Weird that the majority of atheists he mentioned were originally jewish. They must feel good being the people who lie to Christians to keep them from God.

Bishop Baron in contemplating how you describe God, an explanation I whole heartily agree with, I got hung up on the Eucharist. If God is all and in all why is the Eucharist special? I know it is but I am trying to reconcile why

TOO passionately 🤣🤣🤣!

Jesse you are a awesome soldier of God,help us all to learn what the of being Catholic means.....may God bless your lips to proclaim the truth...

I'm sure Prager's audience of illiterates miss his constant disparaging of the LGBTQ community. FK U Dennis !

Your church signed the lateren treaty with fascist Mussolini people, that's how you have Vatican city. The concordat with Hitler of 1933 is another example of the path for Hitler's policies. Jesus apostles am sure would not have considered such treaties with such ungodly systems.

I want to know why this Bishop Barron did his Master Thesis on Marxism. Not your typical theological subject.

Superb !

Too many to count.

Thank you for this lecture. I am very encouraged by the content and will listen over and over again. I need the words to say to folk in conversation or confrontation. I am actually meeting the latter more often recently. Only the other day a street preacher with whom I had a long conversation, suggested I could be called a cannibal for believing in transubstantiation. As for 'dumbing down'. I agree with you Bishop Barron. I must tell you that it started many, many years ago. For my First Holy Communion which I remember vividly at the age of 7 years after making my First Confession, we had to learn a beautiful little hymn which I loved. 'Jesus Thou art coming holy as Thou art, Thou the God who made me to my sinful heart. Jesus I believe it on Thy only word, Kneeling I adore Thee as my King and Lord.' I loved everything about this lovely hymn, still do and often find myself singing it. Well, dumbing down? Yes. A very short time after my First Holy Communion, the nuns who taught us told us that we were to change one word in the second line. We had to change sinful to little. Why?, I wondered. My mother explained that it seemed a bit harsh for children to consider themselves sinful. I seem to remember that I sang the words as written under my breath, every time I walked up to Holy Communion. I remember very well thinking, that's daft I know I am sinful. I understood and I wasn't hurt by that knowledge. Consider how long ago that happened. I am 81 years of age.

Fr. Barron is not a bishop!

