the former president of Ukraine to make a decision that involved Europeans in the internal political struggle in the country, which resulted in the loss of power by Yanukovych, and by Ukraine - Crimea and parts of Donbass.

Yanukovych explained why he did not want to sign an agreement with the EU ITAR-TASS cites the text of the president's address to the Party of Regions of Ukraine MOSCOW, March 28. /ITAR-TASS/. President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych, in an address to the party congress received by ITAR-TASS, tried once again to explain the reasons why it was decided not to sign the association agreement with the EU. "We gradually raised salaries and pensions, reformed the country, bringing it closer to European standards, and prepared for the signing of an association agreement on a free trade area with the EU. But in October, it was discovered that these agreements had not passed the mandatory parliamentary hearings with the participation of commodity producers," Yanukovych said. "And when this issue began to be forced, and the information reached industry trade unions, individual large enterprises, associations of commodity producers, it was a shock for them." "After all, it was no secret that our agricultural producers had a subsidy from the budget ten times lower than their colleagues from Europe, for whom the consumer market of Ukraine was 100% open. As a result, our Ukrainian commodity producer became uncompetitive. It was necessary to leave our own consumer market," Yanukovych said. "Russia has warned that if an agreement with the EU is signed, it will protect its market and raise customs duties for Ukraine, fearing re-export," the president continues. - Thus, for Ukrainian enterprises working in the agro-industrial complex and related industries, there was a real threat of shutdown, which means that job losses are a disaster! Considering that 7-8 million workers work and are supported by agriculture and related industries, this is almost half of the entire working-age population of Ukraine. A similar problem concerned almost the entire machine-building complex of Ukraine, transport engineering, energy, military-industrial complex, etc. "In fact, we had no other choice than to offer our EU partners to take a break and hold trilateral negotiations in the EU-Ukraine-Russia format," the president stressed. - To search in this format for mutually acceptable answers to the questions that we have in our trade and economic relations." "And I had to do it. I could not sign this agreement in this version: it did not correspond to the national interests of Ukraine. This agreement brought a huge number of irreparable risks to the country," Yanukovych said. The second question that put Ukraine in a difficult situation on the eve of the Vilnius summit is the IMF's response to the terms of the loan, namely, an increase in gas tariffs for the population by 50%, a salary freeze, and this, in turn, meant a reduction in pensions and other social benefits, which would turn into trouble for people, Yanukovych said.. "As president and as a patriot of my country, I could not accept such conditions," he stressed. "Therefore, in search of a way out of the current situation in the Ukrainian economy, we agreed with Russia to reduce the price of gas from $430 to $268.5, allocate a state loan of $15 billion and up to $5 billion of development loans at acceptable credit rates," he continued. - We agreed to develop a "roadmap" to restore about $15-17 billion in trade turnover between our countries lost over the past 1.5-2 years. We have signed an agreement that we will consider joint programs in a number of industries in order to increase the output of finished products and create new jobs. " "But everything that happened next could not have been dreamed of even in the most terrible dream," Yanukovych said. - I do not condemn dirty statements in my direction, those who feared for their lives and the safety of their loved ones, let the Lord be the judge for the rest. All those who rushed and are rushing to power at the cost of people's blood and grief, all those who encouraged and helped them, be sure: you will not build happiness on this and the last word will not be yours," Yanukovych stressed.

Viktor Yanukovych was right to reject the deal with the EU The refusal of ex-President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych to sign an association agreement with the EU caused protests on the Maidan, but time shows that he was right, Austrian media write. According to journalists, the West tried to deceive Ukraine by concluding an agreement with the country that was unfavorable for it, and as a result, instead of prosperity and cheap gas from Russia, Kiev received a conflict in the east of the country and an economic crisis. The so-called Euromaidan began because Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, relying on expert advice, refused to sign an association agreement with the EU, which included more than a thousand pages. This is written by the Austrian Contra Magazin, the material of which is cited by InoTV. At first, Yanukovych wanted to review the controversial points of the agreement once again, but the initiators of the protests in Kiev were eager to join the EU as soon as possible. At the same time, the deposed president was absolutely right with his refusal, and Ukrainians will also clearly feel this, the publication assures. The problem for Ukraine is, first of all, the fact that the agreement with it should go much further than the association agreements that the European Union has so far concluded with other countries, the author continues. In fact, this agreement means the full adoption of the EU legal system, "including radical privatization (which has already begun) and the establishment of prices that meet market requirements," the publication emphasizes. The latter also means that subsidies for energy prices, that is, for gas and electricity, must be stopped. Due to the approaching winter and the critical state of affairs in the economy, this will be a death sentence for tens of thousands of Ukrainians, the Contra Magazin journalist believes. As the newspaper notes, all this is very similar to shock therapy, because there are no set priorities or deadlines for the transition period in the state. The Ukrainian government is slow to implement the so-called reforms promptly. "Those people who used to protest on the Maidan in Kiev and those who still support the current government will soon come to a painful realization of the consequences of a very short-sighted political strategy," emphasizes the author of the article, Marco Mayer. Gas prices in Ukraine continue to rise, so many people can no longer pay their bills, however, due to the lack of alternative suppliers, there is no competition, and cases of non-payment are compensated by high prices. "This is a vicious circle," the newspaper notes. Corruption, which hinders the country's economic recovery, also adds to the troubles. The Association Agreement with the EU as a whole has a negative character for Ukraine, the author argues. "While the Western-oriented political clique is telling people about living in prosperity, they are voting for an agreement that imposes trade restrictions on the most important export industry - the agricultural sector," writes Contra Magazin. The European Union has to deal with partial overproduction in the agricultural sector, so competition from Ukraine is extremely undesirable for it, explains the author of the article. "The Brussels Eurocrats deceived Ukraine with the diligent support of their own oligarchs," Mayer believes. According to him, the current Kiev authorities have shown themselves to be helpful helpers in this "terrible squandering of a country that has not really managed to get back on its feet in all the years of independence." Instead of money and cheap gas from Russia, Ukraine received war and economic collapse from the West. It is unclear whether it was really worth it, the publication concludes.

