Amin

The believe of Ahlus-Sunnah is Allah exists without a place because Allah existed and there was no place and after creating the place Allah don't change Allah exists without a place. Who believe Allah is in a place is not a muslim

this is faith of true muslim from china

No one denies the aboveness of Allah. However, it is not an above in terms of direction and place, but rather of status. Allah is above everything in status, and he is exalted from the six directions abs places and other attributes of the creation

@@mz8452 wait I confused him with Al-Baqillani. Al Baqillani is the one who affirmed literal aboveness of Allah over the Throne

@@hahdgdgherfhxno, al baqilani also said it’s not an aboveness of place.

Yes my brother.. This is exactly what Imam Nawawi said.. وكذا قال كثير من العلماء .. والحق ان المعتريدية و الاشاعرة انما هم اهل السنة و الجماعة .... واكثر العلماء كانوا من هاتين الجماعتين ....

The believe of Ahlus-Sunnah is Allah exists without a place because Allah existed and there was no place and after creating the place Allah don't change Allah exists without a place. Who believe Allah is in a place is not a muslim

@@karimdadda3051 depends what you mean by saying " place " if u mean that something surrounds allah then thats kufr , but we say that allah is above all of his creations and nothing is above him and we dont use the term "place " cuz its not in Qur'an or the sunna the philosophers came up with these thing and علم الكلام

@@karimdadda3051 and if u want to talk about aqeedah then bring evidences from the quran and the sunnah dont bring me the human brain and علم الكلام

​@@karimdadda3051true indeed

​@@awabze2425stop following khawarij

be my guest kid

Read Hayat ul Anbiya by imam Al Bayhaqi

He was not, he's a deviant and lier

Also to add its highly recommended to do tawassul thru ur own good deeds as stated in Hadiths. So when ppl say “just ask Allah” there is so many Hadiths mentioning tawassul that it would ignorant to claim its impermissible

Also, a lot of us sometimes ask other people or a sheikh or an Imam to keep us in their prayers, especially when it comes to making Dua for a family member that has passed away. Why then ask someone else to keep you in their prayers while you can pray and ask Allah yourself? Well in short the answer is, you never know who's Dua will/can be answered. And if we say that's okay to ask someone alive then are we saying that the prophet ﷺ is dead in his grave? While prophet Musa(as) was seen praying in his grave when Rasool Allah ﷺ was on the journey of Meraj? Or that he ﷺ was able to be a mediator for the people when he was alive during his time? The prophet ﷺ is the best of the creation, the chosen one and the beloved, if you use him ﷺ in your Duas to Allah InshaAllah the chances of them being is answered is much much higher than just using our own broken Ill established prayers and Duas.

Jazakallahu khairan for the explanation br.

There's no evidence that it becomes a fiqh matter anyways, no one did it and it is definitely Shirk Akbar to do that filthy work.

Brother with all due respect, He just said it's established by all 4 madhabs and the masses? You think he is saying without any research? Please have a little open mind and just sit down with your own thoughts and think about the level of the prophet ﷺ that was given to him by Allah. Not a second goes by without the prophet ﷺ being praised in this life. All the adhan in this entire world has his name mentioned, all the iqamas, all the prayers that we perform has his name ﷺ in it. Every attahiyyat we recite is a conversation between him ﷺ and Allah. Allah says in the Quran "And we exalted for you your remembrance”. SubhanAllah, just look around yourself and you'll see how the prophet ﷺ is continuously being praised around us. Also, a lot of us sometimes ask other people or a sheikh or an Imam to keep us in their prayers, especially when it comes to making Dua for a family member that has passed away. Why then ask someone else to keep you in their prayers while you can pray and ask Allah yourself? Well in short the answer is, you never know who's Dua will/can be answered. And if we say that's okay to ask someone alive then are we saying that the prophet ﷺ is dead in his grave? While prophet Musa(as) was seen praying in his grave when Rasool Allah ﷺ was on the journey of Meraj? Or that he ﷺ was able to be a mediator for the people when he was alive during his time? The prophet ﷺ is the best of the creation, the chosen one and the beloved, if you use him ﷺ in your Duas to Allah InshaAllah the chances of them being is answered is much much higher than just using our own broken Ill established prayers and Duas. At the end of the day، if you have a problem with Tawassul, just don't do it, which is completely fine. But just don't say anything against it without having done all the research yourself. May Allah (SWT) guide us all, آمین۔

