No doubt AI can save time. When used as you suggest it is an improvement over the library card catalog (does anyone remember those?). Maybe the student gets better at writing. I'm not convinced because current word processing programs can correct spelling, punctuation and grammar. I guess the point is that these tools can help one learn, but one must want to learn. It's not a display of skills if you let AI do all the research, then cut/paste some of that information and let your computer be your editor. I've heard that professors from even some elite U.S. universities now encounter students who have never read an entire book, and no longer have the attention span do do so. So the professors now assign fewer, or no, full books. To me, that is sad, and it doesn't bode well for the future. It must be very frustrating for the professors, not to mention that future employers will have little to gain from hiring these students. If all you need to do is have AI write the paper, who needs the employee?
@mac-ju5ot4 күн бұрын
Its almost laughable the manner in which theu ostrasized me ....but im not laughing
@marcosfreijeiro87637 күн бұрын
Fantastic , love this content can't wait for next week's video. Thank you
@dailyphilosophy7 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! I think you may be interested also in this news series, where we talk about the most important inspirational books: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kHbRqHyiidOmiNksi=yeS6Msg2Qb87hO26
@marcosfreijeiro87637 күн бұрын
@dailyphilosophy yes ,I'm watching that as well excellent
@ElkoJohn11 күн бұрын
Is All Life Holy? Did Schweitzer answer this question? Did he think Gd manifested himself in the humans who destroy, harm, or hinder life, which he defined as evil? Did he think the lives of those who commit horrific atrocities are to be valued equally with the lives of the innocent victims of those atrocities?
@dailyphilosophy9 күн бұрын
Yes, he did. He thought that all life was equally holy. In one of his works, he refers to Gandhi and cites Jesus, both of whom are known for their insistence that one should love their enemies: "Likewise, Gandhi, who was the most Christian Hindu of the century, once acknowledged that he got the idea of "ahimsa" or nonviolence from the Commandments of Jesus: "But I say unto you that ye resist not evil," and "love your enemies...pray for them who despitefully use you and persecute your, that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." In both, the ethic of inner perfection is governed by the principle of love." Online here home.pcisys.net/~jnf/mdnstory.html but it's also in his autobiography.
@dailyphilosophy9 күн бұрын
And thank you so much for your kind support!
@lakakababalala116 күн бұрын
Beautiful the animations everything beautiful
@dailyphilosophy16 күн бұрын
Thank you so much! I'm happy you like it!
@marcosfreijeiro876317 күн бұрын
Great, I enjoyed this very much thank you
@peterkavanagh6429 күн бұрын
The reduction is by no additions and much removals this helps any mind calm so listening to the wind and the sights of sun set with less interferencevin
@marcosfreijeiro8763Ай бұрын
Fantastic, I enjoy this very much. I would like to listen live but I'm at work. As always thank you
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you for your encouragement! I hope you enjoy the recordings anyway!
@gillazo7263Ай бұрын
Was Spinoza married?
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Wikipedia says no: "By the time of his death, he had never married and had no children."
@dorothysatterfield3699Ай бұрын
Answer: Yes
@estherayesua6658Ай бұрын
I love the work and philosophical beliefs of Dr. Albert Schweitzer. I hope to follow his teachings on Reverence for Life and carry on his legacy.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
And today, with all the ecological destruction happening out of financial and political greed, his approach seems almost necessary for our collective survival.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you so much!
@marcosfreijeiro8763Ай бұрын
I have enjoyed your channels and I am still enjoying thank you. I am looking forward to next week's reading.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you all for being here and watching this! I hope you enjoy our little Epicurean chat. See you next week at the same time! And, by the way, it seems like we will be done with Epicurus in another two sessions or so. What do we want to read next? Any suggestions? Another ancient philosopher? A Stoic perhaps? Or Descartes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Kant? I'm open to all suggestions except continental philosophy (Heidegger, Husserl, Nietzsche, Foucault) because I don't know enough about them.
@marcosfreijeiro8763Ай бұрын
Great, thoroughly enjoyed it. I can't watch it live but will watch it later
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you for watching! I'm new to streaming, so if you'd like to help me improve, please tell me what you think that I could change to make the livestream better for you! See you next week. The times are in the description above, but I'll also put them here: US: Sunday, 8pm Eastern Time US: Sunday, 5pm Pacific Time UK and elsewhere: Sunday to Monday, 0:00 UTC daily-philosophy.com/epicurus-principal-doctrines-explained/ See you then!
@dimitriseleasАй бұрын
☆☆☆☆☆
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Ευχαριστώ πολύ!
@grizzlyreaper7477Ай бұрын
There are no "Facts" of Philisophy.
@Mochi-si1bqАй бұрын
Are there any “facts” at all?
