The Universe Writes Itself Into Existence Moment by Moment

[@TheoriesofEverything]

SPONSOR (THE ECONOMIST): As a listener of TOE you can get a special 20% off discount to The Economist and all it has to offer! Visit www.economist.com/toe

[@MrPublicPain]

My take on the flow of time is uniqueish. If there truly are zillions of everything in the past and future and present, where does the energy come from to maintain the zillions of futures before they happen? That is why it makes no sense to think time is actually manipulatable to take us into the past or future. Where does the energy come from to maintain the past and create the future a zillion times every femtosecond or at plank scale? That seems like an awful lot of wasted energy doesn't it, if time is actually snapshots that can be manipulated on a universal scale? NO going forward, except on paper and at speed but not enough energy to have pre-created future "frames" to pass time through. No going backwards because there is not energy to do it. Nobody addresses the energy needed to "run" a universe it seems in their little snap shot analogues. Calculate the energy required to maintain a femtosecond record of the future universe before they happen. You can't. Because it's an illusion based on a concept that we manipulate through the analogue of math. Trying to describe corporeal reality IS NOT the actual reality. It's an attempt to understand and explain using other mean than, say, holding Sol in your hands and studying it with magic machines. When the experiment data, understanding and manipulation of the corporeal object all line up? We get a real thing with real understanding and the control that comes with it. Electric generator for example. WE have those down pat! The "past" is only corporeal in objects that remain. A process can be run back and forward and are a description of a concept, not corporeal reality actually letting you hit rewind and fast forward in time. Beware the analogue taking the place of the real corporeal object in your understanding of a concept. And 4 dimensions is basic as the universe runs moment by moment because the energy needed can only by accessed in THE PRESENT. That is my notion anyway. That the past and future have no energy to maintain themselves and the present is the energy state. The conservation of energy means we live in a boring low state present with the energy required for only the present because the energy required to maintain a past or future in infinite. Space time is emerging because when something comes into existence it needs ROOM to be in. The more things that quantumly become? The more room those "things" needs so space is created as well as time because the thing is in the present.

[@NicholasWilliams-uk9xu]

Negative mass is closer to what dark energy is (even though the planck masses there are higher), a mass where (when it's angular quanta masses are bigger than the angular masses that surround it, it's a inverse angular quanta number growth replaced with larger singular quanta growth, this is also quantized growth because the singular mass must displace hbar angular lengths, instead of with regular mass growth by multiples (hbar*n) for mass energy density scaling, which in reality is a division of angular quanta (hbar*n is number of angular quanta radial density scaling (in reality it's a division), and hbar/n single angular quanta displacement of surrounding quanta by radial extent (is a increase of a single angular quantum size))). The single angular quanta circumference grows by displacement of the smaller more uniform quanta around it, instead of increasing angular quanta density with traditional mass scaling. (hbar/n) radius, or (hbar*n) radius, quantized power scaling of a angular quantum vortex or multiple divisions of them by radial displacement. Speed contracts with length by same proportion but doesn't effect time, time dilates with curvature degree quantum vortex alignment, which is a second order vector reflection resistance (effecting the speed more than the length, dilating the time rate of atomic clocks).

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

It doesn't matter if you endorse many worlds or not... We have observational proofs for this given the logical progression of the spatial dimensions and the observations of our three-dimensional universe which is perceived as flat which means our three-dimensional universe potentiality is being stacked infinitely into a four-dimensional manifold biggest infinite amount of the previous dimension get stack in any size version of the next... I will say this a thousand times over if necessary but in order to create a theory of everything you must know the fundamental state of magnetism... If you don't know that magnetism is opposite spinning toroidal flows with one side spinning inward towards the center and one spinning outward in the opposite direction on the other side then you don't understand fundamental magnetism and if you don't understand magnetism at its most fundamental level then you can never create an accurate theory of Everything...

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

Again another major problem with our disconnect with quantum mechanics and general relativity is the fact that we live in a imperfect world and we have imperfect mathematical structures... With our current mathematical system we have pushed the problem of curvature in our mathematics out towards Infinity... If we follow the Terrence Howard style system and we follow my conversion functions that I made for this system then we can have a near-perfect mathematical structure that will help the unification of quantum mechanics and general relativity... For instance if we do a plus one on the multiplication side and a minus one on the division side we maintain the same Fibonacci spiral and therefore we have a system that is in lockstep with our current mathematical system except for when approaching down towards zero the mathematical structures become non-linear and have an extreme curve our current mathematical structure pushes this problem out towards Infinity... Because of this we have a disconnect between general relativity and quantum mechanics... at the most fundamental level we have a mathematical problem that needs to be fixed before we can ever create any theory of Everything or any connection between quantum mechanics and general relativity... X²*X²*X²*•••♾️ < X³ this mathematical equation holds true because ² is a square function and a square is two-dimensional an infinite amount of two dimensional existence can stack into any size three dimensional existence so therefore X³ is always greater than infinite amounts of X² multiplied or however else because ³ is a cubed function and is three-dimensional with depth...

[@AquarianSoulTimeTraveler]

I think he fundamentally misunderstands time... What time is actually a spatial dimension and we have infinite amounts of three-dimensional universal potentiality branching and stacking on top of each other because ultimately if we were the highest spatial dimension in the third dimension then we would expect the relative state or shape of the universe to be round and this is not what we observed we observe a compressed or flat state or shape of the universe which means that our three-dimensional reality is stacking into a four-dimensional manifold and 4D is the time dimension but to us in the third dimension it seems like it can never move because it is only time but if we were in the fourth dimension it would be a physical dimension... We just can't observe it moving because we are three-dimensional...

[@hectorbacchus]

I am stunned that he said that they detected the mirror being “pulled” instead of being pushed after a particle hit it, thus indicating a negative mass. 😳This is incredible.

[@TheMikesylv]

Curt’s show is so amazing it never disappoints

[@ARJ-Richard-Arendsen]

Thanks Curt, this new physics fits perfectly into my philosophy (complex idealism). Elitzur’s nothingness is Henri Bergson's duration. I call it imaginary flow. Spacetime is created out of imaginary flow by exponentiation. It creates a vibrating universe, just like Euler’s formula. Now has a thickness in time where time vibrates both directions at all frequencies. The speed of light and mass are complex features, they flow. So negative mass is a negative flow. Distance is an experience. Driving forces are vibrating time. Discrete space is a placeholder. These are just some overlaps that I found during your talk. I have to study his new physics more, but I already really resonate with it.

[@SP-qi8ur]

Have you ever written a proof by mathematical induction?

[@Gringohuevon]

Thanks ChatGpt

[@axle.student]

I get where you are coming from. I tend to lean into an interpretation as an analog universe. All concepts of a discrete point of measurement is inherently fuzzy, and the more you zoom the more fuzzy any concept of a point becomes. So, now at a microscopic or quantum level becomes somewhat fuzzy like a vibration or oscillation around and imaginary point.

[@timjohnson3913]

@46:45 Curt’s bit here about bepasting was incredible. I love that he or someone thought of it. I agree with him that it’s ridiculous but definitely a “wtf that’s amazing someone thought of that” moment for me.

[@know1355]

Loved this conversation! Much food for thought🙏

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

Normally I don't comment too early, but I love how Avshalom opens up the conversation. You and your efforts are an inspiration, Curt!

