The modern bible translations are utterly corrupted…
@BADDMIXX2 сағат бұрын
Thank You Brother Lex! Well Taught! HalleluJah!
@hansenmarc3 сағат бұрын
If I repeat the Lord’s Prayer exactly as Jesus taught it, is that vain repetition? If not, what’s the point at which it becomes vain repetition? Once a day? Once a week? Once a year?
@OliversFamily-ei6wi3 сағат бұрын
the book of Enoch is inspired scripture and i believe it
@hansenmarc4 сағат бұрын
And into whatsoever city ye enter, and they receive you, eat such things as are set before you: Luke 10:8 By calling this covenant “new,” he has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and outdated will soon disappear. Hebrews 8:13
@willschmidt71914 сағат бұрын
You pre tribulation rapture concept is spot on. Your left behind concept is absolute nonsense.
@lxlx34585 сағат бұрын
Thank you for sharing with us!
@tylerchurch69457 сағат бұрын
The Complete Jewish Bible by David H. Stern is a great translation it’s actually my first Bible I’ve read and I’m sticking to it because it shows me the Hebrew Roots of Christianity
@andyvargas52498 сағат бұрын
Lex and the bathroom 😂🙏🏾, shalom brother
@tylerchurch69458 сағат бұрын
I use the Complete Jewish Bible
@karistinton88813 сағат бұрын
Jude quoted Enoch who lived 3000 years before the ONLY copies of the 'Book of Enoch' were discovered from the 2nd century. This is 100-200 years AFTER the Old Testament was completed by Ezra and Nehemiah. Romans 3:1-2 says that YHUH entrusted the Hebrew Scriptures to the Yehudi, and according to them, the Book of Enoch is not a part of those inspired Scriptures, which they call the Tanakh. Messiah never quoted anything outside of what we know as the Old Testament - not Enoch 1, the Apocrypha, Jubilees or Jasher. The books that have gained 'extra-Biblical text' status are deceptive works, and those falling for them need to be encouraged to study the inspired Word, which does not lie or confuse. (2 Timothy 4:3; Acts 17:21: Num 23:19). The Book of Enoch and its cohort are not the inspired Word - they are contrived fantasy.
@debrawilliams152717 сағат бұрын
Amen and Amen
@StarAccount-km1rt22 сағат бұрын
Awesome and clear teaching. Thanks
@curtishodges3699Күн бұрын
You had it right first time what’s ur motive ??! I’m follow of Christ and he don’t teach titles. You get out that Old Testament. look how Christ Handel it . Told his disciples don’t collect no money. Matthew 10:5-9 you wrong on the deity of Christ & Sabbath. In that video you said 2 times Perpetual Covenant. But in Hebrew it means long duration of time. Look it up.
@margaretpollard2179Күн бұрын
Weren't the Books of the Bible determined at the Council of Trent?
@unclerhombusКүн бұрын
Old Testament tithing was not even done with money. People tithed their *resources* (food, wine, grain, livestock, etc.) to be collected and dished out to those in need who could not obtain necessities.
@danielsmith2447Күн бұрын
You know what doesn't make sense? The book that is supposed to be the word of God! My father is a preacher and my grandfather was too, I was always puzzled by the scores of books they had in their libraries to explain the 66 books of the bible. If it is truly Gods word to us why did he not make it simple enough for everyone to understand?
@biblebill6206Күн бұрын
Ridiculous, there is no literal hell, lake of fire yes, where you burn up in minutes then suffer no more . See Malachi 4 : 3 if your ashes then you can't keep burning over and over ei ; cremation . Think about it . The only one's that will suffer forever are Satan ,the beast, the false prophet no human being will as I show above comment .
@IsaacNussbaumКүн бұрын
You are right, Bill. Not many people know this but: ● Sheol is not hell. ● Hades is not hell. ● Gehenna is not hell. ● The Lake of Fire is not hell.