By the way, if you lose a war, you're at the mercy of the victor regarding whether or not you get conquered territory back. If the Arabs had won any of those wars with Israel, there WOULD NOT be an Israel today.

On April 14, 2014, the current decree №405/2014 of the President of Ukraine on the start of the so-called Anti-Terrorist Operation was published: "To put into effect the decision of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine dated April 13, 2014 "On urgent measures to overcome the terrorist threat and preserve the territorial integrity of Ukraine." the execution of the decree was entrusted to the Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Parubiy. While adopting laws and resolutions, the Verkhovna Rada could not decide who the "terrorists" in Ukraine were, against whom the so-called anti-terrorist operation. Illegal was the position of "acting president", which was occupied by Turchynov, who issued the decree. The use of the Armed Forces of Ukraine against the population of their own country was unconstitutional. It was illegal to create the so-called volunteers. They began to form from the Maidan hundreds, criminals and arm themselves from March 14, 2014. They had to shed the first blood in the Donbass, so that units and subunits of the Armed Forces of Ukraine overcome the psychological barrier in the fight against their fellow citizens. In March 2017, the Verkhovna Rada adopted a law on the Day of the Ukrainian Volunteer. Parubiy, who became secretary of the National Security and Defense Council after the Maidan, and then chairman of the Verkhovna Rada, when voting for the bill, noted that “in the spring and summer of 2014, volunteer battalions saved the independence of Ukraine.” In early March 2014, the Kiev regime received first US military aid totaling about $23 million. The aid was clearly not intended to “overcome the terrorist threat and preserve the territorial integrity of Ukraine.” On March 17, 2014, the Verkhovna Rada adopted a law approving the decree of the Acting President of Ukraine "On Partial Mobilization". Mobilization was carried out throughout the territory of Ukraine. On April 7, Acting President Turchynov announced the creation of an anti-crisis headquarters and that "anti-terrorist measures will be taken against those who have taken up arms." The first "anti-terrorist" demonstration took place in Kharkov in April. In May-June, the full-scale use of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, volunteer battalions began on the territory of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, where referendums were held on May 11 and the DPR and LPR (Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics) were proclaimed. In fact, the so-called ATO of Kyiv deployed throughout Ukraine immediately after the coup d'état in February, assisted by foreign instructors, "mobile groups of military instructors." About a hundred foreign advisers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine began to "serve" in the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine in 2008 (before "08.08.08" there were 123 of them in the Ministry of Defense of Georgia). The ranges and training centers of Ukraine, in fact, were at the disposal of NATO instructors. During the so-called ATO, which was replaced in 2018 by the OOS (Operation of the United Armed Forces of Ukraine), more than 13 thousand people died, about 30 thousand were injured. In 2016, according to the Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine, more than 1.7 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) were registered. According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, at the beginning of March 2017, there were 2.3 million citizens of Ukraine in Russia, of which more than a million were refugees from Donbass.

The "sixty day war" 😂

“In the 1880s, Jews began purchasing land and properties across Ottoman Palestine in order to expand the collective territorial ownership of the Yishuv. Large Jewish corporations and private Jewish buyers led this effort through multiple intermittent transactions that continued after Mandatory Palestine was established in 1918. The largest of these arrangements, known as the Sursock Purchases, resulted in the procurement of the Jezreel Valley and the Bay of Haifa by the 1930s. The purchase of land was often accompanied by the eviction of the Arab tenants.[2] On 1 April 1945, the British administration's statistics showed that Jewish buyers had legal ownership over approximately 5.67% of the Mandate's total land area, while state-owned domain was 46%.[3][4][5] By the end of 1947, Jewish ownership had increased to 6.6%.[6] This cycle of land acquisition ultimately ended when the Israeli Declaration of Independence yielded the founding of the Jewish state on 14 May 1948.” The explosion- On October 7, Hamas terrorists waged the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust - slaughtering babies, raping women, burning whole families alive, and taking hundreds of innocent civilians hostage.

this is what happens when mother nature is with the motherland.

