When I read "Smartest" I knew it would be women speaking 🤣Tell us about your "really neat trips", ladies.

This podcast makes me want to get my thoughts out to my service as well! What are some of the mainstream USMC journals that I could write to?

Why do you think you are so important and so Expert Mode ? Not thinking about low-level Citizens view-points etc

LAMEST high-pitch Voice thing they are Important. You are NOT important, looking forward to near furture litigation

Absolutely enjoyed your podcast on all topics. Very much helps me with my future in Cyber. Thank you

The red d n the 2 Jason are good cut our of the picture now its going on Shane Henderson now that I know who's what final appointment he use to be investigator back 2016 this happen

I'm kind of surprised that none of you mentioned the Kursk Nuclear Power Plant, which seems like an obvious target.

The Kursk Incursion is definitely a game changer. Even Russians started drawing borders of Ukrainian control in Kursk on their daily update map.

Thermobaric bbbombs can spreadd blast waves around corners.

Iran is attacking Israel with drones. The US priority will be to defend Israel.

awful sound (mic) quality btw

This is Second time this shitty app is flaging my comment down,when i point out that this 2Chaps are wasted time justo to say that the shithole Urine is Cooked.

0:32 What a vapid conversation about the Polar Security Cutter that failed to hold senior leadership in the Coast Guard accountable for its cost overruns and building delays. gCaptain’s Malte Humpert wrote an article on May 3rd (presumably a week before this interview) that explicitly said there was no final design in May 2024 for these ships and how that’s going to be a huge issue. Was this WotR interview an actual conversation (as explicitly stated in the title) or just a curated set of talking points?!

My dad and I agreed the censorship was dumb and took away from our experience.

The inside Russian guy on youtube, made the point that the area of Kursk the Ukrainians are in, are essentially backwoods, sparsely populated and a massive agricultural area. All those wheat fields and other crops, worth idk how many millions in food, are not being harvested this year not to mention the future damage caused is a large loss to the Russians. Leave it to someone actually from Russia to have more strategic insight than the " It's just political damage" guy downplaying the offensive.

First time viewer. Enjoyed the conversation. Plug the sponsor less. More than once or twice is too much.

🇺🇦

If he wanted a common type comparison that wouldn't upset maybe try Ford F Series?

Great show. Always love the MK viewpoint. So glad you also mentioned Bronk. He does make a good case for why the Grypen might make more sense in theater: need for high disbursement and lower maintenance requirements. Anyways that F16 has left the hangar... G2U!

very well detailed info

“Russian reinforcements were all destroyed by Himars”. Reality: two or three trucks were destroyed. Ukraine offensive was a good TikTok show. In practical terms? Time will tell. But so far - nothing seriously changed, with key events unfolding still in Donetsk region

Never Miss Thank You for the update 🙏💙💛🔥🍁

22:46 "At the rate that they have been sustaining offensive operations their losses are quite high". That conclusion does not follow from the premise. That the Russians have been sustaining offensive operations since the beginning of the year suggests that their losses are in fact not "quite high". Because if they were high we should observe a diminishing intensity of operations, which we don't.

How this doesn't get tens of thousands of views is baffling. Some of the best analysis you can get

It's hard to believe that anyone would think there's nothing to learn from the Ukraine war. I could write a book on what we can learn, and I'm not even in the Army anymore! Maybe the Harding Project should open enrollment to veterans... ;)

I don't know if "Smartest" is the best descriptor for the title here. This conversation concerns more bureaucratic conjecture over ideals, processes and policies on the abstracted scale way above the cutting edge of the technology being used and applied within the agencies and departments involved in cyber warfare. I believe if this group contained a speaker that was a developer or operator that works directly within the modern cyber warfare environment, like someone who gets their hands dirty on the daily, it would have been a much more meaningful and effective conversation.

Well THIS aged like spoiled milk. Kaufman is just way to pessimistic (dressed as cautious) to be reliable in this war.

At 21:50, “Russian advances are accelerating north of Kharkiv.” Really? How fast are they advancing north of Kharkiv?

Already watched on the app (was wondering why it was split into multiple parts) but commenting for the algorithm

Also, about that column that got whiped out, where were all the IFV's and APC's? Instead you have 40 loaf vans nose to tail. It appears that they don't have any extras.

