A warrant needs to be signed and dated by a judge for a particular date of search. And remember, an arrest warrant is not a search warrant.
@eyefreely9682Күн бұрын
Yeah... I've been strip searched more than 500 times and Never made One Cent
@John-rw2zf2 күн бұрын
Don't believe this woman. She doesn't know how half of what she is talking about and isn't being honest either. She has an angle of some kind in this subject.
@anthonycontarino47133 күн бұрын
total bullshit, juries find guilt or innocense, if the laws are bad change them, sentaces should not be moments of farce
@danielswart51687 күн бұрын
There is so much more to this. If the federal government says something is unconstitutional, each state gets to decide if they will abide by it. Also, most states have a law against police lying. The police are trained to lie. But, since police can't be penalized and can't do their job without lying, it is ignored.
@danielswart51688 күн бұрын
No checks and balances in government, punishments not fitting crimes, and police being immune to prosecution so they do what they want. Also several crimes if you are accused you are found guilty with no defense possible. We have fallen so far.
@TinaStark-r6s18 күн бұрын
Its bullshit its unconstitutional PERIOD FUCK AMERICA !
@RandomDad202418 күн бұрын
I finally found a human being that thinks like a human being holy shit
@danielswart516819 күн бұрын
The state government makes $0.66 for every dollar of child support from the federal government. Where is their incentive to help out and lower payments?
@CurlyFromTheSwirly19 күн бұрын
It's pointless to tell them they can't live near a,park or school but they can still go there. It's probably better for investigation if they have a list of offenders who live nearby.
@BlueRaven-q2x22 күн бұрын
You neglect to state the crimes the elder committed? Shoplifting? Writing a bad check? The old guy who was drunk and rammed into the nail salon killing 4 people? The old man who shot and killed an innocent woman making an Amazon delivery? If a person isn't committing any crime why would the police target them? This is a really dumb little video void of context.
@douglasjordan145725 күн бұрын
It's a state owned business . It's run the same as hospitals. Keep it full & receive state & federal funding . Does that make dollars ¢s Welcome to corperate america .😢 Sad but true.
@Quakeboy0224 күн бұрын
Actually, most prisons are private now days. And the first priority for a private corporation is to increase their revenue stream by convincing politicians to make the laws every more stringent. It works fine, up until it's people like you, your friends, and your parents who are going to jail for decades for minor crimes.
@fredsmith443827 күн бұрын
Makes me wonder if I'll get arrested now in my old age for spewing vitriol about the police and law enforcement in general. I think I'd rather be shot. RIP Ms. Massey.
@Hal-lj7kp27 күн бұрын
explain why its 3x more.. .... you don't ... it makes no sense... unless everyone in prison is just spending all their time on meds and in the hospital -- and if they were sent home--- they would be on medicaid if they were indeed sick--- so its a wash
@Quakeboy0224 күн бұрын
That's just stupid. Here's your sign.
@mamadragonful28 күн бұрын
Is there any evidence that therapy helps? In my experience, much of therapy makes abusers WORSE. It gives them improved manipulation skills and reduces the likelihood of being charged, prosecuted, or convicted.
@SimpleMindedGenius735 күн бұрын
I have a coworker who is an RSO (registered sex offender) and is taking the court mandated therapy. According to him, and this is the only frame of reference I have, they don't even talk about the offenses. They have workbooks with assignments. I've seen his workbook. The assignments in the book deal with sexual offenses, behavior patterns, thinking errors and that kind of thing which could be beneficial to those in therapy but they aren't discussed. An assignment is completed, they hand the book to the "Therapist" who scans it and marks it complete. The rest of the group therapy meeting is everyone talking about how their week went. So, if all therapy sessions follow the way his is then I doubt very much that it works
@Vacerous28 күн бұрын
The term "First time offender" simply means you got caught once. Unless you've worked some of these cases, you have no idea how deep it goes beyond just the one instance. By the time they're caught, you only have to dig a little to find years of escalation.