💐💐💐💐💐 I am a member of the Baha’i Faith. The Bible says the original shroud was not in ONE piece as in the case of the shroud of Turin. This is why the shroud of Turin is fake: “Peter and the other disciple started out for the tomb. They were both running, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. He stooped and looked in and saw the linen wrappings lying there, but he didn’t go in. Then Simon Peter arrived and went inside. He also noticed the linen wrappings lying there, while the cloth that had covered Jesus’ head was folded up and lying apart from the other wrappings.” (John 20:3-7) Also, as a member of the Baha’i Faith, and based on the biblical narrative and rational reasoning, we have to accept that the resurrection of Jesus or any of the prophets or individuals within the biblical narrative that they are spiritual and not physical resurrections even when literal words are used. Here are the biblical reasoning behind what is being said: Jesus called himself “the resurrection” even before he was crucified: Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die”. (John 11:25 NIV) This is Jesus himself speaking, so it was the belief in him and his teachings that accounted as true resurrection and not the crucifixion and belief in the reanimation of the physical body. Belief in him and his words revived those who were spiritually dead and brought them forth from their tomb of ignorance. This is all spiritual and not a physical phenomenon. What does the Bible teach about the physical body and resurrection? It says: “Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications”… (Hebrew 5:7 KJV) Therefore, the Bible teaches that Jesus had flesh or a physical body during his life on earth but that there came a time when he was no longer in possession of a physical body (he was a Spirit/Soul) . Read the whole chapter so you can see the whole content. What else does the Bible teach about physical body or flesh? Apostle Paul himself stated: “Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption“. (1 Corinthians 15:50 KJV) Therefore, no physical body which is a perishable biological entity can have any association or entrance into the Kingdom of God. After all, the Bible teaches that: “God is a Spirit” (John 4:24 KJV) and not a physical body, and that the Word which is Christ himself had existed as a Spirit (a nonphysical entity) long before even the creation of what we call earth. The Bible teaches that all that Jesus taught 2000 years ago were all revealed by the Father. Jesus made sure to tell Simon that flesh and blood are not important in this equation--not even his: “Jesus replied, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by my Father in heaven.” (Matthew 16:17 NIV) Everything Jesus Christ taught and spoke, about his flesh and body had a spiritual meaning and cannot be taken literally even though Jesus Christ was using “literal words” (check the Greek lexicon) related to “flesh and blood”: “Jesus said to them, “Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day. For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Your ancestors ate manna and died, but whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” (John 6:53-58 NIV) Those who took him “literally”, later on they were accused of being cannibals. Read the history and this will become clear to you. Therefore, much of the language that Jesus used must be viewed and interpreted allegorical or symbolic. Jesus taught that it is the spirit that matters and not the flesh. The body has no importance: “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you-they are full of the Spirit and life.” (John 6:63 NIV) People had a very hard time understanding the symbolic and allegorical language that Jesus used--this frustrated Jesus often and said: “Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say.” (John 8:43 NIV) The phrase, “unable to hear” that Jesus Christ uses is obviously not a literal physical hearing but the inability to hear his words with spiritual hearing. Consider this that if people 2000 years ago had a hard time understanding Jesus Christ, there is no wonder why there are over 43,000 conflicting sects within Christianity. This should humble all Christians. What else can we learn from the topic of resurrection and spiritual truths? Well, Mary Magdalene couldn’t recognize Jesus after the resurrection: “At this, she turned around and saw Jesus standing there, but she did not realize that it was Jesus. He asked her, “Woman, why are you crying? Who is it you are looking for?” Thinking he was the gardener, she said, “Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have put him, and I will get him.” (John 20:14-15 NIV) If this was a “literal”, glorified, bodily resurrection of Jesus, why did he appear like the gardener and was not recognized by Mary? Apparently Jesus did not look glorified, he just looked like someone else--not a shining angel, but like the gardener. We also read that the Lord Jesus Christ appeared quite differently to apostle Paul: About noon as I came near Damascus, suddenly a bright light from heaven flashed around me. I fell to the ground and heard a voice say to me, ‘Saul! Saul! Why do you persecute me?’ “ ‘Who are you, Lord?’ I asked. “ ‘I am Jesus of Nazareth, whom you are persecuting,’ he replied.” (Acts 9:4 KJV) Others who were with Paul did not see anything. A physical body is not invisible. Everyone should be able to see it. Moreover, physical bodies cannot go through doors and walls either, but yet, Jesus appears into a room with the disciples when all doors were locked: “A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” (John 20:26 NIV) So, what is my point? The point is Jesus Christ can do whatever he wishes. He can dematerialize from one place and materialize in another place. He can appear as a flash of light from heaven to one person, or as a gardener to another, and he can even eat a piece of fish right in front of you to prove he can do anything. Therefore, we are not questioning what Christ can or cannot do, however, when it comes to the physical resurrection, all the stories we read about his appearances, do not indicate the essential characteristics of the physical body of Jesus Christ as the flesh that he had before his crucifixion, and the Bible in numerous verses makes this very clear. More importantly, if we believe that Jesus Christ has been great eternally in the past without a physical body and long before he was even born, then, he was not in need of a physical body after his crucifixion either, just as Moses and Elijah didn’t need physical bodies either, when they both had appeared to Jesus Christ on Mount Tabor and then vanished from the sight. Why should anyone assume that after Jesus Christ’s physical birth from the womb of Mary, he had, forever, trapped his true eternal reality in some physical body whether it is assumed to be a regular body or some so called glorified body? To insist on this, is tantamount to limiting Jesus Christ to our earthly limitations. The Bible makes it clear that the resurrection of Jesus has much deeper spiritual meanings and should never be interpreted as a literal physical event. Please note that stating that Christ’s resurrection was a spiritual event and not a physical one, doesn’t mean Jesus Christ was incapable of the supernatural powers--it is that Jesus didn’t need any form of a physical body, and that his greatness transcends beyond any connection with the physical reality. Moreover, in numerous passages, the body of Christ has been interpreted to be the body of the believers or the church itself, and therefore, the resurrection is a spiritual reality which demonstrates the spiritual triumph of the cause of Christ, symbolized as a “body” which is none other than the body of the believers rising to promulgate his cause (the body) fearlessly: “And the church is his body”… (Ephesians 1:23 NLT) …”and build up the church, the body of Christ.” (Ephesians 4:12 NLT) “Christ is also the head of the church, which is his body.“ (Colossians 1:18 MLT) “And we are members of his body.” (Ephesians 5:30 NLT) “All of you together are Christ’s body, and each of you is a part of it.“ (1 Corinthians 12:27 NLT) Resurrection of all the manifestations of God are spiritual in nature and not physical or material. I have studied the Bible and continue to study it. “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing.….” (John 6:63 NIV)

If our finite minds will never understand God’s infinite mind, then you must not know what you’re talking about, because you cannot understand God.

It doesn’t matter whether God killed someone in the Bible himself because he ordered it to be. Like how Charles Manson ordered his followers to kill. At least, Charles Manson was held responsible; God gets a pass, and we are called to “reinterpret.”

