15:41 What is meant by a College teaching the 2 kingdoms? The 3 main teachings from sermon on the Mount: 1. Loving everyone, including your enemy. 2. Faithfulness to Jesus teachings in divorce and remarriage. 3. Faithfulness about evangelism.

Wow this video was so powerful!🙌🏻 I’m currently on the road to pursuing a DVM, still in undergrad btw. I have been seriously considering being a physician. I love medicine, and I’ve been around horses for a big part of my life. This is a huge reason why I’m considering wanting to be a vet. I also have this deep desire of being a physician. I tell the Lord sometimes I feel so incapable of actually pursuing that career. I think deep down that’s the one thing holding me back from actually thinking about pursuing this career. I pray that I wouldn’t be lead by my emotions but that I would be lead by the Lords spirit.

Could you provide links to your publications?

Very good, Bryant! You have worked hard and accomplished a lot.

I simply accept it the way it was written but not the way it was misinterpreted prior to 1900 AD

The Virgin Mary is found in the book of revelation and all over the Old Testament. We do not believe in scripture alone, but believe in the apostolic tradition also

I just knew Black Duck was going to be in there somewhere! 😁 Good podcast -Cheryl

It is a gift and a blessing to be home.

Wonderful interview. I appreciate John's humility. Lots of good things to think about.

Great lecture! Very interesting.

Love the app, great for practising my reading. Especially being able to slow it down

Please let me know how I can buy this material! I’ve been trying to study through the Bible & give a good foundation to the young people in the next generation of my family. We’re still in the middle of Genesis, but I am realizing that after Genesis we need to hit the OT highlights and get on to Jesus ASAP. I was thinking about possibly doing Matthew after Genesis, then going back to Exodus, but as the teens are getting busy I’m realizing we may not get thru everything before they are gone! If we could at least have your studies as an outline for the Big Picture of God’s Story, I would be very glad to use this material!! Please do let me know. 💙🙏🏽💙

That fringe element broke off and was led by Theosophists such as Helena Blavatski and Aliester Crowley.. Crowley, then using music as his Mesmer.. and here we are.. today.

When I was in the eleventh grade I decided to shift my studying time from more of the Bible and prayers to burning up to late in the night making academic studies. This was a lie that to drastic drop of grades until my biology teacher questioned me because I used to score well and always on top. I had no explanation but to just state it to my friend Lester that I achieve nothing on my own but worry and burden of academic excellence through the wrong format, conforming to the patterns of the world, I changed and wrote it in red ink that I sinned when I thought trusting myself my mind and ability that I shall perform better after all, I'm a Christian, that was a lost track of thinking.

I am so grateful and I'm greatly inspired by the fact, the professor and my brother stresses that more time for God grants us an astuteness of mind in making keen observations, analysing information and even more when it comes to mastering contents since we are used to putting God's living word into our hearts and souls with all strength, heart and mind that increases our focal power and ability to say exactly the words appear in the Bible also to state in our own words because we not only master but also understand the structure of the message in the scripture.

I love it, Seth. It's great. I remember you saying it and now I see the actual work in its raw and natural.

Will this semantic search for koine Greek be available to the public? (Either the source code, or the semantic search online) This would be great for Bible study.

Sounds just like our Baptist choir in Germany.

All you people talking about how the woman is dressed need to grow the fu*k up. Focus on being a good person and stop gossiping about others. Jesus wouldn’t do what y’all are doing you fake Christians. And though Wesley was an amazing moralist who expected himself to adhere to his way of living but did not expect anyone else to unless they themselves chose to, he also wore boring and unfashionable clothing. But he is one of the reasons for the Great Male Renunciation in which make fashion declines into boring black suits without jewelry and without floral designs. Men can wear jewelry and be flamboyant, and women can show off their bodies. Y’all are just perverts who can’t stop fanaticizing about those women because they’re sexy. It’s ok to be sexy. Our bodies are perfect because God created them. And we should show off perfection, not hide it from the world. Don’t let anyone persuade you to hide yourselves from the world. Did you ever consider the fact that the reason you expect others to refrain from sexual activity is because you cannot engage in sexual activity? You make your own failures the rule for everyone else when in reality, you’re ugly or have some other flaw that prevents others from finding you sexually attractive. Be yourself, unless you believe in anatman, then don’t be yourself 😅

