55mm f2.8 Micro AI-S one of their best

I start photography just over 2 years ago when I purchased a Canon R7; recently I purchased a used R6 and am very much enjoying being on full frame.

I am using my canon ixus 200 is that I got in my high school. I completely can relate that I rarely post or even process my iPhone 13 Pro photos, but canon camera is just so fun to play around with! I don’t think that it’s worth to buy an old digicam for 70$+, but if you are able to find one for cheap, it can be a cool toy to play around with. Creates very cozy photos.

Hi, is the a way you could share your recipes with us? That would be great. Thx

Thanks for this review of 20's. Did you notice any differences in barrel distortion for these lenses?

Kind of wish you didn’t blow it up :/

Great video!! I have the 24mm 2.8 AIS… im trying to attatch to a Viltrox speedbooster to a blackmagic pocket 4k. There is a protruding flange in back of the lens that doesn’t allow attachment to speed booster anyone know a way around? Thanks🙏

What if i am not filming in log?

I sold my R6 and bought the original BM 6K. You mention in passing how comfortable you are filming with the BM. The Canon had me crippled. Too many settings to remember. Too many dependencies. Too much if this not that. Much more unusable footage than usable. 95% of what I shoot on the BM is usable footage. It made me a better story teller.

Hey Caleb! Which adapter do you use for the canon FL to RF?

Facebook c mount lenses page has 10k members!

I use the 50mm F3.5 on mine. Love that lens, it lives on my 50R

The color shift note in the same is a great idea. I’ve been dealing with this same issue recently. This short cut will definitely help.

hi there! this video was so helpful and I’m super new to any cameras but I was wondering if the photos shown in this video were taken raw from the camera or edited at all on a computer? sorry if this question is dumb i’m new to this stuff

I believe that you should be able to shoot raw with the sd1000 if you sideload the CHDK firmware onto the memory card. It opens up a plethora of options compared to the standard settings. Was able to do so with my sd1400is and it works like a charm !

what with 1600 ?

It's one of those Canon Ixus cameras that's built like a piece of jewellery. Looks and feel are very important...like slightly earlier cameras like the Contax TVS Digital, with it's sapphire shutter release button. If you start snapping at a wedding or event, it won't be long until some one is asking about that 'pretty little camera'.

Better than a plastic hot shoe cover is the JJC eye cup for the XE4 that gives you especially in bright light a clear view through the EVF.

Thorium, as I understand it, is in the glass itself. The rear element. So I buy an adapter and leave it on permanently. You gotta wonder about the safety for workers who made these lenses and others who made millions of them.

I got my 50mm f1.2 fd for 25 bucks at a thrift shop and I love it

At the moment this is my favourite it used to be the XF 23mm f2, then the XF 35mm f1.4, then the XF-zoom 10-24mm f4 and now the only non Fujinon lens I use on my X-T5 except my old Canon FD-lenses. xD But this lens is magic especially when you compare it to huger lenses like the 10-24mm it's magic what Voigtländer has done here.

Hi I am having trouble trying to upload the photos to my phone!! Is there any other way than the SD card? If not please tell me how with the sd card because I have such cool photos on this camera and I don’t know how to upload them!

I bought one for £5 in a charity shop. I didn't want the camera, just the case which fitted my 500HS. I decided to turn it into a IR camera, which I did. Then, I saw how much they're going for so have converted it back, this morning.

Damn this is sad... Another underrated channel on KZbin :'(

The Squarehood for that 27/F2 Voigtländer is being avialable since 4 months...came shortly after your video 🙂

I have the Rokinon 20mm1.8 A manuel focus lens i set the aperture through the camera instead of using the aperture ring on the lens . A good low light lens but has flaring problems from bright lights

you NEED to check PORST lenses

I have a 50S, and have considered switching to the 50R with the SmallRig grip a few times, but each time I think of the lower viewfinder magnification, I drop it again. I wish they had done a little better here. I might eventually go for a 50S II or a 100S. I am currently selling my XPan with 45mm and 90mm lenses. Lovely camera, but I use it so rarely.

I have a canon powershot sd630 which came out in 2006 and still takes better photos than my brand new sony xperia smartphone with carl zeiss lens

Have you ever tried the Voigtländer 35mm f2.5 Color Skopar II? It's also a pancake lens but I much prefer the classic design along with the focal length over this one. A conspicuous classic decently fast nifty-fifty lens, honestly I thought Fuji would've made one already on their own but nope.

