今天六四了。

With updated subtitles?

The hard truth, but facts.

急に武満徹の「他人の顔」の曲が流れてびっくりした。（好きだから嬉しい）

The state is always heavily involved in economic development, even before the Industrial Revolution. All those European countries sent armies overseas to grab colonies. Exploitation of those colonies economically benefited the European countries, by providing raw materials and consumer goods (tea, coffee, sugar, cocoa) at low costs and captured markets. The US is probably the country with the least amount of government assistance to industries. But the US still had its own examples of government programs. The biggest case of American industrial policy was the interstate highway system. It favored steel, construction, automobiles, oil industries, at the expense of railroads. Semiconductors also benefited greatly from government efforts. In the late 1980s, Japanese dominated the semiconductor industry. The US government organized SemaTech. All significant American semiconductor companies were invited to join and pooled their technical resources. Finally, several East Asian countries made the transition from agricultural society to industrial society. All of them used top down government direction. The idea that the government needs to just stay out of the economy is just ideology.

Some Chinese scholars who had previously studied in the United States were surprised to find that the number of scholars currently researching China in American universities had significantly decreased. In this video, one scholar seemed to provide a reason. Professor Christensen from Columbia University: "One of our concerns was that the people who did do China's foreign relations and international relations were increasingly going into think tanks and consultancies...the problem was there was an increasing demand in the classroom for professors who taught the next generation of global citizens about the importance of China's rise and its place in the world..." If this is a widespread situation in the US, it might explain why some of the current US policies towards China appear unrealistic and even incomprehensible from a Chinese perspective. The U.S.'s understanding of China lags far behind China's understanding of the US. However, it must also be acknowledged that after three years of the pandemic, Chinese people's understanding of the US needs to be updated as well.

所谓对个人主义的启蒙，"做一个完整、自由的个人"，那是必须要有社会/制度基础或前提的，那就是私有制。只有在私有财产得到绝对保护的社会，人们才会表现出西方式的个人主义，即一切只对自己负责。从这一点出发，就不难理解五四启蒙的失败和其后中国的归属，因为儒家社会和共产社会在所有制上并没有什么本质的差别。

great leaders and economists should help eliminate the economic gap between rich countries and poor ones and get rid of the economic gap between rich people and poor people. .this guy just wanna the US to dominate the world.

this guy is also a so-called Anglo -Saxon guy who desires develop his own country's economy at the cost of the other poor nations. if china does not develop its technology and economy，how can it bring so many Chinese people out of poverty？ the US military has blocked the Chinese mainland for so many years. Imagine if the Chinese military deploys its troops around the America，how would the usa government and the US citizens feel？ What USA should do is not using its military and the US dollar to exploit the rest of the world（mainly the poor people of the world，as the rich will always be rich ) but use it's economic and military force to benifit the whole world especially the poor people of those authoritarian countries. If he advocates for the Africans or the poor people in the middle east，well，I certainly admire him. But he just cares for the American people. Obviously he is a selfish guy. What we (most people of the world) want and need are leaders and politicians who care for the poor people in each nation of the world.

这个标题里的Special是说秦教授的讲座不属于主流吗？

传承国内学者的光荣传统: 不说人话。

秦先生认为中国五四启蒙走向社会主义是受了日本的影响，这当然没错。但同时还有其他各种思潮在竞争。秦先生还是没能解释为什么是社会主义思潮而不是其他思潮在中国占了上风，更无法解释为何日本自己居然不受该思潮太大影响，却以该思潮影响了中国历史的走向。秦先生的解释，窃以为还是不清晰。

She is still defending the CCP. OMG. Wake up!

嘿嘿裕华这头发还是这么潇洒

看到秦老师真好

多年以後⋯⋯有人說潮水退去，莫如說冰消雪溶，裸泳不算事，藏屍方為大問題⋯⋯😂😂😂

在当下时代，秦晖老师之所以重要，不仅仅在于他学术上罕见的渊博和极度的专注；更在于面对当下争论不休的社会问题，他能够以难得的清晰逻辑，为我们守护最基本的底线。 秦晖老师学术与文字的背后，无不表明，社会少了共同底线的共识，会演变成何等的荒谬状态。珍惜秦晖，就是珍惜我们自己。虽然他的很多观点饱受争议，他的一些作品，甚至受到限制。但读过他的作品，都会遭遇一种电光火石般的冲击。