@markh492628 күн бұрын
I met this guy in my alcohol recovery group. After a while he told us he was a convict but not why, but he did whine about it a lot. After a couple of years we broke contact. I knew he was a rapist and a home invader; he told me had over 70 invasions under his belt. A few weeks ago, he showed up at my AA zoom meeting, I wasn't happy, he usually goes to a live meeting at that time, he was chasing a girl at my meeting. Long story about that but I became more suspicious of him. I looked up sex offenders and discovered he is a child rapist which I assume happened during a home invasion. The guy is a very creepy person and lies by omission a lot. I never felt the need to look up the sex offenders list but glad I did. He is 60 years old and still chasing the young girls in AA right in front of his wife. I really dislike this guy and think he should be in prison.
@ThePrototype04728 күн бұрын
It makes more sense when you consider that it's not about providing safety so much as it is about granting additional punishment beyond the scope of jail. It's more for liability in the case of recidivism than it is for actually preventing sexual assault. I'm not sure this is a problem that can really be addressed this way at all.
@Maceman48628 күн бұрын
95% of sex offenders don't offend again in the current system? Sounds like it's working.
@OdhinnAwake28 күн бұрын
Holy shit, the meme is real
@ishkabibble220428 күн бұрын
The SOR holds people accountable. No "law" or "consequence" makes a victim safer. It is the basis of where a society stands on being responsible for our actions.
@stevenswitzer515428 күн бұрын
Yes. It rhrows flags in employment. Im guessing she does not care about that
@FEED_ME_A_STRAY_CAT28 күн бұрын
Blegchk, I'm so tired of media prioritizing sensationalism over research and factual info
@Johnarchiebald28 күн бұрын
Medical Error kills more people than gun crime and car crashes COMBINED
@user-tg6jg4nw6t28 күн бұрын
"First time" offenders are mostly "first time being caught" offenders. With violent and sexual crime there is usually quite a bit of escalation, especially in adolescence when crimes committed against schoolmates or siblings get swept under the rug. When a 19 year old is caught doing something, you don't really know how many times he did that in 11th grade, summer camp, family reunions, tutoring etc. In reality, most adults offenders were ALREADY given a chance to stop being a pervert and just chill. Most sex offenses are by trusted people because that is who gets access to women and children. That guy fondling himself at the bus stop isn't "less likely" to harm your child than your Uncle, he is just someone you would NEVER allow the access. Crime stats are often skewed by the reality of the precautions we already take. Its tough to measure the likelihood that a registered offender would do it again, compared to a trust community figurehead like a priest or guidance counselor. Its the same way women are more likely to be killed by a lover than a stranger. Thats not because strangers aren't dangerous. Its because loved ones are given the most time and opportunity to harm you. The bloated inaccuracy of the registry is another problem. You've got teens on there for circulating their own nudes. College guys registers because some high school girl duped them on tinder. Public urinators and nonsense like that. Not to mention all the innocent people that just get pressured into plea deals because they can't afford to fight. The list really would be more useful if it were kept to predatory crime that we should be worried about. I want offenders to become better people, but we have to balance that against the value of protecting innocent people. Attempting to give criminals the best possible shot at a normal life is great, but if you've done some sick depraved stuff, people have a right to know if they should be careful of you.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
There are some people that shouldn’t be on the registry, but it’s less than most people think. With plea deals RSOs are rarely on the registry for what they say they did. It’s usually MUCH worse but they took a plea deal and that is what is reflected on the registry, not what they actually did. I think that’s where the “public urination” myth came from. Someone told their friend they peed at a park at 1AM, not that they actually flashed a bunch of kids in the middle of the day and were caught.
@Vacerous28 күн бұрын
Agreed. The overall purpose of the registry is to prevent access and allow prospective employers to have the right to refuse hiring them. If you have a recovering alcoholic, you wouldn't want them to work at a bar. As for "first time" offenders, you're exactly right. Vast majority of the ones I or a colleague have busted got started in their adolescents. One case we had started at 14. He was tasked to watch his younger cousins while the single mom did yard work or whatever and he would have the daughter sit on his lap while she played on the computer. To hear how he described the excitement he got each time he got away with it was absolutely chilling. He knew it was wrong and he just wanted to get his kicks. As it went on, he got better at hiding it and groomed the girl to see nothing wrong with it until it was full on contact across 3-4 years. He was finally caught, when he began grooming a new target that would regularly ride his bike down the street. And agreed, these silly instances of people being put on it for urinating in public need to be trimmed, but that's also an overall discussion on judicial practice. Plea deals and the like are being treated as a means to quickly bolster a prosecutor's record with little effort. It's become a business rather than a pursuit
@Cdaragorn29 күн бұрын
You're talking about a scheme that is blatantly unconstitutional for multiple reasons as well as not backed by a shred of evidence that it has ever helped at all because very few people care about actually studying the effects of this kind of thing when their feelings are so tightly wound up by the thing it's claiming to help solve. I mean just the fact that anyone can be put on it even if they have never been convicted of any crime at all is all you should need to know to understand how useless this garbage is.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@Cdaragorn Study just came out that shows that neighborhoods with sex offenders are safer because of the awareness it brings.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@Cdaragorn Also you can only end up on the registry if you are convicted. Not sure where you got that from.