What I ask myself when I hear these kinds of lectures is , do we need to know ALL of these theories, doctrins, bible passages to become closer to God; and should that be the case, what will this mean to you? As a Christian myself, I've noticed that there is a lot of wrapping and packaging around Christianity, and in my experience, people are LOST in all of this jargon. The essence of who you are doesn't dwell in the head ( THOUGHT FORM), but in "BEING", The church needs to help its flock to transcend and transform our shallow thinking minds to thethh Christ Consciousness "

Great video! I am curious: what program did you use for showing routes? Thanks.

I became a voting member of a Christian organization in 1959. Last year, it had become so political, I asked that my name be removed from the membership rolls. There is a pastor in our town who unabashedly preached a political gospel. He may be careful to not mention names of politicians or names of political parties from the pulpit but nobody would have any trouble deducing how he votes. There are probably more than one hundred cars in the parking lost every Sunday. Other pastors see that and assume that preaching a political gospel will increase attendance at Sunday services. I think the NET result is that fewer and fewer people attend services.

I have no college degrees and I've never attended college classes so, if you chose to respond to my question, please take that into account. I don't subscribe to the doctrine that God has one plan of salvation for Hebrews and another plan for everyone else. I don't try to fit almost all Bible prophecies into a future (futurist?) time frame. Many Christians, however, have adopted the theology of Darby and Scofield (and seem to be blissfully unaware that any serious Bible students ever believed anything else). I have often wondered (and was wondering again today) how that theology answers the question of a) whether there is a difference between the millennial reign and the reign of Christians on Earth with Jesus after the millennium and b) if so, what that difference is / those differences are?

Yes brother I grew up there and as corinth that wicked city I rejoice that followers of the way and Sattler are there swmissouri

This is so cool. Thanks, Austin! :)

i am so happy to see christianity is dying in usa

Simply accept it the way it is written and the way it was understood prior to 1900 AD

Overall a good speach, brother Finny. However, you should be very careful whom to invite to your channel. Now, there is no code how exactly to dress, certainly one how NOT to dress. This lady left to you perfectly represents such.

ברבון, אנוכי חושב אשר אתה סיפרת טוב מאוד לכולם על הכל. ואני מכווה אשר יהוה יברך אתה כאשר אתה מלמד Brevon, I think you presented everything to everyone well and hope that the Lord blesses you when you teach.

Colossians 3 23 And whatever you do, do it heartily, as to the Lord and not to men, 24 knowing that from the Lord you will receive the reward of the inheritance; you serve the Lord Christ. I’m thankful you found the thing that your heart loves! Everyone should pay attention to the things their heart loves to do, the things that make their heart leap and brings real joy, peace; & a sense of truly being alive and connected with our heavenly Father. Each one of us were sent here for specific reasons and purposes, and God needs all of His people representing Him as ambassadors in many different types of places, all around the world. Sadly many people do not actually discover and study the subject that is really a good match for them, for the rest of their lives. I have so many friends who graduated with a degree and got a job, only to find out they actually hated the work! But they were in debt for that degree, & had to keep doing what they hated to pay it off. Personally, I changed my major many times. I was interested in so many things, but a bit confused. I did not get good advice to help me understand my real interests, desires and actual abilities. I was pressured by relatives to pursue a major which would ensure that I had a marketable degree with high pay. I ended up in a field which allowed me to serve others, but it was very high stress & not actually a good match for my abilities, so I burnt out quickly. I’m very glad the Lord has spoken to your heart and surrounded you with godly advisors and companions there at Sattler! Blessings on your future, and may all your joyful hopes be fully realized! Trust in the Lord, and He’ll guide your path. I’m reminded of Psalm 37.5: Commit your way to the LORD, Trust also in Him, And He shall bring it to pass. 🌻🙏🏽📖

I look forward to this being available at the App Store! Well done!

Thank You for sharing this uplifting hymn!

It does sound like a great plan, but it would be a question if I would move from Virginia's Appalachians up to Boston.It certainly is more for the saints of that very area. Plus, college is not something I would send my children too. The Bible and church writings are to be studied at home.

