Wow.... These people are nuts. How can you put a translation above the words that God inspired? KJV onlyism is very cultic

Have tseen how the KJV Bible is mathematically encoded

Psalm 12:6 says that the word of God was purified 7 times.... The Authorised Bible had 6 predecessors. 42 translators, 7 died during the 7 year translation. 7 is the number of completion. Acts 16:11... Samothracia is 1611 meters tall And, they first brought the Gospel to European land while pointing at London, all described in Acts 16:11. You see, if you dont believe in every word and comma of what you are reading, then you wont be shown the finer detail. The Holy Spirit is the key to *The* Bible 🙂👍

"Godhead" doesn't appear anywhere in the ESV. I love the KJV for its beautiful language and majesty, but the textus receptus was based on a very limited compilation of later aged Byzantine text types. No doubt, it's fully sufficient as the Word of God, but the ESV is based on the compilation of thousands of manuscripts of the Alexandrian text type, some dating as far back as far as 175 AD. That a particular English translation from 1611 is the only inspired version is just plain silly. KJV onlyists mean well, but really have a kind of cultishishly myopic view of how Scripture came to be. They even go so far as to discredit their own textus receptus and the current version of it is nothing more than the KJV being translated back into the original greek! I mean c'mon folks.

As a brother in the Lord, I find this all a bit confusing. I don't subscribe to Brian's understanding, but rather a traditional Protestant Trinitarian understanding. From what I see, the difference between Brian's understanding and a traditional one, is that Brian views the 3 as parts rather than personages, using the design of the human being as an example revealed in natural revelation. He's correct that The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one, but sees those as parts. There are lots of Biblical truths I consider to be of secondary and tertiary tier importance for orthodoxy, but the Gospel of Christ and the nature of God as He's revealed Himself in Scripture most certainly ranks as fundamental. I have the sense that I'm not fully grasping the full downstream ramifications for this nuanced difference. Do you think Brian's understanding ranks as heretical? I think we can all agree that a perfect theology is not a requirement for salvation, for ultimately none of us are afforded such. Nonetheless, there are certain things that are of peak importance and the nature of God is a topic that takes a top position for consideration. BTW, Brian's view seems to differ from modality where God can only be 1 of 3 at a time. I assume the doctrine of simplicity plays a role here, where God is not to be viewed as a series of parts. Sorry for the long ramble. Kind of a stream of consciousness going on here.

God became a man. So God took upon himself the image of a man. Jesus is the image of the invisible God. While making an image of the father is definitely controversial, catholics aren't saying God in his divine nature is a man. An old man with a beard depicting the father is not accurate. That being said, God does portray himself with human form in scripture, but it's symbolic. The catholics are using similar human form symbolism for the father, which is questionable but still has precedence in scripture where God symbolizes himself in human form for us, because we can identify with the human form better mentally than just an invisible being we can't see.

Christ is not divided. In Christ dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily.

I was decived by this doctrine. Fortunately, the Lord has corrected me to believe in the normal trinity dictrine again.

Recently I read Tertullians letters against Praxeas and was quite surprised to find Denlinger's theology fully exposed and defeated. Thanks for the video.

Denlinger excels at what happens when you participate in a KJVO cult that falsifies things then break off to create your own cult to do likewise. Excuse me while I check to see if a Jesuit typed this comment, since Anglicans are so clearly part of the Roman church.

Amen, no one uses it the way Denlinger does. 🙏🏻✝️❤️ GOD BLESS!!!

My kid keeps interrupting me listening to this and you lost me at some points. I can't even tell if you're baptist, presbyterian, lutheran, catholic, anglican, or orthodox.

I may just respond.

Great video brother

Nice try, but I’m going to follow the godhead doctrine since that is biblical

The trinity comes from pagan Egypt and Catholicism followed suit along with the harlot daughters of Revelation. The trinity is not biblical. Look up the pagan origins of the trinity. The Godhead is biblical. Colossians 2:9 God is 3 parts consisting of soul, body and Spirit/Ruach. God is not 3 persons of a pagan trinity.

Both parties here are wrong. No one theologian or preacher has all the answers. The Trinity heresy and this topic of discussion is not going to be totally resolved until Jesus gets back here. In the meantime, everybody needs to love one another as christ loved. There's a scripture verse that says "every man is right in his own eyes". Pray for jesus to get back here soon. God bless you all

The misunderstanding and error here is in the proper understanding of the oneness of God. God is one family of divine beings. Adam and Eve are one flesh in marriage. The Godhead is one God including the Father, Holy Spirit, and Jesus Christ our Lord. Each one is God and a member of the Godhead family. Blessings. PS... Man is made after the similitude of God. This simply means that Adam and Eve and therefore mankind are made in the image and likeness of God both male and female. Eve was designed in the image of Holy Spirit. Adam was designed in the image of Jesus.

