Could you share more about your issues with the 19AS movements? I’ve found them to be quite robust, reliable, and easy to work on (having serviced three or four now). The later 34x movements I can understand avoiding.
@TimelessHistoryChannel3 сағат бұрын
I have a few mid-1950s Conquests with these movements. Their automatic weight requires strong movement to complete each rotation when the mainspring is about half charged. So, it becomes like a manual wind watch if you want the watch to run consistently.
@TimelessHistoryChannel3 сағат бұрын
34x/35x series are not too bad. But I think I know what you’re talking about. The 50x series have a similar issue like the 19as/22as. But it’s easier to fix if you can tighten the bushings where the two reversing wheels sit. 43x series I find the reversing wheel overtime makes hand winding the crown super stiff. And, it is commonly known for its calendar issue. For a Longines Automatic watch, it is best to buy one in great shape.
@juergenpilot55533 сағат бұрын
@@TimelessHistoryChannel very interesting. I‘ve never had any winding efficiency issues with my 19AS/ASD movements, but as noted that could be a function of wear. Re. the 34x I was referring to the tracked rotor which has a tendency to bind with wear. I also try to steer clear of the sealed mainspring watches. Having had good luck with them, I certainly wouldn’t discourage any prospective buyers from vintage Longines autos, but agree that it’s best to buy one that’s running well and in a clean watch. The good news is that (with a few rarer exceptions) parts movements abound!
@andrewsiegmund717914 сағат бұрын
Thank you for making these videos. They are very informative.
@TimelessHistoryChannel3 сағат бұрын
You’re welcome. Glad you enjoyed it!
@sebastienfoucart324615 сағат бұрын
Great video once more. I own a vintage Longines from 1954 with the same movement quite similar to ref 6263 but with dauphine types hands and numerals at 12 and 6. I do not have any appropriate tool to open the watch to see the exact reference number. It is a beautiful watch with a nice patina. I recommend this brand for vintage collectors. There are also outstanding vintage chronographs by Longines maybe for a future video.
@TimelessHistoryChannel3 сағат бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing. Longines chronographs are very expensive. Haha
@cedarcanoe16 сағат бұрын
We would like to see more Longines please
@TimelessHistoryChannel3 сағат бұрын
Sure! 👍
@jeffdj197522 сағат бұрын
Wow thank you for this information!!!
@TimelessHistoryChannel22 сағат бұрын
You’re most welcome
@pt8208Күн бұрын
Longines has been charging for these Archival Certifications for the last 9 months.
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
That is unfortunate. But, I believe it is free if you request via email and not the actual certificate.
@pt8208Күн бұрын
@@TimelessHistoryChannel No, they charge for the basic certs now (last few months, since April/24).
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Are they charging even for an email response that provides this information?
@pt82089 сағат бұрын
@@TimelessHistoryChannel I have never known them to repond with basic archival certifications via email and I have had 4 Longines vintage pieces certified between Jan/24 - Apr/24.
@neil47016 сағат бұрын
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Unfortunately they are now charging 120 Swiss Francs for an extract from the archives.. This is for an email response followed by the certificate itself, and it seems you can no longer have one without the other. This is very unfortunate and diminishes the brand, IMO.
@davidroland6431Күн бұрын
Great video!!! I fell in love with the No.4. It has a unique design and I have small wrists too.
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Good choice! Thank you for sharing!
@danamcreynolds9456Күн бұрын
I'd like to see you do the same thing with tanks. Longines started changing for extracts after your video was produced.
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Haha, I hope not! I'm sure they will continue to provide this service at no cost. Here are two videos you might enjoy: 1) kzbin.info/www/bejne/j2i1apZviZqlhdE 2) kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2W7kJiposSEoM0
@jobuckley2999Күн бұрын
Those were some beautiful watches. I noticed the hands in the earlier versions were really thick and substantial. You have some great watches. Enjoy.
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Many thanks for the kind words! I really enjoy sharing my collection.
@zillsburyy1Күн бұрын
a lot of watch designs are older than we think
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Indeed! And many of the watch designs we see today are simply variations on classic styles.
