Polish Fighter PZL P.11
18:52
14 күн бұрын
Horten's Ho18 "Amerika Bomber"
9:46
28 күн бұрын
F9F Panther -Tanner's Just Jetz
21:48
Snoopy's Sopwith Camel
3:54
2 ай бұрын
Me264 "Uberfortress"
11:13
2 ай бұрын
Me261 Adolphine
8:19
2 ай бұрын
F8F Bearcat - SMALL is BEAUTIFUL!!
26:02
F6F Hellcat: Made to Order
32:10
2 ай бұрын
Grumman's XF5F Skyrocket
11:04
3 ай бұрын
F4F Wildcat
25:35
3 ай бұрын
MUTANT B-17 and B-24 Gunships!
9:39
B-17 Part 4 - "Punchboard" (Bonus)
15:18
B-17 Part 1 - The Fly Off
25:06
3 ай бұрын
Killer Glider! The BV 40
5:48
5 ай бұрын
Hawker’s Typhoon
30:18
3 ай бұрын
The Shepherd
5:14
3 ай бұрын
FW 189 The Flying Eye
9:18
6 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@ericbrammer2245
@ericbrammer2245 6 сағат бұрын
Why they didn't just put the engines back-to-back, run 4 Props, 2 in front of the wing, 2 behind, and put this critter on Tricycle Landing gear? Wing-root in-take radiators could have cooled the 'pusher' engines, and Torque from the Props easily eliminated! Oh, wait, Dornier wasn't involved, and Ego interfered. Very German, that...
@ericbrammer2245
@ericbrammer2245 6 сағат бұрын
The PBY Privateer and the last bunch of B-24's also had the Tall-Single-Tail. What wasn't Known Then (and plagued even the P-38/P-61/XF-11/C-119) was that in banked turns, twin-boom planes experienced 'prop-wash' that made the Yaw authority 'Iffy', but it Also did THAT to B-24's in Level flight (Lancasters, too, & why the Manchester had 3 fins in it's tail), So, a Single 'shark-fin' cut into cleaner air, while causing more drag, but lesser handling issues.
@lexington476
@lexington476 10 сағат бұрын
Ever since playing the computer game Their Finest Hour: The Battle of Britain I've had an odd interest in the bf-110 and the do-17. The BF 110 in the game was really cool because not only was it a fighter but it had a variant that could also carry bombs.
@artawhirler
@artawhirler 10 сағат бұрын
This thing had more bugs than the Amazon rainforest.
@artawhirler
@artawhirler 10 сағат бұрын
Good video! Thanks!
@lexington476
@lexington476 11 сағат бұрын
1:35 why a range of 5,333 mi? that seems like a really odd number. Even when converted to kilometers it's not a round number.
@tjb7284
@tjb7284 14 сағат бұрын
🙂 schräge [ˈʃʁɛːɡə] Musik
@darrencorrigan8505
@darrencorrigan8505 21 сағат бұрын
Thanks, Warbirds.
@ronjones1077
@ronjones1077 Күн бұрын
And still today our tax $$$$ continue to be wasted
@ravenclaw8975
@ravenclaw8975 Күн бұрын
I subscribed to your excellent channel. I'd read about these planes before, but you provided me with a condensed refresher. Thank you.
@mcmax571
@mcmax571 Күн бұрын
The B-32 was plan B if Boeing couldn't get the B-29 work.
@michaeljmccann1540
@michaeljmccann1540 Күн бұрын
Too choppy oa presentation
@rafaucett
@rafaucett 2 күн бұрын
I think it's interesting how the B-32 looks similar to the Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateer (an offshoot of the B-24) especially the tail.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
Very much so. In fact another viewer said that he has seen a surviving B-32, but I suspect that it was a Privateer.
@farcohollis6862
@farcohollis6862 2 күн бұрын
My father was Navy brought on land to oversee the removal of all Japanese propellers and arms.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
Did he say what his reception was like? I wonder at those initial contacts between Allied and Japanese forces soon after the surrender.