How come the only people I see on KZbin denying the inquisition or Catholics? It's like why the only people that deny the holocaust Nazis for the same damn reason

Let me add that, while I disagree with Father Malloy and see the same history from a different viewpoint, I find his general presentation to be irenic and humble. I appreciate his recognition of his own church's failures. Proestant apologists can learn from his example.

The crusades? War on Islam to liberate land? Crazy!

Take Indulgences: let's accept Father Malloy's careful definition of an Indulgence. Even that sounds so UNbiblical--really, nowhere near Biblical--as to absurd on its face. Pilgrimages to shrines for penance? Seriously?

Hus was promised safe passage, but the pope revoked it. He was burned at the stake. The church--even if it acted through the civil authorities--burned one of its own priests at the stake.

I grew up as a Catholic. I've been a Protestant since my early 20's. As I listened to the speaker's overview of papal history in the 14th and 15th centuries, I'm freshly amazed that Catholics can buy into that institution. Luther had lots of problems, for sure, but his doctrine freed Christianity from the pope and the superstitions that supported it.

The "reweaving" hypothesis has been falsified. No textile scientist who has examined the Shroud itself, and not just pictures of it, has ever made the claim that the Shroud has a single undocumented repair. At minute 51:18 is a photo of Dr. Raymond Rodgers examining the Shroud. But that photo was taken in 1978. After the testing in 1978 neither Dr. Rodgers nor any other memeber of the STuRP team alleged that the Shroud had a secret repair on its corners or anywhere else. But then without having sieen the Shroud in over twenty years, Dr. Rodgers suddenly made the claim that the Shroud's cloth had a secret repair that was precisely at the corner where the 1988 radiocarbon sample had been cut from. It is all just a little too much. This "reweaving" hypothesis fails to account for the severely skewed radiocarbon dates of the Sudaruim, the Titulus Crucis, and the Tunic. See: "The Carbon Dating of the Shroud is Explained by Neutron Absorption," Rucker, 2020.

That is literally Satan’s masonic divine mercy picture (Mt 6: 7; 24: 24) behind him DM priests (Alar, Calloway etc) have suggested to read 5 paragraphs of Faustina’s Diary 📔 daily; indirectly making more important than NT outside of Gospels Good Novus Ordo (NEW Mass) priests temporarily handcuffed by duties, but laity should Get Out N.O; join SSPX Francis prayed to Islam’s false God (rejects Crucifixion) in 2015 and hosted demon worship 2019 & 2024

Catholicism is not Christian - Revelation 17:5 KJV

❤ Thank you 💕 Bishop

"...a list of books and authors we can study..." 1:09:49

I love the way God works. I love when he arrests the heart of public figures and shows us that EVERYONE is welcome in God’s family. So many Christians/Catholics would question Donna’s faith because, as a public figure, we’ve seen some of her lowest moments. Remember, if any of our lives were on display, we would be questioned too. So she should be celebrated for her faith and bravery. Before we judge, remember a mass murder that God arrested on the road to Damascus who ended up being one of the most powerful authors of the New Testament.

Jesus' fight was with compassion. Compassion = To be with suffering. It is not an easy path and it is a hard spiritual road to travel and often lonely. Why are our children not taught HOW to discern through the heart. Why are our children not taught physical, emotional, mental & spiritual education to arrive to adulthood with a strong foundation to face the complex issues in this world. Why are our children not taught the HISTORY of language & the true meaning of words?

The biggest hypocrite God ever created. Lord, forgive him.

It’s a shame that the acoustics were so poor. I missed quite a bit of the discourse and never heard the questions at the end. Can this be published/presented in a different way⁉️

The Bishop's argument for biblical reading in the context of a tradition of interpretation (around the 28th minute) might be construed as suggesting that we can have no direct/original understanding of the biblical message *beyond* traditions. The Bishop's argument can makes sense (to all Christian "denominations") as a defence of the principle of fides quaerens intellectum. Cf. kzbin.infoR6zQbPWD5sA

Fair resource: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3LIdoShhNSLaaM

Is this listed as "Harmful or dangerous acts" lot? Or is it "misinformation", Post Folgers up Mooney Boulevard? It looks like misinformation so I have to Report it as that. Thanks for the show!

❤Thank you very much Bishop❤

Sounds like the revolution was bad, even if sometimes technically correct in some points. So, what's keeping the church from doing that self-reforming? Something is resisting, something that goes deep. Pride. Almost like some matters cannot be reformed. That can tend to create a panic if the allegedly sole source of salvation in the world is unwilling to de-anathematize the gospel, for example (Trent). And panic can look very troubling depending on who's doing what... like Luther. So, he was a mess. But where's the church's self-reform? ...particularly about matters where the clear reading of the completed canon bring a different position on a thing than the traditional teaching of the church? It's not enough to say "you're wrong... and maybe mentally ill." If I read a thing in the original Greek, exegeting according to the same standards applied by the early Catholic church, appeal to other scripture for clarity and find it, and in so doing discover a difference with Catholic teaching, what gives? Why so many accretions? Is it not that they distinguish from the Protestant, driving heels in about church authority, and not because those accretions are beneficial or necessary or derivative at all from scripture?