@arelidelong1188Күн бұрын
Thank you, Lex, that makes total sense!❤
@BillH-l3cКүн бұрын
the bible is the translation of fallible men and has thousands of added words for clarity,,, too get the pure truth you have to go back to the original languages
@sergenarivonchik9006Күн бұрын
I think u touched on why this piece of preflood history that prophecies about not only the flood which u use as proof of fraud? Why not use the prophecies of the end times included.. But u did clarify something when u touched on the TRADITION of some of the etiopic canons... Just emphasies how the concept of the modern canon or ANY canon is just like the traditions of the pharacies, and not even a concept at the time the torah was given through moses U admit that even if it's quoted u use illogical arguments that could be applied to duteronamy where Moses death is written about when he was supposed to be the author... Why don't u dismiss it also? To put it into perspective when Yahshua reprimanded the pharacies for not knowing the scriptures (in my opinion referring to true writen history at the time which included any writings from their ancestors all the way to noah where like today we call it our last will and testimony Wich just like all of the accounts in the Bible are just a testimonyof their life and blessing their children with the knowledge that yahua has given them in their lifetime including life lessons...) tell them they didn't know the scripture that in heaven no one is married or given in marriage... It says that clearly in enoch So when Peter wanted to save yeshua he went against the plan of yah.. Yeshua Said get away from me Satan.. Flipside of that When he said u are the son of Yah he said only the father can reveal that to u... Shows we are always "inspired"but have to judge, are these thought aligned with torah? (take every thought captive) and realize we can't serve 2 masters Yah only said that he will preserve his word It is adding to torah to make all sorts of claims about what Yah "officially" said or didn't say.... He didn't say men would prepare a book that is going to change though time and be official wisdom... Or he maybe just said he would preserve his word... And people would be your guide?... Or was it the spirit of truth the holy spirit?... And to not let any man be your teacher but be brothers sharpening one another like iron sharpens iron... Enoch was a prophet.. And a scribe of righteousness(torah) so might explain why we have prophecies of what not only was in the flood but the coming destruction by fire!
@Retriever-nk8nlКүн бұрын
You are passing judgement on the error of lay people who have been confronted with a religious experience, not on the phenomenon of which you know nothing. I am shocked by your lack of concern in dismissing near-death experiences out of hand as the work of the devil or psychic deception, as if you knew nothing about a sin against the Holy Spirit. You should not talk about things, you do not understand. You're like a petrol station attendant talking about the quality of oil paintings.
@JeremyRondonuwuКүн бұрын
Thank you for this! This is a very interesting explanation. I also read another supporting reference such as from the book of Enoch that blew my mind even more in regard to this context in Genesis 6. I came to realize that the stories written in the Bible are very interesting to dig in.
@franciscopowell9536Күн бұрын
Thank youu Sir!!
@theliefilter6412Күн бұрын
Is the book of revelation inspired by God?
@johniii8400Күн бұрын
What did Jesus say? Was he lying? "Sabath was made for man not man for the Sabath". Please clarify. I love the way you take the Word literal and have learned many things from your channel. When I pray and look up other verses, there are many that help see the reasoning why God was very flexible with some of His Laws. Jesus answered the Pharisees, "Love God with all your heart and your neighbor as yourself, upon these hang all the law and the prophets." To me that is the Gospel, "Good News". We are not politicians or legalists straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel. Jesus wants our lives to be full and enjoyable with His Love as the foundation. I agree with you, all scripture points to Jesus.
@proverbs9102Күн бұрын
You are not right for this, Repent from this deceit!
@WispyFogКүн бұрын
This is not true. Demons ARE out there right now. I know this for a fact. Anyone who believes, especially, a misinster, that all the dead are only laying in wait, is not telling the truth. Get yourself 'taken over' by a demon, and these ideas will change. This minister is a FALSE PROFIT trying to turn you all away from God. I will NOT be turned away. Satan and his demons are in our world right now, doing their jobs. Repent, everyone who is willing, and don't believe all that you see on the internet. Wow. I've seen a lot of strange things on KZbin, but this is my first FP. Thanks for this. Jesus is MY lord and I follow Him.
@thatseth2 күн бұрын
You’re wrong, horribly wrong on this. You must unlearn 😂👊🏾
@BADDMIXX2 күн бұрын
Amen Brother Lex! HalleluJah!
@franciscopowell95362 күн бұрын
THANK YOUU SIR!!
@tomcaldwell57502 күн бұрын
Thank you, Lex.