@farcohollis6862
@farcohollis6862 Күн бұрын
@@worldofwarbirds He said they performed the work willingly but weren’t happy about it.
@texhaines9957
@texhaines9957 2 күн бұрын
My Grandfather worked on pretty much all Convair bombers but mostly B24 and B36. He was a supervisor.
@danielocarey9392
@danielocarey9392 2 күн бұрын
The war ended in 1945. This video states that it was 1944.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
Yes,that was a slip of the lip. I need to put a correction on the video!
@aaaht3810
@aaaht3810 2 күн бұрын
The B-32 may have had its problems but it sure looked bad ass in the frontal view. Too bad some could not have been saved. I would sure like to see one fly by.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
It looks BIG ASSED from the side view! Sorry I couldn’t resist.
@allgood6760
@allgood6760 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for this 👍✈️🇳🇿
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
Thanks I’m glad that you enjoyed it!
@Mike-tg7dj
@Mike-tg7dj 2 күн бұрын
Sad they didn't keep at least one. That automatic gun turret system is pretty sweet, and for what they were doing aerial reconnaissance they were able to take out IJAF airplanes was pretty incredible. You do have to realize that by war's end that the combat experience those Japanese pilots had were young inexperienced.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds Күн бұрын
Yes it really was a shame that they didn’t keep at least one for the museum!
@RivhardDavenport
@RivhardDavenport 2 күн бұрын
THEY SHOULD HAVE LEFT AT LEAST ONE DOMINATOR FOR A MUSEUM!!!!! WHAT A SHAMEFUL LOSS!!!!!
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
I certainly agree! An aircraft type should never just “go extinct “!
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 3 күн бұрын
Given that this video covers several Consolidated aircraft from WWII and the Pacific, you may find the following information interesting. Eighteen months ago I visited the Flying Boat Museum at Lake Boga near Swan Hill in Victoria, Australia. It was built as the Top Secret Flying Boat Maintenance and Repair Facility for the Australian Theatre of Operations and was far enough inland to be safe from Japanese Carrier borne aircraft attack. They have a Frankenstein PBY Catalina hung from the ceiling. The aircraft was rebuilt from the parts of several scrapped Cats. One of several displays are several aero engines, the one that powered the Catalina and then in another corner is the engine used in the B-29 and B-32, and it absolutely dwarfs the Catalina engine in size and complexity. If any of your viewers are visiting Australia and travelling along the Murray River, then 'do yourself a favour' and take a day trip to the Flying Boat Museum at Lake Boga. Excellent place for a picnic around the lake and there is accommodation available, even a caravan park. Swan Hill is just up the road if you need bigger supplies or support facilities. Mark from Melbourne Australia 🇦🇺😮
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
Thanks for the review! I’d love to get Down Under at some point! I’ve got quite a few viewers and listeners in Australia!
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 2 күн бұрын
@@worldofwarbirds You are more than welcome to come down for a visit and having viewers here will give you the opportunity of having your own personal tour guides in most places. The Lake Boga facilities are important to me because of a former neighbour and mate of mine who flew in the Cats during the war. He knew three or four generations of my family, so he was important to me. He is gone now, but I still carry the stories that he told me about his time in the RAAF and the Cats. One of his favourite stories was of flying out from Northern Australia up into the islands to our North, landing to refuel and load up with sea mines and then taking off to head for the Inland Sea between Southern China and Japan. Dropping the sea mines, then turning around to hopefully fly back to Australia. Mission Time, 27 hours.
@tedstriker754
@tedstriker754 3 күн бұрын
I could tell it wasn't pressurized by the size of the windows over the cockpit. That means the crew inside running heaters trying to stay warm, on oxygen masks during most of the fight. Just a bigger version of the B-17 or B-24. Pressurization puts hte B-29 several levels above that thing.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
In the Pacific, below 10,000 feet, I think the temp would have been pretty comfortable. Of course, even the B-29s switched to low level night operations eventually, but due to different reasons.