宪政有用美国也不会南北战争，战争能解决所有的问题，美国比谁都懂。

重复了

Stop hiring any Chinese Communist propogandist in American think tank! It is very dangerous! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqCkdZ1jdtxjjqssi=jV38Eqtuiz-Gq9Ld This is no doubt a Chinese Communist propogandist

Stop hiring any Chinese Communist propogandist in American think tank! It is very dangerous! kzbin.info/www/bejne/rqCkdZ1jdtxjjqssi=jV38Eqtuiz-Gq9Ld This is no doubt a Chinese Communist propogandist

Very interesting. Also nice to be informed on not so recent, but still relevant debates. Personally it gives me some context to some of literature on Vietnam from the same time period. However, on the general question of violence I'd like to stress that there is a lot of contingency as well, often in direct relation to the amount of repression by the old system. I doubt that newer research will support the claim that violence is of integral necessity to fulfill revolutionary aims. That there is the bad habit of practically using violence to achieve aims is another story. In the context of "Revolution from Above" I would like to refer to the One-Child-Policy whose violent aspects according to more recent research were not needed to achieve the overall aim.

高晓松那段纯纯是情绪放大，什么叫“全国只有八个样板戏，其他都没有”？前三十年不说苏联传入的歌曲，梁祝就够震耳欲聋了吧，其他主旋律歌甚至连现在写出来的都无法媲美，还是说只有欧美流行乐传入后，大陆人才算真正听到音乐？？

I downloaded this video for my wife to see Sara. It's been some years since we met her last time in Xiamen, China.

This is fascinating! Wonder if there are some historical analyses regarding the gathering of violence at the very beginning of the revolution.

Insanely rambling and boring. All talk and no content

There's really no so called "Playbook", old or new, in Chinese Political Philosophy. The 'Central Philosophy' has always been 「大同」思維 (vs 「零和」思維), which is also clearly and vividly expressed in Republic China's (Taiwan) national anthem. This Political Philosophy has always been at the center and also the unifying force of China over the ages, under imperial and republic rules. Anyone who read Chinese history should know that. Note: Interpretation of this philosophy varies. Some in the West see it as 'Chinese Hegemony', thus a threat. Others see it as a progressive and harmonious force of the future of humans on Earth.

Half of what this guy says doesn't make any sense ti me. Just to take one example, Of course Americans are different people than the asians in terms of savings!! Also the social security and the status of the dollar as the reserve currency make a big difference in this regard. Changing the trade imbalance by brute force such as tariffs and sanctions is plainly stupid. Regarding the industrial policy, how sad the US does not have many SOE's to implement such policies 😂. And it would be a big slap on their face if they create such institutions because Chinese SOE's are precisely sanctioned by the US 😂.

Mr. Lightizer is so one-sided that his talk sounds like a job pitch in the potential trump administration. That China wants to become strong and rich is ambitious, not agressive. The trade deficit is called "wealth transfer" in the speech, why doesn't he talk about china is also one of the biggest debt holders of the US? So in which direction is the wealth transfer? People like the speaker is one of the main reasons for potential wars.

Amazing, tks much!

It was very strange that Angela did never once compare the Chinese regulation system with the US one which many feel is broken. The regulatory agencies in the United States have largely been neutered by successive administrations operating on neoliberal lines. Similarly, the big tech companies in the US are a law unto themselves. Lastly, Angela's comments on China's growing success in high tech industries were mealy mouthed and highly biased. She seems to criticize everything in China without any balanced assessment. She comes, across more as pro western political activist rather than an academic. Very disappointing...

It toke us 260 yrs and 70 for china? Which system worked best and im a vet

Capitalism and communism combined will we ever find the answer

Can you ever amagian waking up in bed with this woman

COME ON ZIONIS COLONIST AND PROPAGANDA IN THE WORLD AMERIKA NATO AND GANK COLONIST 😮😮

China exports more than imports, so asking to trade in RMB is beneficial to the countries receiving Chinese goods because they have RMB. This is the strategy for China to trade in RMB. The countries buying Chinese goods can use RMB to trade, it's a wonderful design because the forex is not needed and the trade cost is reduced.

Why do you want to restructure the debts? The Chinese BRI projects are excellent and strategic and they are designed to be able to repay themselves and never need to change anything. All the projects are making money and China can wait until they pay themselves.