@Metalheadforager22 күн бұрын
These are all of the surface arguments. There are really good answers to everything you brought up that do not completely discount the book. I have been researching this book for about 3 years now and still am learning but I do not think it is wise to completely reject it unless you can accurately represent the rebuttals to each of these claims and pray for understanding. I’m open to what both sides have to say but you got to go deeper than this.
@Berean-17112 күн бұрын
Comments and corrections to some of the untruths and half-truths spoken here ... The "Book of 1 Enoch" is one of the most well-known examples of ancient biblical writings. Historically, the author of the "written text" is unknown, but it is dated to around 200 BCE and evidence exists showing that ancient Jews and early Christians were very much aware of it and it was widely read. Today, the "Book of Enoch" is considered extra-biblical but important by the majority of Jews and Christians alike, though Ethiopian Jews and some Ethiopian Christians consider it "canonical". The Torah was also not written by Moses but passed down through Oral Tradition before many centuries later being written down and repeatedly copied by later scribes. There are three versions of the Book of Enoch with the later two being forgeries (the 8th century AD Slavonic "2 Enoch" AND the 5th-6th century AD Rabbinic "3 Enoch"). However ... "1 Enoch" has written sources rescued from the older ancient Ethiopian Canon that is partly verified by sections of 1 Enoch found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. The oldest written sections of "1 Enoch" are estimated to date from about 300-200 BC, and the latest part (Book of Parables) is estimated from around 100 BC. The Dead Sea scrolls date from this period as well. What does "Enoch being Taken" before Noah was born prove? NOTHING! Enoch is giving future prophecy about Noah, Jesus, and a whole timeline of events and other characters. Lex's problem with fallen angels being given names I find strange. Beside Jesus ... There are a few other Old Testament figures besides Enoch who are also given the title "Son of Man". "Son of man" is a fairly common term in the Bible, and it simply means “man” or "son of Adam". It simply emphasizes the humanity of a person. For example, Ezekiel, who was also often referred to as “son of man” (e.g., Ezekiel 2:1; 3:1; 4:1; 5:1). “How much less man, that maggot, And the son of man, that worm!” in Job 25:6. The prophet Daniel is also addressed as “son of man.” in Daniel 8:17. I could equally argue that calling Jesus "God" in a literal rather than theophoric sense is dishonest. Jesus in scripture is many times also addressed as the "son of God" but never Almighty God himself. The one time Thomas addresses Jesus as God is only in the theophoric sense. This is derived from the ancient biblical principle of agency which later became replaced with corrupted creedal Roman Catholic "Trinity". Fallen angels are not demons, they remain fallen angels. Both can influence or even possess people. Demons in ancient times (OT and early Church) were understood to be the disembodied dead offspring (Nephelim) or evil spirits that were the progeny of fallen angels and human women. His problem with Enoch's intercession for the "fallen" angels I find strange. Many people throughout human history have encountered angels. The Fallen Ones knew he had God's ear while they had lost their access or were too afraid to approach Almighty God directly. As to scribal additions to the Book of Enoch. I agree that is entirely possible and likely. We also see this in our English translations of even our English New Testaments including Mark 16:9-20 and John 7:53-8:11 as well as many other words, phrases, and verses not found in the original Greek autographs.
@mrjaybee732 күн бұрын
I find that most tithe teaching pastors realize that if they teach "biblical tithing", the money coming into "their" church might dry up and their lifestyle will no longer be so plush. I'm not accusing this teacher of that as i know nothing about him, but in years of debating tithe teaching pastors, this has been a prevalent issue. His last statement leads me to believe this may be true. Listen to the last words he says.
@mrjaybee732 күн бұрын
Sorry brother, you are going off of feeling, not rightly divided text. Context matters. A text without context is a pretext to a prooftext
@johniii84002 күн бұрын
The Lord loves a cheerful giver! Not only finances. He gave His whole life for us, we ought to be willing to lay down our lives for the brethern, which is a whole lot more than 10%. We belong to Jesus now and He can do with us whatever He wants..... to love others and preach the Gospel.
