Shadow Systems CR920X
7:14
Күн бұрын
Heritage Roscoe Revolver
5:27
21 күн бұрын
Springfield Armory SA-16 A2
6:39
Tactical Solutions X-Ring 22
6:32
Ruger LC Carbine 45ACP
8:59
2 ай бұрын
Rost Martin RM1C
6:02
2 ай бұрын
Sig Sauer MCX SPEAR LT Review
8:06
Smith & Wesson 1854 Lever Action
8:49
Ruger American Gen 2
8:19
3 ай бұрын
Rossi Brawler Single Shot 410ga
7:55
Bond Arms Cyclops 45-70
7:35
4 ай бұрын
Kimber KDS9c Review
6:37
7 ай бұрын
Smith & Wesson Response 9mm Rifle
10:14
IWI Carmel 5.56
7:26
8 ай бұрын
Taurus GX4 Carry Review
6:57
8 ай бұрын
Taurus Judge Home Defender Review
5:34
Henry 360 Buckhammer
8:38
9 ай бұрын
Hi-Point YC9 Review
5:42
9 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@jimc4267
@jimc4267 18 сағат бұрын
You’re mispronouncing Schofield. Great video though! 👍
@edsweeney6843
@edsweeney6843 18 сағат бұрын
I had the opportunity to try this gun at a local range's customer appreciation day. The Shadow Systems rep was there. He let me break it in with a box of 50 rounds of Blazer brass. No malfunctions whatsoever, very accurate. The trigger on this is much better than my Glock 43X (which is the worst Glock trigger I ever had). I bought the regular CR 920 in April. I like this better than the smaller model. I did ask the SS rep - it appears the 15 round magazine will work in the old CR 920; I asked if there would be a sleeve to fill the gap, he said probably, but had no ETA.
@Dante-oo1cs
@Dante-oo1cs 20 сағат бұрын
Good stuff. Very informative.
@Verdha603
@Verdha603 Күн бұрын
I never got onto the J-frame wagon for the same reasons you mentioned; sights sucked, grips sucked, and the triggers sucked from the factory. Finally got on the wagon with the 442UC this year and they at least got two out of three right; the sights were worlds better than the fixed front blade and trench sights on older snubbies I've shot, the VZ grip let me get a high grip on the gun without making the web of my hand pay for it in blood, and the grip was just large enough to finally get all my fingers wrapped around it... ...But the trigger sucked; long, heavy, and S&W now gets to fix it after the trigger made it a habit of not wanting to reset every 15-20 rounds, both in live fire and dry fire, and requiring me to pinch the trigger on either side to push it back forward again. Honestly I think it might be the worst trigger on a revolver I've owned so far, with all my other Smith's having a better DA pull, including my 116 year old S&W M1917 that maxes out my Lyman trigger gauge at over 12 pounds. Once it comes back I'll likely get a spring kit installed to drop the trigger weight by a pound or two, and if it manages to work reliably this time, maybe it'll then be worthwhile enough to consider as my BUG.
@esquad5406
@esquad5406 Күн бұрын
Roscoe? Why not just call it murder gun and get it over with.
@williambronson534
@williambronson534 Күн бұрын
Run my CR920P slide on my 43x frame with s15 mags. Great edc and IDPA.
@CGVeteranFl
@CGVeteranFl Күн бұрын
I had a Match grade M-14 at my Armory and used it in Matches. Loved it and want one of my own.
@garypaulson5202
@garypaulson5202 Күн бұрын
Good review
@cocoman12
@cocoman12 Күн бұрын
Thanks for the great video, very informative 👍
@N98858
@N98858 Күн бұрын
All of that Plus A BAG OF CHIPS! I handled that Lipsey's Creation at Shot Show 2024 and was well pleased! Had I not just received back from Finks Custom Guns at Gunsite a S&W Model 60 DAOnly and "Action all Slicked Up" I would jump all over this one ';-)
@jamesschneider3828
@jamesschneider3828 Күн бұрын
They don't offer in 327 magnum so in a couple of years they can bring that out and charge you another $100.
