Hi do you use sometimes piano software and what do you think is the best vst? Really enjoy your lessons thank you.
@lenhumbirdКүн бұрын
Bravo! That was amazing, and very instructional!
@lenhumbirdКүн бұрын
Your video was an amazing discovery for me! The Köln Concert was my favorite jazz piano piece when I heard it as a teenager. Your detailed analysis - and your wonderful personality - makes for a mesmerizing video. I would love to hear what that concert hall's announcement tone actually sounds like! I believe the pedal sounds were added because Jarrett was so frustrated with that piano, he forced the broken pedal to become part of the music.
@GalenDeGrafКүн бұрын
I love that you're digging into media music!
@isaacshaw1596Күн бұрын
There is a notational error. It’s written in 4/4,which is fine but when the main melody comes in , the first bar has a dotted crotchet or dotted quarter note followed by another crotchet. Well the dotted crotchet is correct but the following crotchet should be two 8th notes tied together to show the middle of the bar because it just looks wrong. It’s quite hard to see beats.
@SonataSecretsКүн бұрын
You're absolutely right. I looked at some other arrangements who had done the same mistake and didn't think enough about it myself. I have updated my arrangement with correct notation now, unfortunately can't change the video.
@isaacshaw1596Күн бұрын
@@SonataSecrets the video was still amazing! I loved hearing you play it! Didn’t ruin the video in anyway just my music theory brain had to say something
@stevegrant7762Күн бұрын
Takes the original and improves on it. I think he understands what keith was trying to say at the different stages of the composition and brings it to the fore. Which is what interpretation is all about I suppose. Anyway, this is a wonderful contribution to music.
@drdandan61282 күн бұрын
First of all great analysis I've always loved ur videos! Isn't it in lydian dominant?
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
I guess you're right to call it Lydian dominant (also the "acoustic scale" in another comment), it's just that I don't go that far into the details about it, and I still think you could call out the "lydian" features the way I do where it's applicable in the music.
@seancregomusic2 күн бұрын
I might have to get the music and learn this myself now that I can play more again post-surgery! 🤔 The hardest part is that whole-tone fingering generally really sux. 😖 The nerd in me, though, wonders how you would secure copyright to make an arrangement of this and sell it. Did you just text Danny and ask? 😜 (I’m only half-joking because I’ve actually been able to talk to composers before for stuff like this instead of going through their “people”.)
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
It's a valid question, I've spent quite some time to check it out, and it works through the service/platform ArrangeMe.com which owns a lot of titles, including this one, and makes it available for third party arrangement. Only the deal is I get 10% of any revenue (I don't think the terms of service is a secret), the rest is shared between the platform and the original composers. I think it's actually a good deal, the music gets spread out and the composers get paid, as long as you realize it's not feasable to make a living off of only arranging it. It looks pretty similar on musicnotes.com marketplace (same % deal), however they don't have this title available for arranging so I cannot upload it there. Also, if you upload an arrangement to musicnotes marketplace (something they do have the rights to), it doesn't show in their general search which only seems reserved for their selected artists arrangements...
@seancregomusic2 күн бұрын
@@SonataSecrets that’s great! I know other people who use ArrangeMe, but I didn’t know that Musicnotes does something similar.
@pyjparte65102 күн бұрын
Wow so interesting and thankyou !
@Arthursabbatinibuoro2 күн бұрын
Quem nunca entendeu pra que ser um staccato tá aí! hehe
@tackontitan2 күн бұрын
The Gracie Films outro was perfect
@__DocRooZ2 күн бұрын
Sonata Secrets doing Simpsons analysis was not on my bingo list! Great video.
@arielwertlen67092 күн бұрын
“Hehehe it’s even sillier.” I couldn’t help but chuckle myself. :)
@denaro5722 күн бұрын
Such a great analysis and arrangement!! I want a full Performance in a separate video please! 😍
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
Here you go! kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXayp2mindSfr80
@vengermanu93752 күн бұрын
I was also thinking I'm going to have to go to Vinheteiro's channel to see the full performance but will go and watch yours now 😊
@Rikiko7222 күн бұрын
This is fun as something different. I used to love this show. I almost view it as a kind of comedic version of a secular bible.