[@user-cg3tx8zv1h]

@ 1:44:24 "You told me what I think! I didn't know that I think this is what I think!" Brilliant...

[@axle.student]

Cuts reflective listening skills are exceptional :)

[@NewMusic.FreshIdeas]

As a student of philosophy, especially of phenomenology and particularly of Heidegger's "Being and TIME" (ahem), Elitzur is one of the few physicists who speak to my understanding of the real. Experience is foundational, ideas are derivative. If you reverse that ontology, calamity ensues. Elitzur maintains the proper order.

[@RichardSprague]

Exactly what I thought while listening. Heidegger anticipated all of this.

[@16876]

"maintains proper order". no, gatekeeping is maintaining disorder, in fact.

[@axle.student]

I am no pro, but I found many correlations with some of my own ideas. Much of what he said has a great deal of merit in my honest opinion.

[@1vootman]

This guy is so cool, what a great guest. I love his thoughts on QM, Thanks for the interview Kurt and Elitzur

[@Kounomura]

Reality is nothing but the breakdown of nothing into "positive" and "negative". Similar to how if you don't have money, there is "nothing", no story, (no time and space) But if you take out a loan, you split the zero into +1 million and -1 million dollars, then you immediately have both pozitive money and minus money. And then an interesting story can start, there will be space, there will be time and an interesting story can start... I have cherished this idea since my youth.

[@kafiruddinmulhiddeen2386]

You are on to something. Keep digging, maybe you will find out.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

Reality is life, and life is only body and mind, both of which are in incessant change. When the change stops, life is no more, reality is no more. What I called "body" is a collection of material, physical functions, all of them described by various sciences. Here, we are only interested in sense organs and their functions. What I called "mind" is a collection of mental functions: Sensation - something is sensed by a sense organ Perception - that something is like this, or like that in memory Mental fabrication - a mental representation of that something from memory is built, inevitably changed in the process to accommodate the Sensation. This changes the memory, too. Consciousness - mental function of knowing the "things" manufactured in this entire process. -- Mind also has its sensory function, it senses mental objects. Most of the activity described above handles exactly such objects. Meaning, the closest we can come to reality is Sensation; everything after that is mere interpretation.

[@georgepanathas2009]

For some reason positive annihilated negative and an electron or something like that remained from the bing bang so this positive outcome created cosmos as we know it

[@TheMikesylv]

So if you carry that forward positive-negative linear time-all time , magnetism-gravity , high power short distance energy propagates electromagnetic- long distance low power energy dark energy (like ac electricity) high energy density matter attractive gravity- low energy density matter repulsive gravity ( dark matter) so on

[@mw-th9ov]

To be clear, the experiment referred to in this talk which is said to demonstrate retro causation and support for this proposal is not an actual experiment. It is a proposal for an experiment: a thought experiment linked in the preface above. When Professor Elitzur says "don't believe me, believe the experiment" he is referring to an experiment he has proposed, not the results of an experiment that has been done.

[@PauloRenatoRodriguesprr]

Amazing conversation! This guy is absolutely a genius! Crazy and bold ideas that make sense!!!!

[@jsalva01]

This is incredible - can’t wait to see where this goes

[@elfranz]

the more i dig into this video, the more my brain is twisting. this is simply mindblowing.

[@user-cg3tx8zv1h]

This collection of conversations continues to transcend expectations. The podcast stands unrivaled in its intellectual depth and philosophical rigor. It is unmatched in the depth and exhaustive comprehensiveness with which it explores subjects. I can easily imagine Curt's TOE is becoming an emerging as a beacon for distinguished scientists, philosophers, and profound thinkers, far beyond a mere podcast for enthusiasts or students.

[@sebaztsukinorakuen3648]

Best podcast and genuine person I have had the joy to listen to in a good while.

[@thomastormaschy3835]

TIME IS THE ROTATION OF SPACE, THE MOST CLEVER WAY TO ADD A DIRECTIONAL VECTOR TO 3D SPACE IS TO ROTATE SAID SPACE, HENCE SPACE ROTATES THRU MATTER

[@jojogaming1013]

Interesting. Every single guest has a completely different view of how reality works.

[@joshuadonahue5871]

I guess that's why it's called "theories of everything" and not "theory of everything"

[@tetiraelian]

Yes, it means nobody really knows what's going on.

[@radscorpion8]

and literally no one watching has a clue what is being said

[@couldntfindafreename]

Hopefully one day a talented researcher watch all these interviews and combine them into a single TOE which is both simple to understand and works in practice.

[@feliciozo]

make them box, whoever wins is the most realest

[@akirasthecat]

The "Now" is an event horizon in/of time.

[@GoodBaleada]

Curt, you create a public forum where these mindsets are set free on each other. With all hubris earned. Rare.

[@enidsnarb]

My favorite podcast here so far and that is saying a lot !

[@coder-x7440]

This is why learning to program is such an imperative regardless of AI doing it better, calculators do math better but we shouldn’t avoid math because of it. The block universe or causal universe Elitzur is describing is essentially the same description one can give to any software program. I wonder if he codes to be honest because if he did it would help inform his intuition.

[@axle.student]

Not really. The block universe essentially dictates that your program is just a movie that plays through without any interaction (determinism). Actually it worse than that, every screen already exist in the Z order and your consciousness just moves through the different bodies of you on each layer. > There is interest in Computer simulation theory and the Holographic universe that are closer to your description :) Ol mate Wolfram does a lot on those concepts :)

[@quantummechanic59]

I loved the thumbnail in the video "Something is missing in physics". My answer is Yes, understanding!

[@tofu-munchingCoalition.ofChaos]

40:00 Here are ways to disprove many worlds (only the Schrödinger equation): 1. Find a collapse process (for example like Penrose proposes - there are experiments going on so far many worlds was not falsified). 2. Find patterns between experimental outcomes that should be random (some guiding wave theories suggest that) in many worlds. 3. Find a violation of linearity in the evolution of states (that's essentially where many worlds comes from). ...

[@0thniel101]

Avshalom Elitzur, what a wonderful mind. I totally resonated with his ideas and also his aversion towards many worlds interpretation XD. Looking forward to next talk. Love your work Curt!

[@vickigriffiths6800]

This sounds similar to Ruth Kastner's Transactional Theory of QM - It would be interesting to have a discussion about the differences...any chance of getting her onto your podcast?

[@pv2132]

Proton coherence is what can affect time both back and forth in time. At a black hole where they should decohere “decay”, time becomes stretched to never allow this to happen. This is all I was able to come up with.

[@Amandaaaaaaaaaaaaa]

I know nothing about Phisics but I would listen to Elitzor all day long!

[@StephenPaulKing]

Thank you, Curt, for this interview. Maybe you can get Ruth Kastner soon.

[@techteampxla2950]

Amazing guest and always informative.

[@jakeabrams2542]

Wonderful guest and discussion. I wonder how Abshalom’s model handles the Higgs - if I’m understanding his hypothesis correctly, the non-zero scalar potential (and the associated Higgs self-interactions(?) and graviton exchange) would create spacetime without the need for (before) any fermions or gauge boson exchange. Hopefully we’ll learn more during Part 2!