@Cdaragorn28 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 That's worthless information without understanding how it chose to measure "safe", among other issues with just trying to point to a study without any context.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@Cdaragorn The study’s authors began with years of data for 4,100 confirmed home addresses of more than 1,500 offenders who lived in Baltimore County. Combining this information with data on reported crimes from the Baltimore County Police Department from early 1990s through part of 2009, they found that each additional RSO living in a residential area was associated with 7.5 percent fewer sex offenses. If neighbors learn that a RSO lives nearby, an individual may become more likely to report suspicious activity, the researchers said. Parents also may decide to discuss the need to report sexual abuse with their children, who in turn may be more likely to report something unusual, said J.J. Prescott, a U-M law professor and one of the study’s authors.
@Cdaragorn28 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 All of which has nothing to do with actual safety. In fact I could point to reasons why that kind of excessive reporting creates a less safe environment.
@NixonsFarm29 күн бұрын
As an attorney and a law professor, I have been saying this to those who would argue that certain political figures are being unfairly targeted. Prosecutors are simply doing the bidding of their constituents.
@stephenalexander672129 күн бұрын
You raise good points
@tflowers658229 күн бұрын
What good does presenting an issue do if you don’t suggest a better option? Your stats seem correct, but without a suggested correction it’s pointless.
@tflowers658229 күн бұрын
Offenses may happen in private, but finding a vulnerable person often happens in public.
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@tflowers6582 The stats aren’t correct, they are cherry picked
@Cdaragorn29 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 The stats are correct, they just aren't complete because we can't get good stats on those things. There are plenty of good reasons why this should be thrown out that are better than what was discussed.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@Cdaragorn The stats aren’t correct. There is no study that shows the lifetime recidivism rate is 3 percent.
@imitationofwoman29 күн бұрын
The reoffending rate obviously uses data from offences where sex offenders were caught and successfully convicted and does not take account of offences that were never reported by victims or admitted by the perpetrator. You need to make this clear here that you are relying upon the perpetrators honesty that their offences are one-off's when the reality may be very different indeed. We need to be professionally curious.
@helpumuch688729 күн бұрын
Yea I was thinking the same thing, pretty sure most sexual assault is unreported but this is also might be more specifically about r*pe or something idk
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@imitationofwoman They also like to use 1-3 year recidivism rates because they are being deceptive and trying to find the lowest number possible. Oh yeah the recidivism rate is only three percent! They ignore the 30 year studies that show 20-30 percent cause that doesn’t fit their narrative. They also ignore the fact that a RSO has a sexual recidivism rate that is FOUR TIMES HIGHER than other released inmates.
@zkeletonz00128 күн бұрын
I'm not sure what you're saying here. Are you talking about someone committing multiple crimes before they are caught the first time? Recidivism doesn't refer to someone committing multiple crimes before they are caught. It only refers to crimes that take place after someone has been caught and convicted. And only after someone has been convicted would they be put on a sex offender list. So anything that took place before that would have no relevance to any argument having to do with sex offender registries.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@zkeletonz001 Recidivism just means people that were rearrested. Studies show that ALL sex crimes are underreported. Also the DOJ study shows that something like 20 percent of SOs in prison are on their second or more sex crime conviction.
@me-ye6ld28 күн бұрын
That’s definitely a limitation in the data, but that limitation is also present in the data representing every single person who hasn’t been convicted of a sex crime. It’s good to be mindful of that, but a lack of evidence is still a lack of evidence. Every single person has an incentive to lie if they’ve done a bad thing, but that doesn’t mean every single person is lying when they deny they’ve done a bad thing. If someone says that they haven’t done a bad thing, no one has come forward to say they have, and they have not been convicted of an offense again, that is still evidence in their favor even if it’s not definitive.