@bjkearns2
@bjkearns2 Күн бұрын
The standard airweight frame can’t take the blast/pressure of the 327. They chose not to go to the scandium/exotic alloys because of cost.
@matterickson5993
@matterickson5993 2 күн бұрын
This was the first shotgun ever bought and this video was a great intro tutorial on it! I appreciate how he approached it for a beginner - I love the OE Outfitters firearms review videos
@doughunter924
@doughunter924 2 күн бұрын
Hey that’s a nice review! Thanks. 👍🏻👍🏻🇺🇸
@markw999
@markw999 2 күн бұрын
Wish they had taken it up to the .327. Other than that, looks solid.
@ArtByKevinZapata
@ArtByKevinZapata 2 күн бұрын
How long do you think it can stay loaded? Without wearing out the magazine tube spring.
@christianhardwick6530
@christianhardwick6530 2 күн бұрын
The barrel is way shorter 1. 7/8 in to be exact
@fn6266
@fn6266 2 күн бұрын
A versatile .32 wheelgun is a riot. Definitely on my list!
@gf328
@gf328 2 күн бұрын
To add to your comments, my gx4 has not only been extremely reliable. The build equality feels better than my walthers. And none of the recall issues I've noticed that with the sig 320 and other guns of that ilk. I know that Taurus did have a couple of recalls but mine was not affected by it the recall. And other than being selective on ammunition, no reloads. The gun has not failed going into battery or in reliability. I think I saw more teething issues with the p365 and I purchased this as a throwaway weapon, this has become my EDC
@coltthank2654
@coltthank2654 2 күн бұрын
The sights don’t make that gun worth 800+
@PassivePortfolios
@PassivePortfolios 2 күн бұрын
This is a genius idea from S&W, in an era of a lot of bonehead ideas and products by many large manufacturers. And I am not the type to spread lavish praise on a product willy-nilly. S&W should go a step further and offer 3" barrels.
@user-ov6yd9mz8e
@user-ov6yd9mz8e 2 күн бұрын
I will carry a revolver. And it will be a smith and Wesson. Just not that one.
@paulkopacz5051
@paulkopacz5051 2 күн бұрын
I like the design and the really like the sights but WHY didn't they chamber it in .327 Fed Mag? They could have made it in stainless steel too and it would be a winner. As it is, I don't want it.
@jimmeli5200
@jimmeli5200 2 күн бұрын
They do make it in .327 too, with a 6 round cylinder.
@crushthequarter6863
@crushthequarter6863 2 күн бұрын
If you can find one cheap enough...It's worth it.
@Desperado3248
@Desperado3248 2 күн бұрын
Colt is asleep at the switch to not offer a new Agent, with alloy ? Plus p rated frame and hammer shroud. A six shot 38 not a 32
@williamryan9195
@williamryan9195 2 күн бұрын
Colt is asleep period. They are making showcase/shelf guns for Boomers these day. It's a pretty gun with a slow trigger that is easy to outrun shooting fast. It's also a MIM piece. If I was having my say it would be a rework of the police positive with forged parts, A crisp fast 5 lbs trigger with a strong return spring and melanite or parkerized finish. An all business gun met to win in a fight.32 mag.Not a shelf piece. For carry use.
@rbm6184
@rbm6184 2 күн бұрын
Its not just Colt any more. Its Colt CZ. CZ owns Colt. My favorite snub is still the old tried and true Detective Special. Not really a pocket carry though with exposed hammer unless you get a hammer shroud but I don't pocket carry anyway. I will take a six shot Detective Special over a five shot Chief Special M36. Better trigger also. I will stay away from the lightweight frames that aren't as durable and increase felt recoil.
@redrat1334
@redrat1334 2 күн бұрын
I'm wanting a pocket carry revolver and looking at the original 642 and Charter Arms undercover. Any suggestions?