@tedstriker754
@tedstriker754 2 күн бұрын
@@worldofwarbirds Yeah, if they operated it that low, then pressurization wasn't a big deal, or the need for heat. I was thinking since it was built as a stand in for the B-29 in case it didn't work out, they were flying the same altitudes. Assuming the B-29 was up high over Japan. Didn't LeMay change them to lower altitudes? Due to the jet stream causing them to over shoot their targets.
@perfgeek
@perfgeek Күн бұрын
@@tedstriker754 Well, miss their targets anyway. I _believe_ the jet stream was on their noses on the way to Japan. My understanding is LeMay ordered the planes lower so they could carry larger loads, and be more accurate, though having switched (largely?) to firebombing, accuracy wasn't perhaps as big a deal as at the start.
@stevengriffin7873
@stevengriffin7873 Күн бұрын
@@tedstriker754 Wasn't the planes that overshot their targets it was the bombs affected by the jet stream.
@daviddickey1994
@daviddickey1994 3 күн бұрын
Well I never.
@thethirdman225
@thethirdman225 3 күн бұрын
The Australian Beauforts had Pratt & Whitney Twin Wasp engines because we didn’t manufacture Bristol Taurus engines here. We eventually built Beaufighters here too but I think we sourced the Hercules from the UK. The Beaufighter was known for being fast and with tremendous firepower. It was used extremely effectively at the Battle of the Bismarck Sea in 1943. As a result of some clever subterfuge, the Japanese mistook them for Beauforts and lined their ships up straight ahead, presenting the Beaufighter pilots with a perfect strafing target. Firing with everything they had, the Beaufighters completely wiped out the bridge of pretty much every ship they attacked, almost totally decapitating the fleet and starting fires everywhere. The American crews, watching from overhead, could not believe what they were seeing. Australian crews were known for radio discipline but the Americans provided commentary for anyone who could hear, with outbursts like, ‘Look at those Beaufighter sons of b!tches!’ Converted American B-25 Mitchells went in next, using skip bombing from side on and finished off most of the Japanese fleet. I have sat in a Beaufighter cockpit at the Moorabbin museum in Melbourne. The pilot had a remarkable forward view. They used to run one of the engines occasionally but the aircraft was not airworthy. FWIW, I think the name ‘Whispering Death’ is something of a myth.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
Yes, that video, although my most popular, was one of my earlier ones and there are a few errors and omissions. I should really put together a follow up video on the mythology of the “whispering” and also go over the Bismarck Sea action that you describe that SOMEHOW I completely missed the first time around! Thanks for sharing and the feedback.
@bertg.6056
@bertg.6056 3 күн бұрын
The engines were problematic for both the B-32 and the B-29.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
Certainly! They were being asked to perform at their very limit even as the bugs were being ironed out.
@goplad1
@goplad1 3 күн бұрын
I know where there is an intact example of the B-32. In my model display case! 😁
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
Who makes the kit? That would be a fun one! I’m working on a B-25 right now.
@he-edd-l3784
@he-edd-l3784 3 күн бұрын
Your "imperial units" are ridiculous and outdated. Please use km (kilometers), and km/h (kilometers per hour).
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
Sorry but most of my literature is in those units. Also, as a Canadian pilot, I still work with feet, pounds, gallons, mph, knots and inches of mercury! Lastly, American viewers and listeners pay most of the bills, so I’m going to cater to them! Have a nice weekend. It’s sunny and 24C here!
@he-edd-l3784
@he-edd-l3784 2 күн бұрын
@@worldofwarbirds : Your "explanation by money" is understandable ... Why don't you write : * 483 km/h (= 300 miles per hour) * 30 m (= 98 feet) ?
