Not a clarinet. It's a soprano saxophone.

The valuable concept of infinity is dangerous, incomplete, inconsistent and imprecise.

As a middleschool math, i have been trying to find why, maths in general believe ".99..." is 1. In the video, one explanation was "you have to give up something". After a year of this journey, I believe it is maths treatment of infinity. Infinity is necessary to describe Real Numbers and a host of other concepts in math. I see no reason to give up anything to simply say ".99..." is 1. What are we giving up? Real numbers are a unique and precise value. Infinity in number notation cant represent a unique and precise value on first impression. Infinity in finite arithmetic causes problems. In number base place notation a integer such as 1, does not have any digits to the right of the radix point. Rational numbers are the result of the division of 2 integers. The square and square root of ".99..." do not yield 1, and can also be shown not to equal ".99..." So what is ".99..."? It is not a Real number value. It can easily be viewed as a sequence of 9s following the decimal point, that represents a series of positive values. Since it is infinite, it represents a set of numbers less than 1. What does ".99..."=1 even mean? The = sign doesn't tell us mutch. You could say that a formula shows that the series represented by ".99..." has a limit of partial sums that equals 1. Because math does not believe that there is no number value between ".99..." and 1, the Archimedean property says they are the same. I don't believe that there are no numbers between the greatest value represented by ".99..." and 1. I believe this is the result of base place notation system. There are representations in other bases that are closer, such as ".ff..." in hexadecimal even though the limits are the same.. Again a problem of infinity. The valuable concept of infinity is dangerous, incomplete, inconsistent and imprecise

This is great project. I'm going to cite in my Livestream on Sunday. I hope that is ok.

Initial guess is it something specific about how the bits count

Now do this for Hans Niemann and defermine whether or not he was cheating

If this were me I wouldn't even attempt to solve it analytically. Run a time stepping simulator, calibrate a few friction parameters, then solve by gradient descent

Should invite stuffmadehere with his autopool projector

When working with python you should use Jupyter notebooks for stuff like this. Very useful

Matt and Steve, that was awesome. Thank you for the enthusiastic, entertaining education ❤

I'm really curious and if anyone reads this buried yt comment why did Matt do this video when he did it? I must have seen several people post on this exact subject at nearly the same time. So I'm pretty sure this was a coordinated effort on the part of some organization. What organization was it? How much were they paying these creators to do these videos on the "red wave" or whatever?

"it's got a bit of a spiral shape going on" yes, the 2D ones also spiraled...i've seen these patterns IRL but instead of cubes they are spheres My guess for how many tilings fill 3D space: ALL OF THEM, every 3D configuration fits into a 4D space, so unfolding a shape into smaller shapes should also tile (time to check the website) hmmmm, two left? Nevermind they've been solved but not verified lmao

Lol, crank up contrast and brightness and have some fun

This was literally a waste of time. I don't see why it was made. The thumbnail was indeed clickbait. There is no reason at all to think that pi^pi^pi^pi could be an integer.

You're right. What was I thinking? Of course a dementia written old man who can barely remember his name got 81 million votes without even campaigning from his basement. How many different angles are you idiots going to throw at us to try to sell us this bill of absolute nonsense? Just shut up. No one's buying it. Go away

I kinda feel like this video is just an excuse to make puzzles

I got this game for Christmas when I was in Grade School. It didn't take me long to figure out how to beat Dr. Nim every time... Once you play the game enough times, you recognize from looking at the levers, exactly how marbles Dr. Nim would take if it was HIS turn. THAT is how many marbles that I would choose to take. Every time it was my turn to go, I'd take the number that Nim would take in the same setup. I never lost again.

The algorithm just presented this video to me, 4 years later, and I have a clue that might help solve the puzzle if it hasn't already: what are the actual number of stops between the two stations? Google maps says it's 6 stops (which matches the binary complement), but the length of the journey is now only 1:35(!) and the train line now shows up as "Avanti West Coast"(!)

Politics has shifted it from more sustainable location !! kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5iWpIGXiNSmlassi=xbpXmHsi0vsuhCwK

prime factory

In spain the football pitch pictograms show a proper football ball

The Outro just soo cinematic!

I love that last throw you did when it hit the rim, you almost had to start the take again 😂

Looks like you beat Adam Savage to the punch!

Oh no! Matt fell into the Prime Universe!

Yes I am going to argue - maybe the reason the Romans had only one lower character to the left was because there is an implied minus sign - two characters, particularly if you were to voice it. Now what happens to dogs named ASTERIX? - they start a 10!

Another fun fact: this number can only be divided by 1 and itself! oh wait

strange i can read all that

You play well off each other, this was an easy watch, well done.

havent watched the video yet but ima guess its a error with a signed 64 bit integer.

1:58 belittle the spreadsheet 6:20 proceed to make spreadsheet to explain the concept

For reference, 35mm is equivalent to around 5.6k digital resolution (better than most TV/monitors, smaller than an Apple XDR Display) Whereas IMAX is the equivalent to *18k* digital resolution! That's around twenty 4K TVs stacked together 😂 ↓ _(Disclaimer: resolution is theoretical and means something different depending on who you ask)_

This is so interesting

22:40 Matt Parker has be around longer than Matt Parker, then who/what really is named after what/who?

How many times did he say Matt Parker lol?

This is honestly a really parsimonious Regex of Eratosthenes! 😄

The numbers do not match, this is terrible

I prefer numbers that can be factored..

I’m slightly confused when n != 5, why if our winning number is an O column number, why it has to be the first O… For n=6, you could have B, I, N, G all in row and then O one row up, and then O to make your bingo, no?

I think putting a fence post on the top would be a good cap off.

Alternative Title: Regex for checking if a unary number is prime or not.

> regex_prime_v0 the mark of an optimist or pessimist... v0

I refuse to pronounce it reg-ex, it's rej-ex and I don't care if that doesn't make sense

17:48 You don't need to, that is still my homepage instead of about:blank.

Bro thinks 33 is prime 💀

TRUMP 2028!! <3

2020 was stolen

"comedic premise" is a noun, so it's "comedic pre-miss", it's only "prem-eyes" when you're /doing/ it "we're not setting up a comedic premise" the verb-phrase is SETTING UP you could say "we're not premising this comedically" to use it as a verb or something.

just curious to why the UK version title is different to the US version are there any differences in the two as far as content reading through or are they identical say for the title?

Matts favourite place in Australia is ' Dee Why' he gives it 2 curls when marking 😂