As a Catholic, loved it!! ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

How would you pronounce Claudius? When it was Clavdivs?

loving the mustache man

Not greek or slavic....gypsiec🤣😂

very nice

Phrygian south Thracian south Illyrian Carian Pontic Paphlagonian ...all of them are included in greek dialect. All of them were using greek alphabet

Lupaš golemi gluposti, i toa mnogu golemi gluposti pošto ne ja znaeš pravata vistina i si učel samo laga. Kako prvo vo toa vreme koga bil Filip i Aleksandar Makedonski grci ne sa postojale i koine jazikot ne bil grčki kako sega se kažuva a ete i jas sum učel laži po Istorija... Kako prvo grcite se veštački stvoreni od zapadov ili anglo-saksoncite da rečam vo 1832 godina i pred toa ne sa postojale grci, a koine jazikot bil Makedonski. A koga se sozdava veštačkata grcija , koine jazikot zapadnite političari i lažovi go davaat na grcive so izmeneta forma, taka da sve što kažuvaš tuka e laga. Ako se doznae deka seta istorija na Evropa poteknuva od Makedonia onda ke se znae deka Makedonia i MAKEDONSKIOT NAROD SE prvi na zemjava , i zapadov pravel golem falsiikat za svoja korist i toa so golemi lagi.

HEY BROTHER IM HELLENAS (GREEK) I FOUND YOUR VIDEO VERY RESPECTFUL THERE IS NO NORTH MACEDONIA ITS CALLED MAKEDONIA AND ITS ONLY ONE MAKEDONIA AND ITS ALWAYS HAS BEEN HELLAS AND ALWAYS WILL BE THIS IS A WARNING TO THE SKOPIANS DONT TRY US IN ONE DAY WE CAN TAKE IT ALL BACK

the hand movements sell it

In defence of "aesthetics": Let me preface by saying I'm not going defend everyone's aesthetic senses, as they obviously can contradict each other, but I will say that, over the course of your education, you get exposed to different examples of what works and what doesn't. For example, you might consider n > l to be a really weird sound change, since (afaik) it's very rare in Indo-European languages, but for me, with much more exposure to Sinitic languages, it's so overdone that I'm tempted to tell languages to get new material. (Currently, Cantonese is undergoing the change, and Hokkien has neutralized the two, with /l/ being the primary allophone, and a few more.) I think that gets baked into your "aesthetic sense", and when you're faced with a solution to a new problem, this problem-solution pair gives off vibes that match some proportion of the examples in your head. If that proportion is high, then you'll think of it as obvious, and if it's lower, you might go "I *guess* I can see that", and if it doesn't match anything you've seen, then you'll consider it ridiculous. I think what string theorists (and other people) are trying to get across when saying that some theory is "aesthetically pleasing", what they're saying is that the solution gives off the same "vibes" as other solutions to other problems they've learned about. Like maybe, this looks like how some other physics problem was solved before (considering extra dimensions led us to general relativity, after all), or how positing extra entities allow us to make a simpler theory (like how quarks were first posited to simplify the particle zoo, or how the Higgs boson was proposed so we could describe the electromagnetic and weak forces as facets of an electroweak force), or how string theory has already given us a deeper understanding of physics,* so it's probably worth hammering away at it more. I think it's hard to recognize what the data that gives us this intuition are, and so it just ends up coming out as "vibes" or an "aesthetic sense", and our explicit explanations of why we think a certain solution is more likely boils down to "elegance", when what's going on in the neural networks in our heads is an implicit comparison between this problem and ones we've faced before. * This often gets glossed over in discussions of string theory, but the holographic principle (information in a volume is encoded on the boundary surface of that volume) has been used to great success in understanding electrical conduction in crystals with weird properties. It also checks out, as in it gives us the right answers when we use it to calculate quantities we already know about when quantum mechanics and gravity interact, somthing that cannot be said for its competitor, loop quantum gravity (they have to set a free constant to exactly cancel out all the other factors they end up with when calculating black hole entropies, for instance). While I'm not a staunch defender of string theory, it's at least understandable why string theorists continue to think it's viable, namely, because it's the only theory that we have so far that might work.