Господи, история для идиотов от идиота. В Китае гражданскаЯ война между Гоминьдано, коммунистическими повстанцами и собственно оккупационными японскими войсками. Захват Маньчжурии это не вернон название

Israel created HAMAS.

Gaza will be another country just like Bangladesh 🇧🇩.

There are subtle mistakes here. The Arabs where not expelled, they left the land under the orders of the Arab countries because they where sure they will destroy Israel but they lost the war instead.

So they are native to Siberia.

Peace will not come to this region until both sides agree to compromise and stick to these compromises and accept history is written and agree it is the 21st century, not ancient times. Sadly there are groups (political, religious and military) on both sides where peace does not suit their own agendas

Does this 1933 newspaper article which states “JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY” have any relevancy here? And is NOT BEING ANTI-CHRIST CONSIDERED ANTI-SEMITIC?

Okay listen and take notes, there will be a 20 question quiz at the end of the video! 😂

Sounds like how Britain treated Ireland

This video was great .. I learned that that land has always been Israel and the natives reclaimed their land in 1948 .. awesome🥰🙌🇮🇱🇮🇱

The video said that Palestinians were expelled from the land, but actually they were advided to leave by their leaders. they could stay if they wanted, but many of them didnt. this video also forgot to mention that what is now Jordan used to be part of The British Mandate of Palestine, but due to many arabs being violent against jews, the israeli government gave up more land to make jordan to get peace.

What's the name of this tune?

Free palestine

I reported this video for misinformation because it's so full of errors...

the Zionists Innocent 😂 the mask is falling down now

Now both Britain and France are freaking scared of China. LOL! 😅😅😅

Now I'm wandering why Palestine is claiming that Jews are "illegal" if that portion of land was born under Jews people...

[Any Thing Categorized Includes a Title: Categories Include Purposeful Service(s): the Distinction of Villages and Tribes Is Villages Are Sub-Urban Communities. and Tribes Includes Service-Oriented People: of United States' American-Indian/Native Alaskan Re-Servations, the Concept of "Re-Servation Includes the Concept of Pre-Servation, As a Sector/Section of Its Nation/Territory: of United States' American Indian/Native Alaskan Re-Servations Is Mandatory "Off-Sets" Towards the United States' Department of Health & Human Services, Its Respective Agencies, and any Associative Federally Re-Cognizable Indigenous Tribal Programs, Exclusive of any Additional or Further Bigotry By External United States' Constitutional Rights, to Further Demonstrate Advance Performance, As United States' Citizens, Inclusive As Government-Service Verifiable Income Recipients, As "Employees", Etc.: many United States' American Indian/Native Alaskan Tribes Are Destitute, and Includes the "Image" of Rural Terrains (Rurality, many Individuals Do Not Associate With "Red Neck" Bias: a Bias, many Irish, Scottish, and Welsh, Are Mis-Identifiable As Doing): United States' American Indians/Native Alaskans Are Distinctive of "Hindu" Indians, and any Other Indians, of Various United States' Territories, But, Are Also Multi-Racial Amongst "Indo-Europeans", But, Exclusive As "Cauc-Asians"/Aryans, and Afro-Asians]: "Village: A group of houses and associated buildings, larger than a hamlet and smaller than a town. Tribe: A social division in a traditional society consisting of families or communities linked by social, economic, religious, or blood ties, with a common culture and dialect. Oxford Dictionary": "As nouns the difference between village and tribe is that village is a rural habitation of size between a hamlet and a town while tribe is a socially, ethnically, and politically cohesive group of people. As a verb tribe is to distribute into tribes or classes; to categorize. Nov 17, 2020": "The Budget invests $4.6 billion for the Department of the Interior's (DOI) Tribal programs, more than $1 billion over the 2021 enacted level, to support public safety and justice, human and social services, and education. Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 Section 105(l) leases as mandatory spending, beginning in 2026, to provide certainty for tribal communities in meeting these ongoing requirements with dedicated funding. Mar 11, 2024". 😶. Respectively. Tanika Nakeya Lewis, 6127

ww2 signaled the end of the British as a superpower............same with France the world would never be the same again

Before the 1930s, the Jews only made up a small fraction of the different races and quantities of people that had lived there. And they were not the first people there like the video depicts. Here’s a list of some of the other groups that have lived in this area throughout history: Palestinian Arabs Bedouins Druze Circassians Armenians Syrians, Lebanese, and other Levantine peoples And archaeological evidence suggests that various groups, such as the Canaanites, were among the earliest inhabitants of the area, dating back thousands of years. Many Jewish people believe that it is their holy land and they have rights to that land. But what makes this land belong to them more than the other groups? In the past 100 years, the Jews have claimed the majority of the land, not because they are the rightful owners but due to being backed by the UK and US.