Driving home after work and not remembering any of it. You know you did it but can recall a single thing about it . I guess this is the difference between the two consciousness

Bernard's model is not an analytical idealism but analytical realism from my perspective. This revolutionary theory will change the world today or tomorrow.

I am an ordinary person, but I understand almost everything that Bernardo says! He has the magical ability to explain any super complex subject into very simple terms. What a genius person! All the best wishes for this extraordinary man

Egg 🥚 is a good example rather than domino.

I'm not an academic in this field but, I spent spent several hundred hours reading the essential papers, books, and youtube presentations by Bernardo and the others. It seems to me that they're essential linkages probably go on past death, thoughts and emotions are linked by meaning. The acquisition of Mimi to me seems to be that point with mind. Could be modeled as a superposition. Perfect understanding with interiority non-clonable. Does Bernardo think meaning a crucial link at the heart 37:35 of construction of mind?

It's believed in the collective unconscious and synchronicity and keeping more complex. 32:14

"... Let's pretend that it's a detail... " :D

Where ever 2 or more are gathered in my name I am there among them. Group IIT?

would it be possible in any neurological testing to actually detect all this and measure the activity of whats doing what in the brain.. id absolutley love to gain some clarity so i can learn about myself and understand myself and accept myself .. i want a real time experience just in my body and through just my physical eyes. i dont wanna watch me live my life i wanna experience fully the 'living' bit.

loved this thankyou, in my experience, ever since i was a little girl iv had this metacognition, i always watched the other kids and wondered how they could be so engulfed in their play that they were completley unaware of anything else going on around them. i have always felt like iv missed out on my moments because the metacognition has taken more dominance in my moment of experience that im not actually experiencing it im being directed by awareness of metacognition but in my actual lived moment so how can i be doing both at thesame time.. i experience my moment as subject but its directed from meta alongside which splits me as an of the experience and being the experience.. theres something also at the same time thats aware of these two seperate experiences or perceptions so i feel quite intruded by whats outside of me in my experience. i want to just experience and exist in my moment like the other kids used to do.. im sharing my experience with my meta so i struggle to get engulfed in my existence in that moment.. its alwats there simultaneously, as its happening im living through the illusion in my mind of my reality as im in it. i dont understand why its something that i feel is blocking my actual experience of having fun in real life there and then. how do i stop that part of the meta from intruding my real time existence in my moment. i just want to be. its exhausing me and when you know its a fun moment, its taking away the full feeling of being in reality. i know how i feel as i feel it, i know what im thinking as i think, i see myself knowing how i feel while im feeling.. could go on and on.. im trying to figure out how to get rid of it so i can just be engilfed in my reality and feel it in real without watching me feeling and knowing im watching the experience of feeling when im feeling i dont want to be a spectator aswell i just want to be subject. its constant since a child.. its like having a god energy watching all the time which is yourself but not in body .. makes having privacy an issue cuz its never just me and my ego in real time.. like i feel it should be.. so much clarity from this thankyou.. iv been reading about cognitive polyphasia it has relations its what led me here xx

is the number five 'many'? is that what he said ?? referring to free will as an incoherent concept

Y pluribus unum. From one cause many effects. 🔯⚛️

Brilliant as always. Question: what is the argument surrounding metacognition, loss of metacognition, and then reacquisition through memory reflection? For example, if a person who is metacognitive of something like an alien abduction, they then lose time and forget, and later are able to recall memories through hypnotic regression? Once metacognition is achieved, can it be lost? Can you comment on this Bernardo?

Amazing 👏

So easy to miss but oh so profound; ~55min: Bernardo says, “Information is a way to characterise the discernible dynamics of qualitative states.”

Congratulations to Fidias on his election win and thank you for sharing. Cheers.

I love Kastrup's love for Euler's equation haha. As a mathematics major, it is beautiful indeed.

The world of projection could acknowledge as unchangeable what appears to be changeable is uniquely quality into quantity and inversely but the balance remains the same

A tapestry or the M Blanket VERY WISE SCIENTIST THIS PERSON has motives those motifs represent something(s) which are motivated due to external existence .

IF YOU MULTIPLY A NEGATIVE TIMES A NEGATIVE IT IS A POSITIVE THUS IMPLIES A DEBT TIMES A DEBT IS PAID.... BECAUSE 1 + 1 = 2 AND NOT BECAUSE😅 YOU PAY OFF THE DEBT.... 🗨🤔 Kastrup MAKES A CATEGORICAL ERROR.... Terrence Howard SAYS 1 x 1 = 2 (metaphoricaly) IMPLIES 1 DOLLAR TIMES 1 DOLLAR EQUALS 2 DOLLARS..... 1 x 1 = 1 OR 1 + 1 = 2 ARE NUMBERS NOT DOLLARS DESPITE THE FACT YOU CAN MULTIPLY, SQUARE NUMBERS YET YOU CAN NOT MULTIPLY, SQUARE DOLLARS YOU CAN NOT MIX MATCH THE MATHEMATICS, MONETARY LANGUAGE GAMES..... JUST AS YOU CAN NOT MULTIPLY DEBT IN THE MATHEMATICS, MONETARY LANGUAGE GAME.... ~ 'AIY

I want to live in the “wow” ❤!

So.. is a tomato still a tomato ?

