THANKS !

In the future, physics should embrace Einstein’s theories, but with certain key re-interpretations. Specifically, in his theory of relativity, the concept of spacetime curvature should be replaced with energy field curvature. Einstein claimed that gravity is caused by spacetime bending, but this can lead to logical inconsistencies. Instead, spacetime should be seen as a non-physical framework, with energy fields shaping gravity and other physical phenomena. This explanation offers a more straightforward and realistic understanding of the universe, allowing phenomena like gravitational lensing to be explained by the curvature of energy fields, not spacetime itself. Einstein’s claim of time dilation also needs to be reconsidered. He proposed that objects moving at near-light speeds experience a slowing of time, but this phenomenon has never been observed, and it's impossible to verify on Earth. Claims that time dilation was proven using airplanes or GPS satellites are unreliable due to the insignificant time differences and environmental factors. In fact, to detect time dilation meaningfully, one would need to travel near the speed of light for at least a year, and even then, the effect would be minimal and difficult to observe on Earth. Moreover, the concept of time dilation should be coupled with time acceleration, meaning that both time dilation and time acceleration occur simultaneously. For any observer, whether at the point of departure, en route, or at the destination, absolute time does not change. What differs is the relative perception of time due to the observer's point of reference, but time itself remains constant for all. Regarding photons, while Einstein’s assertion of the invariance of light speed is commendable, his claim that photons are massless pure energy must be revised. Photons do, in fact, have a very small mass, which is why light slows down in mediums like water and is influenced by gravitational fields, leading to effects like gravitational lensing. The invariance of light speed only holds true in a vacuum, but in different environments, the speed of light can vary due to this minimal mass. Lastly, it’s important to acknowledge that measuring the mass of photons or observing time dilation on Earth is impossible with current technology. The mass of a photon is too small to measure in our environment, and time dilation requires near-light speed travel, which cannot be achieved on Earth. In conclusion, Einstein’s theories were groundbreaking, but they must evolve with a more accurate focus on energy fields, absolute time, and photon mass for a clearer understanding of physics.

Excelent quality of graphics and animations, ideas most probably from the book Visualizing Relativity

Good content 🎉

So Einstein just describes Newton's laws in greater detail.

Y’all remember when people used to argue with you online that Gravity isn’t real and it’s just a theory?

The paradox for me is... if you're in a plane doing 600 mph, shouldn't time be slowing down for you as opposed to ground time because you are moving through space faster? 😂

This is pure pseudo-science, the decrease in speed is caused by refraction because the radio waves are slowed by the sun's heliosphere or corona. I debunked this utter non-sense on my channel: kzbin.info/www/bejne/oammZ4mPdr-qqcUsi=OA6UQ-99S9dFgD-M

There are several videos which cover the same ground. None of them explain why iron is heavy... the FORCE of gravity -

If the Eiffel-Tower were of infinite hight there would be no gravity at all. This is a classical solution which is duplicated by GR in the Newtonian limit of „weak gravity (earth) and slow speeds (v<<c)“. That nothing other than light can accelerate to the speed of light is an axiom of GR and SR.

STILL FLOGGING A DEAD HORSE ??? Albert Einstein & his first wife's, 5 famous theories originally published in 1905. None of them have ever been raised to the level of Scientific Law, by THE INSTITUTE FOR PHYSICS, for the simple reason both "Space" & "Time" are purely Human CONCEPTS of the mind, and DO NOT EXIST in Mother Nature. What this reveals is that Albert & wife were simply looking to earn a few Dollars for getting their whacky ideas published in a central European Physics Journal, back in 1905. Which by todays standards would probably earn you around $500 per article, assuming you could get it past the Editor. You could say that Albert & wife were successful in Conning the World for a hundred years with Pseudo Science nonsense. But the result of Albert & wife's mischief has derailed Physics for over 100 years, and NO real factual progress in Physics has emerged in that time. Only more eccentric and absurd nonsense by others cashing in on the game of fraudulent Science Theory publication simply for money !!! MATHS IS NOT SCIENCE and any Scientist seen scratching Algerbraic formulas on Blackboards is a FRAUD. Real Science can only be achieved by proper Research and Scientific experimentation in the laboratory. THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC THERE ARE NO ISLANDS IN SPACE.