Central Asia, it's Asia. Why do you want them to be part of Europe? It's crazy! If Europe wants to invest in these Central Asian countries, please do it. China BRI projects are all over the planet. You do not need the countries to be in your continent to be investable. This is why the Ukraine war was started. The warmongering mentality is still in the students of these American Universities.

IKe very conveniently neglects to mention that China specifically has cancelled debt for failed projects. From the Harvard Internal Review " This rapid acceptance leads to poorly planned projects that quickly fail, thus wasting Chinese capital and hurting their image in African nations. The consequences of these failures led to China canceling US$158 million in Zambian debt in 2006, eventually resulting in a US$392 million write-off." Once again, part of the anti-China narrative selectively to demean, discredit and demonize the BRI. Please spare us!

Is this what success looks like in the world's most powerful and richest country? Economic inequality, inflation, stagnant real wages for the last fifty years, costly healthcare, an expensive education system, student loan debt totaling $1.7 trillion with an average balance of $38,000, poor public transportation systems, racial inequality, mass incarceration, the militarization of police, deteriorating infrastructure, housing affordability, homelessness, the opioid epidemic, and gun violence. Instead of prioritizing the welfare of their people, they meddle in other countries to spread their version of democracy. The question is whether the USA can continue to survive with its version of democracy, not whether it can have any leadership role in the global order.

A legal expert talking economics. Lol😂😂😂😂

Anywhere in the world, if there is a border dispute, it is usually the result of a line drawn by an Englishman; if it is an internal dispute, it is usually the US that is fueling it. Differences in implementation of divide and conquer strategy.

with this kind of researchers, the US will fall soon.

Warmongers like the Usa Goverment should be HOLD ACCOUNTABLE for TAking PRECIOUS Lives!! greetings fromMexico

在很多方面，她是一个典型的中国「学者」： 1）「发钱寒」，注重赚钱、而忽略「政治经济学」特别是哲学问题，因为大陆的意识形态阉割，大陆人普遍不敢谈政治哲学，就算谈也只能像和尚念经那样复述党的 indoctrination 2）她为了撑国家好，可以像妓女用润滑油那样顺口开河地扯出谎话连篇（虽然我其实并不歧视性工作者） 3）她作为经济学家，也算是科学家，但她的治学态度是完全不讲科学的。为了说中国的好话，她可以「睁着眼说瞎话」，而她会觉得这是「爱国行为」 4）她不是一个真正「现代化」的人，因为现代化的基础是科学方法。 现代化要求我们 “put truth before face”, 但中国人会为了「面子」而扭曲事实，这就是中国人很难实现现代化的主要原因。 5）她的理论提倡中国以一种「融合社会主义与资本主义」的模式，但她说不清这种模式为何物。 事实上共产主义有一个核心价值就是「为了让穷人翻身，可以毫无底线地扭曲真相」。而当中国被这种意识形态 在最高的位置控制着，中国必然不能实现现代化。 然而她却在继续为中国的现政权 辩护。 在这个立场之内，如果她无法跳出来，其实没有出路。 6）她強調「创新」，其实她本人也未能跳出党的 indoctrination，她希望中国有创新，但其实几乎所有中国人都像她一样：噤若寒蝉，不敢创新，也无法创新。 7）她根本不算科学家，那她为什么 捞到了 Harvard 的 PhD？ 那是因为她对外国人表现得很科学，但其实她描述的中国是假的。

1:16:03 prestige 😂 not necessarily....pls take a look at DXP's idea on that issue

Chinese alphabetical/pronounciation systems: Wade-giles, Zhuyin, Pinyin. Chinese script/character systems: Jiaguwen, ..., Caoshu, Hanzi.

Three very different perspectives of BRI. Like blind men trying to understand what an elephant is. Building Infrastructures to increase trade and communication between countries will raise the standard of living of people in these countries.

CHINA, THE WORLD'S MOST NOTORIOUS SQUATTER NATION! The communist China has been squatting in Tibet, Mongolia, and Uighur for more than 50 years and is now starting to squat illegally on Hongkong, Taiwan, Singapore and the rest of Asia! Hey GOOGLE, where have the protest against PRC in Havard KZbin vidoes disappear? This is how freedom of expression is gagged in free country!

Her name is Angela? Weird. Her outlook is too much HK.