I do not necessarily agree with scheme design. Ground bearing slabs are generally less thick and less carbon intensive than the suspended slab which is generally thicker....
@kepojeyathas863825 күн бұрын
Hi, just to clarify I think there is no difference to bearing capacity for cohesive soils between dry and wet. The allowable bearing capacity for cohesive soils is always 2C regardless
@Stup1dEng1neerАй бұрын
Can you please upload part 2 of this question I would really appreciate it as a graduate 🙏 Thanks for the very informative video :)
@mingchenliu6569Ай бұрын
Hi Alex. Could you do a video and share your ideas for the questions of March 2022? I find those questions rly challenging and I even got completely no clues for Q4! 😂 Thank you!
@Gyasi9696Ай бұрын
Hi Alex, great answers and very useful content. I would also recommend reading the Examiners report for each question. I think your assumption that the columns cannot be used creates unnecessary constraints for yourself, and misses the opportunity to re-use existing structure that is capable of supporting the loads. A load balance exercise can validate this.
@nickolas13502 ай бұрын
Please continue with such videos, they are very insightful! Could you also include your calculations in future videos?
@alexmcfadyen6690Ай бұрын
Thank you, glad you like them! Yeah sure will done some calcs on a future one 💯
@Amcg1012 ай бұрын
Youve done this on the computer, but in the exam you have to hand sketch your concepts isnt it?
@alexmcfadyen6690Ай бұрын
Correct, exam is hand sketch, so I should start practising that really, good point
@NicolaasBurgers2 ай бұрын
First
@meganpaybody99532 ай бұрын
This was so helpful thanks Alex!
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@patrickknight26734 ай бұрын
Hi Alex, great vids on the exam! How do you get access to the istructe past papers? And I would also like it if you could try the 2nd question of this paper, the long span new build with a shooting range. Thanks
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Thank you, glad you like them! You may have found them by now, but past papers are on IstructE website, here is a link www.istructe.org/training-and-development/membership-exams/exam-preparation/chartered-membership-exam-resources/. I will have a crack at the 2nd question soon!
@lawrencekiminja71824 ай бұрын
Hi Alex, been watching your content and I must say its quite helpful. I hope to sit the IStructE exam in future, as i am still growing as a graduate structural engineer. Just a question though, do you know of any short courses on Structural Engineering to Eurocodes to boost capacity that are offered in the UK? Thanks.
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Thank you, happy to hear they are helpful! I think the IStructE have courses for the exam, and then a separate course for designing to Eurocode, check this link www.istructe.org/training-and-development/courses/
@leekennethtaylor33876 ай бұрын
Good luck in the exam tomorrow!
@ingkwameasamoa8796 ай бұрын
Hello, I have been trying to study for this exam, what are the best books to properly prepare you for this exam ?
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Any books that provide concept design guides are good, most design firms will have some guides too
@kasturchakraborty7 ай бұрын
This video is invaluable. Thank you so much for putting this up.
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Thanks for the comment!
@cheecheelas7 ай бұрын
Hi Alex, thanks for showing us your approach. I have a few questions, on point 5 of the requirements it says the atrium/staircase/lift areas should be clear of Structures. Isn't this implying that we cannot use these areas for shear walls/ or Structural elements for stability? Other question is should we not assume that we cannot have columns in the corridors? Next one, any thoughts on how part 1b, on how to reduce materials even though ur concepts are both consodering this point? I appreciate your thoughts on this.
@cheecheelas7 ай бұрын
Apologies for the misspelling 😂
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
Hi thanks for the comment. 1.The atrium/stairs/lift area can.t have a floor plate running through it, however I think it.s fine, or even good, to use the perimeter of these spaces for shear walls - that's typical for most lift shafts in standard buildings. 2. I didn't assume we couldn't keep the columns in the corridors because it wasn't explicitly stated, and re-using existing structure is the usually the more sustainable option where possible. Might be worth reading the examiner report to see if they agreed. 3. I would suggest editing the brief in 2 ways, firstly the 2nd client requirement says each apartment needs a 1m high window 1m above FFL - I think this means you would need to replace all the existing windows in the current facade, so my request would be to relax this is existing windows can be used as is. Secondly, I would suggest further geotech info is gained so that you can look to use any reserve capacity in the existing footings.
@rexcheung53577 ай бұрын
Sir, you try 2024 question 2? many thanks
@alexmcfadyen66902 ай бұрын
A few people have asked for this one, I will do it next for sure, sounds like it could be hard.
@andysun23407 ай бұрын
for scheme 1, column spacing on L8 less than 6m (5.5m) as client req'd? is this ok?
@BoutBiie8 ай бұрын
Can you do Q2 please 🙏🏼
@alexmcfadyen66908 ай бұрын
Section 2 of this question, that does calcs and drawings for this concept? Or do you mean the next question for this exam?
@alessiodileonardo966210 ай бұрын
Hi Alex, You got the retaining walls on the edges wrong, they should be on the sides of the lower hall not the upper hall (just the first bay from the entire lenght). Think about the ground profile, you need retaining wall on the sides to create the lower hall space.
@alexmcfadyen66909 ай бұрын
Hey thanks for the comment. My solution is actually cut and fill, so I cut the earth on the lower hall side and fill it under the upper hall (I fill the gap between existing ground profile and the floor of the upper hall). I think the examiner's report for this question also mentions following this profile. A retaining wall on the lower hall side would be possible, but then you may have a retaining wall blocking the window on the north elevation.
@262shiv10 ай бұрын
Why didnt you add Beams in first scheme? Is there a reason to avoid beams and to go for PT floors? and where to use the data for wind loads? Any calculations for that we have to add in the scheme?