@marcosfreijeiro8763Ай бұрын
I can't wait for this to start. I watch almost all of your videos time permitting. Personally I won't be able to watch Sunday/Monday but I will watch later. Thank you so much for this content.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you! I hope that it will be useful!
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Many thanks to all who watched this, either live or later! Let's meet again next Monday! See the thumbnail or watch the video for the exact times of our live book club.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
Thank you for this! Although, one might add, sometimes other values may be more important than happiness. For example, a parent might choose to sacrifice their own life in order to save their children in a particular situation. Or a soldier may participate in a war out of a sense of duty, rather than in pursuit of their happiness. But I agree with you that we should always be mindful of the suffering we cause to other beings. Thanks!
@OperationBaboonАй бұрын
suffering is the death of happiness. the less suffering, the more happiness. that is why every religion is about suffering, and every human journey about the pursuit of happiness. that is why. utilitarianism is about the best possible outcome for the most amount of entities. And since the only universal value we can see humans trying to achieve is what we colloquially call happiness, is indeed to lower our level of suffering. All humans did, invent and make up is to reduce suffering. We built houses to beat the cold, we invented farming to beat the uncertainty of hunger, we came up with art and music to distract and cope. All of human endeavour is about reduction of suffering and the uncertainty of tomorrow. And if we do this universally, then we must assume it is a natural drive, which means other life shares is; and indeed proliferation, a certain kind of harmonious stability, some complacency even, can very well be what nature would also experience as happiness; less suffering, less stress, more stability and harmony. And when that is true, we need to consider their suffering too. That does not mean you need to go full vegan, but at the very least understand what the contract of mutual domestication means, and never underestimate the suffering you can cause to something else.
@francisdebriey3609Ай бұрын
I am a fan of Oneness... thank you Baruch. And thank you for your video reminding Spinoza's incredibly strong insight on reality. Jesus said :"Philip, don't you believe I am in God, and God is in me ?" (John 14:11). God and his creation are ONE. We are in God, and God in us.
@nrx8684Ай бұрын
I sure would live to meet Spinoza followers
@nrx8684Ай бұрын
I dont know we are gods or not but I like people who think and wonder about everything and any thing
@jackiecatterwell8719Ай бұрын
I saw Jesus Christ Superstar in The Netherlands when it first came out and I absolutely loved it, so much so that I bought the record! Ted Neeley, Mary Magdalene, and Judas were especially memorable. I certainly can imagine how playing JC for a long time would permeate one's own character. Actors, of course, say they 'become' their characters but shake it off when they finish playing it. I agree that good behaviours and thoughts must become habits but it is very, very difficult to shake off bad habits, or ones not conducive to the good ones. In a way, we are all actors in this respect and, as Shakespeare said, all the world is a stage!
@fundamentals4477Ай бұрын
So what? What will you do with this theory. Does this theory make any difference or help making life happy? I
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
@@fundamentals4477 Hi, and thank you for your comment! This short is part of a longer video that explains more. It's not possible to explain the whole of Aristotle's theory in only 60 seconds... But if you go to the Daily Philosophy channel, you will find more videos on Aristotle, and hopefully then it will become more clear how his ideas relate to happiness. Thanks!
@ZerodaxAxyАй бұрын
is he ai?
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
@@ZerodaxAxyOf course I am. The newest model, artificially aged to look wiser. 🤣
@francisdebriey3609Ай бұрын
He's not the most hated, hatred is about emotions, and we are here in pure philosophical rationality. To me he's the most criticized because the less understood... because too intelligent for the average thinker, and with a very verbose way of writing making his thoughts difficult to grasp.
@dailyphilosophyАй бұрын
You're right. He is very hard to read and make sense of.
@francisdebriey3609Ай бұрын
@dailyphilosophy but : what a genius. Being myself rational BUT also spiritual, Spinoza helped to find the rationale behind the existence of a God. Today, I am deeply, more than ever before, a spiritual rationalist having faith. And no : not faith in a persona having a big white beard, but to a force operating at the deepest level and animating the whole creation like a unique organism, which you, me, everything and everybody is part of.
@jayatixy2 ай бұрын
Its a great video sir, your voice has a really soothing and calming effect. Sir in india we consider stoicism as western version of buddhism. Stoicism is in our view a practical implication of madhyamika, the middle path of buddhism. Sir I would like to request you if you can make videos on buddhism, especially on nagarjuna and shunyata, dependent origination.
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comment! I got many requests recently for the same topic, and I will certainly look into it!