Douglas Hofstadter in his famous book "Gödel, Escher, Bach" already alluded to "strange loops", such as the ones present in Gödel's theorem (& illustrated notably in J-S Bach's compositions and Escher's paintings), as a self-referential aspect of nature that could point to the very principle of metacognition, & therefore, to consciousness itself.

Gracias🙏🫶🇦🇷✌️☀️🧩🌳💫🖤🕳♾️💖

Cool 😎 🆒️ 😎 Belfast Ireland 🇮🇪

How does "the external world affect the state of the retina " if only a representation. If represtations affect representations than doesn't this become a linguistic replacement for matter?

It would seem that representation has a great deal more power than one would normally associate with it! Why too, if mind is undifferentiated is it represented in such a multiplicity of different ways? Sorry, I know this is far from what this conversation is about but if anyone can help explain this I'd be hugely greatful! Thanks.

Thank you A in A! I love how you pursue your questions. I have a basic one. How does the undifferentiated mind produce such a myriad of different effects on us when the physical is represntational? I've been looking through many of Bernado's videos and still can't find where this is addressed.

Seems to me that IIT actually corelates perfectly, and even poetically -- to the underlying conclusions made from the findings, made by Alan Green’s: "Shakespeare Decoded" -- 7 episode series🤯 👏 🫶

Thank you so much!!!

Universe is a divine presence and process

Amazing conversation. Thank you!

Witnessing the April total eclipse at a lake in New York, the eclipse created waves that lapped the shore Very interesting example of the matrix in which we live/perceive

Pattern recognition

The mechanism of biofilm ~ polymers and many things are invisible to human limited perception

Fibonacci magic 🪄

Any thoughts on SOMA breathing or other breathing techniques and rhythm or frequency exercises

Awesome❤

What about microtubules by Stuart Hameroff ? Is this the blanket sheet ? Information gets conscious

If life is sacrificial and we release into universal mind all our individual experiences upon death, then what happens when a person suffering memory loss dies?

Very interesting 🤔

I always struggle with Bernardo. On the one hand there are no things and yet there is such a *thing* as life that pops into existence somewhere along the chain of abstraction. Full disclaimer I am also just triggered by his style of delivery so maybe I'm missing some nuance in what he says

If it’s only mental who’s brain are we in?

Hi can you explain what’s meant by being played by nature?

Obviously very interesting But I have a hard time to believe that we can manifest our wishes It is an utopian theory from my point of view

Thoughts are things. Iamthungs

Whatever can be objectively inferred, and that is to say 'objectively' measured and observed as an ever-changing arbitrary approximate of our rendering (or imagining) cannot be 'that' which is measuring or observing (or imagining) i.e. universal Consciousness; nonbinary, nonlinear & noncomputational Being or Mind or Context. Thus the unqualified 'objective' inference that 'is' the feeling or sensation misinterpreted to be 'an I' - isn't actually You' (the Absolute) but 'is', on the contrary, the crude sum TOTAL of all you 'objectively' conceive, perceive, and are not (i.e. the entirety of the imaginary 'objective universe' or data structure; an insentient projection of our continuous rendering or filtration) - if you do not 're-cog-nise' that primary illusion (i.e. that misinterpreted sensation or vibration assumed to be 'I') you (the Absolute) will imagine yourself (verb) to be looking from 'it' ('from' what you are not) as a non-existent 'object' or 'pronoun' now believed to be traversing a real 'timeline' (a nonexistent 'past'-future') - as an erroneously objectified 'subject' - when there is neither a real 'object' nor 'subject' happening - only pure Subjectivity alone exists (i.e. the 'shareable-wave' and not the imaginary 'particle'; an arbitrary approximate, unfound) - You!' (the timeless Absolute) are dreaming (verb) This very existence, right here and now, is indescribable or noncomputational. Basically, there exists ONLY 'the field' of Self-consciousness; being so intolerable that we compulsively project the unqualified inference of 'space-time-causality' for quasi 'company' or 'diversity' (imaginary 'multiplicity') For Nature (i.e. You!') abhors 'a vacuum' - that is to say; Self-consciousness or Mind ''abhors'' its universal and timeless identity of pure Being or pure potentiality that is the non-objective knowledge; 'I am' - prior to name or form i.e. indivisible Being - never really subject to inference ('space-time') despite any appearance or claim to the contrary - our inherent freedom as self-knowledge or pure Consciousness is so complete or conclusive that, creatively, a welcomed misidentity (or impossibility) is merely suggested, proposed (or projected) and thus an imaginary mourning of an ever-living and ever-loving Being seems to 'happen', such is the schizophrenia of infinite Being (Consciousness) such is our freedom.. #Selfhypnosis #Selftalk #Boundlessdreaming #Oneness

How would Kastrup describe the phenomenon of Lucid dreaming, I wonder...

Michael talks about all these fascinating experiments and yet, there’s no actual evidence for the existence of cells or DNA. So it’s almost like playing a really interesting VR game with only presumptive outcomes.

Superb dialogues! I immensely respect Federico and Bernardo! Thank you to both! If I may humbly make the following remark: "Survival of the fittest" does not mean "Survival of the strongest". It means "Survival of the most adaptive" (to be fit = to be in an optimum state of being). In other words, an organism that most easily adapts to its environment has increased chances of survival.