Simply removing mass from directly interacting with other masses, by projecting its effect onto "the fabric of spacetime", does not explain the deflection of a massless photon in a curved spacetime. It just leaves that interaction undefined.

One thing I have been thinking about is the distortion of space similar to this but the grid lines being displaced by the objects. So it would look more like the ripples of a rock dropped into a pond. The denser the object the higher displacement of space. I don’t know if that’s clear but it makes sense to me.

When I see likes disabled, I don’t watch the video. Just an fyi.

Speed of sound is faster than light

Speed of photons Photon is something we even see But they are everywhere

Once an energy pulse creates a photon it is instantly traveling a 3x10 to the 8th meters per second. The speed is constant through the medium through which it goes and it is the medium that tells the photon how fast or slow it may travel.

Photons travel through quantum space along set paths or roads. Those roads are bent around large bodies of mass. This bending is caused by the push of matter against the roads. Matter and quantum fields repel each other. The matter plows the fields aside creating a dense area of fields near the matter and the fields become less dense with distance. The fields that are inside and pass between the atoms are squeezed out much like water is squeezed out of a sponge by your hand. The filaments or roads that a photon follows bends around the sun. The photon goes a greater distance around the sun. It appears that the photon slows down but in fact just takes longer at the speed of light to go around the sun. Both a to b and c to d travel at 3x10 to the 8th meters per second.

Mujhe kuch samjh nahi aaya. Kash bachpan main Akhrot khaye hote ya machli khayi hoti.

...and a few years before that, somebody noticed fruit falling... one gets the feeling that our host believes gravity has an independent metaphysical existence, and it is just "out there."

Jackson Deborah Gonzalez Laura White Sharon

اعملوا منو عربي🙂

1. If gravitation is a "field" "created" by heavy objects around them, that process should be universal. But not so. Inside a spaceship or space capsule, astronauts fly without gravity. Spaceship has weight and mass, astronauts have mass. But they fly. Why? If you say they and the spaceship are in space, "heavy objects" too are in space. Relatively, astronauts should feel gravity inside the spaceship. 2. The "tennis net" example: Sun-like heavy objects make a dip and so other objects like the earth tend to fall towards them. But what is the material of that "net" in reality? There is nothing, not even ether. What is the "net"? What bends? Time is not some material to warp and earth-like objects are not just a few kilos. So gravity is the explanation of the constant "fall" or motion of everything everywhere always.

This is the opposite of geodesic deviation.. geodesic deviation is the supposed cause of downward bias. 😵‍💫

It is described as curvature but is something else. In Einstein’s theory, it is more of a functional analogy

Dawg, with how many errors you've made in this video, I think you deserve the heat you're getting. Please do your research before making a video implying you understand what you're talking about. This was a waste of time.

Terminal velocity would like a word.

Why would mass change the speed of time, if not for the gravitational effects of the mass? Mathematics is wonderful, but it is not physical reality. In other words, explaining something using mathematics is not the same as physical reality. Does the mass of the Earth keep me on this planet, or does the speed of my clock keep me on this planet?

Actually, the example is not 100 % correct were Bob is older because he climbs the hill. It would be correct if Alice stays on the surface and not go down the ditch. Because if Alice goes down the ditch, the gravity reduces as you go down inside the earth and at some point it would match the reduction felt by Bob on top of the hill. Any deeper Alice goes, It would be Bob who would be younger because he has higher gravity and hence slower time.

Question? since even deep space contains micro-gravity, what is creating the micro-gravity? The Gravity Probe B experiment detected something called "Frame Grabbing", where the Earth is grabbing space/time as it turns on its axis. Wonder if this had been further examined as to impacts to time?