[@axle.student]

This was quite a profound interview. Mr Avshalom Elitzur has some quite profound ideas. I don't agree with all aspects when comparing with my own investigation of the materials presented here, but I find a general agreement with many concepts. I watched this video over 2 days and created approximately 6 pages worth of notes comparing my own concepts to Mr Avshalom Elitzur. It felt somewhat warming to know that someone else has capacity to see physics in this way. Some of the ideas are profound and difficult to describe and I did make comment improving upon some aspects. Unfortunately YT is unlikely to allow me to post 6 pages as a comment. I only posted one page of well formatted comments on a previous video and they are automatically deleted. I feel that it is a shame that we live in a world where important concepts such as the content of this video is not allowed to be discussed :( > Keep at it Mr Avshalom Elitzur. I don't think you have it exact as yet, but I do feel you see the problem and you are on a sound pathway. Thank you Curt for presenting this to us.

[@pantherstealth1645]

👆💯

[@axle.student]

@@pantherstealth1645 Thank you. I wish I could post my notes :(

[@feltonhamilton21]

I believe the fabric of space acts sort of like the base energy that moves slowly and always stable and gravity is that negative energy which is only stable when it can line up with the fabric of space internally or externally to help both of their friction generate images between them and not have their images permanently fade away from existence. Information can never be erased if gravity is working with the fabric of space. It is possible black holes could be recording information about the universe and we just don't have an idea how to record or understand this information. If it's true all planets have their own radio sounds it may be possible all their information could be broken up into sound bits stewing up inside a black hole. If there's any sound coming from a black hole that is a sign of information inside a black hole.

[@BobDobbs68]

If you could work up any kind of math to support this, you’d have as valid a theory as anyone else🤔

[@EternalSearcher]

Avshalom Elitzur is nothing more but a mama boy with mama boy theories

[@tikaanipippin]

Negative mass implies antigravity. In statistical phenomena, such as radioactive decay, how do individual nuclei manage to maintain a constant half-life, or are they all entangled, or in a double slit demonstration, how the distribution of the interference bands remain proportional and symmetrical. I see virtual particle pairs travelling in both directions of time constrained to the wavefunction everywhere now.

[@Khashayarissi-ob4yj]

👏👏👏 So beautiful video. Thank you professor. With luck and more power to you. Walking the path of knowledge and what a beautiful path it is. Thank you Doctor. Hoping for more videos. Dear doctor, I would be greatful if you would make great videos in the fields of philosophy of science, scientific philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and computer science with the same seriousness as the great physics videos. I wish you success. With thanks.

[@mw-th9ov]

I'm sympathetic to the view that causation requires real time, but the idea of a new time at every instant threatens to be another many worlds assertion but simplified to a single dimension.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

Hey, professor: 1 Time and space are both non-existent things. 2 Time is always Now, future and past "flow" from it but the "flow" is only imagined in our Minds. 3 Space is nothing but the relationship between minimum 2 objects. Remove one, where is the space? 4 The moment your rocket started to move towards your tunnel, the rocket and the tunnel are moving towards each other. Meaning, they both "shrink" at an equal rate, both remaing the same length - rocket is always 1 tunnel long, and the tunnel is always 1 rocket long. 5 If the rocket started moving sideways, at a 90 degrees angle in relation to the tunnel, the same as described under point 4 happens, except now they both move away from each other. But they shrink at an equal rate and their respective dimensions remain the same - rocket is 1 tunnel long, tunnel is 1 rocket long. 6 Zen masters have resolved these kinds of problems long ago: Two monks look at a flag on a pole. One monk says: "The flag is moving." The other monk says: "The wind is moving." Their Abbott who was passing by, overheard them and said: "Not the flag, not the wind, the Mind is moving." 7 Not the rocket, not the tunnel, the Mind is moving.

[@E______]

Yea but that’s nothing but a verbal reality for 99.999% of people, to embody that is something totally different and one doesn’t get there through intellectual understanding and or words, it comes from dropping of all assumptions, ideas , concepts , everything, to go beyond the word completely by realize the word is never ever the thing but mere pointer to something imperceptible by the mind.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

@E______ When we understand the Two Truths then words are not obstacles and cannot hurt us. To function as human beings in this world, we need understanding of the conventional truths. To understand us and this world within & outside us, we need to have the absolute truth always running in the base of our mind.

[@wwkk4964]

This was brilliant! Thank you so much for this presentation

[@KineHjeldnes]

No, Kant did not claim that any kind of thought needs space and time, only thoughts that have representations :) He also introduced transcendental time where he actually proposed that the knitting together of empirical time is happening; interestingly enough pretty similar to fake pasts and fake futures overlaps. And, William Rowan Hamilton wrote an essay "Algebra as the science of pure time", where he was very inspired by Kant, and where he also philosophically explained the ideas behind pairs of conjugate variables. Which seems very relevant to these ideas :))

[@KineHjeldnes]

Thank you for an amazing conversation!

[@dakrontu]

The puzzle of 'making an observation' appears to remain. We come down to WHAT IS an observation, does anything exist before it is measured, etc. Who or what is entitled to make an observation? Does it require, as some would propose, a conscious entity? Or is it a matter, as Penrose claims, that gravity forces the wave function to collapse, stopping uncertainty from getting out of hand, such that, by analogy, there are sounds in a forest, even if no one is there to hear them.

[@MikeWiest]

Yes. Objective reduction is what really generates the arrow of time that everyone says is missing from physics. Penrose for the win

[@timjohnson3913]

My money is also on Penrose. There’s some aspect of gravity, or more likely some feature of the fundamental spacetime object, that causes collapse in one temporal direction. The collapsing is the present.

[@bazstraight8797]

I took his interpretation to be that any and every exchange of a photon is an observation. ie interaction and observation are the same.

[@MikeWiest]

@@bazstraight8797 who? That’s not what Penrose says…also it’s not consistent with experiments

[@michellegibson3899]

Love to hear what Curt thinks about someone dreaming the future weeks before it occurred. Personally experience I've witnessed the future from others eyes. Multiple times.

[@sylviarogier1]

Some questions from a non-physicist: how can events to create space-time occur if there is no time to differentiate before event and after event? And it seems like space-time would be chunky if it was only created where events/interactions occurred - unless there is some sort of exclusion principal.

[@axle.student]

This concept of what is the fundamental driver that makes everything progress/change in the now moment is a million dollar question that no one has a conclusive answer to. The best I can offer is the analogy of a particle not moving in space, but spinning on the spot. It is not moving but still has momentum. Translate that to an instant in the time line and the object still retains some concept of momentum. (That may not be directly in line with the guest speakers idea though.) > I struggled with the chunky space time concept for a long time. It's chunky in time so to speak so it's not visible but looks a little like how we conceptualize the stretched space gravity wells around planets, So like a kind of 3D space or time dent in 4D space-time. Space is a little stretched back in time, but looks like a gravity well to us.

[@sylviarogier1]

@@axle.student Thanks!