@LewWhite102 күн бұрын
The uninspired ethos of Kanok (aka Enoch) is accepted very readily by those seeking after secret knowledge. In the book of Barashith (Genesis), there are at least four different men with the name. The Captivity in Babylon for 70 years had serious impacts on the culture of Yahudah. Sectarian groups that formed after the return from Babel had turned from the original Eberith script, and worked with the Assyrian "Aramaic" script to copy scrolls of the true prophets, as well as their own false writings.
@stephentuohy90002 күн бұрын
I took the time to deep dive on this subject. I read the Apocrapha all the time. I have no doubt its Scriptures. This guy works the enemy. Check out how pompus his background is and how he's dressed. He's trying to sell himself as a scholar. So far, nothing but lies. The Apocrapha was part of the Bible in England until the rewrite of the 1611 KJV in 1640-1648 when they added the letter J and the letter Y. The changes created after the original King James Bible in 1611 changed so much regarding names and understandings it has confused texts. The 1500 Geneva Bible (Calvinist work) included the Apocrapha as conical text. It was still in circulation throughout Europe and England. It directly challenged the 1611 KJV so much that King James the ruler, outlawed the Geneva Bible in 1616 in England. The Roman Catholic church dumped the Apocrapha some time after the Byantine Papacy came to power in 537 AD, when the pope declared his authority superceded God's authority on earth and proceeded to changed the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday and changed the Passover to Easter (anglo-saxon goddess Eostre), the Feast of First Fruits to Christmas (Yodins birthday, father of Thor). This fulfilled the prophecy in Daniel 2:21 and started the reign of the 1st beast. The Vatican was hostile towards England but of creation of the Church of England which ended Rome's ability to manipulate England. In response to KJV dumping the Apocrapha, the Vatican added it back into their Bible as 'lesser' works. This bottom line, this video is evil.
@InfinitelyManic2 күн бұрын
But, didn't Paul say "pray for us", which is a form of intercession, & Paul even exhorted Timothy to intercede for others, so you don't really mean that only the Holy Spirit can intercede, right?
@jamiegarren18952 күн бұрын
You have to compare the context when Jude was quoting Enoch versus the context when Paul was talking about pagan writings…. Jude is not the only one that quotes Enoch either….. I say test it and read it yourself…..
@susanverbeek38122 күн бұрын
You have erred in your understanding. Jude quoted Enoch and many of the disciples quoted Enoch Don't believe the Pharisees/Rabbis, Lex, in the land of Israel. They do kaballah satanic worship you have fallen under the leaven of the Pharisees. Look at the God culture on KZbin. The. Scroll library found there in Bethabarah/Qumran was of the Sons of Zadok and John the Baptist
@jbellinger772 күн бұрын
1st Enoch doesn't conflict with the 66 canon of scripture. Enoch did die according to scripture. Yahshua quoted that no man has been to heaven except the son of man that came from heaven, I think from the book of John. Book of Hebrews tells us that Enoch and Elijah died in faith not obtaining the promise, therefore they are in the grave waiting the resurrection at the Messiah's return. Book of Jubilee confirms that Enoch never went to heaven, yes, he was caught up somewhere, but not to heaven. BTW, your ministry helped me 5-6 years ago come to the sabbath and Torah, I was a regular Christian that believed in the rapture, the video about the resurrection changed my belief about the rapture doctrine, I couldn't refute it. Thank you for your ministry, I definitely unlearned so much bad doctrine. I'm now a part of First Harvest Ministries, that teaches how to unlearn the lies of Christian doctrine.
@StevenCollar2 күн бұрын
There is much more inspired Scripture than Books in Biblical Cannon.
@Tony-3044wisdominamystery2 күн бұрын
Lex....you are CORRECT.....but, you say the book of ENOCH is not inspired?.... When the book of ENOCH , and Judah quotes....SAYS EXACTLY WHAT YOU JUST SAID.....
@Following_Christ_2 күн бұрын
Thank you for explaining this so well Lex! God bless you
@achildofthelight47252 күн бұрын
All thing are created by him, and for him.... selfishness or service to others.
@terrydollins34932 күн бұрын
Good job, Lex . Stay strong and hold your ground..
@sergenarivonchik9006Күн бұрын
How about actually coming up with real reasons to dismiss it according to torah...
@AbeeHills2 күн бұрын
Then we get translations that twist what was really written to be understood differently from what was originally meant.