Doesn’t water also “absorb” free electrons in the atp process?
@shawnnoyes4620Күн бұрын
Coal plants DO NOT employ sequestration for CO2.
@mopuribalu2781Күн бұрын
Lightspeed at " lightspeedtimes" .
@petrkinkal1509Күн бұрын
You weight about 100 kg and have about the same density as water so your volume is about 0.1 m^3. 1 planck length is 1.6*10^-35 m so 1 planck cube is about 4*10^-105m^3. You body volume is about 2.4*10^104 planck cubes. But realistically I would say that even something as small as 1 000 000 is something you brain can only comprehend as a number.
@cyp41kКүн бұрын
My thoughts before going to sleep after a probability theory course
@silkatouchКүн бұрын
God, if this is 52!, I don't want to know 53!...
@myronplatte83542 күн бұрын
You don’t need space age materials to do that stuff.you just need to use the cool of the earth and the power of the sun. Use a black-painted chimney to suck air out of the building, and put pipes underground to pull the replacement air through, cooling it.
@Vfm3282 күн бұрын
In my opinion house made from cow dung mixture tends to more cooler because it absorbs most of radiation..
@hito-sama2 күн бұрын
Oh my god, my head
@sdutta82 күн бұрын
The presenter didn’t mention why the ball “accelerates” as it approaches Earth. That is why gravity feels like a force (and fooled the great Sir Isaac). Brian Greene explained that it is because the curvature caused by Earth increases gradient as the contour approaches Earth.
@AndrewLambert-wi8et2 күн бұрын
SOLAR CELLS ONLY LAST ABOUT 20 YEARS. SO I HOPE THAT IS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN LOOKING INTO THE ECONOMY.
@WsprWndrr2 күн бұрын
How it is not a violation of the second law of thermodynamics?
@user-p4w5jnef5w6fu2 күн бұрын
Yes it does... its the amount of ways to shuffle a deck So does 108!, its the amount of ways to shuffle an uno deck
@adnaanu3 күн бұрын
The narrator sounds a bit like Jordan Peterson.
@mohamed_is_him3 күн бұрын
U didn't mention quantum tunneling but still a great video
@user-tj1oj2cm6z3 күн бұрын
Писят два, и этот горад наш. Ееейй
@johnbolton2923 күн бұрын
Very informative and interesting. In case you've forgotten, God loves you. Jesus loves you. On your journey beware of traps and snares. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
@trevorbarrows84463 күн бұрын
i guess 3rd is water haha
@EnriquePaneque3 күн бұрын
What a wonderful video!!
@bread_man0104 күн бұрын
This is so cool 👏👏👏
@mantchova4 күн бұрын
Can't we just convert this heat expelled from the house into electricity?
@wind-leader_jp4 күн бұрын
This video is amazing as it provides a compact analysis of the acceleration of global warming that society is facing. Cooling generates 15% of electricity and 10% of greenhouse gases, further accelerating global warming, which is expected to become more prominent in the future. If you agree, please take a look at the product with my icon and experience the effect of reducing power consumption of your cooler. On May 3, 2024, the BBC reported that air conditioners are being used in the Philippines, which is experiencing a heat wave that threatens to cut off the country's electricity. In India, it is predicted that the number of coolers will increase by several million this year and next, and this is sure to become a new threat. The yen is cheap now, so people who come to Japan for sightseeing should purchase it as a carbon canceling item. It really saves energy in the summer.
@riteshchouksey48974 күн бұрын
Thank you so much
@sacsingh1084 күн бұрын
So far the best intuitive explanation I have encountered.
@cindygonzalez6115 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for this ❤
@pnr27365 күн бұрын
Yooo
@nafets62655 күн бұрын
it seems entropy doesnt exist for this guy
@maheshkanojiya48585 күн бұрын
Next level stuff, actually very recently I realised that much of credit for technology and comfort that we possess goes to research in material science This video added another great information to it also the hope that material science will change our lives in future Thanks a lot keep it up ❤ love from India 🇮🇳
@robertlstrand5 күн бұрын
Lol😂🤣👍👍👍
@aliunal50846 күн бұрын
Just use "goat hair" tents (haircloth tents) for feeling cool under summer sun. As Turks and Mongols have been using these tents as nomads for 2000 years on central asia. You do not need to create an unknown and unnatural material which could be lead to some problems like asbetos.