@JosephDent-qd9ih
@JosephDent-qd9ih 4 күн бұрын
Dominator
@Jack-xo2zp
@Jack-xo2zp 4 күн бұрын
I've always had a question about the B-32 in relation to the B-29 which has never been answered. I've raised the question on several websites that have told the story of the development of the B-29 and how the B-29 program was the most expensive wartime program of the US, and no one has ever had a good answer to the question. The question is, that if the B-29 program was the most expensive wartime program, how expensive was the B-32 program? Was the quoted cost of the B-29 program really the cost of both planes, since both contracts were signed at the same time to produce a long-range bomber? If so, that would explain why the "B-29" program was so expensive since the program really covered the cost of two airplane designs. On the other hand, if the very expensive cost of the B-29 program was just the cost of developing the B-29 and not both planes, then what was the cost of developing the B-32? That cost must have been equally expensive. I've tried to find the cost of the B-32, but there don't seem to be any records available. As you have said, the B-32 seems to be the forgotten bomber. If anyone has an answer, I'd be interested to read it. Thanks.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
I’d like to know too!
@jacksons1010
@jacksons1010 2 күн бұрын
I can’t offer a figure, but a primary reason for the expense of the B-29 was the remote-controlled gun turrets, or more specifically the computing gun sights to make the multiple remote gun targeting system work. The B-32 would have fielded the same system, so it would not have represented additional cost. The B-32 also used the same R-3350 engines, so again it didn’t involve additional development cost.
@user-io9ie5cs8j
@user-io9ie5cs8j 4 күн бұрын
It would have really been something if the one with the final air fatality had been preserved, trust govt to shoot history in the foot.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
I certainly agree! An aircraft type should never just “go extinct “!
@derek45auto23
@derek45auto23 4 күн бұрын
They should have kept one for Wright Patt
@johnruetz3849
@johnruetz3849 3 күн бұрын
I agree that one should have been saved for the museum. I was stationed at Wright-Patterson AFB in SAC ( 17th BW , B-52E and KC135A ) in the 1960's when they moved the museum from Patterson field to Wright field. I was at the museum about a year ago and plan on going again soon. I plan on being there a whole day because there is so much to see. I HIGHLY recommend it.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 2 күн бұрын
I certainly agree! An aircraft type should never just “go extinct “!
@DontThinkso-kb9tc
@DontThinkso-kb9tc 4 күн бұрын
Hap Arnold built a fighting team that sang a fighting song, About the wild blue yonder and days when men were strong....
@richardmalcolm1457
@richardmalcolm1457 4 күн бұрын
Had the Pacific War gone on into 1946, it's hard to think that there wouldn't have been *some* appreciable role for the B-32. It could not have supplanted the B-29 - it was never quite as good a platform - but given more flight hours, I have to think they could have ironed out the bugs, and made a very serviceable long range heavy bomber out of it.
@mcmax571
@mcmax571 Күн бұрын
The B-32-would have never replaced the B-29. The B-29 was the first of the new generation of aircraft that leads into the jet age while the B-32 is still WW2 tect.
@majcorbin
@majcorbin 4 күн бұрын
AVENPORT IOWA DAD JOKE of the day [Q] Which SIDE of an EAGLE,has the most feathers? [A] the OUTSIDE SILLY,of course
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Haha!
@MiserableOldFart
@MiserableOldFart 4 күн бұрын
Can't see how that protection was seen as adequate, as it's less than a B-17 and a much bigger target. B-17s weren't all that hard to shoot down, either.
@johnosbourn4312
@johnosbourn4312 4 күн бұрын
The infamous Last Mission of the B-32 was flown on Aug. 18th 1945, not Aug. 18th 1944.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Damn did I say 44? Ug. A slip of the lip! I’ll post a correction. Thanks
@331SVTCobra
@331SVTCobra 4 күн бұрын
The sole remaining artifact of the B-32 program is a wing. It is located at Montgomery-Waller Community Park in South San Diego. This is on the hill from which John Montgomery claims he achieved flight though he reportedly shot at anyone who came to watch. Anyway the wing is viewable on googlemaps.
@GeorgeRuffner-iy7bm
@GeorgeRuffner-iy7bm 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for this interesting and informative video. 🙈🙉🙊 😎 🇺🇸
@Jalu3
@Jalu3 4 күн бұрын
A wing of a B-32 remains at a City of San Diego Park in the Otay Mesa West neighborhood, specifically at the Montgomery-Waller Community Park.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
That’s a pretty cool detail. Is there a plaque or anything?