@MVRX883 күн бұрын
Thank you for making the video. I have just received my first vintage a Seiko Marvel. May I know, how many times should I wind the watch? As you mentioned that we need to wind the watch fully. How do you that is's fully winded? Thank you for your kind help.
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
You're welcome. Unfortunately, I do not know how many times to fully winded your Seiko since a mainspring's dimension varies from watch to watch. You begin to feel resistance as the mainspring reaches near the end. When it is fully winded, you'll no longer be able to wind the crown forward.
@MVRX8812 сағат бұрын
@@TimelessHistoryChannel Thank you so much for your answer. I actually just watched your Short video about winding 1940-1950 Omega with small seconds. Very insightful. Give me the idea on how fully winded watch should be. And by the way, it's a beautiful watch.😍 hopefully i can get my wrist on one, oneday... 😂
@KKLeung-lt5vt4 күн бұрын
does an unoriginal crown decrease the value of the watch?
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
For a UG, it does as the original crown is different to obtain. Unlike Omega is a lot easier to find.
@zillsburyy15 күн бұрын
it looks good but there are too many models of the Polerouter. they should bring back the UNISONIC. did U.G. tuning fork movement predate bulova's ?
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
If I am correct, Bulova is the first company to introduce the Tuning fork movement.
@bulldog89345 күн бұрын
Awesome video!
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@st0will5 күн бұрын
but it still having some value. and i don't think the normal watch maker can made such thing.
@oldtimer93055 күн бұрын
Wonderful video D, I learned a lot. I was inspired to view the video on the date setting from four years ago - I had no idea not to use quickset from 10PM-2AM, extremely helpful. Now I see this is consistent with website TECHNICAL GUIDE. Okay, now I want a Constellation even more, but know better what I want. Cheers.
@mansoor98946 күн бұрын
Thank you for this video! I have my eyes on 136.070, i just wish i could find a producer of exhibition case backs for this reference
@jadedarby82346 күн бұрын
Wow, can’t wait to see what you do with this :)
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
Haha
@pt82086 күн бұрын
Only noobs think Seamasters are the pinnacle of Omega production.
@neil47017 күн бұрын
I'm glad you didn't destroy it! Actually, I think this is a really interesting piece of horological history. A bit like the fake "English" pocket watches sold in the London in the 18th C. Did the people who bought them on these cruises know they were fake at the time I wonder?
@TimelessHistoryChannelКүн бұрын
That's a good question. I sure hope they do.
@TimelessHistoryChannel7 күн бұрын
Hey folks, I apologize if you felt that this is a clickbait. My true intention is to get as many people to watch this video so that everyone can be aware of the many fakes out there. Once you become a victim, you'll understand how important a video like this can be. When I say I will repaint the dial, I am not referring to spending money having it refinished. I am referring to using a paintbrush and painting it like you see the many dial artworks on the Instagram reel. But I likely won't have time to do that anyway. I would smash this watch into pieces, but it makes more sense to strip it apart and give the movement alone to someone learning to become a watchmaker. It's a good watch repair practice movement.
@ErvinSalma7 күн бұрын
AS1130 - nice movement for affordable vintage watches :)
@allison67647 күн бұрын
Thank you. Beautiful watches!
@SP-pn7xx7 күн бұрын
I wanted to see the smash...
@TimelessHistoryChannel7 күн бұрын
Haha. I would have if the movement was no good. But this movement can be used for training purposes to become a watchmaker. :)
@ARTUROFEDERICOGARZA-zw5ok8 күн бұрын
Cuando vi la imagen con el martillo me dio stress
@TimelessHistoryChannel7 күн бұрын
Haha
@citizaniac1498 күн бұрын
The movement isn't too bad - it has 17 jewels and is even a pallet fork mvt. I've seen worse in fake watches. As you said: might be good for practicing.
@TimelessHistoryChannel8 күн бұрын
You’re right. I was quite surprised to see a decent movement inside. Thought it was going to be some eb8800 caliber. Haha
@antonioferreira29968 күн бұрын
The hands are completely off... the printing on the dial are off too, the lume is weird, overal the watch is too new to be a vintage.