@tim2024-df5fu29 күн бұрын
Because of the list I found out Seattle was dumping their sex offenders in Yakima Washington, Cheney, and Spokane as well. As a result Yakima has 7 times as many sex offenders as the state's average. The list also showed that there were 7 within two blocks of my house and one lived next door. P.S. Not everyone on the list is a predator. I had a buddy who had left his zipper down when he was drunk and was cited for indecency and required him to take a class. He skipped the class which put him on the offenders list.
@helpumuch688729 күн бұрын
Often times when questioning juries before a case involving someone on the registry, the lawyer will ask if people know all the random ass ways you can get thrown on the list like your example. Crazy shit law is weird
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@tim2024-df5fu Your buddy lied to you. People aren’t getting arrested for open flys. Lol
@tim2024-df5fu28 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 Son I've lost count of the juries but I've been on. Being convicted or found innocent in court is not proof of either. It just means you've won or lost a popularity contest. I've also been arrested for smoking a cig in a parking lot when it was legal to smoke inside a building. Please tell me again when you can and can't be arrested. I need a good laugh.
@Eric0908828 күн бұрын
@@tim2024-df5fu Yeah and I’ve read so many case files of people that swear they are innocent but their file is damning.
@zkeletonz00128 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 Do you watch any of the youtube channels that cover bad policing? People get arrested for all kinds of crazy stuff and very often the cop(s) who do it will do it multiple times before they face any kind of consequences for it.
@prun889329 күн бұрын
As a sex offender myself, I can honestly say that we should do away with sex offender registration.
@Roosters-rants197729 күн бұрын
Thats wrong. When 9n the list. You cant be around any kids. Wtf is she talking about.
@Cdaragorn29 күн бұрын
Do you have a point you want to contribute? So far nothing you've said makes any sense.
@writerconsidered29 күн бұрын
If someone has nothing left to lose. How's that going to work out?
@AngryKnees29 күн бұрын
I'll admit I'm biased both because of tepid regrets over not reporting the person that victimized me as a minor, but also someone who generally doesn't support the retributive nature of the modern criminal justice system. The argument in this video is largely vibes-based, and the one number thrown own doesn't justify it's conclusion because it doesn't account for important confounders (see: @Eric09088's comment). I'm open to the idea that SORs are ineffective, but I just don't think this video does a good job of making that case, and something about a 2 minute vibes-based hot take about such a serious and sensitive matter doesn't hit quite right to me.
@boblester73829 күн бұрын
Thank you. Sadly, the general public never thinks this lucidly.
@JR-bj3uf29 күн бұрын
Agree but you can't say anything or talk about this issue without first looking like a weirdo and being suspect yourself.
@Truth-is-not-subjectiveАй бұрын
Yes! It makes all women safer. If a woman needs to make a complaint and the offender is already on that list, it should be easier to get law enforcement to act. A national data base would work well for several other issues as well.
@firefly983829 күн бұрын
Law enforcement isn't your bodyguard. Protect yourself.
@ajm500728 күн бұрын
All criminal convictions are public records, easily accessible to police and courts. The sex offender registry is different , and serves no positive purpose.
@Eric0908822 күн бұрын
@@ajm5007 Except the registry provides police with up to date information on where they live and work and provides employers with vulnerable individuals information on prospective employees.
@mineown1861Ай бұрын
True , many such offences are by family members , but you did seem to brush off the remainder . Even if it's statistically less likely that an predator will take a victim from a park or playground , that's cold comfort to the victims of such opportunistic crime . Recidivism rates are only statistical indicators , and as we all know statistics are meaningless to the individual , so once again it's cold comfort to the victim of a statistically anomalous repeat offender. So taking the argument made against the death sentence as a basic construct , isn't it better that 100 sex offenders have restrictions placed upon them rather than one child be raped ?
@wombatdkАй бұрын
Personally I'd like to see a public registry of ALL convicts. Regardless of crime.
@genespell434029 күн бұрын
That would be a monumental undertaking and it really would do more harm than help.
@yurikaclearcreek719529 күн бұрын
All convictions are public record in the U.S
@wombatdk29 күн бұрын
@@yurikaclearcreek7195 Not as easy accessible as the pervert registry. You need to file a FOIA request to get the details, and you cannot search them by name or neighborhood.
