What you are saying is that Harris can run for President with Obama as her VP. If elected, Harris can step down and Obama can still serve as President for a third term.

Yes...unfairly convicted....all politicians are crooked anyway

That's right

YEAH F@@K THAT BULLSHIT ,2 TIMES IS ENOUGH . YOUR JUST MAKING SHIT UP.

person is code word for a civil (a-i, too far left, to left, or left demo c rat, liberal, no or not military, persons); all so, person can be use to ID a civil (left female) since Person is for civil (left) male; citizen and Citizen are to ID military; “civil or military” is establish in Amendment XIV Section 3 (ratified 9 July 1868);

Yes they've been all mostly thrown out and they're it was a political Biden put him up to it

Evidently the recent rulings from the SCOTUS makes most if not All of that amendment irrelevant. What does the constitution say about the supreme Court and how to get rid of their ass ? Just asking tucky style 🤪 heeheehee ✌️

Trump forever? Gag me with a spoon.

So Kamala nominates Barrack as V.P. then steps aside once they "win" the election. He gets to have a fourth term? He's all but done with his third. I don't think this country can stand four more years of that guy.

He wasn’t even fairly convicted. ❤trump🛐

Im 18 man, im not built for this

Trump was convicted in a "show trial" by a kangaroo court comprised SOLELY of his bitterly partisan political opponents. This is 100% "Banana Republic" bullshit.

A felon shouldn't be able to be president , because if your not able to get a federal job you shouldn't be able to run the oval office it' a federal job.

Please remove this before Barry or Big Mike can see it.

He could pardon himself. The only cases that pardon is not possible are cases of impeachment. Trump was impeached, 2x, but not convicted. Lots of interesting facets here. The governor of NY could also pardon Trump, but that will never happen.

And yet, Kamala is VP but is not eligible to be POTUS per the Constitution. She is an anchor baby.

It's not a loophole. It's you twisting the constitution to make it say what you want. Not what it actually says....It's a common practice with lawyers....The constitution clearly says that a VP can succeed a President, if that president leaves office BEFORE 1/2 way thru his term and run for president, only for 1 time. It's considered 2 TERMS if elected. If AFTER 1/2 way thru a president term, 2 times if elected twice. It's not considered 3 full terms. Two FULL terms is what a president is limited too. A 1 full term former president, as a VP that succeed a president but after 1/2 thur his term, can run for president as many times as he wants. But if elected to a second term, that's it he's reached his limit. The 22nd amendment was a reaction to FDR winning 4 straight elections. Pres. Johnson is an example. He finished Kennedy's term, ran for election and won, could've ran for a second full term if he wanted to, because Kennedy was more than 1/2 thru his term. Pres. Ford would've been limited to 1 FULL term because Pres. Nixon resigned before 1/2 thru. Ford lost his election... The only scenario you mention that raises a question was, a two-time former president elected VP after his presidency, succeeding a terminated president. He can't according to the 22 amendment. But that's not a constitutional crisis. The speaker of the house would become president. It's settled, no if's about it... You're reasoning raises a question in it's-self. Why would a former 2 term president take a demotion as VP? Knowing he can't become president again because of the 22nd amendment.... I'm questioning whether you're really a lawyer. But with today's crazy logic, your reasoning makes a case, because that's the problem today with our legal system. Crazy ass reasoning. Even our loony judges are practicing it. Unsettling issues that's clearly been settled. Plus trying to make the constitution say something it doesn't address or say. It's not a political problem, it's a assault on the foundations of law and order. The very basics of the founding of or country....Our founding fathers wrote the constitution, to give us a foundation of government and law....It's abstract thinking that causes people not to use sound critical thinking. Or in other words, crazy ass scenarios over rulings set in law. Examples, judges that ruled that presidents are immune to legal prosecution while in office, thus making them above the law. That's not in the constitution. Or that special prosecutors aren't constitutional, when the courts have already ruled they are. These judges are making up the constitution as they want to, and unsettling issues that have been settled. It's dangerous, destructive to our commonalities under the law. Not to mention our very democracy. Creating a two tier system. One for the common man another for the privilege....Do your homework and try to prove me wrong. You can't. Because I've stated facts not fiction. And you know ir.

It's crazy to think that 535 congressman and 9 justices have the education to manage the complexities of our modern civilization.

I truly do learn new things every day, no matter how old i get😊 THANK YOU for that 😊education

Loopholes are to lawyers what diesel is to trucks!