@codycornell5036
@codycornell5036 2 күн бұрын
Depends on your price
@dividualist
@dividualist 2 күн бұрын
Definitely go with the 442-1/642-1 (no-lock model). Charter Arms isn't the worst but I would spend that little bit of extra money for a more reputable gun. I carry a 442-1 in a Safariland Model 25 pocket holster everyday and am very satisfied with it.
@redrat1334
@redrat1334 2 күн бұрын
​@dividualist Appreciate the advice. I have always carried auto loaders but looking to simplify my daily carry and try something new. I've heard mixed reviews of S&W QC but like the look and long run of the 642.
@robolive123
@robolive123 2 күн бұрын
I've had mine for a couple months now (642UC .38). Not only does it have a "real" front sight, but also a real rear sight. Excellent set of sights! Also, these VZ grips are fantastic...perfect size, very comfortable, won't catch on cover garment during draw, and enough traction to not squirm in the hand. The sights and grips are worth the price of admission, IMHO. Compared to my 2 all-stainless 640's and another standard 642, I don't feel a big difference in trigger pull quality, but it's slightly better. There are also a couple of tweaks to strengthen the revolver, which I have to take on faith. The one of these that I am a big fan of is the 2-piece barrel...despite what some detractors say, in a revolver like this, the liner/shroud barrel reduces stress on the aluminum frame and is a good thing. Overall, this little gun is absolutely worth the extra money over a standard J-frame. Good review!
@Desperado3248
@Desperado3248 2 күн бұрын
First it would have been perfect if it was a keyless 638. Next , what is the actual barrel length? Is it a legitimate 2 inch barrel ? That translates to a little more velocity than the 1 7/8 usual J frame barrel
@Rnemhrd
@Rnemhrd 2 күн бұрын
The trigger is absolutely not performance center good. I have this and it is better than stock but not PC good, Grip is good. Sights are great.
@andypfleiderer3153
@andypfleiderer3153 2 күн бұрын
So glad I found this video...Thank you kindly for taking the time to make this content!
@jasonashley4579
@jasonashley4579 2 күн бұрын
Another expensive gun with a watercolor finish from Smith and Wesson.
@tejaspics
@tejaspics 2 күн бұрын
Excellent! Thank you.
@jimhiller
@jimhiller 2 күн бұрын
Very competent review
@romans6two338
@romans6two338 2 күн бұрын
I don't understand why S&W doesn't just make better front sights in the first place. I held this in person a few weeks ago, the trigger was only slightly marginally better. The front sight was excellent. I can't justify selling my current Smith, then spend $800. The only benefit is a better sight. I know they boast they threw other stuff on it, but meh. It's a $800 J-frame with a real front sight. I really wanted this to be a great pistol, but it fell short for me.
@williamryan9195
@williamryan9195 2 күн бұрын
Why did they not go with better sights? Because to be honest they are not needed. Like staging the trigger it really doesn't get you a benefit that solid pull through will get. Like the guy said. It is for a get off me situation. I prefer trough/gutter sights, but most shooters today are demanding optics and "good sights".I never waste rounds pushing it out past 5 to 10 yards.800 for that purpose-built pistol is about right. It's in demand
@JL-xn3zy
@JL-xn3zy 2 күн бұрын
Just bought a second 642. Trigger (the more you use it the better it gets), sights, grips, and accuracy are all better. Paid 679 for mine. Have a 638 and a 340pd and am switching solely to the uc 642.
@williamryan9195
@williamryan9195 2 күн бұрын
@@JL-xn3zy All smith trigger work in nice.
@Desperado3248
@Desperado3248 Күн бұрын
I have only one J frame S&W 38 presently. Sold older 36, and 60. I have a 60-7, which has very good wider rear and front sight, like a smaller late model 10. Mistress older ones are not very good .
@CatProvider
@CatProvider 2 күн бұрын
Just subbed. OE has level-headed content with professional presentation
@OldeEnglishOutfitters
@OldeEnglishOutfitters 2 күн бұрын
Appreciate that
@jpfurrow7445
@jpfurrow7445 2 күн бұрын
Any idea what the lbs is on the trigger pull? Did I miss that?