Χαίρετε! Thank you for this video. I am not new to greek and can fluently read NT greek, but my knowledge is so far limited to Koine. I have been starting to push into more classical greek. I have in the last few weeks ordered most of the books you've mentioned because of articles and things I found on line, and you have given me a few more that I'm going to pick up. For a few weeks I have been attacking Athenaze in the UK first, then IT next approach, as it seemed the most natural way for me to take full advantage of the IT version. I had a question. I use the Koine Era Pronunciation (such as Benjamin Kantor uses), and have been reading through Athenaze (UK, and IT) in that, and noticed the vowel length symbols. I'd only ever seen those in LSJ. I'm not really sure yet what to do with those. Do you have a recommendation for a quick primer on how to utilize them? Also, are they a feature of the older pronunciation that would require me to learn a classical pronunciation to benefit from? If so, what would you recommend as the best source for an accurate historical Attic Greek pronunciation would be?

I like the background voices of children playing hide and seek

Gratias multas Luce ! Mihi adiuvit pellicula tua ut omnes tuae. Latinae nostri temporis liguae multum attulisti ! Gratias plurimas !

Quando aggiunge il linguaggio non verbale capiscono subito

Because they are fake political fabricated country designed by Germany. Hellens does not mean Greeks. Ghey occupied the land of Ancient Macedonia in 1913, did the ethnic cleansing of Macedonians in 1924 and again in 1946-1949 and they started claiming that they were the Macedonians. The world needs to hear about the Macedonian genocide done by the Greeks!

I'm about halfway through Pars I and Colloquia Personarum. Currently on Cap XIX: Maritus et Uxor. I'll provide an edit/update once I've completed Pars I. I can not agree with Luke strongly enough: as someone who is self-teaching Latin, this book series is my best friend for studying Latin, as well as learning how languages as a whole tend to work. It breaks down everything you need to know about the grammar in a slow and easy-to-follow format. The marginal notes are extremely helpful and in my opinion the single best feature Ørberg's style has to offer. It's also got a rather surprisingly high entertainment value for a literal textbook. There are parts that are genuinely funny while teaching grammar. There's nothing quite like dropping puns to teach you how minute differences in grammar and spelling can have such a profound effect on the meaning of a sentence. And some closing thoughts on LLPSI thus far (again, only at Cap XIX thus far) : Mēdus did nothing wrong, Marcus did EVERYTHING wrong, Iulia and Syra deserve better and must be protected at all costs.

Latin is old English folks. It's all bullshit. Shakespeare spoke it. King Alfred spoke it. It's essentially, a cleaner version of Hebrew. Hebrew... what's that got to do with it? Well, you see, it's Black Country....The original name for England complete. Land of coal. Home of the Eng ( Henge). It's all been covered up by nefarious bad actors of the Khazarian bloodline. Research, isn't repeating, constantly, the 'accepted' narrative. It's getting your hands, and face, dirty, and getting stuck into the stuff you're not allowed to go near. Go woke, lose your heritage.

This makes sense to me. When you learn english, you learn it and understand it, but occasionally have to ask what words mean in english. Other language acquisition is similar, intuit it until you inderstand the important concepts and the images asspciated with them, then use the language itself to expand the language. Like how you originially got the grammar from immersion in english, but the reason for that grammar was explained later on when you took english classes.

I'm Brazilian and I understand Latin with a huge difficulty, but I believe having an advance knowledge of Italian and French could have helped. Once, I met a couple of Romanian tourists, and they said that the Romanian language was very difficult. I questioned that because it''s still a Latin language. So the guy tested me, and I guessed most of the greetings in the Romanian language 😂

So basically North Macedonia has an identity crisis and wants to be greek intsted of slavic. Maybe the are woke? Like a transgender country

Alexander was half illyrian half greek. not slav

can americans understand native american languages?

