What is the Chevron Doctrine?

The Chevron Doctrine has some interesting implications on the rest of American law. In this video, Attorney Ready explains what it is and how current Supreme Court rulings may change it.

[@MAKOSPEED9]

And that's how the non-elected officials rule/govern the country.

[@rckli]

Except they don’t 😂 and it isn’t how 😅 Imagine one state arguing one plus one was 2 and another state saying it’s actually 3. The chevron would be the equivalent of saying “this official says it is 2” The problem is when these officials say things the public has been lied to - such as “covid isn’t that bad - don’t wear a mask” by some officials and “covid is a pandemic - mask will stop you from getting the disease” (neither is true - as masks prevent the SPREAD of disease, not whether or not you’ll get sick) When reality itself is being argued and one side is literally just saying “you are crazy - we know we are right: there is no disease” as the dead pile up, the movie “don’t look up” and “1984” start to make a lot more sense to me >_>

[@dianekeil2967]

This has been affecting all of us for years - I began to see these kind of agencies getting over the top power starting in the 70's - no one understood what I was telling them and called me crazy - I am so glad this is all coming to the light now - it's hell when you know what they are doing to us and the majority just trusts the government !! Our lives have been ran by non-elected agencies for long enough - now we will start seeing freedom begin to creep in ! Thank you Jesus !!

[@jamesbrent2504]

The Founders never envisioned the administrative state. Congress allows agencies to operate outside the Constitution. It's definitely not good for the country.

[@joan3891]

It’s high time we challenge the administrative state!

[@libertypastor1307]

Thanks for the very thorough, but concise explanation! I hope the SCOTUS overturns the Chevron doctrine. Agencies are not delegated power to interpret laws, that's the job of the courts. It is the duty of legislators to write clear laws with no ambiguity. Plus, all laws should be rooted in protecting the life, property, and liberties of the people; not regulating them! This has led to the loss of many rights.

[@whirledpeaz5758]

They did overturn it this last week.

[@libertypastor1307]

@@whirledpeaz5758 Great! Thanks for letting me know. I will look it up.

[@946towguy2]

@@whirledpeaz5758 They limited the doctrine back to where it belongs. Chevron doctrine was never intended to give an administrative agency the power to create new crimes, but rather to reduce the burden in the courts and the legislature when a law can be reasonably interpreted to apply to a set of facts. For example: if a law says, "Mussels, oysters and other similar single shell aquatic molluscs' it is reasonable to defer to an agency which determines that the law applies to limpets but not bivalves.

[@vincenttiene]

Every time there is a change in the administration, there is a change in federal agents. In some way, it reflects the current administration's. With the new Chevron ruling, decisions are made by judges and ultimately in the hands of SCOTUS. With a lifetime appointment, we are stuck with a conservative/liberal decision for generations. That's all it is.

[@Paul-vk6ed]

Then what’s the point of a judge or the point of congress ?

[@bigbootytvplusnews1054]

Puppets

[@jamescrouch1693]

The agencies who interpret are making law and then are the judges and enforcement of the law, without opposition. That is why I like the change.

[@donpeterson9900]

It’s great that this was overruled because experts seem to be wrong on almost every major issue they have been allowed to oversee.

[@garettsikes4449]

Quick and helpful! Thanks 👍🏼

[@gillesandfio8440]

Applause. Happy Independence Day!

[@vaughnslavin9784]

Thank you!

[@3rdpig]

What is it? It's dead, Jim.

[@tremblingone4269]

Chevron WAS like getting run over by the big rear tires of a tractor - which have angled or Chevron tread.

[@rckli]

Wowowowowow thank you so much for this clear and concise video explaining the very topic your title references I thought videos like these were lost to the sea of shitty videos but no, people like you still exist Bravo 👏🏽

[@whirledpeaz5758]

What WAS........

[@soulmedicine]

Does this effect the UCC codes? D.o.t ?

[@jasonparker6138]

Why would we allow experts to make decisions that affect us? That should be done by people who are trying to get clicks on social media.

[@lsmitty8839]

But our courts dont make laws, only law should be constitutition yes ?? This should bring us to constitutional law

[@renesteitz8613]

🙏🇺🇲🙏🇺🇲🙏

[@jthamilton9083]

Why hasn’t anyone ever heard of it😂😂😂😂

[@adamkoepke1366]

Great, so now we have crucial decisions being made by people who have no specific expertise in the fields they're ruling on. Not sure I want a politician making decisions about how to keep our air and water safe. Once again, another absolutely terrible decision from this out of control court.

[@usnavy-retired9800]

The problem is the either Repub or Dems will place "Their own experts" in the positions of power within these organizations, who will, in turn, pass judgement from an "dubious expert opinion" and make their own laws. These laws cannot be changed except by Congressional action and, depending on the party in power, they may not get changed at all. At least this way (Chevron defeated) we can hold the Congress people accountable to the people, for the laws they pass...as it should be.

[@jaytackett6545]

ATTORNEYS CAN NOT DEFEND YOU OR THE GOVERNMENT OR ANY ORGANIZATIONS OR COMPANIES UNDER TITLE 28 USC 3002 15 ITS A FOREIGN ORGANIZATION OPERATION ON THE UNITED STATES SOIL.

[@Bacteria43va]

federal reserve?

[@ronjones1414]

You need to change the title

[@EdwardM919]

Expect to have a lot more oil spills and crap in food that isnt suppose to be in it.

[@saurelius5217]

Bullshit. In terms of health, the FDA has been using Chevron for years to make it harder for people to health themselves. This also makes it hard for Trump to add that asinine 10% global tariff he wants, yet of course not many people are talking about that.

[@XrayMike17plus1]

What is the Chevron Doctrine? Dead.

[@mchrysogelos7623]

GREAT!!!! O Happy Day.

[@jonathanleonard1152]

Judges courts and legislators do not have scientists and engineers on their payroll. EPA does.

[@usnavy-retired9800]

And that is the exact problem...Seems only liberal experts are hired by these organizations, since most of these departments were created by the liberal hivemind and many of their decisions defy explanation; except that they support a political agenda, rather then a scientific one.

[@saurelius5217]

Do you like the idea of Trump's asinine tax plans? Chevron being struck down makes it harder for him too. Btw the FDA has scientists too, yet every supplement that has come out that works too well they've tried to ban it, not anymore.

[@johnh6515]

It’s too bad they have shown too often they also have agenda’s, not for country but for party. Look at this diverse administration for starters. DEI hires are not The best in all cases. All things equal, is one thing…..selecting the pool of applicants by diversity,first and foremost is always going to be a failed strategy. Merit must rule .