@ajm500728 күн бұрын
Why? What purpose would it serve to know that your neighbor was convicted of a crime two decades ago and hasn't harmed a soul since?
@mo.ka.966128 күн бұрын
@ajm5007 it would serve the purpose of determining wether or not you trust them. Just because YOU don't think that's a big deal doesn't mean everyone else does. It's about informed consent
@tonyelliott7734Ай бұрын
You're definitely a Leftist. You probably use the term "minor attracted people" instead of pedophile.
@Rick-np9vzАй бұрын
It's not just sex offenses will get a person on that list! Urinating in a public place will get you there also!
@Truth-is-not-subjectiveАй бұрын
Only if an idiot designs the data base.
@MrTweetyhack29 күн бұрын
that's why I only defecate in public
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@Rick-np9vz No it won’t.
@Rick-np9vz29 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 in more than one state! They claim it is "exhibitionism"!
@Eric09088Ай бұрын
This is one of those videos that relies on information produced by anti registry groups (aka sex offenders) to make it seem like registries do nothing (Oh trust me, they do thats why they fight them so hard) and that sex offenders aren't dangerous (because they cherry pick a study that has a low recidivism rate because it was only focused on a one or three year period.) Some states do have residency restrictions and some don't. It makes sense to keep sex offenders away from kids for various reasons, such as being able to develop a relationship with them. It also keeps them out of going into schools. They try, there are many news articles. It’s true, most children are abused by family or ACQUAINTANCES. That’s why the registry is so important. It provides vital information to parents and other adults about SOs that are in close proximity in their neighborhood, work or if they know their name. All acquaintances and people who could be your friends. Up to 25 percent of sex offenders are arrested for another sex based crime. That’s not including the fact that sex crimes are VASTLY underreported. So when you say 95 percent of sexually based crimes are first offenses, that’s not true. That’s the first time they were CAUGHT. We know many molesters can have hundreds of victims. Offenders arent having all these problems because they are on some random list. All of their problems come from what they did to get on that list. They face problems getting jobs or finding a place to stay because employers and landlords don’t want to hire someone who committed a sexual crime, not because of the regsitry. They would learn that in a background check even if there was no registry. If you really think RSOs arent a problem, go type in sex offender in google news and see how many arrests there were in the last 7 days. Those are just the stories that hit the news. Also it DOES give victims the ability to track where the person lives and works so they don’t have to see them and can protect themselves as well.
@brandonsteele2826Ай бұрын
Thanks for taking the time to write that. While the video was playing I was pretty skeptical of what she was saying. I was wondering if you had any information to counter other claims that minimize violence against women? For example, men's rights activists say women aren't really in that much danger when they go out because 3 out of 4 murder victims are men, and most women who ARE killed are killed by people they know, so therefore it's illogical for women to be scared of going out alone at night.
@Eric09088Ай бұрын
@@brandonsteele2826 Yeah, I mean there are issues with the registry, no doubt. I think there are proven advantages. A study just came out that found neighborhoods that a sex offender lives in has less s** crimes than ones that don’t because of awareness. Awareness isn’t a false sense of security and a lot of the security you would take against an offender would help even if it was someone else targeting your kids. Absolutely. I think the issue is comparing apples to oranges. Murder is horrific. What makes it worse than SA? Someone is murdered and their suffering is over. Someone that is SAed can suffer for a life time. They are different but equal types of horror.
@genespell434029 күн бұрын
@@brandonsteele2826 Everybody should be scared of going out at night. The criminal element prefer the dark to help them do their dirty deeds.
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@brandonsteele2826 Yeah, I mean there are issues with the registry, no doubt. I think there are proven advantages. A study just came out that found neighborhoods that a RSO lives in has less s** crimes than ones that don’t because of awareness. Awareness isn’t a false sense of security and a lot of the security you would take against an offender would help even if it was someone else targeting your kids. Absolutely. I think the issue is comparing apples to oranges. Murder is horrific. What makes it worse than SA? Someone is murdered and their suffering is over. Someone that is SAed can suffer for a life time. They are different but equal types of horror.
