I do space engines and am wondering if we could get a back and forth type of engine going. it basically would flip back and forth and move the air around like a spinning ring balanced over a magnetic field of some sort and as it got pulled out an electromagnet pulls the energy back in and it is reused...
@MikuMiku-h6h23 сағат бұрын
Absolutely fabulous: Thank you. Greetings from Poland.
@martinlaird971223 сағат бұрын
My goodness she is gorgeous
@JAD73567Күн бұрын
How does it work? Badly.
@heitorchierentin6885Күн бұрын
Why don't call all these extra dimentions as simply spacial properties or particular properties?
@heitorchierentin6885Күн бұрын
A question: what is the difference between more and more dinentions versus just different shapes into the very only three spacial dimentions?
@lightlegion_Күн бұрын
I’m glad to have met you!
@IgnesiasRayanКүн бұрын
How he has been nomitated by the Royal Institution
@aaron2709Күн бұрын
Love him.
@rontarrantКүн бұрын
I'd love to see an update on this topic. A lot can happen in five years.
@rontarrantКүн бұрын
I'm a musician and I had no trouble picking which piece was written by Bach. I can't tell you why, exactly. I can only say that there was something stilted and mechanical about option #1. It had no life. Now, that could be because the arrangement was too simple or because the orchestra and choir didn't feel it the same way, I don't know. But in the end, it just didn't touch my soul. The Bach piece did.
@jackdotblueКүн бұрын
It works in marriage as well. When my wife is observing me I spend a lot of time in either the garage or my office. When I observe her, she asks "what are you looking at?" quite often. The good part about observation within marriage is as long as your wife is watching you, the garage will alway be clean and organized.
@Rahul1975Күн бұрын
could the detector which is electric and hence generates a field affect the atoms being fired through the slit? common sense and logic?
@complexintelКүн бұрын
he made the entire field of physics seems so simple 😊! Brilian!
@abirfaour1564Күн бұрын
amazing you said “glory past”. We are proud of our past. How we didn’t make bread out of it is another story. Maybe we have to find out who stole our bread. And the oil and the brains.
@LexiePersonForeverКүн бұрын
I would just like to say broccoli is NOT low in protein, it’s just very dilute in nutrition. If you ate ~1900 calories of broccoli a day, 1. You’d have to eat 5.5 kg of broccoli or over 10lbs and 2. You’d get 130 grams of protein a day It’s just not feasible to survive on broccoli because you’d have to consume so much volume and weight
@monalworld3311Күн бұрын
It similarly with me(Brain one). 1 when I am in Kota (Raj) 2. when I am in my village.
@CraftingMyLifeКүн бұрын
For me… Will power is all about hormones.
@mortenhansen3455Күн бұрын
What kind of energy does this thing produce?
@ametistbeastКүн бұрын
That is because you haven't asked the question correctly. He replied correctly to the answer you have asked. If this question would have been given in school it would have been wrong as the problem lacks information.
@user-target4AGIКүн бұрын
Could you total Crimes and Murders with your UNIFICATION ??? !
@RUOK2000Күн бұрын
Im 19 mins in and string theory hasnt been mentioned yet
@tigertiger1699Күн бұрын
It’s not just humans.., the Polynesians…..😂
@justinholmes8297Күн бұрын
how do you detect the photons going through a slit? because photons get absorbed and scattered or absorbed and re-emitted. So when you detect one, you have no idea where the scattered one is going. I worked in the videogame industry for years as a programmer and at one point we used something called photon-mapping to pre-render the lighting for our maps. It would use a value for diffuse and specular reflection for a surface and re-emit a photon in the opposite direction with a variance for the diffuse and specular properties and it looked amazing. I'm wondering if it could be improved by treating the photons as particles moving in a wave pattern so that you could replicate this?
@AzharAli-n5cКүн бұрын
great
@frc1255Күн бұрын
“String theory doesn’t represent physical reality” - Leonard Suskind, the grandfather of string theory
@kspangsegeКүн бұрын
Are you deliberately spreading disinformation? If not, I am curious where you picked that up. Let me know. In any case, this is not what Susskind is saying. Her is just saying that a particular version of string theory is incompatible with the word, but this was known from the outset.
@tommygrandefors9691Күн бұрын
I miss Faraday. He presented real science. RI need to reconsider.
@prakashpatankar4022Күн бұрын
Wow what a presentation!!! Rarely have I seen a primer that did the job of explaining a complex subject so entertainingly. And it has that great ahaaa moment insight into how the models are trained without using billions of hours of verification time required from humans. Masterclass...👏👏👏
@RastlovКүн бұрын
These guys have been stringing us along since the 80s. It all sounds good but all talk and no action is only good for playing.
