Hi Ingi. So sorry to hear about your awful experience with the Pfizer vaccine. i am 3 1/2 years into a Moderna vaccine injury in the USA. They have to recall these mRNA vaccines now ! I hope you are doing better.

Absolutely there’s a way around all of this. It’s all up to you - each one of us!

Anywhere we can follow Triccy online? His insight is great and we could all benefit from that. Thanks.

I don't get how he beat it ?

74 Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary Creating and using a digital ID is voluntary (1) A participating relying party must not, as a condition of providing a service or access to a service, require an individual to create or use a digital ID. Note: The effect of this subsection is that a participating relying party that provides a service, or access to a service, must provide another means of accessing that service that does not involve the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System. (1A) A participating relying party is taken to contravene subsection (1) if: (a) the participating relying party provides the service, or access to the service, by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and (b) either of the following apply: (i) the other means is not reasonably accessible; (ii) using the other means results in the service being provided on substantially less favourable terms. Exceptions (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to a service of a participating relying party if: (a) the service provides access to another service; and (b) the individual can access the other service by means other than the creation or use of a digital ID through the Australian Government Digital ID System; and (c) the other means is reasonably accessible; and (d) using the other means does not result in the other service being provided on substantially less favourable terms. Example: To open a bank account, ABC Bank requires new customers to verify their identity. ABC Bank allows customers to do this in person at each branch of ABC Bank or alternatively by using the bank’s online application service, which requires the use of a digital ID. Jacob wants to open a bank account with ABC Bank but he does not wish to use his digital ID to do so. Because Jacob can verify his identity by going to his nearest branch instead, ABC Bank does not contravene subsection (1). (3) Subsection (1) does not apply if: (a) the participating relying party is providing a service, or access to a service, to an individual who is acting on behalf of another entity in a professional or business capacity; or (b) the participating relying party holds an exemption under subsection (4). Exemptions (4) Subject to subsection (6), the Digital ID Regulator may, on application by a participating relying party, grant an exemption under this subsection to the participating relying party if the Digital ID Regulator is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so. Note: See Part 5 of Chapter 9 for matters relating to applications. (4A) In deciding whether to grant an exemption under subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator must have regard to whether granting the exemption in relation to the participating relying party’s service would unduly undermine access to services of that kind. (5) Without limiting subsection (4), the Digital ID Regulator may be satisfied that it is appropriate to grant an exemption if: (a) the participating relying party is a small business (within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988); or (b) the participating relying party provides services, or access to services, solely online; or (c) the participating relying party is providing services, or access to services, in exceptional circumstances. (6) However, the Digital ID Regulator must not grant an exemption under subsection (4) to a participating relying party that is: (a) a Commonwealth entity, or a Commonwealth company, within the meaning of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013; or (b) a person or body that is an agency within the meaning of the Freedom of Information Act 1982; or (c) a body specified, or the person holding an office specified, in Part I of Schedule 2 to the Freedom of Information Act 1982. (7) An exemption under subsection (4): (a) must be in writing; and (b) may be revoked by the Digital ID Regulator if the Digital ID Regulator considers it appropriate to do so. (8) The Digital ID Regulator must: (a) give written notice of a decision to grant, or to refuse to grant, the exemption to the participating relying party; and (b) if the decision is to refuse to grant the exemption-give reasons for the decision to the participating relying party.

Politely call their bluff :~)

thank u for every thing u do for us all

The truth will set you free 😂

This is the first time I've seen this. Great video! Keep up the outstanding work.

I found the pre-trial arguments (concluded yesterday) very interesting. Counsel's application to have most of the police evidence declared inadmissible pursuant to s 138 of the Evidence Act - a very tricky argument which may or may not succeed - would likely destroy the Prosecution's case, if successful, thus making a full trial unnecessary. However, if it fails, the police evidence is a bit of a gift to the Defence - it clearly shows the unlawful conduct of the police, and it's difficult to see how a properly informed jury could fail to hold up the Defence's argument that Nick&Co's conduct was lawful self defence.

As I’ve been saying for years now .. can we concentrate on Israel and the power they have over the world , just maybe they might be the head of this snake you talk about .. you know all of our right wing politicians are Israel first Australia second .. catch up ..

How do you lose your marriage for telling the truth. His ex is a disgrace if it’s because she didn’t support him.

I watched the first few min and saw so many inaccurate statements now I've watched the whole thing i can't believe these people have a moral superiority complex so bad they believe this utter nonsense.