Why we don't study Kitab a-Sunna by Harb al-Kirmani kzbin.info/www/bejne/qp7Xl5uid66Drqc

The sıfat of Allah that he is all hearing isn’t limited to being able to hear from afar. The Prophet peace and blessings be upon him could hear people talking in Mecca while he peace and blessings be upon him was in Medina

You answered your own question at the end. Allah SWT is ALL HEARING so hearing from afar & close doesn’t apply to him. The prophet ﷺ or any other human hearing from afar is still a limitation, because by saying he hears from afar doesn’t automatically mean he hears everything & anything like Allah SWT. & Allah knows best

1). I don't know how you refute Christian & shias(Ya Ali Madad). There is group in Christian Jehowa Witness who don't believe jesus to be god, they tell you, we worship god through jesus. christians do become Muslims so If Christian will tell you that I will become Muslim saying sahadha but at the same time I will ask for help from jesus. would that make him Muslim or mushrik. absolutely mushrik. You guys should join Christian, hindus, jews. 2). The text of Quran is clear, asking help from the dead people whether from prophets, messangers, awaliya(friend of Allah like Shaykh Abdul Qadir jilani), peer(saints), shaykhs, righteous people who are not alive in this world but alive in the barzakh is Mushrik. This is mentioned by Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan | Ibn Uthamin | Ibn Baz | Shaykh Salih Aly Sahyakh & other major scholars 3). When it comes to living people in this world, then ulema put condition like someone is present, alive in this world & able to help that he's capable then it is permissible like Allah said in Quran related to Musha alyhisalam & other prophets asking help from their followers. This is mentioned by Shaykh Salih Al Fawzan | Ibn Uthamin | Ibn Baz | Shaykh Salih Aly Sahyakh & other major scholars 4). When they are live in this world, barely they understood 2-3 language, but somehow Ali ibn Talib radiAllahhunAnhu & prophet Muhammad peace be upon him understood more than one language. Allah is Al ALim(all-knowledgable) not propehts & companions this is major shirk in Allah's sifaat(attributes) 5). And also at the same time, they listen the voices of many peoples in front of their or far from their graves while all of them asking for help or saying oh prophet or awalia make dua to Allah for me(which is major shirk intercession, bidah & haram, as well) 6). Shirk makes people intellect corrupt 7) watch shamshi videos recently with barelvi-sufi by typing on youtube | Shamshi Vs Bareliv Al Istaghtaha| 8) for more about tawheed, sufis, istaghta, tawasool(wasila) & shafaa'ah visit abdurrahmandot org website & learn directly from schoalrs

That is actually based on the assumption that imam abu hanifa and imam maturidi followed different creedal views which is false because imam abu hanifa's creedal views were the basis on which imam maturidi developed theology