Good chat. Wishing success to Ukraine.

#Peremoha .. 🔥🔥🔥

Great podcast

🇺🇦

🇺🇦

Who is "she" and why does she need to be taken care of "quickly"?

The towns are still intact, the soldiers can live off the land.

The Russians cleared the minefields on their side in prep for their own attack. Troops for this were far back. It's why troops aren't being pulled from other fronts. This is amazing but can't help but think its the Arden offensive 1944 and not 1940.

well I think the current Ukrainian offensive into Kursk main goal which was achieved was to cut off the rail network from Kursk to the Russian grouping of forces in Northern Kharkov. this was achieved thereby cutting off supply lines to Russian forces there. and also destroying the Russian military logistical infrastructure in the area. and I think this sets up a future Ukrainian counteroffensive north of Kharkov when the Russian forces in Northern Kharkov are probably out or low in supply making them easier targets for a counteroffensive if successful will be a massive political and military blow to Putin even worse than the Kharkov offensive of late 2022.

The smart thing for the Russians to do would be to contain the Kursk Incursion with local forces and conscripts, without diverting anything from the Donbas, and then fixing the Ukrainian reserves in place to prevent them from being diverted to either the Pokrovsk or Toretsk Fronts which are both in dire need of reinforcements and rotation. This will allow Russia to continue its methodical advance on that front while depleting Ukraine's strategic reserve and being fairly confident that their spearheads are safe from a determined counterattack. While from a political and publicity perspective it is definitely not ideal the Russians were never going to get good media coverage abroad and domestically they can frame this as another justification to the populace that the war must be won lest the West become emboldened and launch further mini-Barbarossas. Imagine if those 2-4 brigades deployed to Kursk had instead been used for a counterattack toward Ocheretyne to try and cut off the Russian Salient creeping towards the crossroads at Pokrovsk. That still probably wouldn't have worked but it would've bought some time and made the Russians more cautious, diverting focus and forces towards securing their flanks rather than pushing onwards. Instead Ukraine seems focused on publicity, which does make a degree of sense as their war effort is dependent upon Western willingness to keep Ukraine in the fight and exaggerated claims about the scope and impact of the incursion in the media definitely will help Ukraine's fundraising in the near term. There is also an element there of trying to get Russia to give up on their Kharkov front in exchange for the International border outside of the Donbas being a semi-DMZ and localizing the war there. While that has some merit and is definitely interesting from an international relations standpoint I don't know if the Russians will agree, at least publicly.

"Russia is embarrassed" this is literally stupid. Who cares? Who cares is Russia if "embarrassed" this is such a female way of thinking especially about war. What is the strategic design behind this? Well there isn't one and once Russia crushes this they will move on.

I remember also talking to my friends on a tincup on a wire back in the days.

audio: podcast from a broom closet.

Really outstanding. Thank you so much! So much riches to discuss. Need to ponder more first & listen again.

#Petemoha .. 🔥🔥🔥

Thank you gentlemen. I'm very close to this issue. Where we once built ships, Sparrow's Point, Los Angeles, we now import Chinese goods.

This sounds like too little, too late. My sense of US Asian strategy is that it's entirely incoherent, based on unrealistic scenarios that are 20 years out of date. Not only is it impossible for the US to defend Taiwan (short nukes), it seems unlikely that it can ensure S Korea and Japan will have access to seaborne trade in the event of a major conventional war with China. Those two need at least 50,000 tons of food a day to ward off starvation. The US is determined to choose an indefensible point, a guaranteed defeat as its first battle against China. And, thanks to US intransigence in Europe, China's back is covered. Plus, that new ally will also supply China with massive raw materials in the event of a sea blockade. Unlike America's East Asian allies China is at no risk of starvation. Those allies really ought to reconsider their geopolitical stance. Being tied to a declining nation that's now fully captured by a mad political religion, Biocommunism, is unlikely to play out to your national advantage if you're within China's ancient sphere of influence.

I HATE THE JONES ACT I HATE THE JONES ACT I HATE THE JONES ACT A video on the strategic sea lift would be great because they are cargo ships thats just as fast as an aircraft carrier.

Says so much of a countries values when it has to rely on military production as its engine of manufacturing growth.

All space is marine by definition. Think about it!?