The word “corruptible” does have the connotation of decay or rotting. It isn’t only speaking g about spiritual corruption or corruptibility. Not saying the latter is not also implied in the word in the KJV. Just that the word itself means to decay or rot, as in a dead body that decays.

I’m confused how these two words are at all similar. They mean two opposite things!

I’m always excited when I find a new and theologically solid channel such as this one. There are quite a number of channels in the “reformed world” but not as many that are mainly focused on solid theology itself, such as with Edwards, Mastrick and others. Looking forward to checking out a bunch of your material as this is a real gem.

Wow, what a fascinating discussion. I only recently even heard of Mastrick but was struck with the fact that here is someone whom Edwards himself held in high esteem. Usually I think of Edwards as already the highest peak in terms of the greatest theologians.

Great review of this systematic theology. Just got this set and very impressed so far. Solid theology along with deeply edifying. Can’t wait to dig in to it.

This was really interesting, thank you. I am eyeballs deep in a read-through right now, so I want to complete that. But I will definitely be keeping this in mind.

This was so wonderful, thank you!

Is it possible to get one where all the blank pages are on the right side only?

I cannot access Bible Hub on my devices lately. I love using Bibke Hub for my studies to compare scriptures and get clearer understanding of the context of a scripture. But alas here today I cannot access the website.

I've just started the video, but before I forget - I already love his enthusiasm! (And love for dinosaurs.) I wish I could learn biblical Hebrew and Greek. Not sure my little brain would be able to handle it, though.

great idea--I am not interested in rushing through the whole bible cover to cover in 2025 . this year I read the new testament in the groupings you show in Immerse Messiah over 8 months, the only thing I did not fully enjoy was the translation that was chosen by my group. I am also involved in a year long study of Revelation, Sept thru May through BSF -Bible Study Fellowship--It dips into the OT and NT during some weeks which I am fully enjoying.

I. Love this idea

In 2024 I started the Matt Horner Bible Reading Plan. Check it out. It is kinda this same idea except you a reading 10 chapters per day through all the genre. It has been very satisfying to help me connect the dots.

I like the idea of this focused study. I’m on my first read through of the Bible, so this will be great to do simultaneously. Thanks for sharing!

I only wish that the words of Christ were in red. Outside of that I love this Bible. I have it in genuine leather

I like this a lot. I am starting seminary myself in about a year, so I really want to read through the entire bible at least once more before that. But recently I have been reading the same 10 chapters every day, as well as some Psalms, and it has been really great. Wanting to get really familiar with specific things. Thanks for sharing this!

I have a copy of this study Bible and it is very fine. However, one must remember it does have a Reformed doctrine bias.

I was thinking that something like this would be a good idea. I am puzzled why this bible never came up when I searched for study bibles, or journaling bibles. Thanks for the video.

What pen are you using

Please research the videos from the Channel ,, TRUTH IS CHRIST ". kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXWyn6J3pMl8hNksi=dTIMiHNKRPVa27Ba Mind-blowing discovery in the KJV about the perfection of KJV. Thanks to computers Brandon managed to find mind-blowing patterns in the KJV that only God could have done... I'm speechless of how perfect and complex and alive KJV is!!!

Please research the videos from the Channel ,, TRUTH IS CHRIST ". kzbin.info/www/bejne/pXWyn6J3pMl8hNksi=dTIMiHNKRPVa27Ba Mind-blowing discovery in the KJV about the perfection of KJV. Thanks to computers Brandon managed to find mind-blowing patterns in the KJV that only God could have done... I'm speechless of how perfect and complex and alive KJV is!!!