Kendini küçük düşüren kişiden daha onursuz başka bir şey yoktur. Kendini alçaltan birinden daha alçak kimse yoktur. Kendine işkence eden ve kendine zarar verenden daha yıkıcı ya da akılsız kimse yoktur. Hiç kimsenin kendisine tecavüz etmeye hakkı yoktur. Eğer biri bunu yaparsa, o zaman kesinlikle bir canavara dönüşecek ve sonunda insanlara olan tüm saygısını kaybedecek ve etrafındaki herkese karşı bencil, duygusuz ve acımasız olacaktır. Bazı ebeveynler kendi çocuklarını dövmenin doğru olduğunu düşünüyor. Kendi çocuklarınızı dövmeniz asla doğru değildir. Çünkü onlar sizin güveniniz ve kontrolünüz altındadır. İnsanların en acımasızı kendisiyle zina yapandır. İnsanın ruhunu yiyip bitiren bundan daha büyük bir kötülük yoktur, insanın kendine yaptığı bu mutlak aşağılama eyleminden daha büyük bir kötülük yoktur. Bu eylem insanı canavarlaştırır ve zalimleştirir, çevresindeki acı çeken herkese karşı tutkulu ve duygusuz kılar, çünkü kendinden nefret ederek ve kendine saygı duymayarak zevk almak için kendilerini eğittikleri bu hastalıktan uzaklaşmak istemezler. Kişinin kendi kalbini ve zihnini sürekli olarak aşağılayıcı cinsel düşünceler düşünerek zevk almaya zorlaması, kişinin öz saygısını öyle bir noktaya kadar yok eder ki, kişi kendisinden daha saf veya daha dindar olan herkesi aşırı derecede kıskanır hale gelir. Bu kıskançlık kişinin kendine olan inancını yitirmesine, zihinsel ve duygusal olarak aşırı derecede zayıflamasına ve korkmasına neden olur ki bu da bağımlılığın, duygusal umutsuzluğun, şehvet çılgınlığının ve bir sevgilinin köleliğinin başlamasına yol açar. Mastürbasyon çok masum ve zararsız görünen bir eylemdir ve bir insanın kalbini, duygularını, merhametini ve insanlığını tamamen yok edebilir. Bu eylem birçok insanın hayatını mahvedebilir ve gelecekteki tüm başarılarını tamamen yok edebilir. Bir insanın ruh sağlığını ve zihinsel gücünü yok etmek için yapabileceği en korkunç eylemdir. Mastürbasyon yapanlar arasında intihar oranı çok yüksektir ve bu alışkanlığı olan insanlar aşırı yoksulluk çekmektedir; evsiz erkeklerin neredeyse yüzde doksanının sürekli olarak mastürbasyon yaptığı bildirilmiştir. Bu onların öz saygılarını, ruh sağlıklarını ve başarılarını yok etmekte ve zihinlerini korku, zayıflık ve öfke ile doldurmakta, bu da sonunda suç ve uyuşturucu gibi kendine zarar veren eylemlere yol açmaktadır. Mastürbasyon gibi çirkin bir alışkanlığı olan pek çok insanın şeytana taptığını, dinsizleştiğini, inancını ve öz saygısını kaybettiğini biliyorum. Tamamen zararsız gibi görünen bu eylem, bir insanın psikolojisine zarar verebiliyor ve kendilerine doğru ile yanlış arasındaki farkı öğretecek bir dine ve inanca sahip olmayanlar için bu eylemi teşvik etmekle sonuçlanıyor. Bu, bir insanın kendisine yapabileceği en utanç verici eylemdir. Psikolojik olarak zararlı etkileri vardır ve çoğu zaman kişiyi hayatının ilerleyen yıllarında bile depresyona sürükler. Bu, her türlü mutluluğu, huzuru, kendine güveni, özsaygıyı, kendine olan inancı ve onuru yok eden bir şeydir. Yaklaşık 3.000 ila 4.000 sosyal medya hesabı üzerinden düzenli olarak davranış analizi raporları yazan, yorumları ve paylaşımları takip eden araştırmacılar, bu kişilerin paylaşımları ve tweet'leri aracılığıyla sürekli olarak bu eylemin içinde olduğunu anlamış ve ardından diğer tüm paylaşımlarını ve yorumlarını derinlemesine araştırmışlar, sonuç ise akıl almaz ve ölümcül olmuştur. Bu kişilerin hepsinin son derece tutkulu ve başkalarına karşı öfkeli bir dil kullandıkları görülmüş. Hayranlarından ya da sosyal medya sayfalarındaki takipçilerinden gelen her türlü hakaret ya da nefrete şiddetle tepki verme eğilimindeydiler. Düzenli olarak mastürbasyon yapan bu kişiler, bir gün bir kişiyi şiddetle desteklerken, ertesi gün ona tamamen küfrediyor ve ondan nefret ediyordu. Bu psikologlar ve araştırmacılar, bu kişilerin aşırı duyguları ve ruh hali değişiklikleri nedeniyle neredeyse akli dengelerinin bozulduğunu varsaymaktadır. Şu anda bekar olmakla hiçbir şey kaybetmeyeceksiniz. Hiçbir ilişki kaybetmezsiniz ve hiçbir saygı kaybetmezsiniz. Hiçbir mutluluk ve dostluk kaybetmeyeceksiniz. Aslında, hiçbir şey kaybetmeyeceksiniz ama kendinizin ve sizin hayal bile edemeyeceğiniz kadar çok şey kazanacaksınız. Cinsel olarak aktif olan ve geçmişinde cinsel faaliyetlerde bulunmuş olanlara gelince, ancak yakın gelecekte cinsel ilişkilerin çoğunun sonunda birbirlerine karşı büyük bir öfke, nefret ve gizli bir tiksintiyle sonuçlandığını fark edeceklerdir. Ve hayatımda birçok kez, cinsel ilişkiye girdiklerine o kadar pişman olan insanlar gördüm ki, bunu geri almak ve o cinsel karşılaşmayı geri almak için dünyada her şeyi yapabilirlerdi. Bekâr ve iffetli kalarak tüm bu nefret ve acıdan kaçınabilir, tüm bu eziyet, saygısızlık ve onursuzluktan uzak durabilirsiniz çünkü iffetli kalarak yalnızca iyi ve dürüst arkadaşlara sahip olmakla kalmayacak, aynı zamanda genel davranışlarınız da hoş olacak, nazik ve merhametli bir mizaç geliştireceksiniz.