Love this brother! Merry Christmas!

The word was with God = The word Sitting right hand So simple..why confused 😂😂😂

What Jewish people said about they one God ?

God has body parts Exodus 33:23 KJV

All Catholics are not saved ,that's a fact ,

Really enjoying your videos brother. Keep up the good work. I would love to respond to some of the stuff that Denlinger spouts. Maybe we could do a video collab one day and discuss and critique these non historical kjv only "fundamentalist" thought patterns. In my opinion this is very dangerous and very cult like that needs to be called out. I know Bryan has been doing this for over 10 years and has a following behind him.

Wow. The direct misrepresentation of what Fred Sanders was saying astonishes me. I would love to debate one of these guys but i highly doubt they would put themselves in that position. If i were them i wouldnt want to make a fool of myself more than I already had.

Excellent excellent video. Love how you referenced Craig Carter's book. Its one of my favorites. God bless and guide you. You have earned a subscriber😁

In Acts during the stoning of Steven we read the testimony "behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God." Perhaps the Father was not witnessed here but rather the right hand is a reference to glorified power and strength which was given to Christ. Jesus himself said he would return at the right hand of power. Therefore, the Father remains to be the invisible God who is manifest in the flesh who is Christ. Denlinger believes the Father is the soul and Jesus is the body. But Jesus said "a spirit does not have flesh and bones as I have." In referring to himself as I/me he distinguishes himself from the body which he is in proving that the body is a vessel that the Word indwelt. So the question remains to be answered. When the body was dead for three days where was the person whom Bryan knows as Jesus?

I've consolidated 24 verses and have 8 statements, biblically supporting Nontrinity. But i'm learning to hold back unless directly asked for them or responded to. No other only true God besides Heavenly Father.

It make me wonder, if the Catholic Church secretly controls everything, don't you think his channel would've been taken down a long time ago for teaching a major heresy???

7:37 on is so savage. I don't understand how Bryan doesn't understand something so simple

Denlinger is proof learning how to mimic Peter Ruckman doesnt make you intelligent or coherent

This was one of your best refutations yet, keep it up!

Verse 12 of Colossians follows: Buried with him (Christ) in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him (Christ) through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead. --- We are told we have an Advocate who stands for us before the Father thus indicating the Father / Son relationship.

Slam dunk! 👏

Yeah.. this guy is a total weirdo.. I don't know why I wasted a year of my life following his ministries. Good that God got me out of it, some people on his channel have been commenting for like 10 years. Sad stuff.

Excellent refutation 👍

Thank you so much for making these videos, I used to be a devout follower of Denlinger & I believed his “Godhead doctrine”. I was driven away by the backstabbing, hatred, mockery, biblicism, and severe disconnection with Church History that is rampant in the KJV only movement, and now am coming to understand the orthodox faith of the historic church including the doctrine of the Trinity. KJV onlyists often repeat old heresies or come up with bizarre new ones due to their laughable disconnection with Church history and denial of true believers as “Roman Catholics”. Beyond the false sense of security in a 17th century Anglican Bible, hilarious personality cults, rapture culture, and trail of blood pamphlets, there is no significant theological backbone. Those of us who want to actually understand the nature of our God, the history of our church, and do legitimate exegesis of the text from the original languages and historical context will usually be driven out among accusations of heresy and be seen as someone who was never a true believer. I love the work you and other historically rooted Protestants like James White are doing to combat this movement, and to defend the faith to the world. It is important we don’t allow new converts to be stolen away by KJV cults for a false sense of security. Sadly, many of these guys will just dismiss you and all the sources you used as “Catholic” and will not actually respond to them. Much prayer is needed for the Lord to open their eyes. God bless, and all glory to the Triune God.

I have made numerous videos on that sanctimonious hypocrite, who judges based on appearances, makes conspiracy theories based on remote connections, disregards his own standards, and the list goes on. Semper Pax Christe tecum nunc et ad aeternum.

You think if people don't do communion in a Catholic church, they are doomed to hell, or at least you support a system that teaches this. Who are you to complain about others condemning you to hell if you support a system that does this exact same thing? Your hypocrisy is astounding.

1. No 2. Yes 3. No 4. No