@@eatinganime I don’t have it, but it’s part of the full spreadsheet

@@zackcrisis100 haven’t tested it yet so can’t say for sure Drawing lub is not good going 2nd where regular bystials would have been hand traps, so it might be that you either don’t play lub/regained or just 1 for mag/saronir Making dis pater to go into seal and seal bringing back dis pater could be decent depending on how reliable the setup is

@@Stringbeater YGO omega

activate runick spell, hit mallis monster we lose, and ussually isnt enought to break any ryzeal board

@@cacoma7209 seems like field spell is in danger this current meta so it’s risky But we also have good spells against single boss monsters like detonator. That makes it higher variance than you’d like runick to be based on what you draw Post ALIN might change a bit based on looping field spells but not sure

@@ProxyLimit it works but it’s ultimately still a card you don’t want to draw and therefore an unnecessary brick (or a ‘win more’ card)

@@LewisBlue345 in terms of card economy drawing an engraver is similar to drawing a hand trap if you go second as they simply cannot let it resolve Going first it’s better economy because it will establish one or more interruptions plus a basic resource or even resource loop

Hey Thanks for your response. You have a point drawing engraver can be similar to drawing a more low impact hand trap like a single negation. But engraver does not compare to drawing a more high impact non-engine card like dark ruler or nib or even the mulcharmy. These cards are a little bit more situational and can sometimes be made ineffective by cards such as anti-spell, an early negate or ash. But when you have a lower non-engine count already and a decent going first certain high impact non-engine are more effective than fiendsmith overall in my opinion

Right! Vision resonator, Crimson Gaia and aerial eater not needed, just play magistus Chorizo

Then don’t buy it. It’s obviously not for you.

​@isaacsamuel6035 honestly, i hope nobody buys it. Its not for anyone.

chorozo is a super fragile line that telegraphs that you are hoping to resolve your effects. the sequence stuff is less telegraphed but also fragile

@ I disagree if you fail the chrozo line you are able to just activate an extender in hand and still go full combo

@@ddbros789 you never go for chorozo if you have the extender, cause you're giving up on silvia and so many bodies just to make it

@ nope

@ that applies to any line ever

Especially now that you have chorozo

The collab we needed

Non ci credo ahahah

@@alucard4344 basically I go for the draw every time I already have tales to send, cause it's free and because of Bao, yes

Yeah I found this line earlier, added it to my preorders

Yes but it likely came back face up in the replay so it’s easier to see everything on field

or the opposite and we compress the engine with the help of fieldspell

you are right! though what i meant to say was that the " this card cannot use this effect next turn" does not apply if on the next turn you use a different copy of card

its still very good as a side deck card for going first with the buster lock

yes!

coming soon

@ legend

what line are you thinking about?

you are right - in a real game what you search depends on your hand. in a simplified gamestate like the combo in a vacuum, you probably assume they dont have ash if they dont ash fieldspell, so elzette likely resolves

i think that card is super overrated and wotn come up often beyond twitter combos but let's see

@@BimYGO Chorozo acts as a nice bridge from Diabel/Azamina to go into White Forest because Diabel and Mu Rcielago make Chorozo and Mu adds Elzette Azamina to then synch into Rcielia to fetch a WF card.

@@adamata64 its fragile because there isnt a reason to do that aside from a weak hand without a better way to start the wf engine. an imperm/veiler on an rciela made off chorozo is probably game on its own in many cases. i think chorozo would be better post ALIN because mystic will place the materials for chorozo to send, but by then we may not even want to play chorozo

i prefer to have oak specifically in the backrow alongside masquerena so if both temple and flam resolve then you get the ip as well as oak adding back or special summoning to loop some resource i also prefer flamberge being on field when their turn starts since temple is an extreme chokepoint and has to resolve in order to bring out masq - if flam was also in backrow youd have to temple the flam, flam the masq, and then masq to ip and float the flam. i dont think its worth the risk unless you are using the floated flam bodies in your own turn for something specific, like making a fucho/assembled for a thrusted feather storm post side

true!