[@axle.student]

​@@sylviarogier1 I hope it was helpful :) Your question just reminded me of a problem I encountered way back when I was attempting to create a universe similar to this. So thank you for that :) There was also another question/comment above in a similar context. I am not a physicist. This is a side passion of mine. > So in short I just kind of resolved the expanding outer boundary of the universe with the internal cosmic expansion of space between galaxies :) All space is expanding along the universes quantum event horizon which means everywhere in the cosmos. It's still lumpy where stars and galaxies are, but otherwise it fits :)

[@mrudo8663]

A dishwasher is my favourite appliances :) it does not have to be turing complete , i just do one thing great, is somehow related to the 2nd law, you cannot clean someting without make someting dirty, i love my dishwasher

[@ACTopo]

Beautiful discussion on the ledge of knowing. Crystalization of Time via nested periodic rhythms and scales or noise is what matters about time and the relative clock rates based on massivity or "PerMassivity" as I have coined a term to help describe the resistance of gravitational wave movements... That said Time is a tool to describe crystalization of nested biological and real rhythmic nature of all physical reality. Relative phase angles between crystalized living temporal songulairities (aka life forms / Broch Membrane I just named after myself that encapsulates crystalized temporal life forms and living realities. Time is a tool for our economic engines and society in general. The next ZenoVolution of sorts is to realize an entire realm exists within and above the concept of time as a super and sub harmonics that create new triplets of concepts of relativism phase angle, amplitude, cyclic life duration/span. Humanity has popularized Relativistic thinking to our own pitfalls at this point - I suspect to bring us to this moment of a new super/subharmonic of scientific foundations to emerge. Remember I'm nothing more than a Fool Trolling the most cutting edge topics. No more no less. Enjoy my LARP - or is it? Who knows.

[@Anyon-z2s]

Generally In agreement seen as a example in microtonal scales in music, dividing a band into new coherence and decoherence functions. I have many similar theories yet my terminology is different. Would you be interested in exchanging emails to discuss them and where we can take It. ? I have some interesting insights I think you would enjoy

[@JohnScott-bb2pm]

Really enjoyed very interesting 👍

[@mw-th9ov]

The assumption throughout is that the collapse of the wave function occurs in physical time and space rather than in a Hilbert space and time. It is a representation of physical space and time. The blank space" referred to as outside the universe refers to the unwritten cells of the not yet enlarged matrix used to describe extended time in updated descriptions not a mysterious extra real space included in an expanding universe. Evidently, the gravity of the universe continually includes the space between experimental particles and is not newly created (or not) depending on how the experimental device is set up.

[@ac12484]

How do you make links in the comment? Are they automatic?

[@IncompleteTheory]

The idea that the photons in the beam splitter eperiments go back in time is interesting, but what would happen if a path was blocked only temporily in that past?

[@sindibadage]

Thanks to people like those two, we are out of caves. No matter if the theory is right or totally wrong, it was pleasure to listen to it, although I have zero idea what they talk about. 😅

[@anonanon2993]

Wow. Mind blown. Thanks a mill.

[@seth956]

The means in which we understand are also the limits to our understanding: a paradoxical cipher for the arrogant mind. There are other means. However, those with prideful motives will run the wheel into insanity. Imagine a cipher that responds to your state of being. "The universe" is playing games with us, so we may become humble to receive what we would like to know.

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

Have a question for a follow-on conversation with Avshalom Elitzur regarding mirage particles. In the experiment (timestamp 1:21:54) the set-up of the experiment leads to the mirage particles. I would expect mirage particles to "occur" outside of that particular experiment alone. I would also expect mirage particles to occur "more frequently" when more particles are in proximity of each other (and opposite; take a cubic space of a light second with only a handful of particles - not a lot of interaction happening there). That makes me think about the first instances of the cosmos, the era of "inflation". Do those mirage particles contribute to the curving (and stretching) of space time? If yes and if there are more mirage particles in "dense" spaces than the most effect they could have was at the cosmic dawn. Perhaps we don't need an inflaton or inflation field or perhaps one can construct those things as a tool to represent mirage particles.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

48:54 "Becoming" is the entire history of the Universe focused in Now. This is also what free will or choice are: because everything there is is just the way it is, the only choice we can possibly make is just this one and no other - regardless of what this one choice is.

[@Justin-f6f4m]

Incredible, he's basically describing the Buddhist dharma realm.

[@kafiruddinmulhiddeen2386]

Dharmic idea, not Buddhist only.

[@sween1432]

This guy reminds me of the mathematician in the movie Pi.

[@Killer_Kovacs]

"yes!" Like kevin McAlister. Spacetime seems to behave like a non-Newtonian fluid. Anton Petrov discussed a new gr effect that changes the viscosity of Spacetime

[@RealQinnMalloryu4]

I hope it is not super fuilde ridddle youtube channel a about SUPER FLUID caused me to have Panic attack I seen it when it first came out ridddle youtube channel caused have panic attack scary video .

[@branimirsalevic5092]

Given the non-existence of space (a nothing cannot be said to exist) and non-existence of time (which is always Now therefore always gone therefore non-existent, where "past" is a memory and "future" is a fantasy , it is difficult to conclude that the union of the two - "spacetime" - exists. Consequently, it is difficult to measure or change viscosity of something that doesn't exist.

[@tofu-munchingCoalition.ofChaos]

30:24 That's an argument that the state is very special in one time direction compared to the other. Not that the laws prefer one time direction over another. That's essentially: Why was there a low entropy state? Why are we not just Boltzmann btains but instead the universe is globally in a low entropy state at "the beginning"?

[@classicalmechanic8914]

Lorentz contraction can coexist with absolute simultaneity but the contraction is slightly different than Einstein's predictions.

[@greentombi]

Finally something which makes sense to me! I hope this is provable, it seems it might be?

[@williamrunner6718]

Universe and Existence are both concepts. They can't move or be moved because to treat a concept like an object is reification. I know the title of this show is poetic not literal but this is actually the way many mathematical physicists talk these days! So you can say LOVE moved mountains. Love is a concept. It can't move anything in reality, it takes objects like a bulldozer and a backhoe to move rocks and dirt. So all concepts are defined but objects are pointed to and can be illustrated and drawn. So Universe is space + matter. Exist is object + location. Object is that which has shape. Space is that which lacks shape. We know that atoms make up all objects that exist. What sense does it make to say that matter popped into existence out of nothing? Nothing can't do anything and never could. Nothing can't morph into something in zero time. No, atoms that make up all objects are eternally assembling, disassembling and reassembling. Matter and motion are eternal. That is the rational explanation.

[@christophergame7977]

Schrödinger didn't believe in quantum jumps. That shows that he didn't understand his own equation. The quantum jumps are the moments of coming into existence. They are absolute events, the same for all observers. This may be expressed by saying that events obey the principle of causality.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

Events/phenomena indeed obay the Law of Specific Causality. Actually, there is no daylight between causes and their result. They are not the same, but they are also not different. Results are not inherent in any one of the causes, nor in all of them together, but when the causes merge - their result emerges. If the causes are present but their result is absent, then those causes are not the causes of that result. You are looking at a wrong result. If the result is present but its causes are absent, then this result is not the result of those causes. You are looking at wrong causes. I don't know why you call them "quantum jumps", the working of the Law of Specific Causality is obvious everywhere, in everything, and always. Level of magnification is irrelevant, if there's something, the Law is at work For example: when a candle, a heat source and oxygen are merged, candlelight emerges. Remove any one of the three csuses and the candlelight is gone. There is no candlelight in the candle, nor in the heat source, nor in the oxygen, yet, when merged together candlelight appears - every time.

[@christophergame7977]

Thank you for your comment.