@demopem2 күн бұрын
I've been an Oingo Boingo fan since wayyyy back. You can find the same quirkiness there, although the genre is completely different. Danny Elfman is a genius. And a little crazy I think. 🙃
@PianoMan63022 күн бұрын
Is it not more accurately defined as the acoustic scale?
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
I hadn't heard of the acoustic scale before reading the wikipedia page for this video haha. Sure, technically it's correct that it uses the major #4 b7 scale, but the b7 part is less prominant than the #4 (lydian) which is why I talk about it the way I do. For example, the main version of the theme doesn't use the b7 at all. The start of the 16th runs (b.13) actually uses the leading note (M7) first before switching to the b7 when approaching the full whole tone part. However, it does come into play in later parts (b.16-17, also b.21), it's just that I didn't go into that much detail in this video. I would argue that it's still correct to call it lydian for those parts of it where it overlaps.
@Badabums22 күн бұрын
Ay caramba! Great Analysis
@CatrinaDaimonLee2 сағат бұрын
"translate to english"
@lizzybach42542 күн бұрын
Tf is that thumbnail 💀
@SonataSecretsКүн бұрын
Changed it 😅
@weepingscorpion87392 күн бұрын
You know, I did not see this one coming. Not a fan of the Simpsons per se but I always found the theme interesting. So thank you for this. :) A quick question on your notation: So, I play the organ and in the books I use, you will always see G Mixolydian with no accidentals, C# Phrygian with 3 sharps, C Dorian with 2 flats etc., i.e. it is indication in the fixed accidentals what the key is. I see here not just on your notation but that of other KZbinrs that you only use major/Ionian and minor/Aeolian for fixed accidentals, so C Lydian will have no accidentals while in stuff I usually use it will have one sharp. So, what gives? Why this difference? I mean, adding the extra sharp or removing the extra flat would negate the need to add the respective extra sharp or natural symbol on the sheet music. Just a question. Thanks. :)
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
I understand the question, it would make more sense theoretically to use one sharp for C lydian, I think it's just that we "default" back to the ionian/aeolian key signature so it's always clear where the root is. At least for me it makes more sense this way because I'm not at all used to playing in other modes in general, so the harmony even feels more like a temporary offset (so accidentals makes sense), even if it's for a whole piece! I suspect you'd learn to feel differently if you're used to playing in the modes more...
@weepingscorpion87392 күн бұрын
@@SonataSecrets Yeah, I think that is one difference between classical vs church music. Classical barely if ever touches the other modes from what I understand, while because some of the hymns are really really old, some of the modes still survive and when we get to the Romantic period some even went back to the Middle Ages and starting reusing the modes. Classical would then be more "modern" or rather contemporary and as a result be more conventional and stick with mainly major and minor. I dunno, this was a small hypothesis I put together with the small experiences I have. - But again thanks for the video and thank you for your answer. :)
@SonataSecrets2 күн бұрын
Yeah, I think so too.
@wolfymozart2 күн бұрын
First! Thank you!!!❤
@barkofink3 күн бұрын
@ 4:14 this is Esus4 7 (chord) not E-
@barkofink3 күн бұрын
@ 12:52 this is B Locrian it would implied a F" otherwise. We can clearly hear Locrian mode anyway
@yavidhi3 күн бұрын
Recommendation: Vers la flamme?
@21748634 күн бұрын
Have you ever thought of doing Scriabin’s etude op 42 no 5? Every Scriabin piece is magical, but that one I find to be especially beautiful despite it’s chaotic undertone
@peterchan60824 күн бұрын
The RH E note that appears in the end of the 3rd bar is an E natural rather than E-flat. It just doesn't sound right to me with an E-flat there.
