@@drachenstein or 25 days with 21 Furnaces!

There aren't even 21 active players on my server. It seems to me that the players on the US server Nyx don't understand the whole situation at all.

the art style is very bad actually. its just a generic landscape.

They said they are going to! But the initial version of markets will be bare bones.

They did say those are coming! But the initial version of markets will be rather bare bones.

Scam fail to deliver products. We are all playing this product. Just because it shares concepts doesn't make it a scam. May want to look the word up.

Mainframe has repeatedly made decisions that could be interpreted as if they wanted to deliberately let Pax Dei die. After the release of Early Access two years too early, the situation has not improved. Originally, the "combat system" was described as a placeholder, now it is only communicated that they want to "improve" this placeholder - so there will be no MMO combat system. Announcements remain vague in terms of timing and content in the description of the details. The upcoming trading system, for example, will initially be released without its most important feature, global access to buying and selling from every single market stall. If this is not then delivered and players have to spend more hours running through the individual marketplaces on their servers - which no one will do - then the trading system would have been pure gaslighting. Only cosmetic changes are being made to the absurd time sink, which has been under massive criticism for a year and has been criticized by all sides, with the exception of the few large clans, and which has led to the massive collapse in the number of players. This whole concept, which everyone now knows has no market, is not being questioned and Mainframe keeps avoiding the subject. Of course, questions are now being raised as to whether this is already bordering on the gray area of ​​a scam.

@@drachenstein you could say that about a 100 different games. Assassin creed shasows, star citizen, veilguard, concord etc.. Poorly run doesn't mean a desire to fail.

That's true, but I'm describing how people get that impression. And by the way: Star Citizen is selling like hot cakes, and everyone who wanted to know already knew that Assassin's Creed Shadows, Veilguard and Concord were flops.

@drachenstein i agree, star citizen is great but i've heard them used as an example of poorly managed for years. ($750M and counting)

lmao you ppl still think money sinks are real or do anything?

Its the most important to the 5 people still playing 😂😂😂 meanwhile the thousands that refuse to come back because of the tree issue and fobar crafting are playing conan. A game with real building and crafting

In UE4 it was as "simple" as a toggle in internal settings. That setting has to be found, changed, and tested, to make sure that not only are things not respawning in buildings, but also that things respawn outside of buildings. One other side effect is that it can cause resources to be invisible, not the most fun thing, but somewhat comical. They will get to it once the terrain settles, and doesn't need as many tweaks on a weekly basis.

@@tammywilliams2035 about 50 people contributed totalling about 180 plots! Thank you!

@@drachenstein Why would they need to if they received this partnership from Discord? I think you are looking at it like this was something unplanned and hasn't been in the works for years now and they just flicked a switch turning this on over night. I believe this partnership was a part of their strategic plan in developing the game from its onset. This would NOT indicate they don't have the people or the money to do it on their own. They knew they were integrating with Discord so they could focus elsewhere. Discord is quite literally a large studio in this case. They partnered with them and got a lot of social features integrated within their platform. The original pitch for the game was one that was accessible by anyone from anywhere and this is one step in that direction!

@@eltarii What I mean with the partner is in relation to the combat system, I have only mentioned the lack of a self-produced chat system as an indicator of Mainframe's lack of personnel and financial resources.

@@WoopU4Free submit an F8! That is comical but also probably needs to be fixed Sooner rather than later!

@@D4rkTower I misspoke! The conversion recipe will not be available until the hotfix next week! Apologies for that!

@@eltarii Ah ok, that would explain why I couldn't find it. I Enjoy the videos man, keep them coming.

@@shivo4328 fun fact Microsoft Flight Sim 24 borrowed the animal assets from Planet Zoo! If they can outsource chat and focus more on things you want worked on like combat while still having a lot of innovative features with chat isnt that a win win?

It's because they only listen to flogs.

@@Faoladh-126 I don't think the next patch will have a wipe but there will be at least a wipe before full release.

@@anthonyscott3659 the placeholder combat was actually quite similar in look and appearance. When they said placeholder they were referring to how the old system didn't use any kinds of stats or effects in the back end. Now combat does and has the proper backend for them to start pulling all sorts of levers to tweak, iterate and improve upon. The changes to combat are actually quite drastic from A1 to today (just over a year ago). It is for the better. As more aspects are implemented and built upon I'm confident it will only to continue to get more fun. If you don't like it right now, keep checking in and you'll definitely know it when you see it!

@eltarii ya I've tried it for couple days after wipe , it's improved but still the games weak link in my opinion.... I know they don't want super twitch action combat but it still seems to "rooted" when you swing having to stop even though they tweaked that aspect a bit