[@pmascaros]

"...this is in the past, so its protected.." In the past with respect to what? Because that is the issue you need to face if you don't want a frozen spacetime, meaning that my present or even my future is nothing more than a past time for another observer.

[@emmetbrown7228]

This guy @2:02:29 ..Hilarious !

[@user-cg3tx8zv1h]

Curt, isn't it time to persuade Nima Arkani-Hamed to make an appearance? I have a feeling the conversation is ready for him, and now he might be ready as well to engage with its comprehensive trajectory.

[@imperfekt7905]

There are two kinds of people... yeah, it's a joke of an oversimplification in general, but it can be a relevant observation in some situations. Here, we have professional physicists discussing issues which probably require a high degree of mathematical skill to understand. Nevertheless, everybody has an opinion, and very few of us have the humility to keep ours to ourselves even when we are opining on issues we don't understand. Hence, we get artists, writers, accountants, entrepreneurs, actors and other amateurs explaining the shortcomings of theories proposed by pros, and offering their own interpretations and solutions. On the other side of the divide, trained physicists may agree or disagree in varying degrees, but they tend to express those viewpoints in careful technical language which the majority of us will have difficulty following. I'm trying to stay away from identifying from either group in a discussion like this, but I think it might be a valid point to note that what Einstein was trying to accomplish in his comment on the nature of time mentioned by Elitzur is somewhat a matter of controversy among scientists. That comment was in a letter meant to console a friend dealing with loss and grief. It wasn't necessarily an attempt to express a rigorous description of the nature of time as a physical phenomenon. FWIW, I feel something like an intuitive sympathy for what seems to be the central point of Elitzur's argument, which is that the universe is changing from moment to moment in some fundamental way that makes the future uncertain, and that time is that process. Expressed perhaps more poetically, the universe is renewed and recreated every moment. For some people, that will lead to the belief that some force which is somehow outside or above the universe is causing and possibly guiding the process. As an agnostic, I feel a sense of awe and humility trying to perceive the process as openly and attentively as possible without trying to limit it by explaining it, and sensing that I have some role in the unfolding of this deep mystery by paying attention to the continuous way I am changed as reality changes around and in me. Om. 🧘‍♂🔬🧬🔭🪐☕ 🍺🧠😎

[@nenadmarkovic7770]

Danke!

[@TheoriesofEverything]

Thank you so much!

[@TheMemesofDestruction]

1:47:12 - “Chaos is a ladder.”

[@bazstraight8797]

So, it seems that the boundary of our universe is the 'everywhere now' forever expanding. This makes a lot of conceptual sense. It also seems consistent with the holographic concept ie the now instant encapsulates everything everwhere that has happened until now. Also it seems analogous to Wolfram's ideas of an unfolding universe created through sequential rule computation.

[@axle.student]

It's a good analogy, but I can never avoid 2 separate concepts of time in it. I can combine the both in a genuine 4D universe but it still gets a bit awkward.

[@axle.student]

Your question just reminded me of a problem I encountered way back when I was attempting to create a universe similar to this. So thank you for that :) I am not a physicist. This is a side passion of mine. > So in short I just kind of resolved the expanding outer boundary of the universe with the internal cosmic expansion of space between galaxies :) All space is expanding along the universes quantum event horizon which means everywhere in the 3D cosmos. It's still lumpy where stars and galaxies are, but otherwise it fits :)

[@bobdaniel5032]

If it's "computation" that drives change, then what/where is the "computer", and where did the computer come from? Risk of infinite regression here. I think that's conflating the thinking behind designing digital technology, with the work of understanding of the analog world. At the bottom, all digital computers (and the brain) are analog objects, i.e. reality. The word compute(-ing) is very seductive but beware of being stuck there, in spite of modern computing's impressive achievements. I say seductive because it's easy to go down the slippery slope of assuming that a computational simulation, and the reality being simulated, are the same. They're not. But this does not diminish Elitzur's contribution.

[@axle.student]

​@@bobdaniel5032 You make an interesting point about analog. I have spent a long time considering the universe as fundamentally analog or analog like which is one to one incompatible with digital (uncertainty principle). . It is rare to encounter someone who understands that any digital computer system (well most systems really) are fundamentally analog and digital is an abstraction layer or emulation layer above the analog :) . We can derive a basic digital system from analog, but we loose information about the analog in doing so. From a perspective of emergence of complexity and stability the noise that exists in analog (what gets rounded out in digital) is the fundamental uncertainty that give rise to novel creation (complexity). For me this concept of attempting to force an analog universe to behave in a discrete digital way (static) is the fundamental problem in physics. > That being said as complicated as analog computing systems may appear to most people, for a universe it simple, fast, efficient and elegant. . So like a mechanical clock, analog mechanical calculator or any other fluid/electrical analog computer the universe does have aspects of that. Accept I just see it as a natural form of rules like systems governing how objects move rather than some creation concept or worse some digital system lol . In computer simulation theories and holographic theories the computation occurs on the spherical 2D surface of the 4D layers of the universe. This has a feel of a flat universe like the internals of a computer system that is projected on to a screen (It's an easy assumption to mistakenly make that connection). This idea arises from the unavoidable 4D spherical surfaces in relativity (No solid 3D in relativity) > Me personally after creating many of these concepts I lean much toward a very simple analog 3D universe these days :) Similar to what Elitzur's suggests but analog.