How do you know your neighbor next door is listing inside my house

The 22nd Amendment Doesn't Say What You Think It Says Correct on all points. Loopholes as you say or vagueness allows more than it actually says. It is not as restrictive by the text as folks think it is. However, the ineligibility of already serving two terms as president or vice president or House speaker would prevent them from being president or vice president or speaker of the House due to the presidential line of succession by position. They must be eligible to be president to serve in the position and those two positions of line of succession. All three positions are the position or positions of succession under the office of the president. Look at the first line of text. "No person shall be elected to the office of president more than twice," and that includes being elected in the line of succession to that position because it would mean being elected more than twice to that office. So former two term presidents are not eligible to be vice presidents or speakers of the House. The same goes for vice presidents and House speakers in the line of succession to the position of president. By the line of succession to the position of the president, presidents, vice presidents, and House speakers are only eligible for two terms in any of those positions of succession that are under the office of the president. Notice it does not say elected "president" but elected to "the office of president." Now office can mean a place or position by definition.

I’ve only got over 20 years experience as a private investigator and process server. I’m not a KZbin expert on everything. But I can assure you that private process servers and deputies have absolutely used a phone call or 2 as a means to effect service of civil process.

You got something wrong. You said "if a VP takes over more than two years into a term." It should have been "if a VP takes over less than two years into a term and serves more than two years."

By “in the future” might you be implying “by April 2025?”

My head is spinning!

Section 1 of The Constitution of the United States. No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

So what you are saying is that Kamala Harris could pick Obama as her vice president.

I've been saying this for years! You just need to find shills to be ahead of you in line who then resign.

Trumpster Republicans, a party that has no respect for the Constitution, laying groundwork for a Trump presidency for life.

YOu got the history right, but the analysis you have. Let me guess, the law firm is a die-hard conservative who wants Trump to win in both 2024 AND 2028. But if a person is elected twice, whether conservatively or in two different terms as president. US code 5, I think has laws on this as well where the Speaker of the House must elibible to beomce President. For isntance, a speaker of the House can be a natuarized USC but canot be president since they are not native born.

At 1:10 you said it backwards. If they became president AFTER two years into the term 'He' COULD run TWICE.

If a ticket contained a former two term President running as vice president, i believe, I hope, the average voter would disapprove of such technical shenanigans to vote against it.

The text of the Constitution says what the Supreme Court says it says.

I am sure this was put out there to entice President Biden to resign so Kamala could take over and not worry about going for 2nd term if she would to win in November. It opens other possibilities for in the future. Just an observation.

Lol...That is so interesting.

That is Obama's BIG PLAN

I agree, the likelihood of that happening is pretty slim and the voters in that election are not likely to expect that to happen. The SCOTUS may even decide that that's not an acceptable reading of the constitution for other reasons. It's sort of like the whole situation of FDR being elected to President 4 times before dying a few months into his 4th term. Prior to that, Presidents had voluntarily shown some restraint in terms of seeking more offices and with medical technology advancing, it was increasingly likely to come up more frequently.

So this is how it starts.

You cannot be Vice President unless you are qualified to be President. If you've already been elected twice then you're out of the running.

Try it , might happen if you are the same party as the SCOTUS majority. But otherwise it ain't gona happen .

why is it written Spanish?

Carter, Bush, Trump, and Biden are eligible for another term.

Gotta love these titles. Didn’t see nothing new here. My “Do Not Recommend This Channel” list getting longer! Does KZbin have a limit? Don’t bother to answer(unless for someone else’s sake) My notifications are turned off.

Congress must end the electoral college

When someone does try to take advantage of that loophole, it would be challenged in the US Supreme Court. Since the US Supreme Court is always being stacked with partisan justices, it will probably be determined by which side has the majority and and the individual in question that is running. The US Supreme Court has ruled contrary to Amendments under the Bill of Rights before, namely the 4th Amendment so they would have no problem ruling on the 22nd Amendment according to which party it favors.

Donald's loophole???

So . . . Obama comes in as Kamala's VP, Kamala drops out and Obama slides into the presidency through this loophole? Anyone who would do this has contempt for the Constitution and the American people -- but then, of course, Obama, Soros, and the deep state have exactly that.

I said this just yesterday: Kamala could choose Barak Obama as VP. She could then step down on day 1 and make Obama president for 4 more years..perfectly legal

I don't agree! A former, two-termed president is barred from serving in any office , that can succeed to the presidency!