also combine but yeah

Try to understand that words have actual definitions, and it's whether an act actually fits the definition of a word or not that determines whether it is terr0rism or not. Your rejection of that fact is an acknowledgement of your own biases. The Islamists commit acts of terr0rism as their standard procedure. The state of Israel's responses to Islamist terr0rism are not acts of terr0rism.

Your question is wrong, because it doesn't reflect what actually happened. The land of Israel is the ancestral homeland of the Jewish people, and they've spent 2,000 years of exile vowing every year, "next year in Jerusalem". Your characterization of them having no connection to it is pure drivel. And they didn't just show up and push expel people from land. The Jews legally purchased as much land as they were able to (as is their legal right), and then they moved onto their own land (as is their legal right), and they expelled some illegal squatters (as is their legal right), and then the surrounding Arabs launched an illegal, gen0cidal war against Israel, vowing to drive them into the sea. Israel defended themselves and drove back the gen0cidal aggressors to establish defensible borders. Every inch of land the Arabs lost to Israel was a consequence of the Arabs' decisions, it's their own fault they lost the land, because if they hadn't hated Israel more than they loved their own children, they'd have had an additional Arab state alongside Israel, of comparable size to it, instead of that land being absorbed into the modern state of Israel as constant Arab attacks force Israel to continually increase its control over those lands.

@lennardchurch8483 "defending themself" and "forcing Israel to increase control" is Hilarious, i was going to reply but now i won't you are totally a Zionist :D