Gravity is amazing. It isn't a force, it's the bending of space itself. When you're standing on the surface of the earth, gravity isn't pulling you down, the planet's surface is literally accelerating you up at 9.8m/s. It's an extremely difficult thing to wrap your head around, requires an understanding of inertial reference frames, but once you realize it. Mind blowing.

bgl, im a lot on this explanation. I understand gravity & time dilation, i think ive just seen better, maybe simpler explanations..

Why do goose down and a metal ball fall at the same speed in a vacuum? How does gravity determine how much force to apply to objects of different masses so that they fall at the same speed?

""SEIO"", STICK THIS JUVENILLE DOG SHIT UP YOUR ASS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Imagine being hit by an iron ball falling at the speed of light

From this we can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that time and gravity are intertwined but we still can't definitively say which one causes what.

Wonderful explanation thank you 🙏

There is an infinite space with no time. Time it's a mental condition as it's a mental condition the need of a big ban as a begining.

All explanations I have ever known essentially claim that "as space is curved, travelling in a straight line is really a curved line". Doesn't explain anything.

Total bullshit. Space has no fabric to push us down. Mass attracts mass.

If gravity is a function of space time, how do you explain and factor in the magnetic fields’ impact of stars and planets on gravity!

It don't need AI to come up with wording for the fundamentals of the SR & GR and time dilation. I've understood these concepts for years. It's you who needs to get to it ... start learning the basics of physics rather than making things up.

The spacecraft example gives it in a nutshell. You clearly don't understand Relativity, including time dilation. Time dilation is the concept that time passes at different rates for different observers, depending on their RELATIVE motion or position in a gravitational field. Time is not constant, it's not absolute. Time dilates. But light speed IS constant for all observers, irrespective of relative motion or position in a gravitational field. I would advise reading about Relativity, both SR & GR.

I most certainly haven't lied wrt my education. That would be daft. I'm using all these words to try and explain the situation with simple examples. Not only clocks are affected by time dilation, the person with the clocks is also so affected. I think the spaceship example is about the best I've come up with. You travel at the speed of light for a period of Earth years, then you don't age relative to those living on Earth. But the person doesn't gain or lose time in existence. Time is not constant, it's relative.

I just made that example up for the benefit of someone else. I used "instantly" to try and keep it simple, so that nothing happens to the person whilst they're travelling to this other place and back. Another example would be getting into a spaceship that could travel at, or very near, the speed of light (that's impossible, as only massless particles can travel at the speed of light - you would need infinite energy to move a massed object at or very near the speed of light, and the spacecraft & yourself would contract to the size of pieces of spaghetti!). Anyway, you get into the spacecraft, and wave goodbye to your partner (you're both 30, say). You travel around for 10 Earth years, at or near the speed of light. When you return, time will basically have stood still for you. You'd just get seated in the craft, and then it would be basically time to get out of it. But time has passed on Earth. Your partner is hopefully still your partner after these 10 Earth years, and is alive and well. You would still be biologically 30 (although you'd be 40 as per your birth certificate) and they'd be 40. Time didn't pass for you (as you were travelling at/near the speed of light), but 10 Earth years passed for your partner. You've lost 10 years of life on Earth, and everyone will have aged by 10 years. But you will still be biologically aged 30, so you have an extra 10 years to live on average compared to your partner 😊

why does the apple still go straight line on the curved space-time while alice and bob don't?

Matter tells space-time how to curve, and space-time tells matter how to move. This is because space and time are not flat, but can be warped, stretched, and pulled by matter.

If the height of the Eiffel Tower was somehow infinite, the iron ball would reach its terminal velocity, when the force of gravity is perfectly matched by the forces of friction and air resistance. The Eiffel Tower and iron ball would have to be in a vacuum, as well as having an infinite height, for the acceleration to remain. And what's more, an iron ball has mass, and only massless particles can travel at the speed of light.

If you’re directly between two massive objects of the same mass, does time pass as if you were on the surface of either one?

That's the backing paper from book covering film... wow, it's all so simple.. but where did the book covering go?where did it come from and if we join the two sides together will it create a worm hole between Rymans and Smith's?