Again enjoying the discussion.. as i always focus on cosntrution and installation of structure to be protected to make sure the integrity of the coating system and no shortings
@dentalmanuk22 күн бұрын
Agreed. CP comes to play with coating damages and till then we need to reserve the cp system to operate an optimum level. Also my approach has always been to be on top of the pipe or structure construction and installation to make sure no serious or even minor coating damages are done on protected structure and also to avoid any rebar connections to the pipe which is the case in paved areas inside refineries .. Corrosion and CP engineers need to involve in the project right from the start of the structure to be protected is installed till backfilling or pavement in order to make sure designed CP system cater for the structure for designed life
@dentalmanuk22 күн бұрын
Thanks for refeesher
@petersealy-fisherproductio766322 күн бұрын
Fascinating!
@dentalmanuk29 күн бұрын
Excellent discussion .. despite having CP experience we learn .. we didn't talk about 100mV shift potential Citroen
@darrilaronowitz8250Ай бұрын
Thank You - that was certainly different and thought provoking - I had not ever thought of this aspect of engineering until now.
@rogeralexander4038Ай бұрын
We cannot measure a potential, but we measure potential differences in units known as volts. Gibbs Free Energy explains that there cannot be zero potential as the free energy fills any void. Therefore there cannot be a negative potential so we must examine the measurement itself. If we are using an old analogue voltmeter there must be current flowing through a coil that moves a magnet on a pivot against the elastic memory of a hair spring. the pointeris fixed to the magnet and adjutment can be made to the anchor point of the hair spring to zero the meter before a measurement is made. We set the instrument zero and measure the potential difference in relation to that zero. If we are using a digital multimeter it does noh have a hair spring but is entirely electronic. It consists of a series of capacitors and resistors that can be likened to cups and byepasses. The charges pass into the cup and when it is full pass on to the next cup. The value of each resistor is known and the eletrical capacity of energy (potential) is known. The wiring is designed so that the display shows the voltage or current flowing through the resistors to complete the measuring circuit. An oscilloscope displays the path of an electron across a screen that has to zero adjusted for each reading or series of readings. It is therefore the meter that sets the zeron for each 'pipe-to-soil VOLTAGE measurement. The ground contact electrode is not a reference potential. All of this is described in detail in Module01 of the CPN on-line Corresspondence Course at the following link. www.pipeline-corrosion-control.net/CorrespondenceCourse/Module01/index.html
@engrsherzaman83412 ай бұрын
Very informative
@alimajeed72933 ай бұрын
thank you so much
@ReyhanehSahraeian3 ай бұрын
Can we say if we have disbond coatings using this method?
@isifundi3 ай бұрын
PCM is not likely to identify disbonded coatings. In fact, none of the conventional coating integrity survey techniques will reliably detect disbonded coatings. It is a challenge.
@zeeshanbabar91453 ай бұрын
Thanks
@altafnizami4 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing.
@user-xu4hu6eo2r4 ай бұрын
Well presented.
@boutlikhetamine49915 ай бұрын
Thank you so much . Frome Algeria too,
@user-qb3dp1yq4n5 ай бұрын
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:32 Too *much cathodic protection can impact the external coating of buried pipelines, posing risks.* 01:53 The *upper limit of cathodic protection magnitude is recognized as -1200 millivolts, crucial to prevent coating damage.* 03:00 Understanding *the electrochemical interaction at the cathode is essential in discussing cathodic protection.* 07:20 Uncontrolled *cathodic protection potentials can lead to coating blistering, emphasizing the coating's critical formulation.* 09:23 Cathodic *disbondment tests, like the cathodic desponding test, evaluate coating resistance to cathodic protection effects.* 14:16 Coating *application errors, even with compatible coatings, can result in adhesion loss and coating failure.* 18:15 Modern *coatings, though effective, pose challenges in controlling cathodic protection current, requiring careful system management.* 19:49 Incorporating *sacrificial anode systems with long operating lives is a practical solution for controlling cathodic protection.* 21:55 Strategic *placement and design of coupons are crucial for accurately monitoring cathodic protection systems.* 23:42 Interference *currents pose hidden dangers in cathodic protection, requiring careful system design and monitoring.* 24:33 In *the next session, the discussion will delve into the risks associated with interference and continuity in cathodic protection.* Made with HARPA AI
@amineboutlikhetingenieurel82206 ай бұрын
Thank you. Frome Algeria
@hello-jp2ls7 ай бұрын
Can ACVG pinpoint coating defects as small as 0.1 to 1 sq.cm area at well-coated 3LPE pipelines??