Read Beowolf lately?? Of course Italians don't understand Latin of Antiquity. Icelanders might understand their language as it existed hundreds of years ago, but English language speakers couldn't without special training.

Luke: I don’t care if you’re using classical or ecclesiastical Latin, just get those vowel lengths right! Lol

I think “domum” is what we called “an accusative of movement”. But it’s a long time ago.

yore overreacting they spoke well

@polyMATHY_Luke when will u make a video about old greek letters such as digamma koppa san or sampi?

That was fun. They must have thought you resurrected from an antique era.

What about the Slavs expelled from the Greek region of Macedonia? All of Macedonia was Slavic (mixed with local tribes, but culturally Slavic) until the Greek civil war. Even today, when I go there I speak Slavic Macedonian to everyone and they understand me, almost all of them.

You should check out the Baltic languages: I suppose it would be very interesting for you.

It’s interesting how you pronounce why like hwy

There is only one difference between dialects and languages. Language is a dialect which has it's own army.

Stop stealing from us Frenchies. You already stolen la Monnalisa

That is phanomemenal!!! As so as the stone of Rosetta for the old Egypt Language. And to the finish give the Overture of Mozarts "Zauberflöte" in a historical recording.

This gives me joy 🤷🏽‍♀️🌹❤️❤️❤️❤️ Yeah, I studied Latin in high school

I have a Vulgate and Douay-Rheims bible together in one book. It's awesome to use to learn Latin.

дуже дякую , було цікаво .

To learn a language go and talk with real people, no App. It wont teach you the essence of the language or the culture of it. A baby can learn all these languages just being exposed to many people speaking in their own languages.

Perhaps he should try to speak Latin without the American accent 😂

Really great video, I was really interested in this and wanted to learn more. On the topic of regional pronounciations, I'm from Poland and had some experience with spoken Latin in high school and also in med school (though nowadays they also allow English if you don't want to learn in Latin), and like, Polish pronunciation is basically almost a mix of classical and ecclesiastical ways. It's shocking how close it is. We have almost every phoneme needed, and most of them match the letters. The main differences between classical Latin and Polish are that: -"c" is always /ʦ/, instead of /k/ in classical and /t͡ʃ/ before i and e in modern, and just like in modern when before other vowels -we don't have a "v" in native words, but ppl pronounce it as /v/, same as "w" which we do have, so it's the same as in modern Latin instead of classical /w/ And some subtler nitpickier ones: -we also don't have a "q" anymore in native words but people usually pronounce "qu" as /kf/ instead of /kʷ/, close though -I guess we would pronounce "z" as /z/ and not /dz/ but that's not really a Latin letter anyway -we have mostly /ɔ/ as "o", and /o/ only as a free variant when before /w/ -we have both /e/ and /ɛ/ as allophones, just like Latin, but for many Latin words Polish speakers will use the wrong one intuitively (e.g. in "credo") -we don't have /ʊ/, only /u/ -we have /i/ as "i" after palatal consonants, and /ɨ/ otherwise (usually written as "y" then)/ We don't have a /y/ phoneme. But unlike ecclesiastical: -g is always a hard /g/, t is always a hard /t/ -h is never silent -"ae" and "oe" are pronounced as diphtongs instinctively before people learn it's just e So to make a Pole read classical Latin mostly correctly, you just need to swap all the letters "v" for "ł" and "c" for "k". Maybe swap "qu" for "kł" (it's still gonna be /kw/ instead of /kʷ/, but that's a really pedantic difference at this point). I made a vowel chart for myself while searching for this info btw, got super sucked in lmao. Turns out almost all the vowels are real close, except our /ɛ/ is more central (but our /e/ has positional variants where it matches the Latin /ɛ/).

Lingua Latina est lingua antiqua

Giant petrified tree trunk from the great flood! God had His angels chop down all the trees and leave the trunks. There were giants in those days. Nephilim. BookOfEnoch.

Salvē Lūcī! 4:10 why isn't in the graphic the phone [u] as a second element of a diphthong (except for ⟨ου⟩)? Grātiās tibī agō!