@jimpyrzynski78804 күн бұрын
This is weird - as you were playing the section around 27:00 I was saying to myself "I get goose bumps each time I listen to this" - then seconds later (about 27:45) - you said the same thing about yourself.
@ginaschrader5 күн бұрын
Mr. Snowden - thank you for explaining this piece of music with sensitivity to what you felt Chopin was attempting to express as a teenager. I agree with you that he was fleshing out some melancholy and trying to weave into it a hopeful ending. I didn't realize until you pointed it out that he was influenced by Bach. That signature tone of Bach brought a touch of magic along with layers of warmer colors. When I first heard this song, I felt like I was riding in a sail boat that encountered rough waters. The sky dark and uncertain. Then suddenly the skies opened and light sparkled on calmer water. Your comments about the waves of music and the brightness of the tones uplifting the mood as it switched from minor into major in mid piece were spot on. Your insights really resonated with me. Thanks again. Gina
@cioccolateriaveneziana5 күн бұрын
"Weird" wouldn't be my choice of a word. Neither would I vulgarize the piece with emojis...
@vaxx20075 күн бұрын
просто ужасно
@bongosock5 күн бұрын
Yes, in the dramatic climax section, he varies the rhythm by removing one note. The result of the removal is very unsettling - in both cases.
@CeciliaLee3205 күн бұрын
First piano music I would like to play! I got it in my head for over a week. Amazingly beautiful. Surprisingly I can do it with both hands!?! As a beginner, this music has magic! I have watched your other video, your performance has magic too !!
@tkegamingrb37805 күн бұрын
A barcarolle would be a song composed and sung on a boat. To understand this song, it would be like calming peaceful waves at the beginning and end, but at the middle point, or the climax, it would be like encountering a huge wave, a tsunami!
@hdholl96965 күн бұрын
And I shall! Great and insightful tutorial.
@annykwok65785 күн бұрын
Thanks! Love the way you dissect and explain the piece. The introduction on the background of the publication was also very interesting. Your analysis absolutely helped me to understand this piece better. Thank you!
@SonataSecrets4 күн бұрын
Thank you! 🙏
@peymannoorbakhsh47496 күн бұрын
marvelous ❤❤❤
@ireneienco97726 күн бұрын
Low blow to Gould. Not a classy look and disrespectful
@ScyllaWyrm6 күн бұрын
This has been my favorite piece of music for quite a long while now. András Schiff's explanation/lecture (which can be seen right here on KZbin) only added to my appreciation of this fantastic achievement in music.
@ykaylow18036 күн бұрын
Thank you
@josdurkstraful6 күн бұрын
We can conclude that Debussy invented the "Hendrix" chord: Dominant 7#9....
@mike-df3qo6 күн бұрын
deBUSSSYY
@flecha.perdida.del.caos.6 күн бұрын
It's personal, but I find in each major second interval dissonance in this piece of music one of those little flowers that shumman suggests. Another form of meaning that makes me shudder
@leowald16 күн бұрын
I agree that it evokes a pleasant sensation rather than sadness. It beautifully captures the essence of intimacy. The beginning represents foreplay, filled with gentle caresses that feel very pleasurable. As the tempo increases, the music becomes more emotional, leading to the climax (orgasm) in the middle. Finally, the music concludes with a sense of restful tranquility. The etude is a description of an intercourse.
@alexyork99176 күн бұрын
Interesting that you describe the 2nd chord in bar 6 (French augmented sixth) as an Ab7 with a flat 5 whereas I would think it makes more sense to think of it as a D7 (in 2nd inversion) with a flat 5. Firstly, it is notated the way I describe with an Ab being the flat 5 of a D7 rather than spelling the D natural as an Ebb (in an Ab7 flat 5) but also it makes more sense to think of it as an altered D7 being the dominant to the G which comes after.
@alexyork99176 күн бұрын
A small point that I would have added is that the switch to Bb major at the very end sets up the transition to the second Nocturne in Eb perfectly. I imagine that this was a deliberate move by Chopin.