@alexmcfadyen66909 ай бұрын
There is no one answer, so long as your scheme is sensible, stable and sustainable it is OK. I’m sure there’s another scheme with beams that suits. For schemes just simple span to depths is fine I think. Section 2 looks to focus more on your calcs.
@adrianchan48411 ай бұрын
Hi Alex, you work in Aus? Just wondering why you took MIstructE exam as in Aus you only need CPEng from Engineers Australia right ?
@alexmcfadyen669011 ай бұрын
Purely for the challenge. You are correct, it's not required in Aus. Also this channel is a VLog of me preparing* to sit the exam. All feedback welcome.
@adrianchan48411 ай бұрын
@@alexmcfadyen6690 Do you think the exam raise the standard of structural engineers? Should Engineers Australia make written exam prerequisite for Chartered engineers ? What do you think ?
@MrASMR-uo6vh Жыл бұрын
Hi, can we have a chat over the phone plz? I have got some questions as I am preparing as well. It will be much appreciated. Thanks
@alexmcfadyen66909 ай бұрын
Hi, drop your question here and me or someone else here should be able to help :).
@sufyannaeem2771 Жыл бұрын
Does anybody have the second part of this question? 2c and d? Or knows how it is solved? I am in urgent need of it
@SoftskillsbyAli Жыл бұрын
Yes i have
@razanhaider827 Жыл бұрын
Is there any possibility to share with me@@SoftskillsbyAli
@ringadantg11 ай бұрын
@@SoftskillsbyAliwhere can I find it ?
@bluebloo5574 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for contribution. hope we can have more before the upcoming exam on next January.
@Ahmad-fi3zu Жыл бұрын
A true man of his word
@Ahmad-fi3zu Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Alex, keep up the well presented vids!!
@sufyannaeem2771 Жыл бұрын
Does anybody have the second part of this question? 2c and d? Or knows how it is solved? I am in urgent need of it
@Ahmad-fi3zu Жыл бұрын
very insightful and knowledge bearing video. Could you please run through question 5 in the IstructE exam 2023 as this is one of that I am finding slightly challenging?
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the positive feedback Ahmed, yes I can do that for sure!
@Tom-qo7ry Жыл бұрын
I agree, total height of building not given therefore structural zones for each floor are not constrained. Maybe they are expecting the appraisal to consider how overall floor depth will influence the overall height and cost of the building? Also, would have thought you do have some torsion in the stability system when considering wind acting on the short sides of the building as north elevation braced while south elevation isn't.
@seifdandashi7316 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. Actually, I find the glazing constraint in elevations vague. For example, when the elevation is 50% glazed, What does that mean, and how does it affect the choice of columns and braces ?
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
The glazing constraint influences where you can locate your lateral stability system. For example you can't have a shear wall where your glazing is, so I would avoid using shear walls or bracing where glazing is noted. Columns are ok on elevations with glazing, unless they say otherwise.
@przemysaws.8988 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the podcast, it is very helpful. I am waiting for more. Would you be able to advice what books are best to read before the exam (in reference to foundation design)?
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback. I would recommend Foundation Analysis and Design by Joseph E. Bowles.
@theunsburger2660 Жыл бұрын
What program did you use to draw your concept schemes?
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
This is blubeam, a pdf editor
@eric0125 Жыл бұрын
please make more of these videos. i am also considering to take the istructe exam
@rocket6592 Жыл бұрын
your scheme 2 seems violated the client‘s req.. Your set back of steel columns in typical floor to cater the roof are actually considered Internal columns (8nos). And you didnt really show how you cater the set back of building envelope at G/F in both schemes. RC Scheme 1: same grid, mega cantilever transfer beam at 1F, 5.5m cantilever beams at R/f. Steel composite Scheme 2: I did this with 2 mega upstand trusses (1.5m depth) extended from the core at above roof to support 2 hanger columns at the 2 corners that terminated at 1/F. The 2 m setback was catered with transfer beams at 8F. The column grid was similar to yrs tho 2m cantilever + 6m + 7m at the 2 wings, and kept 7.5m x2 ard the core. No internal columns were provided, largest grid 15mx7m. Foundation: Friction large diameter bored piles in clay Just a sharing, I passed this way. Anyways, your channel will be a very helpful tools to all candidates, at least they could have a reference when doing their revision. Thanks for your effort!
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
Will look into it, thanks for the heads up
@Glaziya3 ай бұрын
@rocket6592 could you make a channel for Structural Engineering as well it could be helpful.
@francisudubor68113 ай бұрын
Guess they understand that only one foundation style works here.
@mfkwok1213 Жыл бұрын
I am one of the candidate in this exam and try to do this question during exam. After listening your explanation, I am thinking how to deal with the 7.5m set back with a transfer element. The only scheme that I can come up with is cantiliever transfer beam, but the moment would be so great. Eventually, the beam cannot be designed.
@rocket6592 Жыл бұрын
It can be designed, but with mega section sizes. i did the massive cantilever transfer and passed. It was unexpected, but it works.
@hshhsjhahsvs7728 Жыл бұрын
Make this a series. Considering the lack of content on these. Thanks
@ajazahmed111 Жыл бұрын
for writing schemes, do you know if they provide A4 sheets or A3? I thought A3 sheets were for part 2 calculations only.
@alexmcfadyen6690 Жыл бұрын
Hi, you are correct they do provide A4 sheets for section 1 and A3 sheets for section 2. However, so long as you make it clear what section and question you are answering, it doesn't matter which size sheet you use.
@nicholashockings9584 Жыл бұрын
Very helpful video mate. I’m feeling more confident already. Can you make some more?