How many hours have you played?

The only disclaimer I would add to Thors statement is that while working for the most money is great if they treat you like shit the money isn’t worth it. I took a 10% pay cut for a company that had a much better culture and it was worth every penny of that pay cut. (I acknowledge that this isn’t an option for everyone)

Great review man, thanks for uploading!

What a good review! Thank you for explaining the game! I am fascinated by it. I think it might be fun. Thanks for your insight!

If anyone came here looking for tips the way to go is either Russia's or Austria's custom union, Russia is better with lower migration attraction, get stock exchange fast as possible and do the corn laws, then religious schools, and get academia for the education decrees and if you are rich some universities. Get Borneo and SA for MAPI and gold.

You couldn't pay me to play Vicky 3

Religion and Autocracy journal entry is actually really good. When completed it gives you the option to pick three different buffs. I always take the 20% increased assimilation buff. I think it helps assimilate all of the Thai nations I conquer.

Wasnt morocco stronger historically than its portrayal in victoria III?

Your points really makes sense. Victoria 3 is very different from other pdx titles, this is a game where you slowly shape your society, and the grind to industrialize as a nation. Im afraid victoria 3 might go in the wrong path because of the war/battles demands from fans.

Hello from Russia, whatch our guy, Voevoda

Can I play civilisation craft

Bro, what happened to the ck3 vids

Negative Aura Streamer! Cope & seethe

what i dont like : 1.its bad because i cant play it above 1.13 early gray, it just crashes like crazy bro 2.the warfare is also quite terrible (i know you said its not the point) but if your playing as the ottomans, warfare is kinda required againts egypt or if you fail that, to be recognized. now this is a major problem because the warfare sucks, i kinda dont care about micromanagement, but what i do care is that the AI is trash. often i found myself outnumbering the enemy in the frontline 2:1, but for some reason my generals always only deploy 2 divisions to attack 23 enemy divisions, like is he stupid? 3.another bad thing is, since every country has the exact same goals and stuff, the gameplay kinda gets boring. the geography also doesn't really play a role that much, there are some modifiers like rivers and the amazon rainforest but its kinda just that. where as in CK2 and Eu4, where you are on the map actually matters, there are strategic reasons why you want to control trade, why you want a navy or where you want to take the trade ports. this stuff is just absent in victoria 3 what i like : the economics system is just uncommentable, the trade market system (not overal trade, just the market concept) is also really good, the technology is really great, the population mechanics, the industrialization mechanic, the revolution mechanics, bassically other than those 3 bad things, is excellent so in conclusion, its mixed. my ratings is mixed "but you only hate 3 things and love the rest" yea but, the first reason made the game basically unplayable after 1843, the second reason makes me rage quit every time and the third reason, theres not really much point to try other nations. its more of a 1 trick pony or somesorts, you would really love the game when you started playing, but after sometimes its quite a "meh"

Imho its just not fun to play. Its like a free to play game where you just spam whatever resource or production you need at the moment.

Poland because you must play Poland be polish

Thoughts on joe biden

Thoughts on joe biden

Thoughts on Joe Biden?

Victoria 3 is already in a very impressive state. Awesome game.

It's easier in Victoria 2

I am still shocked on how you srent more successful with KZbin, yoy really deserve it! Maybe its just that Victoria three isnt that fun for people to watch but for the few people who do (like me) you really have my attention and i love the videos! Keep it up please!

thats the same as "you should always eat when youre hungry"

why did u not wear armour?

As a newbie 4€ for the game doesn't seem bad and I enjoy it

Laissez Faire even though it’s the best economic law, isn’t represented accurately. For example, controlling the production methods with Laissez Faire is entirely absurd. Laissez Faire should be one of the most automated economic laws in Victoria 3 but even with Laissez Faire, too much power is given to the player. In fact, I would argue that too many of the economic laws are too micromanaging. There should be less micromanaging for the economic systems in general unless someone wants to play a command economy/communist country.

