@@thelongranger55 I need a dragy lol

@@AliFayzi yo!

@@peweynewton3562 no plans but if I did I’d likely convert to RWD, the 4matic systems can handle a bit extra but I’d bet the transfer case would die under more stress

@ANDERZENAMG yeah I heard our transfer case is made of hopes and toothpicks lol I heard of a guy recently getting a jeep transfer case to work

It does get jammed up a bit at bottom just have to jangle and finesse it the right way lol it’ll go!

@@hEXordo I can’t argue with that, but both goated motors. M119 right there too plus honorable mention for m273

@@ANDERZENAMG can't sleep on the m104 or the diesel engines we didn't get in US 😔

M113 & m113k lol

@@peweynewton3562pissed I can’t have an ml270 or ml400 cdi

@@lilleeon I thought about that one and it supposedly pretty good, wouldn’t hurt to try

nope

@@916rider 😂🤙🏼

I mean I would preface this by saying more so BE AWARE... not DON'T DO THIS. That makes it seems like you had engine problems. A variance in mpg could be caused but I am guessing you didn't program the car to know it's out which would also have an effect, possibly enough to negate the discrepancy you saw. I have not lost any mpg with this mod but have also properly tuned and programmed each one to know it's not there.

@@ANDERZENAMG I appreciate your contributions to the community, you have some great KZbin content. Please don't take this the wrong way. This is one mod that I wish you wouldn't recommend. I have the same RaceIQ Tune you have and I tested over two separate 3,000 mile increments. It's widely known that in gasoline engines the EGR improves fuel economy by about 10-15%. My ML55 had very little soot on the intake and EGR pipe when compared to yours.

@@trainingrevolution2031 no harm taken at all don't sweat it, but imo there are too many variables at play to say definitively that is the cause. My ML55 averages 16mpg around the city driving normally and 21 highway on long drives. It is also still on a RaceIQ tune, but also has no cats essentially. I do understand the purpose of EGR system is efficiency, so an increase/decrease in mpg could be expected but I think can also be overcome. I have pulled probably 5 of these off of m112/113's and they have always been pretty caked up. I'd gladly sacrifice the mpg's, even though that has not been the case for me, in exchange for a clean intake manifold. Another thing to note is we only have 92 octane here, so another variable at play between us and these cars can be tuned for different octanes, maybe yours hasn't been optimized for 93 etc. Many many variables at play.

@@ftffighter really appreciate your support and encouragement brotha! Let’s send it and see what happens! 🤙🏼 I’ll invest every dollar right back in as I have been to keep this dream running

😅

I'm not sure what you are referencing? Did you ask a question somewhere that I missed?

@zidizibur2682 Why don't you answer my question? It has been itching for hours.

@@ANDERZENAMG your channel is very interesting friend. what rear shock absorbers can be installed to replace the original ones? w202 4.3 amg .

@ thanks! BILSTEIN b8 is my recommendation but need eibach or H&R spring too

you do not need a tune, the reason I like deleting them mostly is because if the primaries ever failed and broke apart they would block the secondaries and would cause issues or damage to motor.

Hi Nun! Hello to Thailand from Seattle! I love it over there and you guys have a wonderful Car culture :) I would use nemigaparts.com to try and locate what you need, I don't know the part number for that at the moment

@@uzzle21 Josh is the best out there through and through ime, he tunes all my cars and works wonders with everything I throw at him. You will have a safer, more reliable and newer software tune than anyone else out there guaranteed, wouldn’t hesitate to make that jump at all 🤙🏼

not the first nor last time I'll do something against what Mercedes says lol...

@@ANDERZENAMG And every time you regret it :)

@@Ravenola couldn't think of one time I regretted it... I've always found a way that works whether by the book or not. These are just cars, not serious enough to cause regret imo...

@@ANDERZENAMG Maybe I should`ve written regret in commas, but every time I do some serious staff with my car not according the manual something goes wrong sooner or later. I think changing the cranckshaft seal is seriuos enough to do it proper way. Maybe in your case it works fine up to now, but I would not risk not to do it as manual says. Not an easy and cheap job removing transmission.

@@CarsIn4K something like that maybe 🤔🤙🏼

What did the 32 clock in at? 🤙🏼

@@ANDERZENAMG @ 3060 5/8th tank with me in it

@@vito6483 thank you!

@@TheGunsmithingMusician yea but they understated it, the real weight is close to 3800 filled up

@@ANDERZENAMG that sounds about right. Cause I think the factory number doesn't account for fuel. Also, unless you got a really light flywheel, there's only 10-15 lbs difference between a 722.6+tq conv and a 716 + clutch + pp + fw.

yes definitely more stable, with both rear bars noticeable reduction in chassis flex

@@ANDERZENAMG thank you sir!