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

2:08:05 Without the idea of the external source: the proto universe ( Ambartsumyan spoke of the proto-substance), the Universe is doomed, because it does not have its own energy source. P.S. See the Appendix ( if interesting). Appendix Protouniverse/Universe: 0.Comparing with Einstein's equations of 1915, we find a=-c^3/16πG. Strictly speaking, in order to determine the constant a, it was necessary to make a transition to the Poisson equation. Thus, a rigorous derivation of Einstein's equations can be given. 1.The transition to the non-relativistic limit allows us to determine a constant factor for the integral of the gravitational field according to: R[(0)^0]=(4πG/c^2)p; Δφ=-pc^3/4a=4πGр. And a=(1/16π)m(pl)w(pl). 2.Therefore, the Poisson equation can be written as: ∆g(00)=8πGT(00)/c^4, where g(00) is the time component of the metric tensor (for a weakly curved metric the time component of the energy-momentum tensor: T(00)~=pc^2). 3.This equation is true only in the non-relativistic case, but it is applicable to the case of a homogeneous and isotropic Universe, when Einstein's equations have only solutions with a time-varying space-time metric. 4.Then the energy density of the gravitational field: g^2/8πG=T(00)=pc^2 [~=(ħ/8πc^3)w(relic)^4= =1600 quanta/cm^3, which is in order of magnitude consistent with the observational-measured data (~500 quanta/cm^3)], where the critical density value determining the nature of the model is: p=(3/8π)H^2/G. Hence it follows: g~πcH. 5.Expansion is a special kind of motion, and it seems that the Universe is a non-inertial frame of reference that performs variably accelerated motion along a phase trajectory, and thereby creates a phase space. According to the strong equivalence principle: g=|a*|=πcH [=r(pl)w(relic)^2], and w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H. Thus H=1,72*10^-20 sec^-1. {By the way, at t(universe)= πт(pl), w(“relic”) was =w(pl), g=cw(pl)=g(pl); at 1/”H”= t(universe)=380000 years, w(“relic”)/2π was =3.5*10^14 Hz} 6.And а*=-2πcа/M(universe), what is F=M(universe)а*=-2πса=-с^4/8G=-(⅛)F(pl). In the case of the Universe: M(universe)H=m(pl)w(pl)/8π=c^3/8πG=-2a (~ the "dark" const~inv), where M(universe)=E/c^2 is the full mass of the Universe, and the total energy E is spent on creating a phase-quantized space-time: m(pl)w(pl)=8πM(Universe)H { w(relic)^2=πw(pl)H. 7.That is: Δφ=-pc^3/4a= рс^3/2M(universe)H^2. And Δφ=4π[с^3/Gm(pl)w(pl)]H^2= 4πH^2; which is evidence of a phenomenon: spontaneous Lorentz transformations. 8.Thus; Δφ(0)/Δφ=w(pl)^2/H^2~10^126, where Δφ(0)=4πw(pl)^2; the “best” prediction. P.S. Intra-metagalactic gravitational potential: |ф0|=πGm(pl)l/λ(relic)=[Gm(pl)/2c]w(relic), where the constant Gm(pl)/2c is a quantum of the inertial flow Ф(i)=h/4πm(pl) (magnetic flux is quantized: = h/2e, Josephson’s const; and the mechanical and magnetic moments are proportional).Thus, the phenomenon can be interpreted as gravity/inertial induction. a.The basic formula QG of the quantum expression of the Newtonian gravitational potential is: ф(G)=-Ф(i)w, where w is the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational (~ vibrational) field.} b.“Giving the interval ds the size of time, we will denote it by dт: in this case, the constant k will have the dimension length divided by mass and in CGS units will be equal to 1,87*10^-27", Friedmann, (On the curvature of space, 1922). [The ds, which is assumed to have the dimension of time, we denote by dт; then the constant k has the dimension Length Mass and in CGS-units is equal to 1, 87.10^ ± 27. See Laue, Die Relativitatstheorie, Bd. II, S. 185. Braunschweig 1921.] c. Apparently, the following expression takes place: μ(0)ε(0)Gi=1, which means that Gi=с^2 where i is inertial constant, i=1,346*10^28[g/cm]; or k°=1/i=7,429*10^-29[cm/g]: k(Friedmann)/k°=8π; where k°=r(pl)/m(pl)=r(G)/2m(0); i=m(pl)/r(pl)=(1/c)m(pl)w(pl), w=[r(G)/r]w(pl). d.That is ф(G)=-[Gm(pl)/2c]w=-(½)[w/w(pl)]c^2=-(½)(√Għ/c)w=-Ф(i)w. e.w(pl)=(√8n')w(relic)=8πn'H; where H=c/L, L=8πn’r(pl) is the length of the phase trajectory, n'=4*10^61. H=1,72*10^-20(sec^-1). f.By the way, it turns out that the universe is 1.6 trillion years old. g.The area of the "crystal sphere": S(universe)~n' λ(relic)^2~n'S(relic). r=2.7*10^29cm, L=2πr. P.P.S.The inscription on the ancient Roman clock: “More than you think”.

[@classicalmechanic8914]

"Fake past" and "fake future" can be replaced by "absolute present".

[@johnstarrett7754]

A different way of saying "it blooms from every point in the eternal now"

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

Cats do have a superposition. Or various kinds thereof. A combination of "my human is making funny noises, how interesting" and "..........". Caring and not caring at the same time.

[@radical137]

The talk of negative "mass" was confusing to me, maybe I am missing something but the Mach-Zender interferometer uses light, photons. Might it be better for Avshalom to refer to these as negative "energy" photons?

[@ac12484]

This should be on TV

[@TotaMaina-ev6bb]

Same event can be completely random luck for one observer, and fully predictive choice for another, depending upon information, and ability to manipulate that information they got. Like for parents, all the way it was a choice to have a baby together, and they knew likely consequence of their choice, But for child, his/her birth is completely random event, a pure stroke of luck, consequences of which, he/she got to face throughout life.

[@morphixnm]

Avshalom is gradually beginning to walk with Aristotle..

[@IncompleteTheory]

I wonder if Avshalom follows Wolframs work or has even talked to him. Some of the parts of causality and writing of space and time sounds quite familiar to WP.

[@QuantumConundrum]

Around 1:51:40 "the quantum interactions occur outside of spacetime". To me this sounds like passing the "paradox" buck compared from the bomb issue.

[@branimirsalevic5092]

43:45 Stick of dynamite and burning fuse That fuse that burns *now* , 1 meter away from the dynamite, does not cause the dynamite to explode. Actually it has nothing to do with the dynamite. It is like how spring doesn't cause summer - there is "spring" when there are the conditions for spring, then when the conditions change there is summer. Note that there is no "time" or "timeline" in reality, there are just ever-changing conditions. Then we ourselves, through our mental activity, label certain alignment of conditions as "spring", and a different alignment is labeled "summer", "winter"... There is no such thing as "time"; there is only change itself. It is like how there are no "waves" on the ocean surface. There is just incessant movement - change - of water, then we call one configuration "crest" and another "trough". But these two do not exist in reality even for an instant; they only exist as a sort of a mental snapshot which freezes the reality so that we can use our mental sharpie to mark the crests and the troughs on that mental image...

[@sizdehbedar]

Amazing hearing your venerated guests hypothesis reflection about the nature of Time. Since my childhood learning about the circular Universe and the fact that there is no straight line could exist , I began with an strong belief about the concept infinite universe ans that the non existence of Time according to our understanding!? I've become of strong belief that the existences of present moment and the future Time is always been in existence similar to the past events the momentum are similar to the single shots of film strips that when running on moving reels that makes the moving images of all the the single shots converted into a movi g images. Thae difference is that any unique different move we make, place us on a nother circular events with its own existing past ,present and future along.in other words all events in the past present and future have all been existing all along that makes the essences of time meaningless in the way we are made to understand. The universe is consisting of infinite number of already existing reality events running on an infinite circular pass at any level Quantum or macro scale regardless. The notion of gravitational energy are the result of universal electro magnetic pull of negative and positive all existing particles that makes up the whole universe in its finite or infinite existence. Period all along and very since I learnt the non existence of straight momentum line up to now

[@moogzoliver]

I take simultaneity as a coordination problem rather than a metaphysical given.