I have a 50mm 1.8 that picked from a thrift shop for $20. I haven’t printed out the negatives to see how they look

powershotsx150is

A thing nobody ever talked about but i really dont like about the lens, is the fact that its not sharp across the frame beacause of its strong field curvature. The lens is not even sharp across the frame to the edges at f5.6 and at this aperture even the midframes are a bit blurry. At F11 its okay. I really love this lens, especially for portraits, but because of this downside its not suited for me for an "always on camera" lens for everything. I more like to walk around with the 58 1.2 because that lens is at f2 as sharp across the frame the dream lens is at f5.6, and therefore suited for landscapes much better.

I picked up the Vivitar/Tokina 35-105mm f3.5 with Pentax K mount for cheap. It's actually fairly nice lens. It adapts super easy to my RF body and the results are very nice. Pretty darn sharp and useable throughout the focal range. I took it with my on a vacation I took to the East coast earlier this year. I took along a Quantaray 24mm f2.5 also with the PK mount and the combo of those two lenses meant that I didn't have to bring along a lot more lenses. Though I did stuff an Industar N-61 53mm f2.8 into the kit because its so funky and small. That whole kit ended up making me very cool images during the week long trip. The zoom lens was a huge help, though it is a heavy beast. But it has a nice little macro feature that allows it to focus pretty close. Not a true 1:1 macro, but it helps to get you closer to the subject and its useable throughout the focal range. Unlike some other vintage zoom lenses in this same sort of range. Often they can only use the macro feature at the wide end. Anyhow, another option.

Nice video! And to clarify, the non-moving glass element in the L lens is indeed the floating element that's there to correct the image during close focus situations.

I remember saving up for this as a teen and spending probably the most money i ever had on something. Hoping to be able to dig it up in my old storage.

I have the Canon FL 55mm f1.2 Fluorite Lens elements 1968 (1.05822 lbs) {$105: 2-2022} It is fine if you don't mind not having any coatings. I just use an adapter. Works great.

i have the 58mm 1.2 which is great for astronomy but you can still walk around with it stopped down. i use a lens hood to avoid unintentional flare.

I used to sell cameras and lenses on eBay I probably had well over a hundred Canon point and shoots. I used or tested every single one of them with an indoor test and an outdoor test before putting it up for sale. You name the model I've probably had it, almost every SD model and S model. The Canon sd1000 is a really good one but there are others that cost a forth as much that take just as good of pictures. Also there are numerous Canon S models like the s50 s60 x s70 s80s s90 etcetera. That all shoot raw and have a larger sensor size and usually cost a lot less than the sd1000. I think the secret to these cameras is knowing what settings to use and never go over 200 ISO and you can still get good shots you just have to be more careful. Almost all of these Canon cameras take great photos the ones that are between 4 and 10 megapixels especially. Paying $125 or more for a Canon sd1000 I think it's a little nuts. Yes if you can get one at a thrift store for 25 or 30 bucks go for it but a lot of these Canon S cameras you can buy a for 30 to 50 bucks or so they are a far superior camera in several ways.

thats kind a huge GXAce Thumbnail inspiration 😅

Will this lens work with a Lumix Gh4, I bought a C-mount CCTV lens (Rainbow 8-48mm 1:10) but its way too blurry and I was wondering if the lens in this video will work with it?

These photos look great, are they straight out of the camera?

I use the canon powershot a430

What was the film style preset that u mentioned was it the positive film

As a 32y old person this video made me feel so old...😢😂 digicams for my generation were not our parents cameras... they were our "modern" cameras while our parents were still shooting film. P.S. also I remember hating the resolution and quality of the photos and videos that came from that cameras compared to the results our parents had with their film cameras. But we were just kids or teens and didn't want to spend the money on film so digicams were always on our pokets ready to shoot a free photo. P.S.S. I'm also pregnant so maybe it is time for me to accept that I am old now 😂

The LEGO camera made an appearance! 🎉Great info Caleb!

I love the information and the content of your videos. Not many people compare vintage glass like you do. You have a good hold on this niche market. Keep the videos coming. I have a new found respect for vintage glass over modern glass 🫡

Wrong, the aspherical was machine grinded, where the AL version is the hand sanded version of this lens. The AL version is the expensive one, the aspherical, like your model, is only expensive because of lack of knowledge from the users that don’t know this little piece of history

Sorry but you needed to actually shoot some video to show off the differences. The aspherical doesn't only have better contrast and sharpness at f1.2, but it also has swirly bokeh and better depth - call it 3D pop or microcontrast or whatever. I was really looking forward to a video like this and now i am left lacking. The lens is worth it because there are no 1.2 lenses with great sharpness, swirly bokeh, amazing 3D pop and such good color rendition. I want one and I don't know what to tell my wallet...

Hi! As someone with digicam, people don’t usually use “AUTO” mode. I use cloudy/flash wb, -0.3 exp, iso 100. You don’t need to edit it after. Also, I use a sony digicam so the settings may vary.