@TimelessHistoryChannel8 күн бұрын
Actually, the watch is vintage. It was sold to tourists 5-6 decades ago. 😀
@antonioferreira29968 күн бұрын
@TimelessHistoryChannel Seriously!?😯 For sure do not had been almost worn.
@TimelessHistoryChannel8 күн бұрын
Probably put away after returning from his vacation
@WillyMcCoy508 күн бұрын
The wonderful thing about the 565 is the Taubert & Fils made stainless case. With its signature decagonal caseback and Boninchi water resistent crown. What I like about 565 cases is the stepless bezel. Your watch is very nice. Happy Hunting!
@JediRamen8 күн бұрын
Are the buckle’s still signed Omega?
@TimelessHistoryChannel8 күн бұрын
Yes. Usually signed on the underside of the buckle.
@ad.64729 күн бұрын
Looks similar to Credor's models.
@icon777vlad9 күн бұрын
Fire
@mohdgaith29399 күн бұрын
Oh yeah. Museum piece here
@eloygagogonzalez73309 күн бұрын
😍😍😍😍😍
@mohdgaith29399 күн бұрын
Great example you have here
@b_altmann10 күн бұрын
I know it as reference, not case model
@JamesOBrien-l8g10 күн бұрын
Hey buddy I have what I believe to be one of the first omega watches ever made. It’s a vintage watch. I can track back to where it was first purchased and I would like to know if there’s any value to it. Is that something you could assist me with please.
@giuseppedemasi88111 күн бұрын
Very nice watches, what surprised me is the quite NOS condition of main of them!!! Congrats
@TimelessHistoryChannel10 күн бұрын
Many thanks my friend.
@marcn875011 күн бұрын
Useful video thanks and best wishes from Singapore.
@TimelessHistoryChannel11 күн бұрын
Glad it helped
@befee11 күн бұрын
does the 14707 come in other metals and what is the ballpark range for this model?
@lomadonkey12 күн бұрын
Are the dials of the two watches refinished? They look like new :)
@TimelessHistoryChannel12 күн бұрын
They are all factory originals. I will not present anything with a redial or rebuilt. This is an educational channel, so it’s important to show a piece with all its correct parts and, most importantly, a factory-original finish dial. 😊
@micosan12 күн бұрын
This is cool because the Omega I have had for a while now is the 165.070 cal. 552 automatic genevé. And it hasn’t let me down.
@TimelessHistoryChannel12 күн бұрын
Nice! Thank you for sharing
@mui39312 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing all your information on the bewildering references from Omega. I have 1940’s 2319 and it has clearly had the dial refinished sometime in the past however in my time with the watch a fingerprint stain has started to appear - clearly someone has handled this in the past without gloves. My question is would you have it refinished again?
@TimelessHistoryChannel9 күн бұрын
Since the dial has already been refinished, there is nothing wrong with redialing it again if you find the old refinish is not good. :)
@patrickol430012 күн бұрын
Very interesting, I never knew they existed. Thank you
@ingoweidner32913 күн бұрын
i love your videos!
@TimelessHistoryChannel13 күн бұрын
Many thanks! 😊
@timinginstruments13 күн бұрын
2:35 You forgot to put those links :)
@TimelessHistoryChannel13 күн бұрын
Oops! Sorry about that. Please refresh your page and they should be there now. Thank you! :-)
@Omega30t2RG13 күн бұрын
Nice watches! Theses movements are probably the last great movements that omega made before the 70s quartz crisis. Also,if a collector wanted to collect just omega 550/600 family movements,the case,model and style variations are many.
@TimelessHistoryChannel13 күн бұрын
I totally agree!
@andreasbernhardbrandl662213 күн бұрын
Great video derek!
@TimelessHistoryChannel13 күн бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it
@richardpeters408613 күн бұрын
Should watchmakers always replace seals, during a service ? Are they all obtainable ?
@TimelessHistoryChannel13 күн бұрын
Yes, they should. A gasket doesn’t cost much to replace, and it can save you a lot of money by preventing moisture from entering your watch. If you own a regular automatic or manual wind vintage watch, I would say 99.9% of the time, the gasket is obtainable. It is no different from a modern-made gasket.
@ad.647214 күн бұрын
Or get a Seiko Skyliner which has a timeless design and is very affordable 😊.