[@truepatriot6388]

What About AWARENESS? The idea that the Universe (space and time) comes into being at the quantum level with the "moment" of measurement, including both actual and potential positions of particles, raises a profound question about measurement being essential for the continuous moment to moment creation of our Universe. It is important to probing what this really means and try to understand it. Many think quantum measurement is about the essential involvement of a Human observer, or that "consciousness" of a sentient being must be involved. "If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is there to hear it, does the Universe disappear?" That would be absurd. What seems to matter is an interaction between two objects, in this case the test particle and the particles that make up the detector. Perhaps it would be more helpful to use the term "awareness" in place of measurement. In other words, what causes collapse of the wave function is the detector itself becoming aware of the test particle by virtue of their shared interaction, and perhaps the test particle sharing this "awareness" as well. Perhaps this is what causes the pervasive and continuous becoming that Prof Elitzur is proposing. This is a sort of panpsychist view in which Awareness is a fundamental aspect of Reality at all levels not just of sentient creatures. How can this be? Consider a view of Awareness that encompasses interactions between objects, relationships between objects, the influence of forces and gradients on objects, and other phenomena. Again, the concept of Awareness being suggested here is quite fundamental. In order for any interaction to occur between objects in the first place, mustn't some form of awareness be present? We know that we have no awareness of Neutrinos AND we know that we and they do not interact. Often it is assumed this the lack of interaction causes the lack of awareness, but perhaps it is the lack of Awareness that prevents the interaction, the becoming? [This would invert the question you posed in: Is it possible to know about something without ever interacting with it?] From this point of view, there can be no relationship, and no causation, without some sort of Awareness that collapses the quantum wave into Reality - an Awareness that is more fundamental than sentience, AND more fundamental than spacetime, according to Prof Elitzur. This view of Awareness is central to an obscure TOE by Canadian Wilbert Smith in the 1960's (google THE NEW SCIENCE by Wilbert B Smith). Smith had also concluded that Gravity and Electromagnetism are equivalent because, of the fundamental forces, they exhibit similar mathematical relationships. It is notable that Prof Elitzur's theory seems to indicate this same overlap between the two. Most provocative is that Smith claimed the outlines of his theory had been communicated to him by extraterrestrials. I encourage Kurt to look into Smith since they share much in common (both from Canda with interests in Physics, Cosmology, TOEs and UFO's). Anyway, I enjoyed this thought-provoking presentation. Thanks to Avshalom, Kurt, and his team!

[@truepatriot6388]

BTW, WB Smith died unexpectedly, and his Awareness-based cosmology was left unfinished and never submitted for publication. I believe the manuscript at the link below was released by his son and widow (complete with typographical errors). He describes a Reality formed by the engagement of Awareness with 12-parameters, in which Awareness progressively transforms/advances one dimension to the next according to orthogonal relationships (square root -1), culminating in the emergence of form (energy and matter). If this happens enough times so that a sufficient number of stable forms emerge, then a probabilistic phase shift (precipitation) may occur. From here, the level of complexity is able to advance, with the lower-level forms providing a multiplicity of stable modules which Awareness can now encounter with a new progression through the 12 orthogonal parameters. This presents a relatively simple, elegant, fractal-like theory of the cosmos centered in Awareness. Please give it a look. As I continue to consider the non-local quantum erasure of phase objects the Professor's experiments demonstrate, it strikes me that the concept of Awareness in WB Smith's cosmos may be consistent with their curious findings. For him, Awareness is primordial. In the beginning of the cosmos, and perhaps at every quantum instant in accord with your proposal, there is only Awareness of "Nothing At All". And from there, Awareness is not just essential for bringing matter and energy into being, but also "empty" space and unrealized dimensions of possibility, as your experiments appear to demonstrate. And Smith's Awareness is not limited to the forces and interactions between objects, with six dimensions related to Cartesian space and energy fields. Awareness also "acts upon" three dimensions of Control (randomness, choice, and sequence) in order that form may emerge. With choice and its timing, symmetries are broken and potentiality collapses/advances into actual sequence. This seems to resonate with Quantum theory. As you can imagine, WB Smith does a better job presenting all this in his manuscript, along with his detailed speculation about the nature of Gravity. Friston's Free Energy Principle with Active Inference (FEP) also seems to present a view of Life and Consciousness involving symmetry-breaking (and asymmetry-breaking) within cycles of awareness (sensation) and choice (action). It presents the abstract mathematical relationships whereby non-equilibrium systems like us minimize information entropy (surprisal, lack of awareness) and maintain our integrity. With reduced awareness, there is dis-integration into Entropy. We use three main strategies to expand awareness and reduce surprisal: (1) We can inter-act with the world in order to discover the way it really is (exploratory learning via expanded or via more precise sensation); (2) We can refrain from action, and change our understanding of the world so our expectations are more reliable (internal change by improving our causal models); and (3) We can inter-act with the world in order to change it to better fit our model/expectations. Furthermore, each of these FEP strategies can be approached along a Control dimension: (a) Reduced mutual Awareness WILL cause entropic flow where relationship, meaning and complexity are impossible and things break apart (deterministic dissipation). We WILL reduce shared Awareness if we choose to attempt to coerce, control, and conceal information from the world and ignore (suppress awareness) of the agency within it; and on the other hand (b) Expanding mutual Awareness PERMITS syntropic flow where agents are able to freely come together in relational patterns of meaning and complexity (undetermined emergence). We PERMIT shared Awareness to expand if we choose to attempt to freely cooperate and openly exchange information with the world about identity, essential value, agency and choice. We ourselves can also be coerced by the will of forceful agents in the world that are unconcerned or unaware of our own agency and choices. In the face of such entropic threat to our essential integrity and survival, it is worth considering how to respond. We can take action to learn more about aspects of the forceful entity, to increase our awareness and understanding so that we can better predict and respond to it, perhaps in alliance with others. This is the whole point of Active Inference after all. Perhaps we take actions in order to coerce and control the forceful entity, or conceal ourselves from it (Power-Control, type a). Perhaps we take action to help it become more AWARE of our own identity, value and agency, permitting transition into more cooperative and syntropic relationship (Awareness-Relation, type b). It is clear that contending with a coercive entity can become a path for growth rather than oblivion.

[@BrendanTietz]

It’s sad how closed minded people are here. If you examine reality through meditation you’ll quickly realize the only thing that propels the next moment forward is conscious action. The only answer is that the universe is writing itself into existence. This aligns with every spiritual tradition at its core and even theories like the CTMU. God aka the universe/all that is, is simply creating itself through the universe.

[@PetraKann]

Perhaps

[@Mandragara]

No. Decoupling of scales. You won't discover quantum physics from thermodynamics

[@Sapientiaa]

CTMU does not equate the universe as God in its totality. CTMU invokes a Christian Neoplatonic view of God. God isn’t becoming, God just is.

[@PetraKann]

@@Mandragara then quantum mechanics is inadequate or wrong

[@dodatroda]

Blah blah

[@TheMikesylv]

This is why spirituality always says the past future and present is all happening now

[@MabDarogan2]

Columbus actually thought he'd reached Japan. He was an idiot. Other people decided he'd reached the east Indies (Indonesia). They were wrong too.

[@artemirrlazaris7406]