100% NO. Not worth the full price tag. $110 all in for a broken 1/4 the experience game. $34 for Victoria 2 and ALL its DLC. Victoria 3 is a shell of what Victoria 2. Your channel may do better playing Victoria 2 as well or more than Victoria 3. And trying to say warfare isn't part of the Era is just plain ridiculous...

welp

English speakers see a W next to a consonant and forget how to read

while I can agree that vic 3 may not be for me considering I do not like how the completely changed the warfare system, that is completely poor argument to make in favor of Vic 3 making a objectively bad warfare system, and while I appreciate your section of "what makes victoria 3 special" trying to highlight good things about Vic 3, many of the points you made were already possible in a previous game you neglected to mention. Victoria 2 10:45 Taking a feudal nation and turning into a great power, while you can do that in victoria 3 it hardly feels special when every country shares the same tech tree and building options, Sokoto in africa can just build the same type of industry as England and make the same type of government changes. The westernization System from Vic 2 made it so that these small countries stuck in the past had to work their way up to a modern way of doing things while meeting resistance with the pops that did not want these changes. 11:32 Yea, That's kinda not true most of the time, I once passed a reform to turn the U.S. into a monarchist state with Joshua Norton in charge and faced 0 revolt. Pops rarely resist the changes you want. you can choose whatever government you want. Victoria 2 did this way better, remaining a monarchy in Vic 2 was hard. and pops would rebel if a popular change wasn't enacted. Victoria 2 just did most rebels and revolts better in general. Vic 3 has just generalized this as "radical pops" which isnt as interesting as Vic 2 as there were multiple types of radical pops Communist, Fascist, Jacobins, Rebels of certain pops you conquered, and even Pan-Nationalists to name a few. Most of Vic 3's mechanics are watered down from Vic 2 or not even in the Vic 3 at all.

This should be the experience with austria after losing a major war tbh, cuz this actually seems impossible to fully solve

Pretty sure presidential republic is worse than monarchy

I have formed arabia once as Hediaz, the trick is to go to war almost day 1. Expand into your small neigbours, you really need their pops

I very much agree, especially with the parts comparing vic 3 to hoi4 where as in hoi4 the game is pretty shitty and doesnt actually feel like roleplay unless you are forcing yourself to pretend to be doing anything related to a genocide of a specific population and a resurgence of an economy through goddamn focuses like you are telling me that germany was doing this shit through 70 day buffs that magically recovered the economy like where is the immersion its a much better feeling learning how to work an economy during one of the most dramatic time periods that spans multiple decades rather than just one with the events being locked into placed by ai and even when hoi4 isnt on historical the ai can still manage to get the correct and historical events in place. Also literally nothing changes other than idealogies and what factions you can only sometimes join. I mean its bs that democratic nations and non alligned cant even declare war and you need a "spirit" aka a line of code determining if you can create a faction

Cool

- iron is expensive - tools are cheap "why is my tooling workshop doing badly?"

You can basically realise every nation as dominions and within 4 days reunite it by pressing the form button

This video and youtube channel is underated.

Kushite and Egyptian religions both believed that divinity was handed down through the female side of a familial line since a lone of women was the only way to guarantee that the spiritual right stayed in the bloodline. It's why egyptians always elevated a son born from a daughter of the previous queen to the station of Pharoah, even if other sons from concubines had been born before. The kushites had the sane belief on divinity, but my research into them really only goes into the religious aspect, and its give and take relatio ship with the Egyptian gods.

1066 ruthenia martial: ☠️ 1066 ruthenia diplomacy: 🗿

Dude istg , u just suck

Mate, you probably had the worst luck ever, maybe as similar as me

Vulpes loves the gay comminity! Hes also a chaser

I've always found myself going Islam anymore in ck3 for the protection from the Catholics. While I've managed to reform pagan faiths and become feudal and make a respectable empire, I'd always get a holy war declared on me by the Catholics. Is there any way to be near Europe and not Catholic or Islamic?

Russia is tough because both Rurik and Dyre of Kiev both start with special troops like Haesteinn does

Forming Abyssinia or forming a new empire

how less then 1k

Khazaria is actually the biggest jewish kingdom ever

The events that let you change your religion are stress events and they're very random. You either get to choose between stress traits, the most common, stress modifiers, or converting to a heresy of your religion.

Vulpes, bro, you can move your rally point(where you raise your armies) in the military tab. It is at the bottom. Edit: nvm you found out