@JoydeepBanerjee-d1w2 ай бұрын
Sir thankyou somuch for making these videos, its so soothing and sublime. It gives me peace and containtment. 🙏🏻🙏🏻 Sir i would request you if you can please make videos on buddhism especials madhyamika, nagarjuna and his theory of emptiness and dependent origination. It my humble request to you.🙏🏻🙏🏻
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
Thank you for your kind words! I see many requests for Buddhism videos recently, but unfortunately, I am not a Buddhism expert. But I will look into it and see if I can find a way to make some videos on these topics, perhaps by collaborating with someone who has the necessary expertise. Thanks!
@knowthyself68162 ай бұрын
sir can you please explain nagarjuna's shunyata and dependent origination.
@knowthyself68162 ай бұрын
You can go through prof jay Garfield's works for that
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the idea, and I will certainly look into that, but I'm afraid I don't know enough about the theory to make a video on it. The problem with Indian philosophy is that it is such a big and complex tradition, and it's difficult to get into it if one is an outsider without a proper education in the area. But I will try to read and learn about it. Thanks!
@RightNowMan2 ай бұрын
A great message, cheers!
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
Thank you. It's a pity Fromm is not very popular today.
@cognitivadissonantia2 ай бұрын
this was insightful, thank you!
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
@@cognitivadissonantia Thank you!
@caterpillar19362 ай бұрын
To be fair it does help when you have magic powers
@daveblodgett24382 ай бұрын
I saw both the play and film back in the 70's, I had no idea Ted Neely made that his career . . .
@Tubedog82 ай бұрын
Good advice.
@laserhobbyist97512 ай бұрын
I came to this understanding, if I may call it that, in 1996 when sleeping I had severe sleep apnea and apparently, stopped breathing to find myself in a unending void with a sun at the center, a sun which was smiling its awareness at me. I immediately took this sun to be God on high, but yet, as strange is it might seem, it was also just as much me. Then I understood it was the pinnacle of a conscious collective we are all a part of, like the cells of our bodies creating a sum greater than the parts.
@dailyphilosophy2 ай бұрын
This must have been a fascinating experience! Thank you for sharing it!
@lewisalmeida34952 ай бұрын
I have studied Spinoza for over 50 years. I am a teacher and mentor specializing in Spinoza's Ethics. It took me a long time to understand and live his ideas. His Ethics isn't just be read and intellectualize, but to understand and live his ideas. The belief in free will is a great obstacle to true knowledge.
@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine2 ай бұрын
Id live in a barrel everything free theres no capital process of commerce and business
@marcosfreijeiro87632 ай бұрын
This is very good insight, we need to gain skills not cheat. I'm in total agreement. I have seen cheating at school's but the students don't learn or grow in knowledge. Thanks for the great content and good to see you back
@artlm20022 ай бұрын
Not an equivalency.
@BaritoneUkeBeast4Life2 ай бұрын
Spinoza was an enlightened man just like the Buddha, Lao Tzu, Jesus, and the first Hebrew who had to have been enlightened in order to realize there is only one God. Spinoza was vilified by the Jews and Christian’s because their beliefs and understanding of God is utter nonsense and has nothing to do with God. This is reflected very obviously when reading the Old Testament, which is focused on Man and pseudo history which is sprinkled with occasional encounters with a vengeful, selfish paranormal entity. The biggest problem with Spinoza’s work was in its interpretation when put into words. For example, “ God is everything” should read “ Everything is of God”. All objects, nouns, things, are an expression of God. When a person smiles you can’t say that the smile is the person, the smile is only an expression from the person as a smile isn’t an individual thing. One big misinterpretation of what Spinoza was claiming about how all of us are God, is that people ignorantly assume that the physical form of human beings, animals, insects, etc. are what he was referring to. God cannot be described or defined as God is not an object, not a thing, and has no physical attributes. God can only be pointed to as Life, Awareness, Consciousness, which aren’t things, not objects or nouns. But Life, Consciousness, and Awareness flow through all biological forms that animate them. So all physical forms are as unimportant to God (or us), as a shirt or pair of socks are to us when we think of ourselves as a human being.
@wayofspinoza24713 ай бұрын
Thank you for this, it is beautiful. As a life long student of Spinoza's philosophy and now a teacher. I know that Spinoza's Ethics, and if read, studied and understood it will change your life for the better. As you know, Spinoza explains that we are a mode of two of his infinite number of attributes, THOUGHT and EXTENSION. That all of existence express God's essence; however, man's mind is comprised of clear ideas and confused ideas. That God constitutes the essence of our mind; that is when we are thinking clearly we are expressing God's infinite understanding or intelligence. The mind is an intangible thinking thing. It is an idea of the body and the body is the object of the mind. They act as one unit communicating. The body is a finite physical thing and the essence of the mind is eternal.
@lukehunnable3 ай бұрын
"Spain... or Portugal". What the hell was that moment? You do know Portugal is an older country than Spain and never belonged to Spain, right?