@hello-jp2ls7 ай бұрын
Excellent
@sufitanzeel8 ай бұрын
It is detailed but really an informative session, brining logical insights to relate CP as one of the barrier against MIC attacks to metallic structures. Much thanks and your exerted efforts are highly appreciated to share that SME knowledge.
@claudiomoraes83288 ай бұрын
Congratulations, very good videos. I watched them carefully. It was very instructive. How about a new one on field repairs?
@isifundi8 ай бұрын
Great suggestion. We will discuss this early next year! Stay tuned
@Georgyxp10 ай бұрын
Thank you for this informative session.
@rogeralexander4038 Жыл бұрын
Neil Webb does not mention the Alexander Cell or the science behind these surveys which is based on electrical energy.
@Georgyxp Жыл бұрын
Thank you Dr Markus for sharing this invaluable information.
@abdelkrimbenq2217 Жыл бұрын
How much current magnitude can be applied for DCVG survey more then normal functioning current especially in dry environment like desert.and if it can creat an overprotetion is acceptable or not.thank you.
@a.n.cartoonz9240 Жыл бұрын
Tnx lot ...very useful information provided.
@mohammedhadi7961 Жыл бұрын
Remarkable webinar
@isifundi Жыл бұрын
Thank you Mohammed, it was a pleasure to have you in attendance!
@lodeses Жыл бұрын
Great channel this 👍
@lindelanitshifaro2604 Жыл бұрын
Woow very informative.
@elsinabokaba5283 Жыл бұрын
💯🙌
@karindasilva5989 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your easy to understand way of teaching.
@karindasilva5989 Жыл бұрын
So professional and easy and clear to understand.
@tumelomatjila4636 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@mouradaissat1235 Жыл бұрын
very goog explanation, Regards
@AmeltonGsairus Жыл бұрын
Unbelievable informative video, thank you so much for your valuable contribution!!
@williamdieffenbach3264 Жыл бұрын
Thankfully the DCVG equipment now is electronic and the mV difference is easy to record.
@williamdieffenbach3264 Жыл бұрын
Excellent channel. The PCM data is difficult to interpret
@paolapostigo1193 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing !
@paolapostigo1193 Жыл бұрын
Very good, thank you !
@Itskaintmeenu2 жыл бұрын
hi nice sharing
@abdelkrimbenq22172 жыл бұрын
Vert interesting subject,Thank you
@darrenmaley54362 жыл бұрын
Great talk. Is it not possible to size defects against a coupon of known size?
@isifundi2 жыл бұрын
hank you for your question Darren. The relative sizing of defects is dependent on a number of factors and is unique to each pipeline. If the pipeline in question had suitably sized coupons installed, and these are bedded in the same backfill as the pipe, it may be possible to use these to correlate with the %IR readings. However, in the majority of instances, calibration digs are undertaken of a selection of different %IR - to verify the defect size vs %IR and determine what %IR should be repaired. We hope that answers your question adequately. Feel free to contact Isinyithi if you need further assistance. ([email protected])
@syedfayazahmed45042 жыл бұрын
Very informative to get knowledge on coatings with bite sized corrosion series sessions
@sajadkhosravi78812 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your useful training courses
@isifundi2 жыл бұрын
We are so glad you have found this material helpful! Stay tuned for more!
@paolapostigo11932 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video.
@kcl91163 жыл бұрын
Excellent. Thanks Neil.
@royzderich3 жыл бұрын
great presentation, i have a question: Steel and galvanic corrosion, have you ever find evidence of steel damaged by the lack of grounding in electrical powered machinery? I find some alarming signs steel degradation in many surface machinery and transport infrastructure ( conveyors ) on mining operations. I suspect some of the damage could be related with the effect you describe in the presentation (grounding problems). Thank you!
@neilwebb49623 жыл бұрын
Roy, Whether your issue is related to electrical grounding issues (or not) can only be conclusively evaluated by formal interference testing. That said, lack of grounding can set up stray currents in structures which can cause corrosion, particularly if VSD’s are involved. If grounding is intact, you then sit with bi-metallic (galvanic) couples between steel structures and either copper earthing systems or reinforced concrete foundations. (Copper and steel-in-concrete are very close electrochemically). I hope this helps. You are welcome to contact us directly if you need more detailed investigation which we can offer through our engineering service division. Neil Webb