The banker's funded the revolution fir multiple reasons mainly they believed it would open new markets to the financial elite in the belief that they would infact turn centrist like the neoliberal governments of today

Fuck the Freemason deep state

We live under such a corrupt regressive and suppressive system. from the grubberments to the courts. They will not allow truth to be heard, let alone recognized. However Jesus tells us what their end is in Matthew 13:49 and 50 49: So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, 50 And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth. Righteousness wins in the end.

Thank you

@13 min 32sec, there was a glitch - or a gap - I wonder what was said then before he came back to the recording?...

Thank you David. May true justice prevail

I sent this video to hundreds of other people.

Not guilty on all counts

If the long stream of consecutively corrupt governments can protect their criminal by locking up truth tellers, perhaps the public can detain members of parliament in back yard incarceration without limit.

Not just the best interests of the Australian people but for Australia and the long term benifit of the ADF.

Deeply moved, grateful and inspired by your willingness to live your integrity, truth, courage for the greater good of all of us and our precious country. Sending blessings and positive outcomes.

Thankyou Triccy, The Peoples Revolution and David McBride! I am heading to a bookstore right now to pick up a reserved copy of The Nature of Honour by David McBride and will see you all at EDIT .. I did say" 8am on Tuesday 12th March at the Supreme Court, 6 Knowles Place, Canberra for Justice and Honour for David McBride and all men and women who do speak true who we may regard as "whistleblowers" " However am now informed it has been adjourned til May 6-7. PPS reading David McBride's book, what an incredible man!

And we point the finger at China, Russia and North Korea for having Political Prisoners. Here is a living legend in Australia about to also become a Political Prisoner. Remember something, this is our money, our taxes puting this man to the cleaners and into Gaol. The government has no right representing us in this matter and behaving this way. The Governments role in Prosecuting this man in a Kangaroo Court, in secrecy shows you exactly who they are, and you and me are not exempt from the governments coming after us. Its only a matter of time.

I bet you $1000 they'd wouldn't give to flying you know what if it was the other way round and we were saying vote yes. Bunch of authoritarian punks!

Ah have you seen Linda Burneys HANDBAG 👜? AUNTY GUCCI ☝️

👏👏

don't call it Russian Democratic party, it was the Soviet's ....

Good work some important info - the PM signed the writ for the referendum on behalf of the Governor General . Where did the PM get the authority to do this ? There is no legal authority given to the PM to fulfill this task. This makes the entire referendum a fraud & invalid.

You are correct it's illegitimate

Do you need anyone to tow it around I'm available I have 50mm towball 7pin flat plug am free during the days to drive round the city

I have an email from ORIC confirming that CATSI Act reforms were abandoned when Labor and Ken Wyatt went with the constitutional Voice. This is all part of the plan to make the native title system work for natural capital accounting and payment for ecosystem services.

Another thing, there is nothing grass roots about the voice. Something like $33million for the yes campaign, $0 for no vote, Almost every major government entity (literally yes vote colour in pages for kids at TMR offices)and major business all campaign for the yes campaign and it's only the little blokes like you guys that sink your own money into the no campaign. It's never a good thing when big business gets in bed with big government, cronyism at best and fascism at worst.

In QLD, I believe that for that truck and trailer combo, you need an MR license.

Haha awesome Triccy

Mate this is spot on. I'll believe the aunties and uncles any day before the corrupt government we have.

A non-government poll has the NO vote @ 90%, I agree...I have been randomly asking ALL people over the last few months how they're voting & 90% confidently articulate why they're voting NO... Not sure if i can make it this Saturday, best reguards, Ross Pitman...

You shoukd put on the stickers "authorised by the AEC via TPR"

I am with you and I will be there on 23/09/23 standing next to my indigenous brothers and sisters.

Well said Triccy.

It had to be said, thankyou Triccy, I am certain that anyone and everyone who have seen the behaviour stands with you on this and resounds with the sentiments calling for truthfulness. We're done, indeed we are moving onwards.

Since when did we have a Referendum Act🤔

We now need bill boards saying Vote No.

Its not like they are trying to to cheat,, not at all!

Lol. Love it - "just a bit bigger than a bumper sticker" 😂 Good one. Keep it up Triccy!

Good man. Thanks for making this public..

Where can i buy bumper stickers, i feel the need to buy some!

Love the trucks! Can't trust the government.