@joshkamp7499
@joshkamp7499 4 күн бұрын
Minor but significant error in detail: the bomb load specified was 20,000#, not 2,000 as displayed and stated in the video.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
I thought it was a low number too, but I did see it in multiple documents. Perhaps it meant 2000lbs at the very maximum range? At lower ranges and with lower fuel loads it would carry more bomb load? I did state later in the video that the payload ended up being 20,000lbs. Thanks for looking for errors.
@markpaul-ym5wg
@markpaul-ym5wg 4 күн бұрын
I have always wondered what would happen to a plane that was pressurized after being hit with 20mm cannon shells.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Rapid decompression for sure! But I haven’t actually read an account of it happening. I’m curious too.
@moredistractions
@moredistractions 4 күн бұрын
That's pretty wild. I had never even heard of that aircraft type before, let alone known that they were flown in the war. It's amazing to think that they were only about a decade apart in design from the B-52, which is still on full operational duty today, well into the 21st century.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Yes, there were/are some amazing warbirds with incredible longevity. I’m looking forward to doing the Douglas A-1 Skyraider which will allow me to stretch ‘my’ era into Vietnam and beyond!
@markfryer9880
@markfryer9880 3 күн бұрын
I believe that the Skyraider was equipped with the same engine as the B-29.​@@worldofwarbirds
@wolframsobotta4350
@wolframsobotta4350 4 күн бұрын
Die US Jäger hätten keinen einzigen durchgelassen.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Ja, ich glaube, das wäre ein Selbstmordkommando gewesen.
@handy335
@handy335 5 күн бұрын
Very nicely done. Thank you!
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@robertpalma7946
@robertpalma7946 5 күн бұрын
Very Good and informative video
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 4 күн бұрын
Thank you for commenting!
@bricefleckenstein9666
@bricefleckenstein9666 5 күн бұрын
B-32 was too little too late - no significant quantity ever saw usage before the end of the war, since it didn't even START to arrive at front-line units 'til May 1945.
@evakrasnoguir7695
@evakrasnoguir7695 5 күн бұрын
Hey Sir!(its your favorite student Eva)I love this video! The F8F is small but mighty! Amazing video!
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 5 күн бұрын
Glad you liked it! You are small but mighty yourself!
@DeliveryMcGee
@DeliveryMcGee 5 күн бұрын
I don't know if it's still online, but there used to be an A-1 Skyraider pilot's memoir on a website, in which he detailed the start procedure of the Wright R-3350 (same engine as the B-29, but he only had one). Something like "leave the magnetos and fuel off, bump the electric starter until you count sixteen blades [four turns of the engine with a four-blade prop] to get the oil out, then turn on all the fuel pumps and spark and lean on the start switch until it shoots fire out the exhausts."
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 5 күн бұрын
Thanks for these deets!
@ridethecurve55
@ridethecurve55 5 күн бұрын
It wasn't the plane, so much as the Parts! Quality Control was a sketchy business back then. My lot goes in for the 'B-32 DeNile🤔'.
@k75romeofive
@k75romeofive 5 күн бұрын
I am not sure they were all scrapped. I live in Colorado and near to an airport that has slurry bombers based there at times. I saw a plane that I recognized as a B24, but had a single vertical tail. I asked a friend who was an ATC at that airport about thie plane and he told me it was a " Dominator". He was an F-4 Phantom pilot and is very well versed in WWII planes. I saw this plane many times that summer and I am pretty sure it was the B-32.
@worldofwarbirds
@worldofwarbirds 5 күн бұрын
Perhaps it was a PB4Y-2 Privateer? It was the Navy version of the B-24 AND had a single fin.
@goplad1
@goplad1 3 күн бұрын
@@worldofwarbirds That's exactly what it was. The Privateer and Dominator were similar in appearance. One could be fooled at first glance.