@kevinmcinerney19596 күн бұрын
Having watched quite a lot of videos explaining E-MCsquared.. Two observations. One is that each person breaking down the meaning for the general public uses different techniques - different language, different metaphors, different kind of graphics. The other thing is that they all fail to make the concepts understandable. They THINK they do, but they go from simplicity "take my hand, inhale, and I'm gonna talk you through this" to complexity - quite abruptly ... ""it doesn't matter that we can perceive different kinetic energies in our lower dimension viewpoint".. I think I have a reasonable grasp, but the search goes on for as explainor who succeeds in getting through to non-scientific folks.
@tahirdzananovic51856 күн бұрын
Wait till bro hears about 53!
@user-mh8vq9vb9l6 күн бұрын
Never mind. I just had dark mode on 😅
@user-mh8vq9vb9l6 күн бұрын
Why don’t any of your videos have titles
@muntee336 күн бұрын
If velocity increases mass, then is that increased mass used to determine the kinetic energy of the increased velocity? Ie; velocity would increase energy by the square of the mass as the velocity increases BOTH the kinetic energy and mass. Seems like an arbitrary misinterpretation to me. Where the terms mass and kinetic are used/interpreted interchangeably. We all intuitively grasp the concept of velocity increasing an objects kinetic energy relative to its intrinsic mass but to postulate that velocity increases the objects intrinsic mass would require the objects kinetic energy to increase exponentially with velocity as the increased mass is a factor of its nominal kinetic energy. Eg: doubling an objects velocity having a result of increasing its mass (for simplicity sake, say double) 100% To determine its kinetic energy you then have to calculate an object of TWICE the intrinsic mass travelling at 2 x v, So K2= (2ma) X (2v) and not K2=ma X (2v)
@AMC22835 күн бұрын
mc2 is an object's kinetic energy in its rest frame, not its relativistic kinetic energy
@ueihgnurt6 күн бұрын
Shouldn't there be more light in the event horizon? I mean time goes different there also due to gravity billions of photon was trap after you fell into blackhole should've rained onto your head. shouldn't it be more light than dark? Every sec you fell down. it's been thousand years outside you don't know how many but I bet it's brighter than the ammount of photons our sun can release during sunstorm.
@herbsandflowers81526 күн бұрын
Ok... but technically you could have a tetrachromacy condition where the fourth type of cone is detecting light farther away from the three usual absorption spikes and in this case nothing would stop your brain from assigning a new color to this wavelength because really what is color ? it is just our brain assigning a visual output information to light wavelengths and it that case nothing would stop it from making up more colors. I wish we had nanorobots for that lol (however that is assuming the brain could handle the new information , qualias are still a black box for neuroscience)
@tombouie6 күн бұрын
Enlightening & mind melting
@soonsiangtoh73307 күн бұрын
I fit it in my calculator
@coolstar78197 күн бұрын
Wow! Thanks a lot of discussing this and making it easy for us to understand. I am a 12th grader :)
@sandasturner95297 күн бұрын
Those molecules are so happy 😁☺️ @4:10
@sandasturner95297 күн бұрын
@2:25 We're all just particles trying to have a good time 😊
@thetwodimensions75887 күн бұрын
As Carl Sagan said, a googleplex is as far to infinity as 1, infinity is not a number, it's not a physical, chemical thing.
@gigaya7779 күн бұрын
we need a black hole video :3
@trogdorbu9 күн бұрын
This is my favorite channel. Can you do a video about how well atoms hold onto their electrons inside a normal star? In such a high energy environment, how often do free electrons crash into a nucleus? Also, how hot would a star have to get for most nuclei to be more or less stripped of all electrons?
@FreedomUnchained9 күн бұрын
Liar .. CO2 is not out of control. Temperatures go up and CO2 follows. Explain that
@botplays689310 күн бұрын
52! is not close the the amount of particles in the observable universe.
@birdwalkin10 күн бұрын
did you know. if you tallied up matches until you had 52! of them, you would need to do it again 1 trillion times per second for the next 1 trillion years until you were even close to having 52! matches
@cadenwells135610 күн бұрын
I mean, black holes ARE physical objects. But what we see is just the warping of space time
@ThankYouESM11 күн бұрын
Quite a bit off-topic... I was wondering if thermal paste combined with aerogels can be perfect for keeping all the processors cooled down, especially in smartphone for heavy gaming. Granted... have heard many people saying aerogels are currently far too expensive to make, maybe you can explain... "why".