@Clever_creatureКүн бұрын
That Perfectly explains "Maya"
@TheObserver-h7cКүн бұрын
First let me say the content was very informative and valuable. My hats off to Prof Spence. Nature is not complicated and very frugal. Loops are not necessary. Einstein did not abolish aether. He utilized its outcomes as a basis for GR. Seeing the effect the MMx had on aether, Einstein looked for a link between aether and his developing GR. It was found to be time. The big moment is when he realized the key to aether was its particle density. Or more succinctly, the encountering of aether particles per unit time. This would give rise to time dilation and length contraction. One item Einstein could not mention was this tie-in to aether. Doing so would certainly sully his new GR. Biting his tongue he had to pass on another principle of equivalence. This equivalence involved the velocity of a mass and density of space. "Mass incountering more aether particles per unit time (due to density or velocity) increases length contraction and time dilation." Taking a classical and simplistic approach, as not to clutter but simplify the following: • Aether is composed of identical particles composing all of space • But occupied space can vary in particle density per a volume from location to location. • It has no direction of flow but is most likely associated with a mass. • Aether not only is connected to light as a medium but also leptons. • Aether, permeating all space, creates observable phenomenon, most unexplained. A new theory, D-space, adjunct to space-time explains the above and much more.
@SeanGilchristКүн бұрын
Too much swallowing... I'm out
@John_LofgrenКүн бұрын
Unfortunately at around 11:00 Mr. Finkel gets upset with technology and has a small tantrum and it’s really off putting. Stopped watching.
@isatousarr7044Күн бұрын
The challenge lies not just in the mathematical elegance of the theory but in finding experimental evidence to anchor its profound implications. Untying this string may lead us to answers about black holes, the origins of the cosmos, and the very structure of spacetime. It’s a reminder that even the most intricate knots can eventually be unraveled with persistence and insight.
@brunovandooren3762Күн бұрын
Not just that. But we have the Standard Model which is the most verified theory in the history of science. And true, we don't know 'why' the standard model works. But we know it does, and it explains an absurd amount of things for which there is no alternative explanation. At the moment it looks like there is not a single reason to choose string theory over the standard model other than 'the math is beautiful'.
@MariehuneaultКүн бұрын
Someone on tik tok reviewing a lipstick: 1.1million views. An amazing video of our earth from space while listening to the brave astronauts who beheld it: 185k views. Go figure. We must look deeper. ❤ Thank you so much for this. Goosebumps the whole video.
@shinevarambilan1704Күн бұрын
Quasi experience
@azharalibhutto1209Күн бұрын
Great ❤❤❤
@augusonictheracoon5279Күн бұрын
Reminds me of Wallace and Grommet.
@AdityaKumar-f3h9dКүн бұрын
Lesson: we should compare ourselves with inferior people and be happy rather than comparing with superior ones and strive for better. 😊
@murrayleskull2708Күн бұрын
I like holes.
@pressureswitchКүн бұрын
I wish I had an ounce of the confidence that haters have piled into this tiny comment section 😂
@MrBitterman75Күн бұрын
Sabine has entered the chat…
@MaverickBlue42Күн бұрын
Honestly I was waiting for Brian Greene....
@DH-bf9xbКүн бұрын
About 36 min, he's talking about vibrational moments as if they've been observed as such. They haven't. It's horribly misleading.
@danpeacock2630Күн бұрын
Humanity created a.i. and primarily tasked it to support the business world before curing any diseases or hunger. Humans don't deserve a.i.
@terrizittritsch745Күн бұрын
Sean is my favorite physicist to listen to!
@RFC3514Күн бұрын
The last 30 years of theoretical physics have basically been wasted beating this dead horse. 🙄
@G0nxsfКүн бұрын
String theory has failed miserably. A new model needs to be created
@turtletom8383Күн бұрын
Id rather listen to Terrance Howard
@MrBitterman75Күн бұрын
😂
@jdbrintonКүн бұрын
This guy used about 10x more words than necessary to cover almost nothing.
@MrBitterman75Күн бұрын
Give it to him, he’s Italian:-)
@kspangsegeКүн бұрын
Not true. He covered a huge amount of stuff. I am guessing you are just not his intended audience.
@dominiccordova8347Күн бұрын
I found Mr. De Biasio on a quantum gravity youtube channel last year, interviewing Verlinde(amongst others) and was instantly impressed with his enthusiasm, sincerity, obvious acumen and a pleasing abillity to communicate principles and theory to the "great unwashed" like myself. I expressed these sentiments in the comments section. AND I was so surprised that he responded to my comment, AND with such a humble and pleasant reaction, I am very happy that he has found such a distinguished platform as The RI. Deserving, rising ambassador of the physics community to those of us toiling in 4 dimensional spacetime. Bravo.