Ummmm actually that's a soprano sax

if it is an integer can we figure out which one it'd be?

why does 1.25 speed feel so much more natural?

My idea: After 10 years of placing the last block you just destroy it all. Taken 1200 years to build just for it to stand only 10 years. pure poetry

I've been working on a video game for a lil bit and decided to take a break by watching this video only to realize this exact thing can be used to fix an issue ive been having! Thanks Matt!

I would ad half a of a stone in 10 years then the other half 10 years after that. Letting the art piece finish on time and looking how it was ment to look but with the split block as a reminder of the mistakes we make and that we can fix our mistakes.

The simplest solution is always the best: Topping the piramid with a block over the 2x2 layer at its center. Done.

Thanks, Matt. Thatt.

Germany made a maths mistake, and Matt made an exposure mistake. This footage is way too dark

My calculator found it to be less than 2,6 x10^15. Perhaps the brackets were misplaced

What a waste of resources and brainpower

They’d both be worth nothing due to inflation

So just wait 20 years to install the last block instead of 10, not elegant, but it works.

Just thought I'd let you know you helped make my wife very happy

But, if an algorithm takes X time to do a task, then improving by 100% would make the value of X zero, since the time consumption would be improved by 100%. So, the improvement was close to 99.99999999%

"Iiii like your funny words, magic man."

So would an infinite number of pennies but the bills have more utility.

since when dose concrete last this long

Now they can add a mini pyramid on top for the final decade.

Where is the assembly madlad? 😂

Considering that they have 116 blocks to go but need 117 events (each decade) they could start putting each block in extended intervals, instead each 10 ears they would have to set another in 10 ears and 1 month (or sth like that)

The last celebration 10 years after the last stone and 1200 after the first should be painting it

😂😂😂 checking the watch while shooting money was priceless...

I think that Laura had a nice idea, but the logic went backwards. If you have a prism made of plasticine and twisted it (a volume preserving transformation) it would start to cinch in in the middle, so the antiprism is bigger than that.

eh just put something fancy on top to finish it

Lol, your title is wrong , why its 40,832,277,770 instead of 40,832,277.770% ???

It could have been called the gta pyramid, but that obviously would take too long

i doubpt humanity will survive 1200 years anyway

In the last decade, add something to the top like capstone or flag pole

Does this concrete last 1200 years?

Matt's voice going ever more high pitched with excitement as the presents align with the correct results is fantastic.

Things without intrinsic value have no value

For me, the most logical thing to do is to place the first block of a new pyramid in the year 3093.

Does this mean there are infinitely more irrational numbers that all other real numbers because they are the only real numbers that can't be represented as fractions?

Euler's ghost is somewhere at this point like: "Matt DUDE "!

20XX. There's just a department calculating. What? We long forgot.

Of course. But halting at 1:45. someone isn't getting the beaming energy (yet)!

I haven't watched the Video. Just came here to comment that I think the whole "Different sizes of Infinity" is based on a huge misconception. They apply rules that apply to none Infinite things to Infinity and are surprised they get None Infinit logic as a result. I don't get it. Clearly Infinity cannot be explained with a common sense thought experiment which is entirely based on everyone having the concept of Finity burned in their Brains. If you assume our common sense is unfailable and can grasp the Universe to its fullest (which these ppl apparently base their entire Argumentation of off) than anything this experiment could explain would be why real Infinity cannot exist. The assumption of differently sized Infinities is trash because it beats the entire concept of Infinity itself. Also Arkhams Razor should have anyone reconsider and maybe take one of the several easy explanations for the result of the thought ecperiment before jumping to an assumption that's literally beating it's own concept. Really. I hate this Theory. I will not watch the Video but I hope he explains why the thing is a misconception or at least sold wrongly to the public.

This art project would a brilliant Minecraft server art project for the kids, they could do it in the exact same way

for anyone who cares, at 8:22 the old guy is actually playing a soprano saxophone which looks similar to a clarinet but is quite different

It would be interesting to know how they solve the structural integrity problem, the concrete may also crack or degrade in some way since it has to be there for so long and some of the almost oldest blocks will be used as the foundation for the highest towers.

Chile

soprano sax, not a clarinet! it seems the one who calls out the mistakes is not free of sin himself!

I recal learning about this in 2014 and being like "oh damn i missed it" and here i am again in 2024 like "oh damn i missed it" 😂 see yall in 2034 i guess

The last decade is for the beacon🤣

I'd say just put a bronze cap on the top at the last year. Timeless and classic.

U need Terence howard 😮

it doesnt matter if one infinity is larger than the other, one of them is infinitely more annoying to pay for things.

okay in the future if the internet is still around, and humanity hasnt decided to do something different, i have a prediction. I will say that this project doesnt get completed even half way. and in 1000 years we should have time travel by then, so come back and let me know if im right. (4.14 SW corner)

Gee Whizz!