@@zakymalik6920 They followed different creedal views. Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah was upon the creed of the Salaf as-Saliheen. Maturidi was a mutakallim who deviated from the creed of the Salaf as-Saliheen. Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah was initially a student of Ilm al-Kalam but he later denounced it in his life after he saw the evils in it. Imam Abu Hanifah رحمه الله said, “May Allaah curse ‘Amr ibn ‘Ubayd as he opened the door for people to speak about matters that have no benefit of 'Ilm al-Kalaam.” A man asked him, “What would you say about what people invented in speaking about the tangible and non-tangible things?" and he replied, “These are the statements of philosophers; you should stick to the hadeeth (of the Prophet) and the way of the Salaf (righteous predecessors) and avoid every newly invented matter as it is an innovation.” Hammaad ibn Abi Haneefah (son of Abu Haneefah) said, “My father - may Allaah have mercy upon him - entered my house once while a group of people of Kalaam advocates were with me, and we were debating about a subject with raised voices. When I heard his voice in the house, I came out to him, and he said to me, 'O Hammaad, who is with you?' I said, so and so, and so and so, and I mentioned their names; and he said, 'What are you debating about?' I said, 'We are debating about such and such subject.' Then he said to me, 'O Hammaad, give up Kalaam.' Hammaad said, 'I did not know my father as someone who would order something and then forbid it. So I said to him, 'O father, did you not command me to take it up?' He said, 'Yes, my son, but today I am forbidding you from it.' I said, 'Why is that?' He said, 'O son, these people who argue about subjects of Kalaam used to have one view and one religion (belief), then the devil incited enmity and differences between them, so they became divided...'”

@@zakymalik6920 In terms of creedal views; Ibn Abi Al-ʻIzz said in Sharh At-Tahaawiyyah: “The statements of the Salaf (righteous predecessors) about affirming the attribute of ʻuluww are many. For instance, Shaykhul-Islam Abu Ismaaʻeel Al-Ansaari said in his book Al-Farooq with a chain of narration up to Muteeʻ Al-Balkhi that he asked Abu Haneefah about the person who says, 'I do not know whether my Lord is in the heaven or on the earth.' He (Abu Haneefah) said, 'He has committed kufr (disbelief), because Allaah says (what means): {The Most Merciful (Who is) above the Throne established.} [Quran 20:5], and His Throne is above seven heavens.' He further asked Imaam Abu Haneefah, 'What if he says, 'He is above the Throne but I do not know whether the Throne is in the heaven or on the earth.'' Imaam Abu Haneefah replied, 'He is kaafir (a disbeliever) because he denies that He is in the heaven. Whoever denies that He is in the heaven has committed kufr.' Another narrator added, 'Because Allaah is above the highest heaven, and He is supplicated upwards not downwards (i.e. people raise their heads towards the heaven and stretch their hands upwards towards Allaah).'” [Sharh Al-ʻAqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah] Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah condemned the one who denies the 'uluww of Allah as a disbeliever. Maturidi does not affirm 'uluww and stated this suggests affirming a place for Allah (a false premise based on ideals from his kalami beliefs.)

@@zakymalik6920 also an assumption lol

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته The Sharh is utilised by many around the world without their insight on the author and his misrepresentative nature. Although it is clear from the Sharh itself that he is literally critiquing Imām at-Tahāwī, many fall prey into believing he is just expanding on Tahāwīs understanding, which is not true. Especially considering that many matters he brings are far-fetched and completely contradict the known and agreed upon Hanafi creed. In addition, our books have been claimed by the same group for years, us translating a video exposing the nature of the commentator and his clear agenda to insert Taymiyyan philosophy is better than being lied to for decades regarding an Imām (Tahāwī).

No

Why ?@@marufabdullah8241

Jesus is not in church. They have placed hanging idol, which is not jesus

@@lonemurtaza2276 again I do not consider that idol to possess any power yet make him waseela that Allah has the sole power and can grant my wish and has the absolute power. So that should be right ? Because Jesus is one of Allah’s beloved prophet and he is alive , so whats wrong in Waseela with him ?

You can do Istigatha with Jesus Alaihissalam but what is the pupose of going to that Idol??​@@altafpatel