I'm obsessed with the micro galaxy line I just hope they manage to make all of the ships that at least had screentime like the defender or maybe even stuff from shadows of the empire! love the video as always :D

I have seen paper bags and to be honest I prefer the plastic one. This is because plastic is transparent and I can build my set without removing all bricks from the bag and therefore have a cleaner table to work on. LEGO has always been trying to put maximum quality over the rest, so I am glad they are keeping using plastic where they can. Because, yes, plastic is better. That said, all companies try to show the best part of themselves when doing promotions, so I am not surprised LEGO is trying to show they are not using the "evil" plastic anymore.

Great video. Thank you

I want paper instructions for b-models also, without screens, that's why I chose lego, so I can rest from screens

It wants a second symmetrical cockpit.

seems too good to be true.

The longer it takes for Lego to introduce paper bags in the North American market, the more I'm convinced the paper bags thing was an EU environmental compliance move

I feel like the reason people immediately distrust sponsored content is due to a lot of sponsors here on KZbin being not-so-great (there was a massive controversy with BetterHelp, an online therapy service that sponsored a lot of content creators across the platform a while back that got into hot water for having notoriously lax requirements for contracted therapists) or owned by the creator promoting it (there was a CounterStrike: Global Offensive lootbox website that "sponsored" the people who owned it way back in 2016), and that, mixed with the audience's fears that the sponsor contract requires the creator to glaze the product instead of pointing out critical things like JANG does with his CaDA sponsored vids (or, in the case of that RX-7 review, tries to do), which may lead to the video being incredibly misleading about the quality of the product featured. If people understood which creators have the integrity to be honest about their sponsorships like JANG does, there wouldn't be as big of a need for people to jump the gun on distrusting sponsored content altogether

Honestly, I'm considering buying this after watching this vid. The FD RX-7 is my ultimate dream car, and I'd love to have a model of it. However, while I love the car, the fact that this is only available with the Veilside bodykit instead of the stock bodywork which is gorgeous and timeless) is mildly disappointing to me. If this were available with the stock bodywork (and pop-ups, likely with a manually-operated function unless it can be configured to work with the headlight button) it'd be an instant buy for me, hands-down

I’ve been a Lego guy for the past 6 or 7 years and I finally gave in to funwhole because the price was so much better but I had serious misgivings. But when I bought and built the Balcony Theatre, I can say it’s 100% worth it. If you’re in the fence, I’d recommend it.

Panda is a must for me

I really like that we are getting more solid dragons that are NOT from ninjago

We need more icons cars 🤩

10:36 also kinda looks like F16 XL

Will you be reviewing more of these sets soon? They have many neat sets, so looking forward to seeing your reviews !

That Walker popping up made me way to nostalgic about a holiday i spend with my parents...back when life was simple 🥲

This is a late comment, but on the subject of Ahsoka's starfighter, I'd argue that the canopy piece isn't subjectively inaccurate, it's *objectively* inaccurate. The actual Eta 2 fighter's canopy cuts off sharply at the back, but for some reason Lego decided on a build for it that curves down into a bulbous shape instead. Seems they're not only trying to see how far they can go with shrinking sets and upping prices, they're starting to screw up details they already got right years before. It's ironic with how popular this set and the ARC-170 are with people, while even if I didn't have one or the other, I'm quite disappointed in the faults of both that could've been easily avoided/fixed. The high price tags ($45 and $70 respectively) don't help either.