1. Beeke and Smalley's systematic theology is a great multi-volume systematic theology from a Reformed or specifically Puritan perspective. Beeke is of course *the* modern day Puritan. 2. That said, maybe I'm biased since I've had a lot more exposure to him, but I prefer the works of J.I. Packer more than Beeke and Smalley for a Puritan systematic theology. That's mainly because I think Packer says most of what needs to be said more concisely (as Packer has said of himself, Packer by name and packer by trade!) and with more memorable and beautiful style. Otherwise the bas toic or fundamental content or information is more or less similar, or so it seems to me. Regrettably Packer famously or infamously never wrote a systematic theology when he had the ability and opportunity to do so. He was under contract to write a systematic theology with a famous Christian publisher but unfortunately never was able to do so. Perhaps Packer should have done so, but in the end he maintained there were already better systematic theologies in existence (Packer often recommended Berkhof) and he maintained he had other priorities come up. Given this, we need to refer to multiple works to get a good sense of Packer's (Puritan) systemic theology. I'd recommend books like Concise Theology, 18 Words, A Quest for Godliness, "Fundamentalism" and the Word of God, God Has Spoken, Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God, and The Heritage of Anglican Theology (which is really about Puritan Anglicanism). These contain the most robust systematic theological work from Packer, I think. Other works like Knowing God and Keep in Step with the Spirit are also excellent but tilt more toward practical theology than systematic theology, in my judgment. 3. Still, though I personally prefer Packer, I think this systematic theology by Beeke and Smalley is nevertheless valuable. It has its significant advantages over Packer. For example, it's more comprehensive on the classical loci than Packer is. It's also more comprehensive in bringing together the thinking of all the Puritans in general, whereas Packer tends to focus primarily on representative Puritans, especially his beloved Richard Baxter and John Owen. And Beeke and Smalley is more up to date on the scholarship. These are just some advantages over Packer that I'm aware of. 4. Of course, Puritan systematic theology is distinguishable from Reformed systematic theology too. Or at least Puritan systematic theology is a subset of Reformed theology in general. As such, one would do well to read Reformed systematic theology. For classic Reformed systematic theology, I still like Calvin best of all and Turretin equally as well. But Bavinck has made a huge comeback in recent years, thanks to Gray Sutanto (from Indonesia) and others. I've yet to read Jonathan Edwards's own favorite systematic theology, Petrus van Mastricht, whose works are finally being translated into English. I need to read more Charles Hodges as well, though I wish there was an edition of Hodges that translated his often lengthy sections of Latin which stymie me! Among with Vos, Warfield is the standout at Old Princeton, though Warfield is like Packer in that he never wrote a single systematic theology (Warfield so prized Hodges he didn't think he could ever best his great teacher) and so one must read various works by Warfield to get a good sense of his theology. Fred Zaspel has helpfully arranged Warfield into something like a systemic theology; Zaspel on Warfield would be an excellent place to start with Warfield, but of course eventually one must read Warfield on his own. For contemporary works, my favorites are: Robert Letham (though he's more of a historical systematic theologian); Robert Reymond (though he tends toward overly Clarkian views for my tastes); I actually think Grudem is underrated by most Reformed Christians (though I wouldn't say Grudem is as intellectually on par with Letham or Reymond); and especially John Frame. I think Frame is the most intellectually astute and robust living systematic theologian. That is, Frame gets the closest to being a philosophical theologian at a time when philosophical theology is well underway. I say this even though I don't entirely agree with Frame and even though he has many Reformed detractors especially in or associated with Westminster California (e.g. Michael Horton, R. Scott Clark). 5. All that said, I think Reformed Christians are sorely lacking in a great philosophical systematic theology. William Lane Craig is currently working on one which should set the standard for evangelical Christians in general, but Craig is a famous Molinist in the vein of Alvin Plantinga, not Reformed. But there's hope, for there are some philosophically and theologically intelligent and knowledgeable Reformed professors who have the ability to write one. Specifically I'm hopeful that someone like James Anderson and/or Greg Welty will pick up the mantle and write a systematic philosophical theology from a Reformed/Calvinist perspective.

I like the ESV and many others. But remember…to whom much is given…much is also required.

I’m really curious where this work will rank 50 years from now. I think it is going to be hard to top. And I think as years go by, the former sys theo classics will still be appreciated but less and less readable and relevant. Your thoughts?

I was just wondering when you were going to post again

A heretical text

Thank you. Very helpful!

It is not ehat the 1611 kjv looked like. That ised a Blackletter typeface. Yours uses a Roman typeface. A roman typeface cane out later in 1613.

You should check out the geneva bible

Was the the Pastor Matt Everhardt reading plan I spy in the front of your Bible? :)

Orange 2:35 Green 4:07 Yellow 9:15

Thank you brother, great video!

Started the video strong, "battle to the death." That made me laugh. Great review. Thanks for sharing. I need to add the Reformation Study Bible to my growing collection.

Thank you for this review! I found it very helpful.

I feel like the study bibles (and I have a lot) are helpful TOOLS, just like good books written to help elucidate Scripture. I read Charles Stanley’s, John MaCarthur’s, and several others. Almost All of their introduction pages say something like “remember this is a tool, read the scripture on its own daily as well as this” or something to that effect. Love these. Think I’m becoming a Bible hoarder but I do read them all. Hope I’m not sinning by reading so many and so many translations other than the paraphrase ones or ones that obviously aren’t coming from the Inspired Manuscripts. Ty for this video and God Bless. I’ve bee unable to find the NKJV of the Reformation Bible. It seems ESV is all that’s left.

Gave mine away to a library. It’s chalk full of Calvinism

They left out the Congregationalists by not including the Savoy Declaration though..

Great video

As a Reformed Baptist, I prefer the Reformation Study Bible.

15:50 I find the articles in the back to be clearly Reformed/Calvinist. It's a very informative study Bible with lots of helps. But if you are not Reformed or Calvinist, be forewarned, the notes are decidedly of that theological framework.

12:45 Presents more than one view. What about Rom 9-10 and Eph 1?

I recommend a magnifying page to help make it easier on the eyes for reading.

Appreciate it as a beautiful Bible and the word of God.

How is the reading/ghosting/ experience of the RSB?

How is the print/ghosting/ reading experience?

I’m adult that has intellectual disability my reading is not high understanding . It’s okay for me to read New International Reader’s Version for personal reading ?. It’s okay to have NLT as my study Bible Reading ??

The only thing I would like to add, is I believe we are bound to have something wrong, let scripture interprets scripture, and sometimes we find ourselves interpreting it ourselves rather than allowing the Holy Spirit to Interpret it