BEAUTIFUL!!!

I am interested in the longer talk you gave referred to in the capstone video! Where can I access it? Thank you!❤️

Hey, this is Seth! 👋 Thanks for checking out my work. (see app details below) 📲 As of 10/26/22, I'm testing a beta version of Tanakh Reader internal to Sattler 🌐 I hope to move towards open source. My code code will live here: github.com/Tanakh-Reader 📬 I'd love to hear from you! You can reach me at [email protected] Blessings ✌

Great looking app! I'd be interested to see if there will be more flexibility with choosing known words in the future (like if you are learning vocab by chapter rather than occurrence)! Thanks for sharing.

Wow

It was a blessing to meet Pablo 17 years ago! And Yesterday 14th of October he went to meet his Máster.

Not much help when you don't even publish the list..

So happy to hear Pablo give his goodbye speech, and hear his lifelong work was worth it all!

This is one of my favorite teachings & I have it saved in two of my folders: God Milestones & Favorites!

Paul tells women in this statement "the why" for headcovering It's "a symbol of authority on her head" - What exactly does that statement mean? Symbol is a thing that represents or stands for something else. So what does the woman's head covering stand for? It stands for God's hierarchy of authority in His Kingdom, In His creation When a woman covers her head in prayer and her work for the Lord - She is announcing to the seen and unseen world, to principalities and powers and wicked rulers in high places and to the angels, to the minions of satan and to the devil himself, "that she has submitted herself and is under the authority of God Almighty" ---- So back off satan -hands off!!! Every woman of God, especially single women without husbands should want to wear that symbol of authority on her head - because the angels are watching, and so is everyone else in the universe! Ladies make that clear distinction you are not a woman of rebellion, jezebel's daughter, you are like Ruth who left Moab and place herself under the protection and care of Almighty God. "May the LORD, the God of Israel, under whose wings you have come to take refuge, reward you" Ruth 2:12-13 for your humble submission to His Word and His Authority. hope this will help women who are still trying to understand this teaching..... God bless you all.