If any man be jailed, the Pope must go with him.

Thank you so much Mr Barry Schwortz God Bless you and the Shroud Also made my faith in God 100% guarantee that Jesus Christ has Risen! 49:02

Thank you so much Mr Barry Schwortz God Bless you and the Shroud Also made my faith in God 100% guarantee that Jesus Christ has Risen!

Thank you so much Mr Barry Schwortz God Bless you and the Shroud Also made my faith in God 100% guarantee that Jesus Christ has Risen!

I have much Love for this man, he is ultimately responsible for my conversion to Catholicism. I stumbled upon a debate between Bishop Barron and atheist “star” Alex O’Connor on the UNBELIEVABLE?” youtube channel. Bishop Barron spoke with a level of authority that I’d not previously encountered. I was stripping and staining our back yard fence and spent the next three weeks listening to every talk, debate, lecture, and homily. SOLD!

He can move Diagonally in any direction

I had to turn this off at 9: 05. At this point nothing had been debunked and two lines of defense had been established. 1. The numbers of people killed and tortured was exaggerated. 2. The Catholic Church was less guilty killing people in defending its beliefs than heretics leading people astray. Please note I did not attack the Catholic Church. I only stated what it actually put forth in the first 9 minutes of this video.

Dennis no longer raises funds for the now woke Salvation Army. Neither do I.

Absolutely enjoyed this!!!!!

Bishop Baron is a brilliant man, and brings light to many topics. However - at the risk of being guilty of his criticism of “cherry picking” the Bible to come to an overarching understanding about it, insofar as our finite intellects can comprehend the limitless mind of God - his second section here on misunderstanding the Bible is replete with misunderstanding. Simply, God speaks for Himself. In the beginning was the word and the word was God. God speaks for Himself. The Bible is His story. Isaiah 55:6-9 “Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near: Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.” We can, each of us take God at His word. He has promised to preserve it pure. It is eternal as is He. (Psalm 119:89 “For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.”) The word of God is not bound. (2 Timothy 2:9) Isaiah 55:11 “So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.” While Bishop Baron makes an honest effort to de-obfuscate the matter, the subject can’t be divorced from one’s faith in what constitutes final authority, and one’s personal confession of such faith. Is God’s word, as contained in the Bible, and vouchsafed to be pure, unadulterated, and complete - nothing added or subtracted - our authority about itself? Or is the richly developed, historic, interpretive tradition (including dogmatic decrees) of the Catholic Church the final authority? Does not John himself tell us what kind of “library” the Bible would be if everything could be written about the Lord God, Jesus Christ? The world itself could not contain all the books. John 21:25 “And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.” Yet, we have one Book that contains all of the written revelation of God. Jeremiah 29:13 “And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart.” The Bible has been compared with (or called) a communication device. We should appreciate that the Church has been tuned in, and accept the reports about what has been communicated. But we can and should heed the Lord’s invitation to “Come and see.” on our own. Just as prayer can be communal and personal, so too can be our encounter with God’s word. And remember the central verse of the Bible (King James Version): Psalm 118:8 “It is better to trust in the LORD than to put confidence in man.”

Oh Timothy keep keep that which is committed to thy trust avoiding profaine and vain babblings and opposition's of science falsely so called .Yes God did create light before he created the sun but he would have you believe that was just a metaphor and Agog and all belonging to him were actually slathered also it would take someone from within the Catholic church to come up with the big bang theory .why do they find it so hard to tell the truth .

How to paint valentine cards in watercolor

The best explanation of reparation for sin that I have heard is the man who in a fit of anger towards him neighbor burns his neighbor's house down. After his sin he recognizes and confesses his sin to a priest. The priest is going to require the man rebuild his neighbor's house to repair the damage done to his neighbor.

R'amen. Thank you for bringing my religion more recognition. We are a young faith and need to get the recognition so that we may grow, and help the world be aware of his noodly appendage. R'amen.

Great Clickbait. This is on youtube, so this is heresy, or is it? Now I have to listen to this. Barron is great, however, I wish he didn’t have so many false premises. I love him and my brothers and sisters connected to him. However, the differences are so vast that unfortunately I doubt they will ever ( in RC language) come home.

I have never doubted the shroud. The evidence has always been overwhelming, but it’s just now being public