The authors of confusion hate real data, Origin of time in language is a measure of a CYCle, that cycle can be a patern, we call time as its a basis to a thing, in reality. What hes stating is dogma of creative fiction rather than reality of what time is. Just as everything must keep spinning for existence to bem the spin of energy tells you its path of movement. Movements are time based in a quantified space, meaning space in which we can have two more objects of varrying distances that can relate information. That is space. Space with a single ionsphere of data, has no relevant relation other than existence in a void of emptiness which is then not space, and thus space would not be needed for a energy of said thing, it would just be... We have pleura, a plethora, a myriad of energy, difused into space. Space as defined again as how we describe it it, a 3 axis system to observe its moment in sapce. We call this 3 dimenssions becuase its 3 dimensional graphing, one dimension of measure would be x, two would be x and y, or y and z etc. THree dimensions of measure are x y and z, all of which converge to an inpolated point of perpendicular intereaction... Thus I argued that there is only logically 3 dimensions, time is not a dimension its a movement within a dimension of a thing to a thing, time being based on a cycle creates a rythmn like music, but we then have subordinates of time. Meaning logically we base our time on the solar system we live in, and not hte galaxy, that being said... subordinates of time we use crystals often for timing and hten calibrate it to the solar system nad use some simple math and a stop watch is like every other stop watch typically within 1 trillionth of accuracy, but things can become less accurate... So the universe writies itself into existence is poetic but stupid, since writing is a subordinate of an action and writing is al iving action... Universe is an ACT of movement confiend by space. that ACT is hte matter, in the stage of of a empty space, that is theory based infnite, or confined. as in their idiot blackhole nonsense, but in reality.. space can be made within sapce infnitely, and cpu's describe in 3d modeling the best philosophy. Stating 4th dimension is time, because of time dilation isn't really accurate, since its a totalltiy different physical field. Time is based in movement and its ordered to what th basis of the time is BASED off of, IE galaxy, Earth, the moon, the star, the sun, another galaxy, all terms are made up to typically be coherent to the person in reality calculating and studying earth. The authors of confusion are liars. Everythign I said above except for a few opinion is all open knowledge out linguistic history and not the pseudo modern age of make believe... Which is eroding crebility and good investment, its hustle or grift that robs the republic of real works.. Refer to Rakine, Fahrenheit, Celsius, and hten other terms of temp measure and how it was done nad history, its not complicated its just useless things are being taught and the use of theory is beign dictated as reality constnatly to input garbage shit, whislt real history of science gives towards how and accuracy of things.. thus cpativity of a state of disbleief is held and the institutions are attmepting ot brainwash new kids ot the bullshit, this is in nearly every field of the americas, even in anthropology. We don't need a theory of everythign since that owuld be made up shit. We operate in reality to what is truth, what comes or doesn't doesn't matter... It is or it isn't to reality... Just comes across foolish.. I really don't know the theory of everythign, I write some formulas to surmise some basic philosophies but its in gods hands is a wise phrase, but even i nthat department the smae theory crafters are in the god theory crafters.. Meh, Ill stick with greeks, PHysis, as physics... lying seems ot be so popular at defrauding so many lives, as things inflate becuase well peopel invested in liars and thieves... meh. I don't see a paradox, in anything there are new intrigues of particles but even then its based against a virtual pool of unknowns since when your at hte edge of discovery you have to make theorhetical bounds so your calculations make some logical sense, OS you create a detailed hypothesis and why to base the observation at hand, even though its based on a false assumption or a created false, so you can find the truth of what is going on. Like we know its not this, so make this everywhere as part of hte study your elimianting something by using it... to get a background comparisson, hopefully its nto reacting to what your eliminating.. but meh.. thats why you would test in another way.. I would definately state that many people ahve come ot cause a lot of cruelty nad harm ot people constantly... in this land.. not a nice place.. Time.. is measure within Space of 3dimenssions. As something accelerates faster adn faster its velocity becomes meaning less, its light is relative to itself, but there is no speed limit, infnite speed, that relates to relativity, so you can accelerate at a rate much slower but evnetualyl be much faster than a speed of light, yo ucan accelreate infinitly if you can create a cohesion of all your atoms to move together in place, such as a containment field, this would allow matter to accelerate at an infinite acceleration allowing you to go anyone in the universe... the problem is you can under normal propulsion methods becuase it creates tensil destruction of hte object either compressed into oblivion or stretched, as the cohesive bonds are broken apart by the force of each particle moving slightly faster or slower the nthe later depending ot where the origin of hte propulsion system is. So... a containment field would allow the ceasation of propulsion effects or allow you to move an object that cannot be stretched or compressed and hte aotms all move at the same rate when accelerating...

[@timjohnson3913]

How rude of you to split this into 4 paragraphs; I wanted a full wall of text. 😂

[@bernardofitzpatrick5403]

Is brevity the soul of wit ? 😅

[@mategombas771]

Why is it a must to have evertrue laws in phisics. Maybe laws and rules change constantly with changing universe.

[@isedairi]

Time to interview Claudio Bunster!

[@86congtymienbac80]

Past, present, future co-existence is 4-dimensional thinking. Yes. However, for people with 3D spatial thinking, past, present, future are one main flow because they are locked in 3D space, starting with something similar to something/m3.

[@ricodelta1]

This guy isn't even wrong! But I love his talk!

[@bernardofitzpatrick5403]

Are you a resurrection of Pauli ?

[@FrancisFjordCupola]

Time seems to be flowing... but I would like to challenge that we can remain in-place. Sure, we can like Elitzur remain seated in our chairs, our rooms. But do we sit still? Relative to the chair, the room perhaps. But the earth rotates on its axis and has a trajectory orbiting the sun. Relative to the center of the sun we do move. Perhaps not much, but relative distances do change. And the sun moves through the galaxy and so on and so forth. Paradoxically, in order to "stand still" one would have to "stand still" relative to all else that exists but that also implies that the rest of existence should also "stand still". One great big pause of non-movement. That's impossible. So we cannot remain in place.

[@axle.student]

At the universe or cosmic scale we don't move around very much, so a motionless object is easy to conceptualize. Time on the other hand being hidden is a little more difficult lol

[@irrefudiate]

Personally, I believe time is existance and that nothing exists without it. But, it may be that existance can become nothing, and then become something again. To me that could be the nature of space, which I know is being studied, but I don't think has been answered. Still, space/time is bandied about. In my dream, smallness was finite. Now, I believe it pops out of existance.. then, of course, it pops back into existance. Time/existance is a singularity.

[@besensable]

This is interesting!

[@adelinrapcore]

That won't be that big of a problem, the problem is how we define that "moment"..

[@axle.student]

"how we define that "moment"" Fuzzy. So kind of imagine the line vibrating backwards and forwards a little making the line feel a bit fuzzy in the pseudo time line :) Or imagine the moment as the crest of a sine wave that tappers off each side of the moment.

[@singingphysics9416]

13.45 who knows who is going to become the next moron to start a war 🤣

[@volaireoh883]

No proof and can't be falsified...so anything goes right?

[@PetraKann]

It also means, like String Theory, it’s NOT a science

[@QuantumConundrum]

The "proof" is that some "paradoxes" seem less prevalent when you consider this interpretation. I suspect different paradoxes may show up. To me it's more like cathegory theory, in that alternate representations can be useful. I don't think there's a free lunch here.

[@PetraKann]

@@QuantumConundrum Proof is in the realm of Mathematics not science. Scientific theories are not proven but rather the predictions they make must be testable using the scientific method. This is the main reason why String Theory, as it stands todays is NOT a science. It is more akin to a Mathematical Philosophy. Paradoxes are fundamentally a clash of logic - again not an aspect of science.

[@goldwhitedragon]

No SCIENTIFIC proof. You forgot that bit. There is plenty of non-Scientific proof.

[@PetraKann]

@ such as?

[@JungleJargon]

There’s no quantum without the entirety. Energy can’t make itself or order itself. This is evidence of Creation since no physical thing can ever make or direct itself. There’s no such thing as an infinite regress of greater and greater amounts of energy as a source for every physical thing. There has to be an eternal all powerful all knowing Creator of every physical thing there is and only your Creator can create you again. Only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and create you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can.

[@TheMikesylv]

Constructer theory is describing his his emerging space time just in a different way sort of

[@zeroonetime]

As everything Else, we are all Time elements acting in Quantum Timing ~ Life Force.