* Starting Off on the Right Foot… It can be argued that the confusion about women having to wear a veil or something similar could be attributed to the Bible version one is using. For example some translations add the words “…a symbol…” while others do not. Also some use the word “wife” instead of “woman” or “husband” instead of “man.” Whereas other versions like the King James Version never uses the words “wife” or “husband.” For some the chapter supposedly refers only to married couples and still others believe it refers to men and women in general. In addition it delves into the creation order (See verses 8 and 9). A misunderstanding in just a few words can throw off the entire meaning of the chapter. therefore, it’s best to use only the King James Version in this matter, which seems to be simpler and more concise. * Where the problem usually begins… If we follow those who subscribe to the doctrine of women wearing veils then it can be argued that the most often cited verse in this teaching is 1st Corinth. 11:5, which states: “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.” According to those who believe women ought to wear veils this verse implies that a woman’s uncovered head is someone who does not wear a veil and assumes that such a person already has long hair and is wrong for not doing so. Therefore, the conclusion is that it must be referring to an “additional” covering. Another conclusion is that if a woman ought to be covered ONLY when praying and prophesying then it would seem as though it is something that can be taken on or off like a veil. But one should keep in mind that the word “veil” is not actually mentioned here neither anything that IMPLICITLY states that the covering is something can be placed on or taken off. Here’s something to consider: imagine a woman with long flowing hair praying and prophesying without a veil. Would the lack of a veil really equate to someone as if they were shaven? Why would anyone come to this conclusion? It would seem a bit odd that a woman with long hair who is not wearing a veil should somehow be equated to being shaved. This is most certainly an odd thought pattern if we accept the veil interpretation. But it does fit the narrative of those who understand the word “uncovered” to mean “not covered in long hair” or simply put, “short hair.” Looking at a woman with short hair one can easily say that she might as well be shaven. So be honest doesn’t it make more sense that if a woman is uncovered meaning has short hair would be more closely relatable to being shaven than someone with long hair without a veil to be equated to being shaved? To put it in another way it is not a big leap to make the correlation between short hair to being shaven, unlike being asked to believe to make a GIGANTIC LEAP OF LOGIC that an unveiled woman (even with long flowing hair) is somehow equated to being shaved. * Is the Covering Long Hair or a Veil? ….. If we examine all the verses from verse 4 to 15 without bias we should at least conclude that the passages have something to do with the heads of both men and women. The question we should ask is: Are they referring to hair that covers the head or some kind of veil? Some will even say both, but if we carefully examine verse 15 it would seem that we would be getting a clearer picture of what was being referred to in the earlier verses when it mentions the words, “covered,” “cover” and uncovered." “But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her FOR a covering." If the covering is long hair then to be “covered” which is synonymous to “covering,” should be understood as long hair as well. Then it makes sense when it says that it is shameful or dishonorable for a man to pray or prophesy with his head “covered” because they are referring to long hair. Now logically speaking wouldn’t being “uncovered” or “not covered” then mean short hair? Therefore, if to be covered refers to “long hair” then the opposite should be true, in that to be “uncovered” should be understood as “short” hair. * You Should Naturally Know Right From Wrong by Just Looking…. If these verses do not move you yet then here’s one that should definitely blow your mind. Paul asks you to make a judgment call in verse 13 as if one should naturally see a problem because he asks you to: "Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?" If “covering” really meant a veil then one would have to explain why anyone would possibly come up with judgment that a woman praying or prophesying WITHOUT A FABRIC VEIL ON THEIR HEAD WOULD LOGICALLY OR NATURALLY LOOK WRONG? Someone needs to explain this logically. Be honest, does looking at someone doing this naturally create a thought that a veil is missing? I have never seen or heard anyone say: "What a shame she is not wearing a veil on her head” after looking at a woman with long hair while praying or prophesying, that would be ludicrous. There is no NATURAL or NORMAL reasoning to make such a judgment. But if the word “uncovered” were to mean "short hair." then it would make logical sense. Because if I see a woman who has a manly haircut doing these holy things like we read in verse 5, then I can naturally judge that something doesn’t look right. Also, the very next verse continues this line of thinking that things should be obvious to understand by mere observation in nature. "Doth not even NATURE itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him." 1st Corinthians 11:14 Note that verses 13 and 14 are two consecutive questions both of which asks you to NATURALLY ASSUME that there something wrong by SEEING a woman’s head to be uncovered (meaning having short hair) and a man having long hair (meaning being covered). I would like to also add that it is NOT jumping from a “veil” in 13 and then suddenly to “hair” in 14 like some would like to suggest, because you will note that verse 15 refers back again to the woman which FLAT OUT STATES the “covering” to mean “long hair.” Therefore there is no excuse not to understand the previous verses. By this simple understanding we can then understand the part where it states that it is shameful or dishonoring for a man to pray or prophesy with his head covered, meaning covered in long hair, like in verses 4: “Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.” This “dishonoring” of the head fits perfectly with verse 14 where it mentions that it is “shameful“ for a man to have long hair, therefore the topic is the same in that the head covered in this verse refers to “long hair. ” I should also add that these verses in NO WAY imply that the covering on the man can be placed on or taken off, like some like to argue. It’s SIMPLY SAYING that it is a dishonor if a man prays or prophesies in LONG HAIR. The same should be understood in verse 7: “For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.” Again, they are NOT implying something that can be put on or taken off but that the man should not cover his head (with long hair) and the reason because he is the image and glory of God. This same idea should be included in the verses that refer to women like in verse 6: “For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.” This verse is often misinterpreted like verse 5 when it’s simply mentioning in the same tone as the previous verse that if a woman have short hair then let her head be shaved BUT if it is a shame to be shaven let her be covered in long hair. It’s really not complicated once you understand what it means to be covered or uncovered. Everything else starts to make sense when you read the other verses knowing that they are referring to hair. I can only imagine how lost one must be when they are stuck on one or two verses that to them seems questionable but not take into consideration all the other verses that point to covering as long hair and uncovered to mean short hair. Therefore, given all this logic and proof, how can one conclude that they are referring to a hat, bonnet or veil? Again, how can one have logical judgments or conclusions that by merely looking at a long-haired woman performing such holy acts without a veil that one would automatically assume that there is something off? It makes no logical sense. Therefore, the whole veil doctrine is wrong, it cannot be substantiated and should be rejected.

Very good. Thankyou !