@helpumuch688729 күн бұрын
You hit a bunch of great points
@kimberlyakin8908Ай бұрын
I agree that we Need a Better Based set Up. a Man that is 17 dating a 16 year Old should NOT be prosecuted for SR when he turned 18. Also a Man who SR someone if they are dating and He is under 19 should not have to register. BUT you are sadly wrong Many reoffend which is why we see Many with Huge tally/ Priests with 300. Boy Scout Leaders who Have 20 ,30 + Yes Many offenses occur In the Home. But My offender when On to be arrested more than Once for domestic abuse and who Knows what else. Also only 1 in 4 will report the assault Many people don't even get medical care. Also Just Because they are "" In the Home"" does Not mean there are Not many victims. Teacher found to have groomed over and over again, Father who abuse daughters going after daughters friends. It's Nice that You can In fact make Yourself Feel Better with the false claims But IM sorry You wrong and off. THEY WILL ALWAYS REOFFEND Just because they didn't get caught or their victim I to young to tell But they are offending. You don't Just R a child Out of the Blue. You thought about it for a Long time and then "" couldn't help themself". They Just caught a POLICE MAN boy friend who R a one year Old with the MOM in the House. Hospitalized the child Broke a Bone on her to do it. Please
@rodrogers689529 күн бұрын
97% of ‘offenders’ never reoffend, yet their lives and those of their children and spouses are destroyed forever. This is Unreasonable, UnAmerican, and UnChristian.
@kimberlyakin890829 күн бұрын
@@rodrogers6895 The Cristians said to stone the offender to till dead So Im wondering How many should a offender Be allowed before Punishment? Just wondering . Rod
@rodrogers689529 күн бұрын
@@kimberlyakin8908 Once again, 97 % of offenders Never re-offend, 95% of offenders are family or friend of the victim; wholesale LIfetime ‘labeling’ of over 1 Million Americans: 1. costs millions of dollars per year 2. Creates barriers to rebuilding lives 3. Absolutely protects no one. Yes, a very small number of people may need to be kept track of, but a nationwide registry of over 1 million people is not the answer.
@Eric0908829 күн бұрын
@@rodrogers6895 Yeah no. Maybe try looking up statistics instead of parroting lies you have heard. I’ve actually read the studies.
@rodrogers689528 күн бұрын
@@Eric09088 I’ve read the studies, I’ll stand by my figures. We have over 1 Million people on the Registry who are denied housing, jobs, freedom to travel, volunteer opportunities, etc. Do you honestly believe that 1 out of every 300 people in this country needs to be harassed and persecuted for LIFE because of a past mistake? If so, you would have felt right at home in Nazi extermination camps.
@joshwoodard8278Ай бұрын
Everyone echoes these comments until they realize the hard way that the system has nothing to do with justice, locks up innocents, and has little to no oversight. Or until they realize that crimes are committed by people and not monsters. And until a family member or friend is incarcerated. And if they are suggesting that prisons *should* be this way, it says a whole lot more about how horrible *they* are and not whoever they’re jumping to condemn.
@joshwoodard8278Ай бұрын
Thank you
@TimeSurfer206Ай бұрын
It not only isn't working, it's giving us a false sense of security... And it gives the Cops a way to do absolutely nothing while pretending to keep us safe. "A kid got touched, so we showed them all the pictures in the Registry, and they couldn't identify their toucher. "O well, we did all we could."
@HemiChryslerАй бұрын
what percentage of sex offenders are guilty only of urinating in public ?
@TimeSurfer206Ай бұрын
It's >0. Thus, "Way too many."
@Eric09088Ай бұрын
@@TimeSurfer206Can you show me one example of that ever happening? It’s a myth.
@TimeSurfer206Ай бұрын
@@Eric09088 Prove it.
@Kelly_BenАй бұрын
As of 2014, at least 12 states required registration for urinating in public. It depends on how the charges are brought... if described as lewd or indecent exposure, it's more likely to land you on the registration.
@Eric09088Ай бұрын
@@Kelly_Ben Exactly. It depends on the persons motivation. If it was sexually motivated then it is a sex offense. Thats not why it was brought up here. It’s to scare people into thinking they could end up on a registry because they peed in the forest. Out of 600,000 or more RSOs there’s not one case of someone ending up on the registry for public urination without a sexual motivation.
@ericdean1309Ай бұрын
Pedo's are listed so those selling to pedo's can find them.n