@romans6two338
@romans6two338 2 күн бұрын
It is only slightly better, then a standard 442/642. Check it out in person first. I did and it was an easy pass for me. Only great improvement for me was the front sight.
@crushthequarter6863
@crushthequarter6863 2 күн бұрын
I believe around 8 or 9 lbs.
@pauljenkins6877
@pauljenkins6877 2 күн бұрын
A great honest review.
@Hawk-ODA212
@Hawk-ODA212 2 күн бұрын
Very well done, sir. Good info. This is one of my favorites in my inventory.
@bobscar327
@bobscar327 2 күн бұрын
Excellent review. Well done, thanks.
@jeffreylocke8808
@jeffreylocke8808 2 күн бұрын
X/S sights are top grade I use them in optic height on my M&P 2.0 10mm.
@3wheelmannc860
@3wheelmannc860 2 күн бұрын
Solid revolver offering imo. With all the R&D and technology, I would like to have seen a 6 shot .38 +p and/or 6 shot .327.. That would make a very nice carry.
@REVOLVER_NOIR
@REVOLVER_NOIR 2 күн бұрын
I agree 😊
@kylewood8327
@kylewood8327 2 күн бұрын
Doesn’t Ruger offer something like this?
@williamryan9195
@williamryan9195 2 күн бұрын
I think Smith made a ported 327 a while back. They should bring it back
@kevinfelton689
@kevinfelton689 2 күн бұрын
​@@kylewood8327they offer the LCR 6 shot in .327 federal. My wife has one and she really likes it.
@jimmeli5200
@jimmeli5200 2 күн бұрын
The .327 UC is a 6 shot model. Taurus also makes a 6 shot snubbie in .327 too.
@jwslks
@jwslks 2 күн бұрын
Excellent review! Thank you
@OT333
@OT333 3 күн бұрын
RICK GRIMES
@donne9768
@donne9768 3 күн бұрын
I took my Cattleman II out yesterday and shot it with the 45ACP cylinder I purchased for it. It took a little machining to make it fit properly, which I let a qualified gunsmith do. Probably put 35 Colt longs and 50 ACPs through it. The ejector rod housing screw came loose. Probably the last one I haven't used the Loctite on. This is the first time I've shot it since installing the Wolff springs in it. Definitely worth every penny.
@RonKelmell
@RonKelmell 3 күн бұрын
This old man likes the short barrel, easy maintenance, reliability, light, wide ammo selection, and my tapered barrel later version 'tactical' is plenty accurate enough (2-3 moa). ARs vomit on themselves every time you pull the trigger. That's why ARs like oil. AR or Mini, avoid Russian steel case ammo.
@Mowkade
@Mowkade 3 күн бұрын
This revolver is really hitting on all cylinders for me, but the major detractor aesthetically is that ejector rod hanging out there in the open with no locking bolt connecting. Not to mention the lack of a proper hammer stud. It’s understandable that they omitted this to reduce manufacture time and cost, but visually I would pay the extra money to have it. It might seem silly, but this will be the main reason why I will pass on this revolver. I think heritage should’ve partnered with Rossi on this one. .
@thernly
@thernly 4 күн бұрын
Excellent video.
@robertfox4524
@robertfox4524 4 күн бұрын
Just waiting my 72 hours before I pick mine up!
@cbwelch4
@cbwelch4 4 күн бұрын
I would not want any ambiguity about whose property the gun is.
@mike34744
@mike34744 4 күн бұрын
I love everything about this gun better than the Glock 43X, but I don’t think we can say it’s as reliable. Maybe after a lot of breaking in, but overall I think Glock is hard to beat for reliability.
@merlin1464
@merlin1464 5 күн бұрын
I’m confused about the grain, what grain is stronger or weaker? 400 vs 325 vs 300?
@OldeEnglishOutfitters
@OldeEnglishOutfitters 4 күн бұрын
It depends what you mean by power. The lighter grains typically are moving significantly faster and the slower rounds have more mass. They will both excel at different things.