You can set iso limits and their shutter max/min shutter in auto iso settings, but sadly you can’t set limits to aperture

Thanks and yes it is 🤩

Thank you , glad you enjoyed it

Thanjs

No, it’s for the students renting there only or maybe for their guests

Thanks yes it was cold, I definitely wasn’t dressed the part but I think it was the excitement and all the photos I could take and take in the views that made it’s feel like a minute now, so not boring at all, the feeling I had when suddenly I realised I was there alone was truly unreal though

They vary from shoot to shoot depending on weather , subject , lens

@@LondonViewpoints what about this video?

Kind of, but this was a one off

You’re welcome

Ideally you first get down to lowest iso and then only start increasing ND , but if you start before f22 start opening up, you’ll be basically fluctuating the low ISO’s , not terrible but , I prefer getting iso to lowest 100 first

It’s indeed a once in a lifetime experience, one of best hikes , totally recommend it

What do you mean ? They’re building a replica ?

@@LondonViewpoints Well.. Actually I love London and I love all of the heritages. ^^; So I found the heritages and make the Real Heritages as like the Big ben. Not the Replica. Please don't take the misunderstand.

Yes it was only for a couple of nights

It is indeed 👍🏻

Thanks, 14-30mm, 20mm, 50mm

Thanks for the tip, and glad this worked for you, well if you’re saving raw images the wb doesn’t matter as you’ll transition it with key frames in LRTimelapse, but if you’re doing a video only interval timelapse then auto WB does a decent job as you say, while also on some of the modern Nikon’s probably including your Z6III (not tested, waiting for my order, but expecting it to behave same as Zf/Z8/Z9) there should be no aperture flicker either so super smooth 👍🏻

You’re welcome

I’m confused, please elaborate

Thanks, yeah sure, as long as there’s enough light, 5.6 should be enough

Oh really ? Thats neat, I got to try it, wondering if that’s the same on Zf, Z6III and Z8 ?

@@LondonViewpoints I have only tested on z9 and z8. 😊

Dare I ask - what’s a caseoh ?

@@LondonViewpoints He Is Fat

Calicut beach sunset

I’m not aware with the options in the settings of the d7500, maybe it doesn’t do it

@@LondonViewpointsThanks. Could you tell me where you found out about this please? Perhaps I could research it but I cannot find how to set the minimum shutter speed.

Maybe you got lucky with a good one, my one had rather soft sides and corners while the one stop difference didn’t maybe much difference for me

Well, all I can say is congrats and well done, I’m sure living there with that view is and will be awesome, as well as an investment in a property with a view like that surely will only go up in value 👍🏻

Not the one time I was there, but that doesn’t mean it’s a rule

The employees take the first cable car around 9. Don’t think they hike up there.

Thx👍🏻

Yes, this is an old video before the new adapter existed

These are not the kind of reflections a circular polariser will fix😉

Yes that’s true but I think for best photo results Shard is better

I don’t do composites, all three are just as I shot them timelapses, the middle one was the further away one, last one is just from Greenwich Park and not that telephoto as the middle one (500mm)

@@LondonViewpoints As mentioned, the shot at 0:17 is not possible (without composition) from Greenwich Park or even Shooters Hill, which are around 7 km or 14 km from The Shard. This is because the apparent sun disc size in that shot is larger than the height of The Shard. The sun subtended angle is always around 0.5°, regardless of lens used. For the sun to appear the size as The Shard the camera needs to be around 30 km away. For the sun to appear even larger (as in this shot) the camera needs to be even further away.

@@matthewjones255 oh so you mean the middle shot, that one was shot from Brands Hatch with a 500mm lens and probably cropped middle from the 6k resolution, but it definitely ain’t a composition 😀

⁠@@LondonViewpointsThat explains it, thank you! To be authentic, I knew it must be from much further away, and even Shooters Hill didn’t match. The cropping does not affect the relative ratio of two objects in the shot (sun disc and The Shard), so it has to be about 30km away (estimate).

You and 100m other tourists annually ?

Thanks

Yeah imagining is all we can do with that 😂

Sadly I don’t think so

Thx 👍🏻

Haha I’m sure he’ll do something funny up there

Well we all know it did happen just recently, I was just outside by the M25 and saw it, but seen photos taken on Millenium Bridge with it clearly seen above St Paul’s, so yeah it can happen

@@LondonViewpoints Exactly, I live in The Netherlands and over here we can see it about 8 times per year in darker places. The last one which I watched and photographed for about 3-4 hours was exceptional but I have seen much better ones especially from 2000-2005. I would go outside with KP=7. With KP8 you will surely see them outside London. Kp9 is not needed but tends to be more impressive of course.

Evp ?

The standard ones as soon as you know you’re going, they apparently get snapped up to 3 months prior, but the sunrise 6-9am one is easier to get , there was free spots even 2 days before I went but also that’s because I think no one bothers booking it before 9am and people just go anyway

Thanks 👍🏻

Thanks

There are, just… it seems I’ve not done a single video about the west side 🤦🏼‍♂️

Primrose Hill.

Thanks, glad to hear😁

Thanks a lot Kash, it was a great couple of days, and even though I wasn’t even planning to shoot anything, this was a cool side quest 😄

Thanks👍🏻

@@LondonViewpoints 😎😁🫶 hope Yr good